Saturday, February 09, 2008

We Need Woody

 

 

 

 

 

THE ABSURD TIMES

 

 

        Most of the news has been about the elections and the primaries.  This has made subjects such as the war in Iraq and maybe Iran less prominent.   Global warming, the economy, the class war, etc., have all been ignored.

    Now of course, the candidates have said a thing or two about these issues.  The Bush/Cheney Party has pretty much selected McCain who seems inclined to continue the war up to a hundred years and maybe take on Iran, but many of the Cheney wing are unhappy with this choice as he may reform immigration and take the obscene tax cut away from the upper 1%.  He also seems to believe in evolution.  Fortunately, they still have Huckabee who seems not only to disbelieve evolution but may even believe in a geocentric solar system.  If he can force this into law, perhaps as Vice President, we could stop those micro-organisms from becoming anti-biotic resistant -- they would have to go to Canada to evolve.  So would we all, it seems.

    The Democrats are busy with a real race for the nomination.  Hillary keeps saying that Obama could not stand up to the attacks of the Bush/Cheney party and Obama replies "Try me.  I'm from Chicago."  And he is, not Park Ridge, but the "South Side."  Having lived on the North and then Northwest side, I knew better than to walk alone on the "South Side." 

    Cheney showed his sense of humor by quoting mayor Daley "Vote often and vote early," but really didn't get Daley's point as Daley had a unique approach to the English language.

    Now there is a vote about granting immunity to large phone companies for helping the government to spy on you.  Now this kind of spying has been going on for some time as the article below will show, but the Bushites want the fourth Ammendment to be negated.  At least previous political figures had the guts to do their illegal actions and face the consequences if they were caught.  Nixon was an example.

    I'm trying to imagine what Woodie would be singing right now.  Or would he be emegrating?

 

What You're Missing in our subscriber-only CounterPunch newsletter
AFTER IRAQ, BUSHIES PLAN WORLD WAR THREE
Japanese "defense force" practices amphibian landings in Southern California. Target: China. Chris Reed reports from Tokyo. The FBI and the Myth of Fingerprints: Cockburn and St Clair trace the final downfall of "100 per cent certainty" on fingerprint matches What's a miner's life worth? Do we hear $230 and seventy six cents? Jeffrey St Clair on Big Coal's lethal auction, courtesy of the Bush administration.
... CounterPunch Online is read by millions of viewers each month! But remember, we are funded solely by the subscribers to the print edition of CounterPunch. Please support this website by buying a subscription to our newsletter, which contains fresh material you won't find anywhere else, or by making a donation for the online edition. Remember contributions are tax-deductible. Click here to make a donation. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Get CounterPunch By Email for Only $35 a Year

Call Toll Free 1-800-840-3683
or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Today's Stories

January 13, 2006

David Price
How the FBI Spied on Edward Said

January 12, 2006

Jennifer Van Bergen
The Unitary Executive: Why the Bush Doctrine Violates the Constitution

Jeremy Brecher / Brendan Smith
Command Responsibility: Torture and Legal Accountability

Lawrence R. Velvel
Alito Refuses to Answer Fundamental Questions

Ralph Nader / Robert Weissman
Corporations, Originalism and the Bill of Rights: an Open Letter to Justice Scalia

Jackie Corr
Killing the Big Sky's Golden Goose: Marc Racicot and the Deregulation of Montana Power

Jared Bernstein
The Wage Doldrums

Russell D. Hoffman
New Horizons in Space, New Lows in Government

Aubrey Streit
I Was Born in a Small Town: the Fate of Rural America

Clancy Sigal
Hugh Thompson and My Lai: He Broke Ranks; He Did the Right Thing

Website of the Day
Nukes in Space

 

January 11, 2006

Kevin Zeese
NSA Spied on Baltimore Peace Group (And They've Got the Documents That Prove It)

Ray McGovern
The Big Wiretap

Allan Maass / Joe Allen
Schwarzenegger's Hit List: Smearing Mandela, Killing Tookie

Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Snatching at King's Legacy: Mythmaking, Profiteering & Outright Distortions

Annie Murphy
Evo Morales' Sweater

Allan Lichtman
Abramoff's Kind of Big Government

Ramzy Baroud
Politics of Chaos: Gaza's Turmoil in Context

Joshua Frank
MoveOn Surrenders to Hillary

Kathleen and Bill Christison
"Eating Palestine for Breakfast": the Real Sharon

Website of the Day
Memoirs of Rummy's Geisha

 

January 10, 2006

Uri Avnery
The Post-Sharon Landscape: Three Fingers, No Fist

Saul Landau
Different Americas

Noam Chomsky
Beyond the Ballot: Iraq, Iran and China

Brian J. Foley
Playing with Fire: Congress and Executive Power

Lenni Brenner
The War Within the Antiwar Movement

Ronan Sheehan
Sheehan to Sheehan: Cindy Sheehan's Irish Interview

Paul Craig Roberts
Bush's Con Jobs

 

January 9, 2006

Behzad Yaghmaian
Who is to Blame for the Deaths of the Sudanese Refugees?

George Bisharat
US Aid to Israel is Out of Hand

Dave Lindorff
How the US Press Squelches Bush Impeachment Drive

Norman Solomon
Smoke a Marlboro, Then an Iraqi: How Media War Images Distort Not Inform

Christopher Brauchli
The Generosity of Credit Card Companies

Aharon Shabtai
A Poet's Letter on the Occupation

Andrew Cockburn
How Many Iraqis Have Died Since the US Invasion in 2003?

 

January 7 / 8, 2006

Lawrence Velvel
The NYT's Unconscionable Decision to Sit on the NSA Story for a Year

James Petras
AIPAC on Trial: Them or US

J.L. Chestnut
Racism and Injustice in Alabama's Courts

Mike Ely
The Dead Miners in Sago

Andrew Wilson
The Dying of Ariel Sharon

Lila Rajiva
Two Moms Go to Capitol Hill

William Cook
The Rape of Palestine

Ramor Ryan
The Sub Motorcycle Diaries: On the Road with the Zapatistas

Thomas Kleine-Brockhoff
An Interview with Michael Scheuer on the CIA's Rendition Program

Peter Montague
Inherit the Wind: the Global Spread of GMO Crops

Ron Jacobs
Would Ethan Allen Pay to Protest?

Neve Gordon
Images of Real Eco-Terrorism in Twaneh

Fred Gardner
Business as Usual in San Diego

Josh Mahon
Idaho Timber Industry Leader Advocates Violence Against Green's Mom

Dr. Susan Block
Abramoff Family Values: the Lobbyist Who Screwed Us All

Jeffrey St. Clair
Playlist: What I'm Listening to This Week

Poets' Basement
Albert and Engel

Website of the Weekend
Bush Crimes Commission

 

January 6, 2006

José Pertierra
Posada Carriles May Soon Hit the Streets

Joe Allen
Gary Freeman's Struggle: a Black Radical from the 1960s Fights Extradition to the US

Winslow T. Wheeler
Huge Defense Budget, Lousy Equipment

John Bomar
A Former NSA Officer on Snoopgate: the Squawkers Should be Congratulated

Jason Leopold
Snoop and Shred

Norman Solomon
Axis of Fanatics: Netanyahu and Ahmadinejad

Robert Pollin
Remembering Harry Magdoff: the Man Who Explained the Empire

 

January 5, 2006

Scott Boehm
Big Profits, Buried Lives: Bulldozing the Dead in New Orleans

Zoltan Grossman
New Challenges for the Antiwar Movement

Heather Gray
Whistling Dixie Yet Again

Haninah Levine
Simple is Dangerous: the Pentagon's Plan for a Manhattan Project on IEDs

Pierre Tristam
The Sham of Homeland Security: a West Virginia Parable

Remi Kanazi
Stroke of Luck?: Political Hemorrhage in Israel

Gilad Atzmon
Sharon Meets His Maker

Kathleen and Bill Christison
What Hillary Clinton Doesn't Know About Palestine

 

January 4, 2006

Ron Jacobs
Pity the Miner: A-Diggin' My Bones

Lila Rajiva
Terror Hits Bangalore

Huibin Amee Chew
Why the War is Sexist

Pat Williams
How the West Turned: Biting the Hands That Steal

Linda Milazzo
The House That George and Jack Built: Ownership Society Meets the Entrepreneurial Style

Nick Dearden
The Fantasy of "Even-Handedness": Blair's Cynical Policy on Palestine

James Petras
Evo Morales: All Growl, No Claws?

Website of the Day
Rat Out a Lobbyist for Jesus

 

January 3, 2006

James Ridgeway
Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and 9/11: How Much Did the Bush Administration Know?

Laith al-Saud
Iraqi Intellectuals and the Occupation: an Interview with Dr. Saad Jawad

Dick J. Reavis
Border Walls: the View from Mexico

Joshua Frank
Hillary Clinton, AIPAC and Iran

Rochelle Gause
Inside Rafah: Collective Punishment as Normalcy

Missy Comley Beattie
How My Mother Went from a Republican to a Screaming Progressive

Paul de Rooij
A Glossary of Dispossession

 

January 2, 2006

Paul Craig Roberts
A Gestapo Administration

Clancy Sigal
A Trip to the Far Side of Madness

Cindy Sheehan
A Tour of Europe: Friends Don't Let Friends Commit War Crimes

Alexander Cockburn
A NYT Editorial Contemplates Iraq

 

Dec. 31 / Jan. 1, 2005/6

Patrick Cockburn
The Year in Iraq

Alexander Cockburn
Who Are We to Complain?: a Diary of 2005

Ralph Nader
Rumsfeld vs. the Military: a Pentagon of Loyalists and Enforcers

James Petras
The Politics of Language: "Escalation" or "Retaliation" in Israeli Attacks on Palestinians

Peter Montague
A Darker Bioweapons Future

J.L. Chestnut, Jr.
Black Forever: Race, Class and Activism in the South

Vijay Prashad
My California Vacation: Conversations with Indian Americans

P. Sainath
Farm Suicides in Vidharbha

James Brooks
The Spoils of War: Israel's Corruption was Inevitable

Eileen E. Schell
The Farmer Wants a Wife: Hayseeds and Hickxploitation in the Land of Reality TV

Christopher Brauchli
Birds of a Feather: George and Vlad

Jo Guldi
Politics, Gay Marriage and Christianity

Fred Gardner
America's Only Legal Grower

Ben Tripp
A Hapless New Year

St. Clair / Walker / Pollack
Playlists: What We're Listening To This Week

Poets Basement
Engel, Albert, LaMorticella, Buknatski, Davies, Ford and Bear Dog

Website of the Weekend
Commit Bloggamy with Dr. Suzy

 

December 30,2005

Evo Morales
I Believe Only in the Power of the People

Earl Ofari Hutchinson
The Toxic Air in Black America

Dave Lindorff
Bush's NSA Spying Jeopardizes National Security

Gary Leupp
Targeting Iran and Syria: Goss Builds Case for Turkey-Based Attacks

Ron Jacobs
A Dead New Year's Eve

Brian Concannon
Down in Haiti, the Chickens are Coming Home to Roost

Sandra Lucas
Inside TeenScreen: the Making of Mental Patients

T.W. Croft
The Wind Has Changed: Gulf Storms, Fables of Reconstruction and Hard Times for the Big Easy

Website of the Day
Images of Mass Consumption

 

December 29, 2005

Norman Solomon
Journalists Should Expose Secrets, Not Keep Them

Missy Comley Beattie
Christmas Without Chase

Dave Zirin
Over the Edge: the Year in Sports

Kevin Zeese
Top 10 Antiwar Stories of 2005

Derrick O'Keefe
Bolivia and Venezuela Offer an Alternative to Neo-Liberalism

Sam Bahour
Turning the Page in Palestine, Again

Macdonald Stainsby
What's Behind Paul Martin's Broadside Against Bush?

Bill & Kathleen Christison
Let's Stop a US/Israel War on Iran

Website of the Day
Deconstructing the Democrats

 

December 28, 2005

Jeffrey St. Clair
The Worst Day of Ted Stevens' Life?

Lila Rajiva
Operation Romeo: Lessons on Terror Laws from India

Amira Hass
The Humanitarian Lie

Joshua Frank
Let the Drilling Begin: Iraq's IMF Loan

David Swanson
Leaking Top Secret Lies

Richard Thieme
High Time for Torture

Paul Craig Roberts
Three Books to Wake You Up

Website of the Day
Conyers Report: "Constitution in Crisis"

 

December 27, 2005

Evan Jones
Whither the National Guard?

Uri Avnery
The Peretz Shuffle

Mike Whitney
Pop Goes the Bubble!

Gideon Levy
Dusty Trail to Death

David Swanson
Kurt Vonnegut: a Man Without a Country

Norman Solomon
NSA Spied on UN Diplomats During Push for Invasion of Iraq

 

December 26, 2005

Lawrence R. Velvel
The Usurpers of Our Freedoms

Lance Olsen
The Toughest Challenge for Intelligent Design

Ben Terrall
No Holiday Compassion for Haiti's Political Prisoners

Scott Boehm
Santa Drove a Bulldozer

Charlie Ehlen
A Vietnam Vet's Appraisal of Bush

Tom Kerr
The Atheist Dad at Christmas

 

December 24/25, 2005

Aleander Cockburn
The Year of Vanished Credibility

James Petras
Iran in the Crosshairs: Israel's Deadline

Ralph Nader
Talkin' About the "I"-Word

Lila Rajiva
Horowitz's New Project: Begging for Brownshirts

Fred Gardner
Dialogue with the DEA

Ron Jacobs
When Impeachment was Taken Seriously

Dave Lindorff
Xmas Games for a Gitmo World

Gary Leupp
Happy Birthday Mithras!: the True Meaning of December 25th

Saul Landau
Bush's Year in Review: a Report Card from Santa

John Chuckman
A Christmas Tale for Bushtime

Dr. Susan Block
Merry XXX-mas!

St. Clair / Vest / Pollack / Donnelly
Playlist: What We're Listening to This Week

Poets' Basement
Holt, Jones, Landau, Ross and Albert

Website of the Weekend
Merry Xmas, From the Beatles

 

December 23, 2005

John Ross
The Corrido of Death Row: Mexico Ends the Death Penalty

Chris Floyd
Gospel Truth: Bush Hypocrisy, Radical Holiness and Woody Guthrie

Lawrence Mishel / Ross Eisenbrey
The Economy in a Nutshell

Joanne Mariner
Bringing Torture into Court: the Loopholes in McCain's Bill

Eric Johnson-Debaufre
The Trew Law of Free Democracies?

Ray McGovern
Cheney the Bully; Rockefeller the Coward

J. L. Chestnut, Jr.
What White America Doesn't Hear

Website of the Day
BB King: What I've Learned This Year

 

December 22, 2005

Ingmar Lee
The Citizen's Metamorphosis: I Awoke an Object of Suspicion

Elisa Salasin
Classrooms in Cages

Christopher Brauchli
Absolut Bush: "I Swear to Upturn and Rear End the Constitution of the United States"

Robin Blackburn
Rudolf Meidner, a Visionary Pragmatist

Evelyn Pringle
Dan Olmstead, Autism & the Dangers of Thimerosal

Amira Hass
A 14-Year Old's Prison Journey: "I Refused and He Hit Me"

Francis A. Boyle
Iraq and the Laws of War: US as "Belligerent Occupant"

Stew Albert
The Spies Who Thought We Were Messy

Website of the Day
How to Reach a Human Voice

 

December 21, 2005

Paul Craig Roberts
One Nation, Under Prosecutors: Presumed Guilty

Lila Rajiva
A Short History of Radio Free Iraq

Joshua Frank
Nancy Pelosi's Truth

Dave Zirin
The Bray of Pigs: Bush Nixes Beisbol Cubano

Ramzy Baroud
US Image Problem Rooted in History, Not Media

Sonia Nettnin
Connect the Dots: Decoding Bush's Mumbo Jumbo

Ben Saul
Torture as Calculated Policy

Jonathan Cronin
Anniversary of a Handshake: Cherry-picking History in Iraq

Patrick Cockburn
Iraq Election Spells Total Defeat for US

Website of the Day
Nixon on Presidential Power

 

December 20, 2005

Jackie Corr
Natural Gas: a Montana Tragedy

Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Nothing New About NSA Spying on Americans

Michael Donnelly
"Eco Terrorism": Cui Bono?

Gian Paulo Accardo
Empire of Shame: a Conversation with Jean Ziegler

Pierre Tristam
Trifler, Fibber, Sophist, Spy: How Bush Flouted the Constitution

Norman Solomon
The Foulest Media Performances of the Year

Sen. Robert Byrd
No President is Above the Law

Dave Lindorff
Missing Black Boxes in WTC Attacks Found by Firefighters, Analyzed by NTSB, Concealed by FBI

Website of the Day
FBI's Spy Files: Got Yours Yet?

 

December 19, 2005

Mike Marqusee
The Global War on Civil Liberties

Gary Leupp
Feds Ask Student: "Why are You Reading that Little Red Book?"

Ron Jacobs
The Antiwar Movement, the Democrats and the Delusions of Bushworld

John Blair
Stealing the Golden Shovel: Lessons on Civil Disobedience

Gideon Levy
Sadism at the Qalandiyah Checkpoint

Kevin Zeese
The Global War on Civil Liberties

Missy Comley Beattie
Warnings from a Military Man and Dad

Don Santina
Ride 'Em Brush Cutter: Cowboy Imagery and the American Presidency

Website of the Day
A Call for Justice in Palestine

 

December 17 / 18, 2005

Cockburn / St. Clair
Time-Delayed Journalism: the NYT and the NSA's Illegal Spying Operation

Gabriel Kolko
The Decline of the American Empire

Susan Alcorn
Texas: Three Days and Two Nights

Werther
The Democrats are an Impotent and Tolerated Opposition Party

Ralph Nader
The Senator Without Guile: Proxmire of Wisconsin

Patrick Cockburn
Counting Ballots and Bodies in Baghdad

Fred Gardner
When Prosecutors Deceive: Did the Feds Frame Bryan Epis?

Dave Lindorff
Spy Scandal Far Larger Than Just NSA

Ned Sublette
Essence is Gasoline

Lee Sustar
The Class War Economy

Jason Leopold
Did Karl Rove Destroy Evidence in Plame Case?

Laura Carlsen
Report from Hong Kong: Deciphering the Language of Globalization

Jeff White
Teacher Fired for Talking About Peace?

Ray McGovern
Torture Between the Lines

Chris Floyd
Pale Fire: the White Death of Fallujah

William Loren Katz
Remembering the First Quagmire at Xmastime: Zachary Taylor vs. the Seminoles

Rose Miriam Elizalde
Mashenka and the Bear: a Tale for Our Time

Greg Moses
Pinter's Provocation: Self Love in America

Heather Gray
Privatizing the Social Contract

Alison Weir
My Bethlehem Experience: the Sequel

St Clair / Walker / Pollack
Playlists: What We're Listening to This Week

Poets' Basement
Landau, Engel and Albert

Website of the Day
At Least Homeland Security Believes that Mao Still Matters

 

December 16, 2005

Tom Kerr
CNN's Goddess of Vengeance: What's Not to Love About Nancy Grace?

Mark Engler
The WTO in Hong Kong: Is Market Access the Answer to Poverty?

John Bomar
When Ollie North Came to Hot Springs

Patrick Cockburn
Iraq Votes; Now What?

Pierre Tristam
Iraq, Ourselves

William S. Lind
The Fine Art of Withdrawal

Cyril Neville
Why I'm Not Going Back to New Orleans

Robert Jensen
Monkey See, Monkey Do: Reason, Evolution and Intelligent Design

Saul Landau
Bolivian Democracy and the US: a History Lesson

Website
CounterPunch & Dr. Price Vanquish Anthropologist Spies

 

December 15, 2005

Oren Ben-Dor
The Ethical and Legal Challenges Facing Palestine

Stan Cox
"Agroterrorists" Needn't Bother

Joshua Frank
Organic Inconsistencies: Federal Food Politics

Ben Terrall
Waivers for State Terror: Bush and the Indonesian Generals

Patrick Cockburn
Silence Descends on Baghdad

Monica Benderman
What Peace Needs

Walter A. Davis
Fear and Loathing in San Quentin

Vijay Prashad
Our Torture Problem

Website of the Day
Hourly Wages After Four Years of "Recovery"


December 14, 2005

Patrick Cockburn
Iran Poised to Win Iraqi Elections

Paul Craig Roberts
Lethal Developments

Lawrence R. Velvel
A Bore Called Bob: On Trying to Read Woodward

Wayne Garcia
The Summer of Sami

John Sugg
Preach Peace, Sami; Get Truthful Prosecutors

Gary Leupp
Bush and the Constitution: "Just a Goddamned Piece of Paper"

Ray McGovern
Torture: a Defining Moment

Alan Maass
They Murdered a Peacemaker

April Hurley, MD
NPR Swallows Bush's Guestimate on Iraqi Dead

Kevin Alexander Gray
Richard Pryor's Mirror on America

 

December 13, 2005

Stephen T. Banko, III
Heroes

Patrick Cockburn
America's War So Far: 1000 Days of Getting It Wrong

Laura Carlsen
What's at Play at the WTO

Karl Grossman
Nuclear Routlette in the Troposhere: Another NASA Plutonium Launch

Niranjan Ramakrishnan
The Original Sin

Kevin Zeese
Report from the International Peace Conference in London

Norman Solomon
At the Gates of San Quentin

Michael G. Smith
Ending the Death Penalty

Stew Albert
California Killers

Bob Dylan
Song for Tookie: George Jackson

Phil Gasper
California Murders Tookie Williams: a Report from San Quentin

Website of the Day
Boot Hill

 

December 12, 2005

Paul Craig Roberts
The Defenders of Torture

Lawrence R. Velvel
George the Disconnected

Jessica Stewart
My Husband is at the Gates of Gitmo

George Bisharat
Busharon: a Fusion of Like Minds

Nate Mezmer
Killing Tookie Williams: If a Black Man Dies in America, Does It Make a Sound?

Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Richard Pryor Wasn't Crazy

Alison Weir
My Bethlehem Experience

Seth Sandronsky
Thank You, Richard Pryor

Patrick Cockburn
Iraq: the Beginning of the End

Website of the Day
Wrestling for Peace


December 10 / 11, 2005

Alexander Cockburn
All the News That's Fit to Buy

Landau / Hassen
The Condemned of Nablus

Ralph Nader
The Widening Wasteland of American Media

Linn Washington, Jr
The Philly Media and Mumia: When They Don't Bash, They Ignore

Bill Christison
Apathy, US Culpability and Human Rights Day

Mike Ferner
The Courage of Jim Loney

Elizabeth Schulte
Abortion and the Bush Court

Neve Gordon / Yigal Bronner
Murder in Jerusalem

Linda S. Heard
Saddam's Trial: Grandstanding in the Theater of the Absurd

Ingmar Lee
A Kayak Journey to Vancouver Island's Wildest Forest

Ray McGovern
Lies, Torture and the Six Blind Mice

John Chuckman
Torture and White Phosphorous: the Moral Hell of Condi Rice

John Ryan
An Honorary Degree in Child Sacrifice?: Madeleine Albright and US Foreign Policy

Dick J. Reavis
From Waco to Baghdad

Christopher Brauchli
Bush's Hired Pens

Behzad Yaghmaian
Trapped at the Gates of the European Union

Aseem Shrivastava
The Winter in Delhi, 1984

John Ross
Bushlandia in Black and White

Ben Tripp
War, What is It Good For?

St. Clair / Pollack / Vest / Despair
Playlist: What We're Listening to This Week

Poets' Basement
Hassen, Bear Dog, Ford, Mickey Z, Albert & Engel

Website of the Week
Burn a Brick for Bush

 

December 9, 2005

Linn Washington, Jr.
Roots of Gitmo Torture Lie Close to Home

Dave Zirin / Mike Stark
On Seeing Wesley Baker Die

Patrick Cockburn
Blair Tries to Cover Up $1.3 Billion Iraqi Theft

Alexander Cockburn
Murtha Returns to Attack; Flays Bush

Lila Rajiva
Shooting the Mentally Ill

Gary Leupp
White House Liars on the Defensive

Jason Leopold
Rove Running Out of Answers, Time

Bruce K. Gagnon
So These Are the Democrats?

Andrew Cockburn
Meet Rahm Emmanuel, the Democrats' New Gatekeeper

Website of the Day
"X-mas Time for Visa"

 

December 8, 2005

Kathy Kelly
Blessed are the Merciful in Baghdad

James Petras
The Venezuelan Election: Chavez Wins, Bush Loses (Again)

William S. Lind
Questionable Assumptions: Dissecting the Stategy for Victory

Laura Carlsen
The Strange Mission of Vicente Fox: Free Trade and Mexico

Justin Akers
Bush's Border War

Thomas Graham, Jr
A Nuclear Pearl Harbor in Outer Space?

Norman Solomon
Rumsfeld's Handshake Deal with Saddam

Tariq Ali / Robin Blackburn
The Lost John Lennon Interview

Website of the Day
Pigs at the Trough of War

 

December 7, 2005

John Ryan
Dershowitz vs. Chomsky: a Review of the Harvard Debate

Gary Leupp
Suicide Before Dishonor in Occupied Iraq

Fran Quigley
How the ACLU Didn't Steal Christmas

Jeremy Brecher / Brendan Smith
Bush War Crimes: the Posse Gathers

Joshua Frank
Bird Dogging Hillary

William W. Morgan
Rendition, Torture and Democracy

Dave Lindorff
A Stunning Win for Mumia Abu Jamal

Patrick Cockburn
Saddam: "Come Visit My Cage"

Harold Pinter
Art, Truth and Politics: the Nobel Lecture

Website of the Day
Witnesses to Torture

 

December 6, 2005

Ron Jacobs
No One is Illegal; No One is an Infidel

Patrick Cockburn
Inside Saddam's Trial: Tales of the Human Meat Grinder

Yifat Susskind
Death, Politics and the Condom: African Women Confront Bush's AIDS Policy

Mike Whitney
How Greenspan Skewered America

Pat Williams
Public Land Should Stay Public

Paul Craig Roberts
Condi to Europe: Trust Us

Website of the Day
Debunking Woodward

 

December 5, 2005

John Walsh
The Lies of John Edwards: What Did the Democrats Know and When Did They Know It?

Brian Cloughley
The Poor Dead: the Relative Value of Human Lives

Mokhiber / Weissman
The Corporate Crime Quiz

Robert Jensen
How Big Money Eviscerates the First Amendment

Norman Solomon
Hidden in Plane Sight: US Media Ignores Iraq Air War Plan

Peter Rost, MD
An Open Letter to the Justice Department: Pfizer May Have Violated Federal Laws When They Fired Me

Lila Rajiva
The Torture-Go-Round: CIA's Rendition Flights to Secret Prisons

Website of the Day
National Day of Counter-Recruitment


December 3 / 4, 2005

Alexander Cockburn
The Revolt of the Generals

Lawrence R. Velvel
Iraq, Brains and Lies

Rev. William Alberts
The Forgotten Christmas Story: Saying No to King Herod

Saul Landau
Latino Troops Have Parents

Ralph Nader
Consumerama

Paul Craig Roberts
Don't Confuse the Jobs Hype with the Facts

Mike Whitney
Blood Feast: Celebrating Executions in America

Allan Lichtman
The DeLay Scheme: Blatantly Buying Our Government

Dave Lindorff
A Sudden Rush for the Exits?

Brian Concannon, Jr.
Haiti's Elections

Fred Gardner
Oregon NORML Honors Growers

Manuel Garcia, Jr.
On Freeing the CPT

Carol Wolman
Remembering the 60s

St. Clair / Vest / Walker / Pollack
Playlist: What We're Listening to This Week

Poets' Basement
Albert, Engel and Orloski

Website of the Weekend
Free the CPT

 

December 2, 2005

Stan Goff
An Open Letter to Congress from a Veteran and Military Dad

Mike Ferner
Beware Iraqization: Melvin Laird, Vietnam and Christmas Bombings Over Baghdad?

Christopher Brauchli
Bush's Constitutional Kamikazes: Padilla's No-Win Dilemma

Niranjan Ramakrishnan
Questions for the President

Manuel Talens
The Chávez Theorem

Peter Phillips
Death By Torture: Media Ignores the Hard Evidence

J.L. Chestnut, Jr.
Alabama's Taliban: Judge Roy Moore, Preachers and Dixie Hypocrisy

Website of the Day
Support the Hampton University Peace Activists!

 

December 1, 2005

John Walsh, MD
The God Gaps

Ron Jacobs
Hard Rain: Toward a Greater Air War in Iraq?

Jenna Orkin
EPA's Latest Betrayal at Ground Zero

Joshua Frank
Howard Dean's Blunt Message: Forget Palestine

Tiffany Ten Eyck
Rank and File Resistance to Delphi

Missy Comley Beattie
Home on the Range: Where the Fear and the Animus Play

Eli Stephens
The Reed and Kerry Show

Elaine Cassel
A Government Game of "Gotcha" with Jose Padilla

Website of the Day
Rare Erotica

 

 

Subscribe Online

January 13, 2006

A CounterPunch Exclusive Investigation

How the FBI Spied on Edward Said

By DAVID PRICE

The FBI has a long, ignoble tradition of monitoring and harassing America's top intellectuals. While people ranging from Albert Einstein, William Carlos Williams to Martin Luther King have been subjected to FBI surveillance, there remains an under-accounting of the ways in which this monitoring at times hampered the reception of their work.

In response to my request under the Freedom of Information Act, filed on behalf of CounterPunch, the FBI recently released 147 of Said's 238-page FBI file. There are some unusual gaps in the released records, and it is possible that the FBI still holds far more files on Professor Said than they acknowledge. Some of these gaps may exist because new Patriot Act and National Security exemptions allow the FBI to deny the existence of records; however, the released file provides enough information to examine the FBI's interest in Edward Said who mixed artistic appreciations, social theory, and political activism in powerful and unique ways.

Most of Said's file documents FBI surveillance campaigns of his legal, public work with American-based Palestinian political or pro-Arab organizations, while other portions of the file document the FBI's ongoing investigations of Said as it monitored his contacts with other Palestinian-Americans. That the FBI should monitor the legal political activities and intellectual forays of such a man elucidates not only the FBI's role in suppressing democratic solutions to the Israeli and Palestinian problems, it also demonstrates a continuity with the FBI's historical efforts to monitor and harass American peace activists.

Edward Said's wife, Mariam, says she is not surprised to learn of the FBI's surveillance of her husband, saying, "We always knew that any political activity concerning the Palestinian issue is monitored and when talking on the phone we would say 'let the tappers hear this'. We believed that our phones were tapped for a long time, but it never bothered us because we knew we were hiding nothing."

The FBI's first record of Edward Said appears in a February 1971 domestic security investigation of another unidentified individual. The FBI collected photographs of Said from the State Department's passport division and various news agencies. Said's "International Security" FBI file was established when an informant gave the FBI a program from the October 1971 Boston Convention of the Arab-American University Graduates, where Said chaired a panel on "Culture and the Critical Spirit". Most of Said's FBI records were classified under the administrative heading of "Foreign Counterintelligence," category 105, and most records are designated as relating to "IS ­ Middle East," the Bureau's designation for Israel.

Post-Patriot Act alterations of the Freedom of Information Act facilitate the FBI's efforts to keep significant portions of Said's FBI file classified ­ as if concerns with resolving Palestinian sovereignty from twenty or thirty years ago are indelibly linked to Bush's "war on terror". Large sections of Said's file remain redacted, with stamps indicating they remain Classified Secret until 2030, 25 years after their initial FOIA processing. One 1973 "Secret" report is now "exempt from General Declassification Schedule of Executive Order 11652, Exemption Category 2," and is "automatically declassified on indefinite". Such administrative stonewalling diminishes our ability to understand the past and further complicates our ability to document the FBI's role in undermining domestic democratic movements.

In February 1972, New York FBI agents produced a report listing Said's employment at Columbia University, his home address and phone number, including a notation that his home telephone service was provided by New York Telephone Company ­ information that was later used to request listings of all toll calls charged to Said's home phone number. A July 1972 FBI report indicates Said received a phone call from someone who was the subject of intensive FBI surveillance. The NYC agent wrote that "reasons for phone call, activities of the professor, and his sympathies in relation to [blank in the document] matters have not been ascertained".

In the months after the attacks at the 1972 Munich Olympics there was a flurry of FBI interest in Said and other Palestinian Americans. In early October 1972, the NY FBI office investigated Said's background and citizenship information as well as voting, banking and credit records. Employees at Princeton and Columbia Universities gave FBI agents biographical and education information on Said, and the Harvard University Alumni Office provided the FBI with detailed information. As Middle East scholar Steve Niva observes, "looking back, this post-Munich period may have marked an historic turning point when statements in support of the Palestinian cause became routinely equated with sympathies for terrorism."

The FBI spoke with their "Middle East informants" in Boston, Newark and New York to gather information on Said. One report indicated that "several confidential sources who are familiar with Middle East [blank in the document]in the United States were contacted during 1972 and 1973, but were unable to furnish any information pertaining to Edward William Said." During this investigation, FBI agents located and read a 1970 Boston Globe article headlined "Columbia Professor Blames Racist Attitude for Arab-Israeli Conflict".

One FBI report detailed events at the fifth annual convention of the Association of Arab-American University Graduates (AAAUG) held in November 1972 in Berkeley. Said was living in Lebanon at the time and did not attend the conference, but because he was a member of the AAAUG Board of Directors, the FBI included their convention report in his FBI file. There was a significant FBI presence at the conference, and the FBI's released records include the conference program indicating presentations from a selection of Arab-American scholars such as anthropologists Laura Nader and Barbara Aswad.

The extent of the FBI's surveillance of the conference is seen in the FBI's list (provided by a "reliable" FBI informer) of all AAAUG convention's attendees staying at the Claremont Hotel. Why the FBI collected information on conference attendees' accommodations is not clear. Was it to break into participants' rooms to plant listening devices, search for documents, or to monitor attendees? The redacted report does not say, but the FBI's well-documented reliance on such "black bag jobs" during this period raises this as a likely possibility. The Bureau's policy for these illegal operations was to maintain separate filing systems for them. The FBI's report contains summaries of several talks, including a detailed account of Andreas Papandreou's keynote address criticizing "the imperialistic forces of the United Stats against the peoples of the Middle East, Greek and Arab peoples alike."In January 1973, the FBI undertook further criminal and biographical background checks on Said, and the New York Special Agent in Charge recommended in February that the case be closed. But an FBI investigation the next month of a "subject [who had] traveled in the United States in 1971" began a new investigation of Said as one of several individuals whose phone numbers had come to the attention of the FBI and were believed to have possible "connections with Arab terrorist activities." Such alleged connections remain unspecified as do Said's connections to such activities, but such vague associations are frequently used to keep investigations active.

FBI memos from this period discuss the creation of a LHM (Letterhead Memorandum, meaning a memo identified as coming from the FBI) that "should be suitable for dissemination to foreign intelligence agencies". The agency or country to receive this LHM report is not identified, but Israel's Mossad was a likely candidate.

During the aftermath of the Yom Kippur War the FBI collected several of Said's newspaper columns and interviews, and his file includes a New York Times column arguing that Arabs and Jews in the Middle East had historically been pitted against each other rather than against "imperialist powers". In 1974, the FBI received word that Said would speak at the Canadian Arab Federation Conference in Windsor, Ontario, and the Bureau again tracked Said's movements, though an FBI informer indicated that "he did not consider Said to be the type of individual who would be involved in any terrorist activity".

The FBI made no entry in Edward Said's file in 1978, the year of the publication of his groundbreaking book, Orientalism.

A July 1979 FBI report summarized information on thirty-six individuals (names blacked out in the released documents) preparing to attend the August 1979 Palestine American Congress (PAC) at the Shoreham-Americana Hotel in Washington, D.C. The FBI noted that Said was an ex-officio member of the council. Snippets of paragraphs on other unidentified attendees mention past academic and political conferences attended, and one FBI informant is identified as being linked to the "pro-Iraqi Ba'ath Party". FBI offices receiving this report were advised to check their files for pertinent information on any of the mentioned individuals.

The extent of the FBI's conference surveillance is shown in a partially declassified Secret Report Index indicating that attendee records had been consulted from FBI field offices in twenty-five listed cities alphabetically listed from Albany to Washington. This report contains sentence summaries on participants. Said's summary, for example, says, "EDWARD SAID ­ Previously identified as being from Columbia University, New York City, New York, and as being deeply affiliated with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine." Other released passages find the FBI preoccupied with tracing various attendees' PFLP sympathies.

The PAC was perhaps the most open and democratic deliberative effort by displaced American Palestinians to address the goals of the Palestinian struggle. With great concern the FBI documented how the PAC "created a Preparatory Committee that empowered it to prepare a working paper on a proposed constitution for some mechanism for collaborative action".

The FBI noted some internal arguments about the legitimacy of some delegates coming from Arab communities with low Palestinian populations. The FBI reported that one delegate at the Congress "reminded all in attendance that the FBI has no legitimate interest in the activities taking place during the three day convention. There was no reason to be afraid of one's presence at all functions of the PAC." Without irony the FBI then noted with concern that some present used false names to register their hotel rooms.

Following opening remarks by Jawad George, another speaker described in the FBI report as a revolutionary black male named Smith, "ensured the PAC that the black Americans would render assistance to Arab revolution." Other speakers discussed in the FBI report included a member of the Organization of Arab Students and Ramallah Mayor Krim Khlif speaking on efforts to establish a Palestinian State on the West Bank.

The FBI report discussed problems arising at the conference's conclusion when there was "much discussion on just the preamble to the constitution. Strong disagreement on the wording of a sentence concerning return to its national homeland, to national self-determination, and to its national independence and sovereignty in all of Palestine, by the Arab peoples." Fights over the wording of the constitution's preamble continued, and several disputes "almost broke out into fist fights" between rival factions. Said's FBI file contains a copy of the "Proposed Constitution of the Palestine American Congress" that had been distributed to PAC attendees, which the FBI marked as classified "SECRET." This information provided by an FBI informant from this period has now been reclassified under thePatriot Act measures making the document classified "Secret" until the year 2029.

In May 1982, the New York FBI Special Agent in Charge sent a Secret report to FBI Director William Webster saying that Said's name had "come to the attention of the N.Y. [FBI Office] in the context of a terrorist matter." FBI headquarters was then requested "to contact liaison with State Department's Middle East section with regard to their knowledge of Said". A week later, Said's file gained a photograph of him addressing the December 1980 Palestine Human Rights Campaign National Conference. One 1982 newspaper clipping added to the file attempted to connect his wife Mariam Said and the PLO to the funding of a full-page anti-Israel advertisement in the New York Times.

During the summer of 1982 an unidentified individual was arrested and deported from the United States, and the "INS obtained photocopies of all documents in his possession". Among this deported individual's papers was Edward Said's name and home phone number. Documents relating to Said and this deportation are still being withheld and are being vetted under National Security Classification review processes.

On September 3, 1982, FBI Director Webster instructed FBI librarians at Quantico to use their computerized New York Times index to locate all past references to Said. This generated a thirteen-page report containing abstracts of forty-nine NYT articles featuring Edward Said. These articles range from political columns by Said, features about him, to literary book reviews by Said. The New York Times Information Service was long used by the pre-Google FBI to compile dossiers on persons or organizations of interest. Thus did the FBI collected a filtered analysis of Said's writings and public statements formed by the reports and prejudices of Times reporters and editors.

Said's FBI file, in the form in which it reached me, concludes with a few redacted reports (now reclassified until the year 2030) from 1983 and a highly censored Classified Secret memo from August 1991 that ends with the suggestions that the FBI "may desire to contact your Middle East Section for additional information concerning Said".

Curiously, Said's FBI file, as released to me, contains no information on the remaining dozen years of his life. Either the FBI stopped monitoring him, or they couldn'tlocate these files, or they won't release this information or even the fact that the information exists in the files. The latter two possibilities seem far more likely than the first .

It did not matter how frequently or clearly Edward Said declared that he "totally repudiated terrorism in all its forms". The FBI continued to focus its national security surveillance campaign on him. Had the FBI read the Palestine American Congress's proposed constitution placed in Said's file in 1979, they would have seen the group's commitment to upholding the "basic fundamental human and national rights of all people and affirms its opposition to racism in all of its manifestations including Zionism and anti-Semitism". Instead, they kept searching for connections to terrorism.

The FBI's surveillance of Edward Said was similar to their surveillance of other Palestinian-American intellectuals. For example, Ibrahim Abu Lughod's FBI file records similar monitoring ­ though Abu Lughod's file finds the FBI attempting to capitalize on JDL death threats as a means of interviewing Lughod to collect information for his file.

Having read hundreds of FBI reports summarizing "subversive" threads in the work of other academics, I am surprised to find that Said's FBI file contains no FBI analysis of his book Orientalism. This is especially surprising given the claims by scholars, like Hoover Institute anthropologist Stanley Kurtz in his 2003 testimony before the House Subcommittee on Select Education, that Said's post-colonial critique had left American Middle East Studies scholars impotent to contribute to Bush's "war on terror". Given what is known of the FBI's monitoring of radical academic developments it seems unlikely that such a work escaped their scrutiny, and it is reasonable to speculate that an FBI analysis of Orientalism remains in unreleased FBI documents.

But some known things are obviously missing from the released file. Chief among these are records of death threats against Said and records of the undercover police protection he received at some public events. But there are no reasons to withhold such records, and their absence gives further cause to not believe the FBI's claim this is his entire releasable file.

The reasons for the temporal and thematic gaps in Said's file remain unknown. One explanation for such gaps is suggested in Kafka's The Trial, where reference is made to cases of suspects never cleared of vague accusations but who are instead given an "ostensible acquittal" under which the accused's dossier circulates for years, "backwards and forwards with greater or smaller oscillations" on "peregrinations that are incalculable". Perhaps such Kafkaesque forces move within the FBI, empowered by post-9/11 legislation and desires to shield the public's eye from acknowledgments of past persecutions of Edward Said.

David Price is author of Threatening Anthropology: McCarthyism and the FBI's Surveillance of Activist Anthropologists (Duke, 2004). He can be reached at: dprice@stmartin.edu



 

 

Finally Available
from CounterPunch Books!
The Case Against Israel
By Michael Neumann

Click Here to Advance Order Philosopher Michael Neumann's Devastating Rebuttal of Alan Dershowitz

WHAT'S INSIDE
Grand Theft Pentagon:
Tales of Greed and Profiteering in the War on Terror

by Jeffrey St. Clair

 


The Book on 9/11 the White House Denounced as "ABSOLUTE GARBAGE"

 

 

 

 

CounterPunch Speakers Bureau

Sick of sit-on-the-Fence speakers, tongue-tied and timid? CounterPunch Editors Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St Clair are available to speak forcefully on ALL the burning issues, as are other CounterPunchers seasoned in stump oratory. Call CounterPunch Speakers Bureau, 1-800-840-3683. Or email beckyg@counterpunch.org.

Friday, February 01, 2008

Wit and the Campaign


THE ABSURD TIMES
Above: Is he still running for Senate?
Anyway, the Debate last night provided some genuine with, mostly by Obama, but some by the pundits. My favorite was by the MSNBC Pundit who was asked which of the two would win Missouri? As you know, it is the Sate of Harry Turman and Claire McKaskill but also Kit Bond and Jack Danforth (mainly known for dog food and helping Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court). The answer was that Obama would win Missouri, but Clinton would win "MIzzuruh." That is right on target! I know. Believe me, I know.
When asked if he'd be on a joint ticket with Hillary, Obama said "I'm sure she would be on anybody's 'short list'."
About experience: "It is not enough to be ready on day one; We need someone who is right on day one."
About the war: "Anyone who is so worried about Iran as a threat never should have invaded Iraq." (This one is a bit dangerous as it is exactly right.)
Well, there were others, but this suffices.
*ZNet | Asia*
*My Heart Bleeds For Pakistan *
*by Tariq Ali; The Independent; January 01, 2007*
Six hours before she was executed, Mary, Queen of Scots wrote to
her brother-in-law, Henry III of France: "...As for my son, I
commend him to you in so far as he deserves, for I cannot answer
for him." The year was 1587.
On 30 December 2007, a conclave of feudal potentates gathered in
the home of the slain Benazir Bhutto to hear her last will and
testament being read out and its contents subsequently announced
to the world media. Where Mary was tentative, her modern-day
equivalent left no room for doubt. She could certainly answer
for her son.
A triumvirate consisting of her husband, Asif Zardari (one of
the most venal and discredited politicians in the country and
still facing corruption charges in three European courts) and
two ciphers will run the party till Benazir's 19-year-old son,
Bilawal, comes of age. He will then become chairperson-for-life
and, no doubt, pass it on to his children. The fact that this is
now official does not make it any less grotesque. The Pakistan
People's Party is being treated as a family heirloom, a property
to be disposed of at the will of its leader.
Nothing more, nothing less. Poor Pakistan. Poor People's Party
supporters. Both deserve better than this disgusting, medieval
charade.
Benazir's last decision was in the same autocratic mode as its
predecessors, an approach that would cost her – tragically – her
own life. Had she heeded the advice of some party leaders and
not agreed to the Washington-brokered deal with Pervez Musharraf
or, even later, decided to boycott his parliamentary election
she might still have been alive. Her last gift to the country
does not augur well for its future.
How can Western-backed politicians be taken seriously if they
treat their party as a fiefdom and their supporters as serfs,
while their courtiers abroad mouth sycophantic niceties
concerning the young prince and his future.
That most of the PPP inner circle consists of spineless
timeservers leading frustrated and melancholy lives is no
excuse. All this could be transformed if inner-party democracy
was implemented. There is a tiny layer of incorruptible and
principled politicians inside the party, but they have been
sidelined. Dynastic politics is a sign of weakness, not
strength. Benazir was fond of comparing her family to the
Kennedys, but chose to ignore that the Democratic Party, despite
an addiction to big money, was not the instrument of any one family.
The issue of democracy is enormously important in a country that
has been governed by the military for over half of its life.
Pakistan is not a "failed state" in the sense of the Congo or
Rwanda. It is a dysfunctional state and has been in this
situation for almost four decades.
At the heart of this dysfunctionality is the domination by the
army and each period of military rule has made things worse. It
is this that has prevented political stability and the emergence
of stable institutions. Here the US bears direct responsibility,
since it has always regarded the military as the only
institution it can do business with and, unfortunately, still
does so. This is the rock that has focused choppy waters into a
headlong torrent.
The military's weaknesses are well known and have been amply
documented. But the politicians are not in a position to cast
stones. After all, Mr Musharraf did not pioneer the assault on
the judiciary so conveniently overlooked by the US Deputy
Secretary of State, John Negroponte, and the Foreign Secretary,
David Miliband. The first attack on the Supreme Court was
mounted by Nawaz Sharif's goons who physically assaulted judges
because they were angered by a decision that ran counter to
their master's interests when he was prime minister.
Some of us had hoped that, with her death, the People's Party
might start a new chapter. After all, one of its main leaders,
Aitzaz Ahsan, president of the Bar Association, played a heroic
role in the popular movement against the dismissal of the chief
justice. Mr Ahsan was arrested during the emergency and kept in
solitary confinement. He is still under house arrest in Lahore.
Had Benazir been capable of thinking beyond family and faction
she should have appointed him chairperson pending elections
within the party. No such luck.
The result almost certainly will be a split in the party sooner
rather than later. Mr Zardari was loathed by many activists and
held responsible for his wife's downfall. Once emotions have
subsided, the horror of the succession will hit the many
traditional PPP followers except for its most reactionary
segment: bandwagon careerists desperate to make a fortune.
All this could have been avoided, but the deadly angel who
guided her when she was alive was, alas, not too concerned with
democracy. And now he is in effect leader of the party.
Meanwhile there is a country in crisis. Having succeeded in
saving his own political skin by imposing a state of emergency,
Mr Musharraf still lacks legitimacy. Even a rigged election is
no longer possible on 8 January despite the stern admonitions of
President George Bush and his unconvincing Downing Street
adjutant. What is clear is that the official consensus on who
killed Benazir is breaking down, except on BBC television. It
has now been made public that, when Benazir asked the US for a
Karzai-style phalanx of privately contracted former US Marine
bodyguards, the suggestion was contemptuously rejected by the
Pakistan government, which saw it as a breach of sovereignty.
Now both Hillary Clinton and Senator Joseph Biden, chairman of
the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, are pinning the
convict's badge on Mr Musharraf and not al-Qa'ida for the
murder, a sure sign that sections of the US establishment are
thinking of dumping the President.
Their problem is that, with Benazir dead, the only other
alternative for them is General Ashraf Kiyani, head of the army.
Nawaz Sharif is seen as a Saudi poodle and hence unreliable,
though, given the US-Saudi alliance, poor Mr Sharif is puzzled
as to why this should be the case. For his part, he is ready to
do Washiongton's bidding but would prefer the Saudi King rather
than Mr Musharraf to be the imperial message-boy.
A solution to the crisis is available. This would require Mr
Musharraf's replacement by a less contentious figure, an
all-party government of unity to prepare the basis for genuine
elections within six months, and the reinstatement of the sacked
Supreme Court judges to investigate Benazir's murder without
fear or favour. It would be a start.
*********************************************************************************************

Monday, January 28, 2008

Yes We Can

THE ABSURD TIMES
(After one week of owning the Absurd Times)
Today is a strange day. This entire weekend has been a tremendous to my cynicism and pessimisson concerning the contemporary American political scene. First, on Saturday, Obama gave a very inspiring speech on his victory in South Carolina after a week of sleaze from the Clintons. Yesterday, Caroline Kennedy published a piece in the NY Times endorsing him, she who was 3 years old when JFK died, mentioned that Obama had inspired some of the same emotions that people had told her JFK did. She had never experienced that feeling before. Today, Ted's son, JFK's daughter, and Ted Kennedy all gave speeches in support of Obama, and Ted's was one that will be quoted endlessly far into the future. I wondered in Obama could rise to the occassion of following Ted, and he did, and only one sentiment in it had I predicted -- "humbled".
I have to be wrong right now, but I actually feel positive about things political as I listed to a 1958 version of the Diabelli variations.
The best analysis line in the following discussion came from Cris Matthews who invoked the great movie Adadeus. My own twist or version of the analogy is that Hillary Clinton is the Salieri of Presidential Politics.
Well, at least it's interesting

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Genocide

THE ABSURD TIMES
 
 
    An update:  We can thank Hillary for getting Obama's remarks clarified.  It seems they were edited out of the broadcast tape.  The point he made was that Reagen was able to get democrats to vote for them (against their own interests) and that made his "transformative."  However, Reagen's policies were despicable and Obama, instead of accepting a position with Harvard (at least Larry Tribe mentioned this), he went back to the South Side of Chicago to work "against the effects of those policies."  Obama also pointed out that Hillary was on the Board of WalMart at the time.  (Her supporters say she was working for change that way.  Hey, I just want to be accurate and fair, right?)  
 
 Bush's moves to "fix" the economy sound remarkably similar to those of Herbert Hoover, another Republican.
   
     I have for some time been irritated, or at least made uneasy, at the way the term "Genocide" is tossed about.  It seems that any sort of conflict where you don't the the people who are winning are commiting genocide.  Finally, I came across an article that defines the term as it is understood in international law (of course, the U.S. is exempt from any and all provisions of international law simply by virtue of its so stipulating) along with what seems to be a genuine example of it.
    I am reprinting a copy of it below, but allow me to express my relief that in none of the debates has the subject surfaced.  Not only does it lack relevance to the United States, but all candidates would feel constrained to take the wrong side.
 

Never Against! European Collusion in Israel's Slow Genocide


Jan, 22 2008 By Omar Barghouti



Source: The Electronic Intifada.

The European Union, Israel's largest trade partner in the world, is watching by as Israel tightens its barbaric siege on Gaza, collectively punishing 1.5 million Palestinian civilians, condemning them to devastation, and visiting imminent death upon hundreds of kidney dialysis and heart patients, prematurely born babies, and all others dependent on electric power for their very survival.

By freezing fuel and electric power supplies to Gaza, Israel, the occupying power, is essentially guaranteeing that "clean" water -- only by name, as Gaza's water is perhaps the most polluted in the whole region, after decades of Israeli theft and abuse -- will not be pumped out and properly distributed to homes and institutions; hospitals will not be able to function adequately, leading to the eventual death of many, particularly the most vulnerable; whatever factories that are still working despite the siege will now be forced to close, pushing the already extremely high unemployment rate even higher; sewage treatment will come to a halt, further polluting Gaza's precious little water supply; academic institutions and schools will not be able to provide their usual services; and the lives of all civilians will be severely disrupted, if not irreversibly damaged. And Europe is apathetically watching.

Princeton academic Richard Falk considered Israel's siege a "prelude to genocide," even before this latest crime of altogether cutting off energy supplies. Now, Israel's crimes in Gaza can accurately be categorized as acts of genocide, albeit slow. According to Article II of the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the term is defined as:

 

"[A]ny of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; ..."

 

Clearly, Israel's hermetic siege of Gaza, designed to kill, cause serious bodily and mental harm, and deliberately inflict conditions of life calculated to bring about partial and gradual physical destruction, qualifies as an act of genocide, if not all-out genocide yet. And the EU is suspiciously silent.

But why accuse Europe, in particular, of collusion in this crime when almost the entire international community is not lifting a finger, and the UN's obsequious Secretary-General, who surpassed all his predecessors in obedience to the US government, is pathetically paying only lip service? In addition, what of the US government itself, Israel's most generous sponsor that is directly implicated in the current siege, especially after President George W. Bush, on his recent visit, gave a hardly subtle green light to Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to ravage Gaza? Why not blame the Palestinians' quiet Arab brethren, particularly Egypt -- the only country that can immediately break the siege by reopening the Rafah crossing and supplying through it the necessary fuel, electric power and emergency supplies? And finally, why not blame the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority, whose subservient and visionless leader openly boasted in a press conference its "complete agreement" with Bush on all matters of substance?

After Israel, the US is, without a doubt, the guiltiest party in the current crime. Under the influence of a fundamentalist, militaristic, neo-conservative ideology that has taken over its helms of power and an omnipotent Zionist lobby that is unparalleled in its sway, the US is in a category by itself. It goes without saying that the PA, the UN, as well as Arab and international governments maintaining business as usual with Israel should all be held accountable for acquiescing, whether directly or indirectly, to Israel's crimes against humanity in Gaza. It is also true that each one of the above bears the legal and moral responsibility to intervene and apply whatever necessary pressure to stop the crime before thousands perish. But the EU commands a unique position in all this. It is not only silent and apathetic; in most European countries Israel and Israeli institutions are currently welcomed and sought after with unprecedented warmth, generosity and deference in all fields -- economic, cultural, academic, athletic, etc. For instance, Israel was invited as the guest of honor to a major book fair in Turin, Italy. Israeli government-funded films are featuring in film festivals all over the continent. Israeli products, from avocados and oranges to hi-tech security systems, are flooding European markets like never before. Israeli academic institutions are enjoying a special, very lucrative, association agreement with the relevant organs in the EU. Israeli dance groups, singing bands and orchestras are invited to European tours and festivals as if Israel were not only a normal, but in effect a most favored, member of the so-called "civilized" world. Official Europe's once lackluster embrace of Israel has turned into an intense, open and enigmatic love affair.

If Europe thinks it can thus repent for its Holocaust against its own Jewish population, it is in fact shamefully and consciously facilitating the committal of fresh acts of genocide against the people of Palestine. But Palestinians, it appears, do not count for much, as we are viewed not only by Israel, but also by its good old "white" sponsors and allies as lesser, or relative, humans. The continent that invented modern genocide and was responsible for massacring in the last two centuries more human beings, mostly "relative humans," than all other continents put together is covering up crimes that are reminiscent in quality, though certainly not in quantity, of its own heinous crimes against humanity.

In no other international affair, perhaps, can the European establishment be accused of being as detached from and indifferent to its own public opinion. While calls for boycotting Israel as an apartheid state are slowly but consistently spreading among European civil society organizations and trade unions, drawing disturbing parallels to the boycott of South African apartheid, European governments are finding it difficult to distinguish themselves from the overtly complicit US position vis-a-vis Israel. Even European clichés of condemnation and "expressing deep concern" have become rarer than ever nowadays. Moreover, Israel's relentless and defiant violation of Europe's own human rights laws and conditions are ignored whenever anyone questions whether Israel should continue to benefit from its magnanimous association agreement with the EU despite its military occupation, colonization and horrific record of human rights abuse against its Palestinian victims. If this is not complicity, what is?

Morality aside, sinking Gaza into a sea of darkness, poverty, death and despair cannot bode well for Europe. By actively propping up an environment conducive to the rise of fanaticism and desperate violence near its borders, Europe is foolishly inviting havoc to its doorstep. Instead of heeding -- or at least seriously considering -- calls for boycott, divestment and sanctions against apartheid Israel, adopted by virtually the entire spectrum of Palestinian civil society, it may soon have to reckon with uncontainable forces of irrational and indiscriminate violence and its resulting chaos.

It seems European elites are currently determined never to oppose Israel, no matter what crimes it commits. It is as if the bellowing -- and increasingly hypocritical -- slogan upheld by Jewish survivors of European genocide, "Never Again!", is now espoused by European elites with one difference: the two letter, 's' and 't', are added at the end.

Omar Barghouti is an independent Palestinian political analyst and founding member of the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (www.PACBI.org)

***********************************************************

 

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Under New Ownership -- Corno

THE ABSURD TIMES





Corno di Bassetto
Mr. di Bassetto (pictured above) has just taken over this publication. However, he has imposed only one rule on us: "Always tell the truth, it's the funniest joke ever." We have decided to abide by this rule whenever he is watching.
He has an observation to pass on relevant to this year's primaries, especially Huckabee and the Religious Right: "The vilest abortionist is he who tries to mold a child's character."
****************************************************************************************************************
Personally, I am pained to announce that I just heard Obama praise Ronald Regean for ending the excesses of the 60s and 70s. He might as well throw in Grenada and most of central america as well as IranGate.
This leaves Edwards and Kucinich as the only two worth considering. How could Barak be so stupid??!!! He can not claim a lack of education.
And now and update about Iraq. Remember Iraq? Edwards is now the only one allowed on TV who has said ALL our troops out within a year.
This selection comes from Tomgram:

Tom Dispatch

posted 2008-01-17 10:42:21

Tomgram: CSI Iraq

The Corpse on the Gurney

The "Success" Mantra in Iraq
By Tom Engelhardt

The other day, as we reached the first anniversary of the President's announcement of his "surge" strategy, his "new way forward" in Iraq, I found myself thinking about the earliest paid book-editing work I ever did. An editor at a San Francisco textbook publisher hired me to "doctor" god-awful texts designed for audiences of captive kids. Each of these "books" was not only in a woeful state of disrepair, but essentially D.O.A. I was nonetheless supposed to do a lively rewrite of the mess and add seductive "sidebars"; another technician was then simplified the language to "grade level" and a designer provided a flashy layout and look. Zap! Pow! Kebang!

During the years that I freelanced for that company in the early 1970s, an image of what I was doing formed in my mind -- and it suddenly came back to me this week. I used to describe it this way:

The little group of us -- rewriter, grade-level reducer, designer -- would be summoned to the publisher's office. There, our brave band of technicians would be ushered into a room in which there would be nothing but a gurney with a corpse on it in a state of advanced decomposition. The publisher's representative would then issue a simple request: Make it look like it can get up and walk away.

And the truth was: that corpse of a book would be almost lifelike when we were done with it, but one thing was guaranteed -- it would never actually get up and walk away.

That was in another century and a minor matter of bad books that no one wanted to call by their rightful name. But that image came to mind again more than three decades later because it's hard not to think of America's Iraq in similar terms. Only this week, Abdul Qadir, the Iraqi defense minister, announced that "his nation would not be able to take full responsibility for its internal security until 2012, nor be able on its own to defend Iraq's borders from external threat until at least 2018." Pentagon officials, reported Thom Shanker of the New York Times, expressed no surprise at these dismal post-surge projections, although they were "even less optimistic than those [Qadir] made last year."

According to this guesstimate then, the U.S. military occupation of Iraq won't end for, minimally, another ten years. President Bush confirmed this on his recent Mideast jaunt when, in response to a journalist's question, he said that the U.S. stay in Iraq "could easily be" another decade or more.

Folks, our media may be filled with discussions about just how "successful" the President's surge plan has been, but really, Iraq is the corpse in the room.

"Success" as a Mantra

Last January, after announcing his "surge strategy," the President called in his technicians. As it turned out, Gen. David Petraeus, surge commander in Iraq, has been quite impressive, as has new U.S. ambassador to that country, Ryan Crocker. Think of them as "the undertakers," since they've been the ones who, applying their skills, have managed to give that Iraqi corpse the faint glow of life. The President asked them to make Iraq look like it could get up and walk away -- and the last year of "success," widely trumpeted in the media, has been the result. But just think about what the defense minister and President Bush are promising: By 2018, the country will -- supposedly -- be able to control its own borders, one of the more basic acts of a sovereign state. That, by itself, tells you much of what you need to be know.

In order to achieve an image of lifelike quiescence in Iraq, involving a radical lowering of "violence" in that country, the general and ambassador did have to give up the ghost on a number of previous Bush administration passions. Rebellious al-Anbar Province was, for instance, essentially turned over to members of the community (many of whom had, even according to the Department of Defense, been fighting Americans until recently). They were then armed and paid by the U.S. not to make too much trouble. In the Iraqi capital, on the other hand, the surging American military looked the other way as, in the first half of 2007, the Shiite "cleansing" of mixed Baghdad neighborhoods reached new heights, transforming it into a largely Shiite city. This may have been the real "surge" in Iraq and, if you look at new maps of the ethnic make-up of the capital, you can see the startling results -- from which a certain quiescence followed. Powerful Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, a longtime opponent of the Bush administration, called a "truce" during the surge months and went about purging and reorganizing his powerful militia, the Mahdi Army. In exchange, the U.S. has given up, at least temporarily, its goal of wresting control of some of those neighborhoods from the Sadrists.

Despite hailing the recent passage of what might be called a modest re-Baathification law in the Iraqi Parliament (that may have little effect on actual government employment), the administration has also reportedly given up in large part on pushing its highly touted "benchmarks" for the Iraqis to accomplish. This was to be a crucial part of Iraqi political "reconciliation" (once described as the key to the success of the whole surge strategy). It has now been dumped for so-called Iraqi solutions. All of this, including the lack of U.S. patrolling in al-Anbar province, the heartland of the Sunni insurgency, plus the addition of almost 30,000 troops in Baghdad and environs, has indeed given Iraq a quieter look -- especially in the United States, where Iraqi news has largely disappeared from front pages and slipped deep into prime-time TV news coverage just as the presidential campaign of 2008 heats up.

The surge was always, in a sense, a gamble for time, a pacification program directed at the "home front" in the President's Global War on Terror as well as at Iraq itself. And if this is what you mean by "success" in Iraq, Bush has indeed succeeded admirably. As in the Vietnam era, when President Richard Nixon began "Vietnamizing" that war, a reduction of American casualties has had the effect of turning media attention elsewhere.

So another year has now passed in a country that we plunged into an unimaginable charnel-house state. Whether civilian dead between the invasion of 2003 and mid-2006 (before the worst year of civil-war level violence even hit) was in the range of 600,000 as a study in the British medical journal, The Lancet reported or 150,000 as a recent World Health Organization study suggests, whether two million or 2.5 million Iraqis have fled the country, whether 1.1 million or more than two million have been displaced internally, whether electricity blackouts and water shortages have marginally increased or decreased, whether the country's health-care system is beyond resuscitation or could still be revived, whether Iraqi oil production has nearly crept back to the low point of the Saddam Hussein-era or not, whether fields of opium poppies are, for the first time, spreading across the country's agricultural lands or still relatively localized, Iraq is a continuing disaster zone on a catastrophic scale hard to match in recent memory.

What Bush has done with his surge, however, is buy himself that year-plus of free time, while he negotiates with Iraq's inside-the-Green-Zone government to cement in place an endless American presence there. In the process, he may create a sense of permanency that no future president will prove capable of tampering with -- not without being known as the man (or woman) who "lost" Iraq. Forget the Republican presidential candidates -- Sen. John McCain, for instance, has said that he doesn't care if the U.S. is in Iraq for the next hundred years -- and think about the leading Democratic candidates with their elongated (and partial) "withdrawal" plans. Barack Obama, for instance, is for guaranteeing a 16-month withdrawal schedule, and that's just for U.S. "combat troops," which are only perhaps half of all American forces in the country. Hillary Clinton's plan is no more promising.

The President's gamble, so far "successful," has been that the look of returning life in Iraq will last at least long enough for him to turn a marginally "successful" war over to the next administration. If the Democrats sweep to power, he hopes to stick them with that war. As Michael Hirsh of Newsweek put the matter recently, while discussing the President's trip to the Middle East: "Far away in the Persian Gulf, Bush is creating facts on the ground that the next president may not be able to ignore." (Of course, this assumes that the Iraqis will comply.)

In that case, here would be another piece of potential Bush "success": Nine months into any new presidential term and the Iraq War is yours. (Those of us old enough to remember have already lived through this scenario once with "Lyndon Johnson's war" in Vietnam, so how does "Barack Obama's war" sound?) Then, former Bush administration officials, Republicans of all stripes, neocons, and an array of pundits will turn on those uncelebratory Democrats who, they will claim, managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of "success," if not victory. Wait for it.

Victory Laps and Other Celebrations

But folks, let's face it, despite the cosmetic acts of the President and his undertakers, America's Iraq is still a corpse. And yet, in this "post-surge" moment, everybody is arguing over just how "successful" the surge has been. All agree it has "lowered violence" in Iraq. The Democrats insist that the plan's "success" is limited indeed, because its main goal, "political reconciliation," has not been reached. On the other hand, Republicans, assorted neocons, and some in the administration are already doing modest victory dances. The newest New York Times columnist, William Kristol, a man previously known for being endlessly wrong on his Iraqi war of choice, just last week chided the Democrats in his typical way: "It's apparently impermissible for leading Democrats to acknowledge -- let alone celebrate -- progress in Iraq."

Let the celebrations begin! In the White House, anyway. After all, whatever Iraq news breaks out of the inside pages of the paper is now often framed by this ongoing dispute about the how much surge and post-surge success has happened, about how much to celebrate, and that is another sign of success for the President. No wonder, as Michael Abramowitz of the Washington Post put it, Bush's recent meeting in Kuwait with Gen. Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker, as well as his comments to a rally of 3,000 hoo-ahing U.S. troops, "had the air of a victory lap for a president whose decision to raise the troop levels in Iraq last year was questioned not only by Democrats but also by many Republicans and even generals at the Pentagon."

But folks, George W. Bush can lap the Middle East, the planet, the solar system and America's Iraq is still never going to get up and walk away. Not even in 2018 or 2028. Don't forget, it's a corpse. (In fact, unlike the politicians and the media, recent opinion polls show that the American people generally have not forgotten this.)

In the meantime, the military in Iraq is preparing for something other than a simple victory lap, just in case the President's surge luck doesn't quite extend to 2009. Former brigadier general and Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Middle Eastern Affairs Mark Kimmitt, for instance, recently suggested that there was "only a mild chance" that surge security gains would prove permanent: "[I]f I had to put a number to it, maybe it's three in 10, maybe it's 50-50, if we play our cards right."

In fact, General Petraeus and the rest of the U.S. military are faced with a relatively simple calculus for their exhausted, overstretched, overused forces among whom the rate of post-traumatic stress syndrome has tripled. Although the President recently insisted that he would be happy to slow down or halt an expected drawdown of 30,000 surge troops by July, the fact is that present military manpower levels there are literally unsustainable -- especially since 3,200 Marines are now being committed to the ever less successful Afghan War. Drawdowns are a must and "successful" Iraq, already experiencing signs of another uptick in violence and death (including of American troops) in the new year, is likely to need a dose of something else soon, if that faint glow of life is to be sustained.

One candidate for that, as American troop levels drop, is air power, a much underreported subject in both Iraq and Afghanistan. In Iraq, according to a recent study by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the use of air power took a striking leap forward in 2007. According to the study, the number of Close Air Support/Precision Strikes -- sorties that used a major munition -- in Iraq went up five-fold between 2006 and 2007 (not including December of that year), from 229 to 1,119 or, on average, from 19 per month to 102 per month. 2008 started with a literal bang, 40,000 pounds of explosives were dropped in ten minutes on 38 targets in a Sunni farming area on "the outskirts" of Baghdad. After 10 preceding days of intermittent air attacks, this was probably the largest display of air power since the 2003 invasion. It was also undoubtedly a harbinger of things to come and, of course, guaranteed to drive up the number of civilian dead.

Similarly, between January and October 2007, according to the Associated Press, the U.S. military more than doubled its use of armed and unarmed drone aircraft, which clocked 500,000-plus hours in the air (mainly in Iraq). This is undoubtedly a taste of what "success" means in the year to come.

Dancing on a Corpse

So, here's a simple reality check: The whole discussion of, and argument about, "success" in Iraq is, in fact, obscene. Given what has already happened to that country -- and will continue to happen as long as the U.S. remains an occupying power there -- the very category of "success" is an obscenity. If violence actually does stay down there, that may be a modest godsend for Iraqis, but it can hardly be considered a sign of American "success."

Every now and then, history comes in handy. In a previous moment, when the neocons and their allied pundits were feeling particularly triumphant, they began touting Bush's America as the planet's new Rome (only more so). That talk evaporated once Iraq went into full-scale insurgency mode (and Afghanistan followed). But perhaps Rome does remain a touchstone of a sort for administration Iraqi policies.

What comes to mind is the Roman historian Tacitus' description of the Roman way of war. He put his version of it into the mouth of Calgacus, a British chieftain who opposed the Romans, and it went, in part, like this:

"They have plundered the world, stripping naked the land in their hunger, they loot even the ocean: they are driven by greed, if their enemy be rich; by ambition, if poor; neither the wealth of the east nor the west can satisfy them: they are the only people who behold wealth and indigence with equal passion to dominate. They ravage, they slaughter, they seize by false pretenses, and all of this they hail as the construction of empire. And when in their wake nothing remains but a desert, they call that peace."

Folks, it's obscene. We're doing victory laps around, and dancing upon, a corpse.

Tom Engelhardt, who runs the Nation Institute's Tomdispatch.com, is the co-founder of the American Empire Project. His book, The End of Victory Culture (University of Massachusetts Press), has been thoroughly updated in a newly issued edition that deals with victory culture's crash-and-burn sequel in Iraq.

[Note: I'd like to offer one of my periodic bows to the invaluable sites that give me special help in collecting information on Iraq, especially Juan Cole's Informed Comment, Paul Woodward's The War in Context, the daily Media Patrol summaries at Cursor.org, and the enormous range of pieces posted every day at Antiwar.com. In addition, thanks to Yasmin Madadi for research help and Michael Schwartz for advice. If you want to check out that CSIS airpower study yourself, click here (PDF file).]

Copyright 2008 Tom Engelhardt

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

Cocaine Crap or Just a Freakin Minute

    One of Hillary's surrogates, the owner of BET (a network for Blacks just as inane and worthless as the others but starring black people) spoke glowingly of Hillary and Bill as being in the forefront of caring for blacks while Obama was on the streets of Chicago using cocaine, as he mentioned in his book.  Well, Obama DID talk about his drug use and how it almost destroyed his life and how he overcame it.  More importantly, such a past makes him MORE believable than the man who didn't inhale or Tammy Wynette Clinton.
    In treating recovering addicts and alcoholics, it is very important to establish some trust and rapport with your client.  Many, perhaps most, come with the idea that if you haven't been hooked, you can't possibly relate to what they are going through.  It is not true, of course, but it is essential that you know all the drugs, what effect they have, what withdrawal is like, and be familiar with emotional pain of some sort.  If you confess yourself as a "recovering addict," you establish yourself as trustworthy and understanding and also offer hope for recovery.  If you deny it, you have quite a few extra steps to go through before you gain their trust.
    Obama, by admitting his use of cocaine, and his recovery and subsequent success, becomes a very positive role-model for millions and gainst trust. 
    Let me give another example.  When Nancy Reagen tried to "fight" drugs, she came up with her solution -- "Just say NO."  In drug circles, she was laughable, absurd, as unhip as a Lawernce Welk hip hop marathon.  Meanwhile, Ronald spent money bombing Central America.  On the other hand, Betty Ford went into rehab, talked about her downers and alcohol, and established a clinic that is recognized throught the world as very effective.  The difference is that the patients kenw that Betty Ford had "been there."
    Let me tell you some more.  When I used to drive these people to AA meetings as part of my job, they could easily point out crack houses from the windows of the vans whereas I still haven't developed that talent.  (Fortunately, I don't want it.) 
    Yes, I've treated addicts and I can tell you that less than 3% of them fit the stereotype you see on TV.  I had a few that did, but I also had Medical Doctors, Psychiatrists, and Attorneys as clients.  With some of them, it is just as important to speak to them about their profession as their addiction, but you still have to gain their respect.  I had a father whom I wished to visit his son, but he called to argue about his medication (he was well-known in that field, not addiction related).  I finally had to tell him that I have never enjoyed any discussion relating to the Carbon element.  He then agree to come and visit his son and the son is still recovered today and the father much relieved.
    AA: remember that there is no ONE AA, even though they all use certain rituals.  Rather, there are thousands as each one is different.  The only thing in common is addiction.  (Oh yes, and humanity.)
    So, anyway, I wish Hillary would stop that crap, give Obama credit for courage and hope, and move one.  Then they could both vote for Edwards or Kucinich (who is suing MSNBC for excluding him from tonight's debate even though they invited him two days earlier).
 
Grant me the serentiy to accept those things I can not change,
The courage to change those I can,
And the wisdon to know the difference.
 
Ciao
 

Saturday, January 12, 2008

The Primaries and Iran -- update

The Absurd Times
(Our newest editor, Jean)


Nausea
That really is about the only word for it. The first bit of sabotage was Colin Powell's, Bush's liar for hire, endorsing Obama and pointing out that "he is black enough." Who needs that kind of endorsement in racist Amerika?
Then what's with the polls? Well, I personally know no one without an answering machine to answer the phone for them and I haven't answered one in years. These people are bound to have certain other things in common and, besides, it eliminates the maxim that any person in the population has an equal chance of being questioned and that is what a representative sample is. Furthermore, even with this measurement error, those who do answer the phone and answer the questions are unlikely to admit that they would not vote for anyone who is black -- or female. Yet they will vote their predjudice. In addition, they do mention a plus or minus 4 percentage points "margin of error," meaning they could be as far as eight points off, (assuming a representative sample), and some networks were so inane as to report AVERAGE PERCENTAGES of polls! And yet, they usually are accurate enough. Did you know that, mathematically, the larger the polulation being measured, the smaller the sample needed for accuracy? I don't believe it, but I can prove it mathematically. In fact, I have.
Kucinich did us all a great favor in NH by calling for a recount. Some of the votes were hand counted and some computer counted. Fortunately, they used the scanner method which relies on a paper record and thus the recount is possible. In many other states, no paper record is kept. All that is needed is a taser, or a Blackberry, to change an election result.
Hillary's tears probably swung that election for her. The polls probably shut Edwards pretty much out as his debate performance was exceptional. In fact, winning a debate, that is by presenting your point and supporting it and refuting your opponents with facts is almost a certain way to loose the election.
Finally,the whole bit in the straits of Hormuz was faked with flase splicing, video mixed with audio from a different time period, etc. Even the Pentagon is backing off on that.
Well, at least I got to play with a few fonts.

Wednesday, January 02, 2008

Pakistan's Future

Lest Bhutto becomes more romanticized than she already is, I give you Tarik Ali on the
recent news: 
 
 
   *ZNet | Asia*
 
    *My Heart Bleeds For Pakistan *
 
    *by Tariq Ali; The Independent; January 01, 2007*
 
        Six hours before she was executed, Mary, Queen of Scots wrote to
        her brother-in-law, Henry III of France: "...As for my son, I
        commend him to you in so far as he deserves, for I cannot answer
        for him." The year was 1587.
 
        On 30 December 2007, a conclave of feudal potentates gathered in
        the home of the slain Benazir Bhutto to hear her last will and
        testament being read out and its contents subsequently announced
        to the world media. Where Mary was tentative, her modern-day
        equivalent left no room for doubt. She could certainly answer
        for her son.
 
        A triumvirate consisting of her husband, Asif Zardari (one of
        the most venal and discredited politicians in the country and
        still facing corruption charges in three European courts) and
        two ciphers will run the party till Benazir's 19-year-old son,
        Bilawal, comes of age. He will then become chairperson-for-life
        and, no doubt, pass it on to his children. The fact that this is
        now official does not make it any less grotesque. The Pakistan
        People's Party is being treated as a family heirloom, a property
        to be disposed of at the will of its leader.
 
        Nothing more, nothing less. Poor Pakistan. Poor People's Party
        supporters. Both deserve better than this disgusting, medieval
        charade.
 
        Benazir's last decision was in the same autocratic mode as its
        predecessors, an approach that would cost her – tragically – her
        own life. Had she heeded the advice of some party leaders and
        not agreed to the Washington-brokered deal with Pervez Musharraf
        or, even later, decided to boycott his parliamentary election
        she might still have been alive. Her last gift to the country
        does not augur well for its future.
 
        How can Western-backed politicians be taken seriously if they
        treat their party as a fiefdom and their supporters as serfs,
        while their courtiers abroad mouth sycophantic niceties
        concerning the young prince and his future.
 
        That most of the PPP inner circle consists of spineless
        timeservers leading frustrated and melancholy lives is no
        excuse. All this could be transformed if inner-party democracy
        was implemented. There is a tiny layer of incorruptible and
        principled politicians inside the party, but they have been
        sidelined. Dynastic politics is a sign of weakness, not
        strength. Benazir was fond of comparing her family to the
        Kennedys, but chose to ignore that the Democratic Party, despite
        an addiction to big money, was not the instrument of any one family.
 
        The issue of democracy is enormously important in a country that
        has been governed by the military for over half of its life.
        Pakistan is not a "failed state" in the sense of the Congo or
        Rwanda. It is a dysfunctional state and has been in this
        situation for almost four decades.
 
        At the heart of this dysfunctionality is the domination by the
        army and each period of military rule has made things worse. It
        is this that has prevented political stability and the emergence
        of stable institutions. Here the US bears direct responsibility,
        since it has always regarded the military as the only
        institution it can do business with and, unfortunately, still
        does so. This is the rock that has focused choppy waters into a
        headlong torrent.
 
        The military's weaknesses are well known and have been amply
        documented. But the politicians are not in a position to cast
        stones. After all, Mr Musharraf did not pioneer the assault on
        the judiciary so conveniently overlooked by the US Deputy
        Secretary of State, John Negroponte, and the Foreign Secretary,
        David Miliband. The first attack on the Supreme Court was
        mounted by Nawaz Sharif's goons who physically assaulted judges
        because they were angered by a decision that ran counter to
        their master's interests when he was prime minister.
 
        Some of us had hoped that, with her death, the People's Party
        might start a new chapter. After all, one of its main leaders,
        Aitzaz Ahsan, president of the Bar Association, played a heroic
        role in the popular movement against the dismissal of the chief
        justice. Mr Ahsan was arrested during the emergency and kept in
        solitary confinement. He is still under house arrest in Lahore.
        Had Benazir been capable of thinking beyond family and faction
        she should have appointed him chairperson pending elections
        within the party. No such luck.
 
        The result almost certainly will be a split in the party sooner
        rather than later. Mr Zardari was loathed by many activists and
        held responsible for his wife's downfall. Once emotions have
        subsided, the horror of the succession will hit the many
        traditional PPP followers except for its most reactionary
        segment: bandwagon careerists desperate to make a fortune.
 
        All this could have been avoided, but the deadly angel who
        guided her when she was alive was, alas, not too concerned with
        democracy. And now he is in effect leader of the party.
 
        Meanwhile there is a country in crisis. Having succeeded in
        saving his own political skin by imposing a state of emergency,
        Mr Musharraf still lacks legitimacy. Even a rigged election is
        no longer possible on 8 January despite the stern admonitions of
        President George Bush and his unconvincing Downing Street
        adjutant. What is clear is that the official consensus on who
        killed Benazir is breaking down, except on BBC television. It
        has now been made public that, when Benazir asked the US for a
        Karzai-style phalanx of privately contracted former US Marine
        bodyguards, the suggestion was contemptuously rejected by the
        Pakistan government, which saw it as a breach of sovereignty.
 
        Now both Hillary Clinton and Senator Joseph Biden, chairman of
        the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, are pinning the
        convict's badge on Mr Musharraf and not al-Qa'ida for the
        murder, a sure sign that sections of the US establishment are
        thinking of dumping the President.
 
        Their problem is that, with Benazir dead, the only other
        alternative for them is General Ashraf Kiyani, head of the army.
        Nawaz Sharif is seen as a Saudi poodle and hence unreliable,
        though, given the US-Saudi alliance, poor Mr Sharif is puzzled
        as to why this should be the case. For his part, he is ready to
        do Washiongton's bidding but would prefer the Saudi King rather
        than Mr Musharraf to be the imperial message-boy.
 
        A solution to the crisis is available. This would require Mr
        Musharraf's replacement by a less contentious figure, an
        all-party government of unity to prepare the basis for genuine
        elections within six months, and the reinstatement of the sacked
        Supreme Court judges to investigate Benazir's murder without
        fear or favour. It would be a start.