Showing posts with label VAST NITWIT CONSPIRACY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label VAST NITWIT CONSPIRACY. Show all posts

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Vast Nitwit Conspiracy

Nitwits!


Illustration: Teabaggers in Iran


The current insanity is becoming closer to a definition. There is a great deal going on in the world that our own imperialism will not allow to be challenged. Consequently, it become more important to focus on the most ridiculous items here so that the media is not clogged with realities around the world. The "Tea-baggers," for example, the racists, the southerners, are all helping in this endeavor.

People wonder about Joe Wilson. Who is he? Well, aside from being the one who shouldted out "YOU LIE!" during a joint session of congress, I heard him talk about the "Holy city of Charlotte," South Carolina. Unless my memory fails me, I was in that city for a couple of days. There was one sane person in it, a Physics Professor. Across from the hotel I stayed in, was an old, 18th or early 19th Century style building, in a bit of decay, with DAUGHTERS OF THE CONFEDERACY engraved in it. The state flag looked very much like the Confederate Flag. The main topic of conversation was the flood of a few years back from a hurricane. (As I said, I might not have the right city, but it was a large coastal town in the south of South Carolina.)

Below is the true and original definition of "tea-bagging" which is great to remember when you hear the term again, thanks to the Urban dictionary. Current usage was added after the F* channel lunacy.

Anyway, below that are a three relevant items. The first is a copy of a letter one of you sent to the Prez. I sent one too. You can all make a variant of it and perhaps at least FEEL as if you are doing something.

The second is an article illustrating the sort of things with long-term consequences that we should be talking about.

The third is an article about Journalism in general.
**************************************


teabagging 9424 up, 1358 down

April 14, 2009 Urban Word of the Day
the insertion of one man's sack into another person's mouth. Used a practical joke or prank, when performed on someone who is asleep, or as a sexual act.
At the frat house last night, when Tim was wasted an down on the floor, he got teabagged by, like, ten guys!

Me and Jen were teabagging last night when her mom walked in. Awkward.
***********************************************

Dear President Obama,

I know that your chief concerns lie elsewhere right now, but Prime Minister Netanyahu's
decision to grant building permits for dozens of new homes for Israeli settlers in the West Bank
has many of us deeply concerned.

Especially since you specifically and firmly insisted that the road to peace and the establishment of two independent states, Palestine and Israel, depended on Israel's cessation of West Bank expansion and occupation.

Mr. President, I think many Americans like myself feel that Israel has no intention of following your suggestions at this time, and openly defy and ignore you.

May I respectfully ask why no sanctions are ever mentioned with respect to Israel? If Israel does not wish to pursue peace and a two state solution, what penalties do they face? If the answer is "none", then how can we expect them to comply with what the whole world sees as fair and just?

South Africa, to use a famous recent example, did not comply with the world's encouragement to end the hated apartheid regime they enforced, but sanctions from around the world changed their minds.

Israel has also been called an apartheid state by no less than three Nobel Peace Prize winners,
amongst many more. Former President Jimmy Carter, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and former
South African President Nelson Mandela have all encouraged Israel to change without much success.

I hope you will consider some sort of sanctions against Israel if it continues to be unmotivated in any way to end the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, and stands intractably in the way of the much longed for two state solution you so rightfully and courageously support.

We fund Israel with billions each year, and perhaps a withholding of part of that amount could also be a sanction, I cannot see why not.

Mr. President, you have much to do, and I don't wish to take up any more of your time. Thank you for your great efforts and you have my full support. Believe me, I know, any sanction you dare mention against Israel will cause a media explosion.

But without any, Israel will continue to ignore your suggestions. All the best to you Mr. President, this has to be a tough decision.

Sincerely yours,


****************************************

Israeli leaders hunted for war crimes

Work on several fronts to get convicted Israeli top officials for war crimes. But Israel is likely to blow at any convictions.

JERUSALEM: >From several pages is an attempt to prosecute Israeli politicians and military officials for war crimes, according to the UN probably responsible. Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, former Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, Defense Minister Ehud Barak and chief of the Israeli military are likely targets, but Israel will probably blow any judgments, assess American professor.

A committee appointed by the United Nations with the South African judge Richard Goldstone headed concludes in a recently published report that there is strong evidence that Israel committed war crimes during the three-week war in Gaza in the early years. Including Israel has deliberately shot civilians and used Palestinians as human shield. The UN report, which follows a string of similar accusations from other organizations, has no direct legal significance, but recommends that the UN Security Council sends the case to the International Criminal Court (ICC).

"The Committee believes that the prosecution of persons responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law would contribute to the completion of such violations," says the Goldstone report.

Uncertain

The ICC has already started to consider an application from the Palestinian Authority, which wants the court to investigate crimes committed by Israel, but it is uncertain whether it is feasible, because Palestine is not recognized as an independent state.

Initiates ICC investigations will chief prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, probably go after some of the most senior people in Israel, estimates the American Professor of International Law Francis A. Boyle, who for many years has been involved in war crimes trial.

"If Moreno-Ocampo choose one indictment, I cannot see him go after low-level soldiers. He will go after the leaders; Ashkenazi (Commander of the Israeli army, ed.), Defense Minister Barak, Olmert - those who ordered war, "said Francis Boyle told Berlingske Tidende.

Boyle, in particular was instrumental in persuading the Serbian President Milosevic to justice, is himself the man behind a third attempt to get Israel studied, namely to establish a war crimes tribunal for Israel under the UN.

Political resistance

All three proposals are, however, against fierce political resistance, including from the U.S., and is hardly reality. And even if the ICC investigated and condemned the Israelis for war crimes, Israel will probably blow on it when you have not joined the ICC assesses Francis Boyle.

Yigal Palmor, spokesman for the Israeli Foreign Ministry, will not answer clearly whether Israel would accept the judgments of the ICC.

'Israel is not a member of the ICC, so it has no authority over Israel. If the UN Security Council referral, the ICC can also look at non-member countries, but it is a rare and most hypothetical situation, "said Palmor Berlingske Tidende.

Whether Israel did nothing, would an ICC ruling, however, have consequences for the Israeli tips, notes Francis Boyle.

"There would be issued arrest warrants, and wherever they moved away, the State would be obliged to apprehend them and hand them to the ICC.

They could not travel much, "he says.


From: Z Net - The Spirit Of Resistance Lives
URL: http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/22636


*****************************************************************************

Can journalism schools be relevant in a world on the brink?

Journalism schools have much in common with the mainstream news media they traditionally serve. As the business model for conventional corporate journalism collapses and digital technologies reshape the media landscape, journalism schools struggle with parallel problems around curricula and personnel.

As I begin my third decade of teaching journalism, I hear more and more students doubting the relevance of journalism schools -- for good reasons. The best of our students are worried not just about whether they can find a job after graduation but also whether those jobs will allow them to contribute to shaping a decent future for a world on the brink.

Can journalism and journalism education be relevant as it becomes increasing clear that the political, economic, and social systems that structure our world are failing us on all counts? Do these institutions have the capacity to see past the problems of falling ad revenues and outdated curricula, and struggle to understand the crises of our age? Can journalists and journalism educators find the courage to grapple with these challenges?

The question isn't whether journalism and education are important in a democratic society but whether the institutions in which those two endeavors traditionally have been carried out can adapt -- not only to the specific changes in that industry, but to that world in crisis.

My answer is a tentative "yes, but" -- only if both enterprises jettison the illusions of neutrality that have hampered their ability to monitor the centers of power for citizens and model real critical thinking for students.

Journalism's business problems provide an opportunity for journalism education to remake itself, which should start with a declaration of independence from the mainstream media and a renunciation of the corporate media's allegiances to the existing power structure. Our only hope is in getting radical, going to the root of the problems.

Toward that end, I proposed a new mission statement to my faculty colleagues in the School of Journalism at the University of Texas at Austin. I argued that by stating bluntly the nature of the crises we face in today's world and breaking with our longstanding subordination to the industry, we could offer an exciting alternative to students who don't want to repeat the failures of our generation.

It quickly became clear that while some colleagues agreed with some aspects of the statement below, only a handful would endorse it as a mission statement. Some disagreed with my assessment of the crises we face, while others thought it politically ill-advised to criticize the industry and corporate power so directly. But nothing in that discussion dissuaded me from my conclusion that if journalism education is to be relevant in the coming decades, we must change course dramatically.

So, I offer this mission statement to a broader audience as one starting point for debate about the future of journalism schools, which must be connected to a discussion about the fundamental distribution of wealth and power in the larger world. Journalism alone can't turn around a dying culture, of course, but it can be part of the process by which a more just and sustainable alternative emerges.

Journalism for Justice/Storytelling for Sustainability: News Media Education for a New Future

Schools of journalism must recognize that our work goes forward in a society facing multiple crises -- political and cultural, economic and ecological. These crises are not the product of temporary downturns but evidence of a permanent decline if the existing systems and structures of power continue on their present trajectory.

These failing systems produce too little equality within the human family and too much devastation in the larger ecosystem. We face a world that is profoundly unjust in the distribution of wealth and power, and fundamentally unsustainable in our use of the ecological resources of the planet. The task of journalism is to deepen our understanding of these challenges and communicate that understanding to the public to foster the meaningful dialogue necessary for real democracy.

The best traditions of journalism are based in resistance to the illegitimate structures of authority at the heart of our problems. From Thomas Paine to Upton Sinclair, Ida B. Wells and Ida Tarbell, the most revered journalists have had the courage to take a stand for ordinary people and against arrogant concentrations of power. But today, commercial journalism is constrained by diversionary and deceptive claims to neutrality, leaving journalists trapped in a corporate-defined and -directed subservience to the status quo. Increasingly we live with a journalism that rarely speaks truth to power and routinely echoes the platitudes of the powerful. Even when journalists raise critical questions, too often it is within the parameters set by the wealthy and their political allies.

In a world in which an increasingly predatory global corporate economy leaves half the population living on less than $2.50 a day, can we ignore the call for justice? In a world in which all indicators of the health of the ecosystem that makes our lives possible are in dramatic decline, can we ignore the cry of the living world? Mass media have a moral responsibility to produce journalism for justice and storytelling for sustainability.

As the journalism industry faces a broken business model and struggles for solutions, there are great opportunities to reshape journalism to serve people and the planet, following the traditions of the spirited independent journalists of the past and present. The curriculum for this should not only offer training for a job but also inspire a collective search for the values and ideas that can animate a just and sustainable society. We invite you to join us in this exciting time for journalism. By remembering the inspirational lessons of our past and facing honestly the problems of the present, we help make possible a new future in which justice and sustainability define not just our dreams but our lives.

A note to critics: Some might argue that this mission statement threatens to "politicize the classroom." This kind of complaint is based on the naïve notion that a curriculum in the humanities and social sciences can be magically constructed outside of, and unaffected by, the distribution of wealth and power in the larger society. The choices that go into all teaching -- from the identification of relevant problems, to the selection of appropriate materials, to the analyses offered in lectures -- are based on claims about the nature of a good life and a good society. The important questions are whether instructors are open with students about how those choices are made and can justify those choices on intellectual grounds. In other words, there is a politics to all teaching, but good teaching is more than the assertion of one's politics.

When a department constructs a curriculum that supports the existing distribution of wealth and power, challenges rarely arise. Perhaps the most politicized departments on any college campus are in the business school, where the highly ideological assertions of corporate capitalism are rarely challenged and the curriculum is built on that ideology. In a healthy educational institution with real academic freedom, we should encourage a diversity of approaches to complex questions. This mission statement identifies problems and suggests we consider the systemic and structural roots of those problems without asserting simplistic solutions. Such an approach honors the best traditions in journalism and scholarship, offering a path for struggling with difficult questions rather than dictating simplistic answers.


----------------------


Robert Jensen is a professor in the School of Journalism of the University of Texas at Austin and a board member of the Third Coast Activist Resource Center, http://thirdcoastactivist.org/. His latest book is All My Bones Shake: Seeking a Progressive Path to the Prophetic Voice (Soft Skull Press, 2009). He also is the author of Getting Off: Pornography and the End of Masculinity (South End Press, 2007); The Heart of Whiteness: Confronting Race, Racism and White Privilege (City Lights, 2005); Citizens of the Empire: The Struggle to Claim Our Humanity (City Lights, 2004); and Writing Dissent: Taking Radical Ideas from the Margins to the Mainstream (Peter Lang, 2002). Jensen can be reached at rjensen@uts.cc.utexas.edu and his articles can be found online at http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~rjensen/index.html.


From: Z Space - The Spirit Of Resistance Lives
URL: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/commentaries/3984