Showing posts with label kushner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label kushner. Show all posts

Friday, April 20, 2018

NAKBA, KHALADI



THE ABSURD TIMES






Latuff's take on the Nakba.  May his country recover from the fascist coup in motion now.


THE NAKBA
BY
LEITH

The Nakba, or catastrophe, is the Palestinian word given to the invasion of their lands by Zionists and the systematic expulsion of many Palestinians (many of whom still have their original deeds and door keys).  An Israeli sympathizer call this "Independence," but from what is too gloomy to contemplate right now.

We have an interview with Rashid Khaladi, current Professor of Arab Studies at Columbia University and who holds the Edward Said chair.  It helps to learn a bit about Edward Said.  He was a nearly concert-level pianist and a close friend of Daniel Barenboim and together they attempted to bring Palestinians and Israelis together through music.  His book, Orientalism,  should be read even today for a great background to western biases against the Arab Culture. 

Kaladi was a good friend of Obama in Chicago until Obama ran for national office at which time they were forced to separate.  One of Obama's failures was in not inviting him to his inauguration. 

Today, there is a great fear that peace might break out at any time.  Arms manufacturers and politicians in Israel dread this idea and the current demonstrations along the Gaza border are seen as a great threat as they are non-violent.  So far, dozens have been killed and thousands wounded by Israelis, snipers especially.  A sniper can kill from isolation several hundreds of meters away without detection so he is nice and safe. 

Still, the non-violence continues remorselessly, despite the efforts to the Trump, Kushner, Netenyahu troika and will continue for another month until the date of the Nakba.  Here is the interview:


Palestinian protests against the Israeli occupation are continuing this week as Israel begins to mark the country's 70th anniversary of its founding in 1948. According to the Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza, Israeli forces have killed 33 Palestinian protesters over the past three weeks since the "Great March of Return" protests began to commemorate the mass expulsion of Palestinians during Israel's establishment. Palestinian authorities estimate nearly 4,300 Palestinians have been injured in the peaceful protests—many were shot with live ammunition or rubber-coated steel bullets. Gaza authorities have also accused Israel of deliberately targeting journalists and medics. Since the protests began, one journalist—Yaser Murtaja—was killed, and 66 journalists were injured. In addition, 44 medics have been wounded, and 19 ambulances were reportedly targeted. The protest marches are set to last to until May 15, recognized as the official Israeli Independence Day. Palestinians mark the date as Nakba Day, or "Day of the Catastrophe." For more we're joined by Rashid Khalidi, Edward Said Professor of Arab Studies at Columbia University. He's the author of several books, his most recent is titled "Brokers of Deceit: How the U.S. Has Undermined Peace in the Middle East."


Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!Democracynow.org, The War and Peace Report. I'm Amy Goodman.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: And I'm Nermeen Shaikh. Welcome to our listeners and viewers around the country and around the world. Palestinian protests against the Israeli occupation are continuing this week as Israel begins to mark the country's 70th anniversary of its founding in 1948. According to the Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza, Israeli forces have killed 33 Palestinian protesters over the past three weeks since the Great March of Return protests began, to commemorate the mass expulsion of Palestinians during Israel's establishment.
Palestinian authorities estimate nearly 4,300 Palestinians have been injured in the peaceful protests. Many were shot with live ammunition or rubber-coated steel bullets. Gaza authorities have also accused Israel of deliberately targeting journalists and medics. Since the protests began, one journalist, Yaser Murtaja, was killed and 66 journalists were injured. In addition, 44 medics have been wounded and 19 ambulances were reportedly targeted.
AMY GOODMAN: The protest marches are set to last until May 15th, recognized as the official Israeli Independence Day. Palestinians mark the date as Nakba Day or "Day of the Catastrophe" when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, their expulsion began. On Wednesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu began celebrations of Israel's 70th Independence Day at a ceremony in Jerusalem with a nod to U.S. plans to move its embassy there from Tel Aviv.
PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU: We all praise the historic decision by President Trump to recognize Jerusalem as our capital and to move the embassy there of the world's biggest power. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, America.
AMY GOODMAN: On Wednesday, Trump tweeted, "Best wishes to Prime Minister @Netanyahu and all of the people of Israel on the 70th Anniversary of your Great Independence. We have no better friends anywhere. Looking forward to moving our Embassy to Jerusalem next month!"
For more, we're joined by Rashid Khalidi, Edward Said Professor of Arab Studies at Columbia University. The author of a number of books, his most recent Brokers of Deceit: How the U.S. Has Undermined Peace in the Middle East. Talk about what is happening right now in Gaza. It is almost getting no attention in the United States. But this period of time leading up to March 15th.
RASHID KHALIDI: May 15th.
AMY GOODMAN: May 15th.
RASHID KHALIDI: It is remarkable that it has gotten as little attention as it has in this country, because this is a new phase. It is almost entirely nonviolent. The Israelis try and focus on other issues, claiming that it is violent or people are throwing things or whatever, but you have literally tens of thousands of people walking to the fence, camping along the fence, carrying out protest activities, which are then met with a hail of hundreds of thousands of bullets. The numbers speak for themselves—the hundreds of people who have been—the thousands of people who have been wounded, the dozens who have been killed.
What it shows is I think the Israeli security establishment is terrified of Palestinian nonviolence. Any narrative in which the Palestinians use violence is easy for them to master. But a narrative in which the Palestinians walk towards the fence and ask for their rights is one that they are very uncomfortable with.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: This isn't the first protest of its kind in Israel-Palestine, but is it the first one in which the Israelis have responded so disproportionately?
RASHID KHALIDI: It is not the first of its kind. The most underreported story in Palestine is the non-violent nature of an enormous amount of protests. We pay a lot of attention to violent actions. But the first intifada was largely nonviolent. For three or four years, Palestinians were engaged in massive nonviolent protests, which were met with systematic repression. Rabin said "Break their bones." That was his order to his soldiers when he was defense minister. So it's not the first time that the Israelis have used this kind of violence. I don't think that they've ever gotten to the point of shooting down literally thousands of people in this way, so maybe that is unprecedented.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: And what do you think accounts for that?
RASHID KHALIDI: They are very, very worried about two things. They're worried about the fact that the Palestinians might actually finally realize that nonviolent action is smarter and might be more effective. And secondly, they don't like one of the demands of this protest movement, which is the issue of return. Because it brings up the issues that the Israelis hoped had been buried from 1948 onwards, which is to say their expulsion of three quarters of a million Palestinians back in April, May and so forth, of 1948, their confiscation of their property and their refusal to allow them to return. And that's what this March of Return is about.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: Are there additional demands?
RASHID KHALIDI: That is the main focus of it. That is the main focus of it. Almost the entire population of Gaza, with a very few exceptions, are refugees. And so they are living in this cooped-up enormous prison camp, right across the border from the lands that they once owned and cultivated.
AMY GOODMAN: So explain the organizing that went into this mass nonviolent protest that is happening particularly on Fridays after prayer.
RASHID KHALIDI: Right. This started off as a civil society initiative, which was then of course picked up, cynically, picked up by Hamas, which has realized the bankruptcy of its own approach and its unpopularity with Palestinians. But it started off as a movement by young activists who wanted to do something. They are living in this pressure cooker of Gaza.
AMY GOODMAN: Describe it.
RASHID KHALIDI: They can't get out. They can't go anywhere. It is the highest population concentration on earth. To get a permit to go to get medical care or to study abroad or to visit your family in the West Bank or Jordan is almost impossible for the overwhelming majority of Gazans. So they are in prison in Gaza. They're suffering without enough electricity. There is sewage. I mean, one could go on and on.
AMY GOODMAN: Let me go back to just some of the incidents that have taken place. Earlier this month, a Palestinian stepped forward to say he was the unknown man who was shot by Israeli sniper in a gun sight video recorded last December that went viral. The video captures the sound of a gunshot, the Palestinian man falling to the ground, then a voice celebrating in Hebrew and cursing the sniper's victim. Tamer Abu Daka says he was shot in the leg without warning as he stood about 200 meters from Israel's fortified border. He told Al Jazeera he posed no threat to Israeli troops.
TAMER ABU DAKA: Some young people near the border were lying on the ground. They couldn't get out. So I came to protect them and ask them to go back. Then the Israelis shot me. How am I a danger to the Israelis? We were on our land. We didn't cross. I was in the buffer zone. I had no weapons in my hands. I had nothing.
AMY GOODMAN: Israel's military has criticized the soldiers who shot Abu Daka for cheering, but has defended the shooting itself, with Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman saying the sniper deserves a medal. And he not only said it for the sniper who shot him last December, but he's saying that no Gazan is innocent. Explain the significance of Avigdor Lieberman's statements and who he is.
RASHID KHALIDI: Well, this is part of a systematic defamation of the entire Palestinian people. What Lieberman and the security establishment is essentially saying is the Palestinians are a terrorist people, and whatever they do is beyond the pale. And I think the thing to focus on here is the use of snipers to gun down people at a sufficient distance from this—you can see in the video we just saw—at a sufficient distance from the fence that it is impossible that they could cause any harm to the Israelis themselves.
So heavily armored Israeli soldiers with sniper rifles at hundreds of meters are picking off systematically Palestinian protestors or people who try to approach the fence or whatever. And that this is a policy that the government is proud of, that Lieberman is praising the snipers who have shot down literally thousands of people? I think it tells us a lot about Israel's attitude toward Palestinians, that they are subhuman.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: I think one of the perceptions that is quite common—you said earlier that Palestinians are now increasingly disenchanted with Hamas, and Hamas is not very popular in Palestine and with the residents of Gaza. Can you explain why people still have the sense, in fact, that the majority of Palestinians are sympathetic with or support Hamas, and how that sense kind of emboldens Israel to carry out the kinds of—the disproportionate violence of which we have been speaking?
RASHID KHALIDI: If you go back and look at the way in which Israel has dealt with the whole issue of Palestine and the Palestinian national movement, they always demonize whatever appears to be the leading movement. When it was the PLO or Fatah, whatever, they were terrorists, they were beyond the pale, you couldn't talk to them. And the same is now true of Hamas. I think the interesting thing is not just Hamas—all of the political parties are discredited in the eyes of most Palestinians. They seem to have failed. Hamas with its policy of—so-called policy of—resistance, which in fact is a sham. Hamas prevents people from firing rockets from the Gaza Strip. It is carrying out without a security agreement the same kind of role of protecting Israel that the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah is carrying out with a security agreement. Palestinians see that.
They see the cynicism of that and they see that both sides, that is to say the PA in Ramallah and Hamas in Gaza in fact are bankrupt—
NERMEEN SHAIKH: So why is Hamas doing that? And why are they…?
RASHID KHALIDI: Why are they doing it?
NERMEEN SHAIKH: Yeah, why…?
RASHID KHALIDI: Out of fear of Israeli retaliation.
AMY GOODMAN: Is the reconciliation agreement between Fatah and Hamas fracturing?
RASHID KHALIDI: It doesn't seem to be going anywhere, sadly. I mean, this is the overwhelming demand of the Palestinian people, that these useless politicians get together and end this meaningless split, so that the weaker party, the Palestinians, can at least present a unified front.
AMY GOODMAN: Let's talk about the journalists who have been killed. Let's talk about the Palestinian journalist, Yaser Murtaja, who was fatally shot by the Israeli army while covering the protests along the Israel-Gaza border. Photos show the 30-year-old journalist wearing a flak jacket clearly marked "press" at the time of the shooting. This is Murtaja's mother and brother speaking after his killing.
MOTAZEM MURTAJA: I was next to him at the protest. Targeting the journalists was very clear, to the point that they targeted the two of us directly using snipers and gas bombs.
YUSRA MURTAJA: We thought it was just an injury and he will be injured for a while and then God will heal him and he will come out of it like the rest of the injured people. I didn't expect him to die.
AMY GOODMAN: That is what happened in Gaza. And then you have today's headline in the West Bank: press freedom groups are expressing alarm over the arrest of a journalist early Wednesday by Palestinian security forces. Relatives say the officers presented a search warrant, arrested Hazem Naser without mention of what he's being charged with. He works for Najah Broadcasting Channel, which frequently covers Israel's demolition of Palestinian homes, arrest of Palestinians. He's arrested in the middle of the night. Murtaja was killed.
RASHID KHALIDI: I think the thing to say about the murder of this journalist and the murder of many of these people is that there is a policy of targeted assassination. It is not just snipers just randomly shooting people. It is an intelligent system in which collects information on everybody who is in activist, and these people are then being targeted. They are murdering specific people. They're not just shooting at random. They're doing that as well, but some of these, many of these killings—there's a wonderful book by a man named Ronen Bergman on the history of Israel's targeted assassinations. This is a policy of killing Palestinian leadership. They have been doing it for decades and decades.
And now they realize that some of the most dangerous people are not people who are firing rockets, but rather people who are organizing popular demonstrations and nonviolent action.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: Do you see any transformation or intensification of that policy on Israel's part as a consequence of Trump's election and his—one of the many steps that he says he going to take is to move the capital from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. So what kind of message is that giving to Netanyahu and those who support him?
RASHID KHALIDI: Frankly, they've always had coverage from Washington for whatever they did. But I agree—I think your question points to a reality, which is they have even greater impunity with a president like Trump who will give them complete carte blanche for whatever they want to do.
AMY GOODMAN: And is moving the U.S. embassy.
RASHID KHALIDI: Precisely.
AMY GOODMAN: The significance of that, now following—the U.S. saying it is doing that right around the 70th anniversary? Guatemala says it will follow suit.
RASHID KHALIDI: This is really very important. Jerusalem is the most important of all of the issues in the Palestine-Israel conflict. The Trump Administration's decision that it recognizes, apparently from what they've said, the entirety of Jerusalem as sovereign Israeli territory, has implications for the entire conflict. It has implications for the rest of the occupied territories. It has implications for Israeli annexations, not just of Jerusalem—of Golan Heights, of other areas that they may choose to annex. So they are giving them a, basically, open season in terms of further annexations, further expansions and so on and so forth, by this Jerusalem thing. It is not just recognizing Israel's capital as Jerusalem or moving the embassy. It has all kinds of other implications.
AMY GOODMAN: What will happen on May 15th?
RASHID KHALIDI: The consulate in West Jerusalem will be turned into an embassy.
AMY GOODMAN: And what will happen at the wall, the Gaza-Israel wall?
RASHID KHALIDI: I have no idea. But at the rate at which things are going, unfortunately, we're probably likely to see even more savage, vicious, brutal murderous repression.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, Rashid Khalidi, we want to ask you to stay with us as we move on to Syria. Rashid Khalidi is the Edward Said Professor of Arab Studies at Columbia University.
His latest book Brokers of Deceit: How the U.S. Has Undermined Peace in the Middle East.
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Thursday, January 11, 2018

GAZA V. KUSHNER


THE ABSURD TIMES




I ave to say, belatedly, that this was first published BEFORE Trump's "shithole comments.  I think Haiti voted with him on Israel and the capital.

[There is usually a caption here, but this speaks for itself.  The question is why we have not heard a word about what has been going on over there?  We have been deluged with news of Sloppy Steve and Twiddledede Trump, Twitter rants, Harvey Weinstein, is Ivanka really a "dumb as a brick" that we have had no time for such frivolity as Gaza and Palestine.  Only the photo a a 14 year old girl slapping an Israeli soldier (perhaps after being slapped first and certainly after her brother had been beaten and arrested) got any attention.  Mudslides in California.  What horrors!  Forget about Yemen.  Anyway, time for some information for a change.]

GAZA

The subject of Gaza has been pretty much banned from discussion in the U.S.  Some states are even trying to pass anti-BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) discussion illegal.  In sorth, there is an all out attack on discussion of what Israel is doing. 

To compound this, there seems to be another attempt at a corporate attempt to take over Pacifica Radio over which Democracy Now is broadcast, although discussion seems to have faded for now.

At any rate, we might as well get out all of the information we can before the net is seized and speech shut down completely in the interests of Corporate Power.

Here then is Dr. Finkelstein, noted scholar and author, driven out of academia by Derschowitz and Company, but still writing and publishing.  He spoke with Amy Goodman for the entire hour without a sign of invasion from outside.  This is not the original order of the segments, but here it is in its entirety:

Israel is facing a possible International Criminal Court war crimes probe over its 2014 assault on Gaza and the ongoing expansion of settlements in the occupied West Bank. Despite the threat, the Israeli defense minister announced on Tuesday Israel would approve the construction of hundreds of new settlement homes in the West Bank. This comes as Sweden criticized the Trump administration for threatening to cut off hundreds of millions of dollars of annual aid to the U.N.'s relief agency for Palestinian refugees. Palestinian legislator Hanan Ashrawi compared President Trump's threat to cut off aid money to blackmail. For more, we speak with author and scholar Norman Finkelstein. His new book is titled "Gaza: An Inquest into Its Martyrdom." Norman Finkelstein is the son of Holocaust survivors. He is the author of many other books, including "The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Human Suffering" and "Knowing Too Much: Why the American Jewish Romance with Israel Is Coming to an End."


Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: Israel is facing a possible International Criminal Court war crimes probe over its 2014 assault on Gaza and the ongoing expansion of settlements in the occupied West Bank. According to the Israeli TV station Channel 10, Israel's National Security Council recently warned Israeli lawmakers that the ICC could open an investigation at some point this year. Despite the warning, the Israeli defense minister announced Tuesday Israel will approve the construction of hundreds of new settlement homes in the West Bank. Palestinian leaders began calling for an ICC probe soon after the 2014 assault on Gaza, which killed more than 2,100 Palestinians, including over 500 children.
This comes as Israel and the United States are facing growing international condemnation over their treatment of Palestinians. Last month, the United Nations voted 128 to 9 in favor of a resolution calling for the United States to drop its recent recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Meanwhile, on Tuesday, Sweden criticized the Trump administration for threatening to cut off hundreds of millions of dollars of annual aid to the U.N.'s relief agency for Palestinian refugees. Sweden's ambassador to the United Nations said the cutting off of the aid, quote, "would be destabilizing for the region." Palestinian legislator Hanan Ashrawi compared President Trump's threat to cut off aid money to blackmail.
HANAN ASHRAWI: I would say that Palestinian rights are not for sale, and we will not succumb to blackmail. There are imperatives and requirements for peace. And unilaterally, President Trump has destroyed them. He has even sabotaged our efforts at achieving a just peace and getting freedom and dignity for the Palestinian people. By recognizing occupied Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, he has not only disqualified himself as a peace broker or a mediator by taking sides and by becoming complicit in Israel's occupation, he has also totally sabotaged, he has totally destroyed, the very foundations of peace.
AMY GOODMAN: Part of the U.N. aid money goes to refugees living in occupied Gaza, the most densely populated area in the world. For years, the United Nations and aid groups have warned conditions in Gaza are almost unlivable due to the decade-long Israeli military blockade and multiple Israeli assaults on the region. According to the International Committee of the Red Cross, seven out of 10 people in Gaza live off humanitarian aid. The unemployment rate, 44 percent. Electricity cuts can reach up to 20 hours every day.
Gaza is the subject of a new book by the author and scholar Norman Finkelstein. It's titled Gaza: An Inquest into Its Martyrdom. Norman Finkelstein is the son of Holocaust survivors. He's the author of many other books, including The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Human Suffering and Knowing Too Much: Why the American Jewish Romance with Israel Is Coming to an End.
Norman Finkelstein, welcome back to Democracy Now! Let's begin with the latest news of this report of a possible ICC, International Criminal Court, war crimes probe into the Israeli assault on Gaza in 2014.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Well, there's been long-standing ICC investigations of Israeli conduct, and this is another phase, the report in the Israeli press that it's moving along. The chief prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, she has been very soft, as has the previous ICCchief prosecutor, when it comes to prosecuting anyone except Africans. Since the founding of the ICC in 1998, the only persons who have ever been tried are African leaders or Africans accused of significant human rights crimes. It's called—by many African states, it's called the International Caucasian Court, not Criminal Court.
What will come of this, it's unclear. It's possible that the chief prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, will use the Palestine case to demonstrate that not only Africans are prosecuted, as a way of demonstrating that she's going to break the precedent. I, myself, have contacted her, because, as I said, it's been an ongoing process, and what happened in 2014, which I discuss at length in my book, is part of the investigation. And people who know her and have been enthusiastic about my manuscript have also contacted her.
I would also just want to make one point. Of course an investigation would be a good thing. Of course an investigation is warranted. However, we have to bear in mind that the Palestinians have won many important political and legal victories. In 2004, the International Court of Justice found in favor of the Palestinians across the board. Then there was the Goldstone Report, which was another important victory. The problem is not that the Palestinians lack in political and legal victories. The problem is that the Palestinian leadership, or so-called leadership, has never translated the legal and political victories into something practical on the ground. And so, even if—and I'm hoping it will happen—but even if there's an ICC victory for the Palestinians, even on that remote possibility, the problem is: What do you do with it? And the Palestinian leadership has never done anything with its victories.
AMY GOODMAN: So, before we get into your inquest into Gaza, I want to also ask about this threat of the U.S. cutting off millions of dollars to UNRWA, to the Palestinian refugee agency. Explain the significance of this agency and why Palestinians rely on this so much.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: OK. First of all, you have to bear in mind that 70 percent of Palestinians in Gaza—let's just call them Gazans—70 percent of Gazans are classified as refugees. That means, technically, actual refugees and children of refugees. But under the categorization used in Gaza, they're all classified as refugees. So that's 70 percent. Secondly, half of Gaza's population, or slightly more, are children. And so you have this overwhelmingly refugee child population, and they rely overwhelmingly on UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency.
UNRWA is financed between 25 and 30 percent by the United States, and that comes to about $300 million a year. And so, the threat of cutting the money to UNRWA would be—it would be devastating for an already devastated population, overwhelmingly children. Nonetheless, I would like to keep things in proportion. So, it would be a catastrophe, no doubt about it, if UNRWA is defunded by the United States. However, let's look at the numbers. We're talking about $300 million annually. Mohammad bin Salman, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, he paid $500 million for a yacht. That would have covered all of UNRWA's expenses, American—the American portion, for more than a year. He paid $450 million for a da Vinci painting. That would have covered all U.S. expenses, again, for more than a year. He paid $300 million for a house in Versailles. That would have covered all the U.N. expense—UNRWA expenses by the United States. And God only knows how much money he paid for Tom Friedman's column in The New York Times.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, why don't you explain what you're referring to, the op-ed piece in The New York Times about Mohammad bin Salman—
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Yeah. There are—
AMY GOODMAN: —the crown prince of Saudi Arabia.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: There are young people here, so I have to be careful about my language. But all it was was a very expensive—it was a—
AMY GOODMAN: Yeah, be careful. No cursing on here.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: No, it's not cursing. But it was a protracted—it was a verbal blowjob, probably the most expensive one in world history, that was administered to Mohammad bin Salman, the column he wrote in the Times. It was vintage Tom Friedman. He goes into Saudi Arabia for three days, says everything is wonderful, talks to the crown prince's sister, who's representative of the people of Saudi Arabia, says they're all very enthusiastic about him, and then he walks away and writes this column.
AMY GOODMAN: Hardly mentioning in this column, among other issues, Yemen. Mohammad bin Salman, who is in charge of the U.S.-backed Saudi assault on Yemen.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Yes. Well, Yemen is—look, the fact of the matter is that every reactionary, every regressive movement in the Arab world is financed by the Saudis, whether it's Yemen, whether it's Bahrain, whether it's Syria, whether it's Egypt. Everywhere, it's the Saudi money. And it's also, incidentally, the Saudi money that keeps the Palestinian Authority afloat. That's why they have to pay all—they have to pay deference to the Saudis. It's a wretched, parasitic regime.
AMY GOODMAN: What about Jared Kushner's relationship with Mohammad bin Salman? And how does that play in here? He's gone repeatedly to Saudi Arabia. Jared Kushner, senior adviser to his father-in-law, President Trump, apparently is in charge of the Middle East peace process. And they have, apparently, cooked up a plan—Jared Kushner and Mohammad bin Salman—for peace in the Middle East.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Well, first of all, we have to look at the context: Jared Kushner knows nothing about anything. Jared Kushner is only there because he's married to Trump's daughter. He's the son of Charles Kushner. Charles Kushner is a real estate mogul, a billionaire who has the distinguishing characteristic of actually having been arrested and spending time in jail. Now, that's very rare—
AMY GOODMAN: By Chris Christie, when he was a prosecutor in New Jersey.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Right. That's very rare in the United States for a billionaire to spend time in jail. Among other things, he hired a prostitute and had her photographed in order to—hired a prostitute to have his brother-in-law photographed, and then presented the video to his wife at some family gathering. Jared Kushner, he got into Harvard University because the year he applied, his father gave $2.3 million to Harvard. Everybody agreed he didn't have the grades, he didn't have the test scores. These are people who profit—who profit from their parents' profit. There's no known knowledge that he possesses about the Middle East.
And incidentally, it's the same thing with Mohammad bin Salman. His only interest is—has only one interest. And, of course, the interest is to maintain his power. But the Saudi regime is a parasitic regime. Work—literally, in Saudi Arabia, "work" is the four-letter word. If you say that you have a job, that you work, the Saudi ruling class looks at you with contempt. "You work?" And so, the Saudis know—in their now battle with Iran, they know that they couldn't prevail against Iran on a military level, on a strategic level. You know, Iran is a 5,000-year-old civilization. It's a very impressive place. And so they're hoping that the United States and Israel will take their chestnuts out of the fire. So they want Israel and the United States to go to war with Iran. And so they're willing to do anything. You know, they'll give away Palestine. They'll give away this studio. They'll purchase it and give it away to get the United States and Israel to do their bidding. So, we're not really talking about a peace plan. We're talking about handing Israel everything it wants, in exchange for Israel and the United States taking out Iran.
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.
srael faces a possible International Criminal Court war crimes probe over its 2014 assault on Gaza, which killed more than 2,100 Palestinians, including over 500 children. For more, we speak with Norman Finkelstein, author of the new book "Gaza: An Inquest into Its Martyrdom." He is the author of many other books, including "The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Human Suffering" and "Knowing Too Much: Why the American Jewish Romance with Israel Is Coming to an End."


Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: Our guest today, author and scholar Norman Finkelstein, author of the new book Gaza: An Inquest into Its Martyrdom, the book published as Israel is facing a possible International Criminal Court war crimes probe over its 2014 assault on Gaza, which killed more than 2,100 Palestinians, including over 500 children. I want to turn to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu talking about the 2014 military offensive in Gaza. He was speaking to Brian Williams of NBC News.
PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU: You know, at a certain point, you say, "What choice have you got? What would you do?" What would you do if American cities, where you're sitting now, Brian, would be rocketed, would absorb hundreds of rockets? You know? You know what would—you'd say? You'd say to your leader, "A man's got to do what a man's got to do." And you'd say, "A country's got to do what a country's got to do." We have to defend ourselves. We try to do it with the minimum amount of force or with targeting civil—military targets as best as we can. But we'll act to defend ourselves. No country can live like this.
AMY GOODMAN: That was Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu justifying the 2014 military offensive in Gaza, that the International Criminal Court is apparently about to open up a war crimes investigation into.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Well, Benjamin Netanyahu says two things: Number one, Israel had no option, and, number two, that it used the minimum amount of force. Well, let's look quickly at those two points.
Point number one, everybody agreed that the reason they went—once the fighting began, Hamas had one goal. The goal was to end the siege of Gaza, to lift the siege. Under international law, that siege is illegal. It constitutes collective punishment, which is illegal under international law. The siege has been condemned by everybody in the international community. He had an option. He didn't have to use force. He simply had to lift the siege. And then there wouldn't have been a conflict with Gaza.
Number two, he claims he used minimum force. There's a lot to say about that. You can decide for yourself whether it's minimum force when Israel leveled 18,000 homes. How many Israeli homes were leveled? One. Israel killed 550 children. How many Israeli children were killed? One. Now, you might say, "Well, that's because Israel has a sophisticated civil defense system, or Israel has Iron Dome." I won't go into that; I don't have time now. But there's a simple test. The test is: What did the Israeli combatants themselves see? What did they themselves say?
We have the documentation, a report put out by the Israeli ex-service—ex-combatant organization, Breaking the Silence. It's about 110 pages. You couldn't believe it. You know, I'll tell you, Amy, I still remember when I was reading it. I was in Turkey. I was going to a book festival. I was sitting in the back of a car and reading these descriptions of what the soldiers did. My skin was crawling. I was like shaking. Soldier after soldier after soldier. Now, bear in mind, you want to say they're partisan, the soldiers? Read the testimonies. They're not contrite. They're not remorseful. They're just describing what happened. There's no contrition. These aren't lefties, supporters of BDS. What do they describe? One after another after another says, "Our orders were shoot to kill anything that moves and anything that doesn't move." One after another after another says, "Israel used insane amounts of firepower in Gaza. Israel used lunatic amounts of firepower in Gaza."
AMY GOODMAN: These were the Israeli soldiers.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: The soldiers, they're describing it. One after another says, "We blew up, destroyed, systematically, methodically razed every house in sight." What does that mean, "every house in sight"? Seventy percent of the people in Gaza, they're refugees. It means they lost their homeland. The last thing they have, the only thing they have, the only thing they've ever had, is their home. And the Israelis went in like a wrecking crew with their D9 bulldozers.
AMY GOODMAN: Explain how it began.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: How what?
AMY GOODMAN: How the 2014 Israeli military invasion of Gaza began.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: No, these are hard things to explain, because it depends on where you want to start. Where I start is, at the end of April 2014, a national unity government was formed between the Palestinian Authority and Hamas. And the United States and the EU, surprisingly, they didn't break off negotiations with this new unity government, although it "included a terrorist organization," and it enraged Netanyahu.
AMY GOODMAN: You're using air quotes. You're saying what the U.S. called a terrorist organization.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Well, what Israel calls a terrorist organization, because, at that time, the U.S. was willing to negotiate. And Netanyahu went into a rage, because he was being ignored over Iran, now he's being ignored over Hamas. And so, he finds a pretext—I don't want to go into the details now—he finds a pretext to try to provoke Hamas into reacting, so that he can say, "You see? They're a terrorist organization." And then it quickly spiraled downwards, as it typically does. And then Israel went in. There was the air assault.
And then, July 17th, the day the Malaysian airliner went down over the Ukraine, Netanyahu used that moment. The plane was downed in the afternoon, and he launches the ground invasion in the evening. You would be surprised how finely attuned the Israelis are to the American news cycle. They begin Operation Protective Edge in 2008 with Obama's election to the presidency on November 4th. They begin the ground invasion of Gaza during—well, [ 2008 ] was Operation Cast Lead. They begin Cast Lead on November 4th, 2008, when Obama is elected president. They begin Operation Protective Edge, the ground invasion, on July 17th. When the airliner is downed over the Ukraine, all the cameras are now riveted over there, and so they launch the attack.
And the attack was—well, let me just quote to you Peter Maurer, who is the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross. And I was even surprised by his remark. Peter Maurer said—and I'm quoting him, paraphrasing him, but almost verbatim. He said, "In my entire professional life, I have never seen destruction as I saw in Gaza." And that's coming from the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross, who is accustomed to seeing, witnessing war zones. What was done there was—it was a crime against humanity. You take a place like Shejaiya. Shejaiya, it's a very densely populated neighborhood of 90,000 people. Israel dropped, believe it or not—it's hard to even fathom—more than 100 one-ton bombs on Shejaiya. More than 100 one-ton bombs on Shejaiya. Did the same thing to Rafah. Did the same thing to Khuza'a. Did the same thing to the whole Gaza Strip. And then you have this guy come along, and he said, "We used discriminate force. We used proportionate force."
AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to go to after the—an attack on a U.N. shelter in 2014, the Israeli military attacking, in Gaza, which killed many Palestinian civilians. The spokesperson for UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, broke down and cried during interview on Al Jazeera. His name is Christopher Gunness.
CHRISTOPHER GUNNESS: The rights of Palestinians, even their children, are wholesale denied, and it's appalling.
AMY GOODMAN: Christopher Gunness is starting to cry.
CHRISTOPHER GUNNESS: [crying]
AMY GOODMAN: That's Christopher Gunness, as the camera turns away from him, his head in his hands, later tweeting, "There are times when tears speak more eloquently than words. Mine pale into insignificance compared with Gaza's." Norman Finkelstein, we have two minutes left.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: I happen to know Chris Gunness. He's a really terrific guy. I hope he doesn't lose his job because I said that. But he is a special guy. He's an unusual guy. He worked in Gaza. He's married to a man, he's married to a Jewish man, and he's married to an Israeli man. So you can imagine that Hamas was not thrilled with him. But he's very principled, and the tears were real. Anybody who lives there, has even passed through there, their heart breaks at what's been done to the people of Gaza.
AMY GOODMAN: What do you think needs to be done now?
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Well, it's clear the first thing that has to be done is the siege has to be lifted. And the U.N. Human Rights Council, although its report was a total and complete whitewash and disgrace—Mary McGowan Davis was the author of it—they did say, according to the law, the siege has to be lifted immediately and unconditionally. That's the law: has to be lifted immediately and unconditionally. That's the first thing that has to be done. The siege has to end. The occupation has to end. And the people of Gaza, after 50 godforsaken years, should have the right to breathe and live a normal life.
AMY GOODMAN: And how do you think that's going to happen?
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: It's a very tough moment right now, but there are always possibilities. In my opinion, there is the possibility in Gaza of a nonviolent mass resistance, trying to force open the checkpoints and the West Bank. I don't have time to go through it now. I think a mass strategy of smacking Israeli soldiers—women and girls—in the footsteps of Ahed Tamimi, that kind of strategy—
AMY GOODMAN: Who faces many years in prison right now.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Yes. Nobody's saying it's without risks.
AMY GOODMAN: Ten seconds.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: But just as the children of Gaza, when they threw stones at the Israelis in 1988 during the First Intifada, shifted international public opinion, I think the people—the women of Gaza, if they have a "Me Too" campaign—"I smacked an Israeli soldier today"—I think that can win international public opinion also.
AMY GOODMAN: You talked about a nonviolent campaign—
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Yeah, I don't consider—
AMY GOODMAN: —throughout the occupied areas.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Look, I'm in the tradition of Gandhi. And Gandhi was very clear: When you're facing huge odds against you and you use kinds of force like scratching, slapping, kicking—
AMY GOODMAN: Three seconds.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: —Gandhi said that's not violence. And I agree with him.
AMY GOODMAN: Norman Finkelstein, author of Gaza: An Inquest into Its Martyrdom.
sraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing a domestic political controversy after an Israeli TV station aired a secret audio recording of his son from outside a strip club in 2015. In the recording, Yair Netanyahu can be heard talking about prostitutes and demanding money from the son of an Israeli gas tycoon. Yair implies his father—Prime Minister Netanyahu—helped push through a $20 billion deal to benefit the businessman, saying, "My dad arranged $20 billion for your dad, and you're whining with me about 400 shekels." This comes at a time when Benjamin Netanyahu is facing multiple corruption investigation


Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to ask you about Benjamin Netanyahu and the corruption investigations he's facing. Of course, Benjamin Netanyahu recently speaking about his very close relationship with the Kushners, sleeping in Jared Kushner's bedroom when he visited the United States, when he was a little boy. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu facing a domestic political controversy after an Israeli TV station aired a secret audio recording of his son from outside a strip club in 2015. In the recording, Yair Netanyahu can be heard talking about prostitutes, demanding money from the son of an Israeli gas tycoon. Yair implies that his father, Prime Minister Netanyahu, helped push through a $20 billion deal to benefit the businessman, saying, quote, "My dad arranged $20 billion for your dad, and you're whining with me about 400 shekels," this coming at a time when Prime Minister Netanyahu is facing multiple corruption investigations.
In September, Yair Netanyahu also faced controversy when he posted an anti-Semitic cartoon on Facebook. White supremacists, including former Klan leader David Duke, praised Yair Netanyahu, posting an image depicting billionaire investor George Soros at the top of a food chain, dangling the world in front of both a reptile and former Prime Minister Ehud Barak, a frequent critic of his father, Benjamin Netanyahu, and then being tweeted praise by David Duke. It's an astounding story, written about in Slate and other places.
Can you talk about what is happening now? And does this—do the corruption investigations jeopardize Netanyahu? And what about his son?
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Well, I'll just look at the last point briefly and then get to the heart—in my opinion, the heart of the questions you're asking. The relationship between his son and Netanyahu, Yair and his father, Benjamin Netanyahu, is very similar to Jared and Donald Trump. These are privileged, spoiled and remarkably unremarkable individuals.
But the question you asked about the corruption, in general, it's an interesting question. You're not quite as old as me, but you can go back far enough to remember that when we were growing up, Israel was a very austere, it was a simple, and it was a pretty honest place. And that's the image of Israel that retains in the minds of many American Jews, say, over the age of—over the age of 50. And so, back then, let's say you take, in the 1970s, Yitzhak Rabin, who was the prime minister. He had to leave office. He was forced out of office because his wife had opened up a bank account—one bank account—in the United States. And apparently there wasn't even any money deposited in it, if my memory is correct. But nowadays, it's just one scandal after another scandal after another scandal after another scandal. And the remarkable thing is, it doesn't really affect Benjamin Netanyahu's standing. You can have a succession of scandals, but he has been in office for a remarkably long period of time.
And then the question is: Why? And I think the answer is: Because, whether one likes it or not, Benjamin Netanyahu is the true face of Israel. He's an obnoxious, loudmouth, racist, Jewish supremacist. And that's the whole population now. Now, I'm saying it's in their DNA. I'm not saying it's genetic. But it is a very sorry thing that the state of Israel has degenerated into. And that—
AMY GOODMAN: I mean, it's clearly not the entire population. You have so many critics. You have a peace movement there.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Well, no, I would say—you know, Amy, I would wish that were the case. I would wish that were the case. But if you ask the critics themselves, if you ask a Gideon Levy, you ask an Amira Hass, you ask a—
AMY GOODMAN: Who write for Haaretz.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Right—you ask B'Tselem, you ask—
AMY GOODMAN: The human rights group.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Right—Breaking the Silence, the soldiers' group, they'll tell you they represent nobody. They'll tell you they don't represent anymore. There was a period where they represented at least a factor in Israeli life. But it's no longer true. And the fact that Benjamin Netanyahu endures, despite the succession of scandals, is a manifestation of how much that society has degenerated.
So, Gideon Levy, I think, the columnist, he made a comment the other day which I found very interesting. He said, the Israelis, they see a fellow in a wheelchair—he lost both his legs—in Gaza. He's holding a flag. They shoot him right between the eyes, a sharpshooter. Everybody sees it on video. He says, no Israelis cared. Then another kid is killed. In this case, the second case, a kid is killed. A third is killed. Nobody cares. One thing they care about: The young girl, Ahed Tamimi, smacked an Israeli soldier. That causes hysteria. How dare a Palestinian smack an Israeli soldier? But the daily atrocities—
AMY GOODMAN: And this, again, the smacking of the soldier, after her 14-year-old cousin, who was shot at very close range in the face, just coming out of a coma right now, by Israeli soldiers.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: And living through an occupation, living through the ransacking, the ravaging of your home, your neighborhoods, these soldiers constantly harassing you, hectoring you, browbeating you, threatening you. But the only question for Israel is: How dare this girl smack a soldier in the face? But the killings are meaningless.
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.
In December, President Trump announced he would recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and initiate a process of moving the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. The move has sparked protests across the Occupied Territories. The United Nations voted 128 to 9 in favor of a resolution calling for the United States to drop its recent recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Despite the international condemnation, several leading Democratic lawmakers, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, praised Trump's decision.


Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: Before we get to speak more extensively about Gaza, I wanted to quickly ask you what you felt the motivation was for President Trump recognizing Jerusalem as the capital, saying he'd move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv, the massive response in the United Nations after he announced this recognition, the overwhelming vote against the United States, and the United States threatening people who voted against them.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Well, it's a little complicated question, how U.S.-Israeli policy works. But in general, you could say, when major U.S. national interests are at stake, the Israel lobby has very little power. We saw that, for example, during the negotiations over the agreement with Iran. That was a major U.S. international interest. The lobby was dead set against it. Netanyahu was dead set against it. But the agreement went through. And many of Israel's strongest supporters—Dianne Feinstein, Nancy Pelosi, the whole gang—they supported the agreement.
But when a major U.S. interest is not at stake, the lobby is quite powerful. So you take, in this particular case, it was clear the Saudis, which is a U.S. major interest, didn't care what the U.S. did with Jerusalem. They gave the green light: "If you want to give it to Israel, that's fine with us. We don't care." So, no U.S. natural interest is at stake, and so Trump does what anybody does: He rewards his donors. In this case, it was Sheldon Adelson, the casino billionaire, who was strongly supporting the U.S. recognition of Jerusalem as the undivided capital of Israel.
But we have to bear in mind, it wasn't just Trump. You know, sometimes the media wants to pile up on Trump. And they forget it's not just Trump. Charles Schumer, the current Senate minority leader, Schumer was constantly attacking Trump, right after he got elected: "Why aren't you recognizing Jerusalem as the undivided capital?" When Trump did recognize it, Schumer, Charles Schumer, he said, "He did it because of me. I was the one that urged him to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital." So that's the Senate minority leader speaking. And for the same reason—if you look at Schumer's money, he gets it mostly from conservative, right-wing Jews and from Wall Street, the same sources of income as Trump, the same streams of income.
And on these questions, a lot of the Democrats, including Schumer—or especially Schumer, I should say—are worse than Trump. So, for example, after the Mavi Marmaraincident in 2010, when Israel killed the passengers aboard the humanitarian vessel, the Mavi Marmara, killed 10 passengers, Charles Schumer, he went before a group of Orthodox Jews, and he said, "The people of Gaza voted for Hamas. They voted for Hamas, and therefore economic strangulation is the way to go." Now, bear in mind what that means. We're talking about a population, more than half of which are children, who are living under a medieval siege. And what he's effectively saying is we should continue starving them, until they vote or get rid of Hamas. Now, what do you say about something like that?
You know, Charles Schumer, he went to my high school, as did, incidentally, Bernie Sanders. I didn't know him. He was, I think, four years ahead of me. I knew his sister pretty well, Fran. Extremely bright. You know, even now, looking back almost a half-century, she still stands vividly in my memory. Extremely bright young woman. They were decent, actually. Chuck's—as he was called Chuck—his father was an exterminator. You know, that's really rising. It was an impressive show. He's an extremely bright guy. He was valedictorian of his class, and he was way ahead of everybody else, as was Fran, you know? But what they turned into, what can you say? He grew up in Kings Highway in Brooklyn, right near where Bernie grew up, by the way. I passed the house every day, because I bicycled to the pool. What do you say about a person who recommends starving children? That's what he did.
AMY GOODMAN: We're going to—
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: You know, he's a moral monster. And you have to face up to that fact. He's a moral monster. And yet everybody wants to dump on Trump. What about people like Schumer?
AMY GOODMAN: Well, we're going to break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about the situation you're describing in Gaza. Your new book, Gaza: An Inquest into Its Martyrdom. We're speaking with author and scholar Norman Finkelstein. The book has just been published. Stay with us.
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.