Showing posts with label Craig. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Craig. Show all posts

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Neo-Cons or Neo-Kissingers?

HOW MANY DO YOU REMEMBER?




Illustrations: Actually, they are the reason for this edition. Our illustrator came up with a great version of the disgraced and outcast Gonzo after I jumped the gun and posted his letter of resignation, so here is the actual picture of him resigning. Also, he keeps updating the neo-con shooting gallery and I’ve posted that too. See how many of the “crazies” (as George Bush Sr. called them) are left standing and how many of the departed can you identify?

Meanwhile, Republic Senator Larry Craig, of Idaho, one of the Foley wing of the party, I guess, called a press conference and announced “I AM NOT GAY! I HAVE NEVER BEEN GAY!” I must agree that in the conference he looked morose, not gay.

Just in: Poison nerve gas was found at the United Nations in New York today. Nope, it was brought here in 1996 by the inspectors. Bad accounting was blamed for the incident. Well, then, we need an Anti-Bad-Accounting Act passed. Anyone suspected of bad accounting can be locked up without a warrant, lawyer, or trial.

Lest we forget, the Decided plans to ask for another 50 billion to continue in Iraq. This will bring the price to a billion dollars a week. We can’t afford Universal Health Care?

Below is an article by Robert Fisk, the most reliable correspondent of the subject of the mideast. He writes for the Independent, but they now charge for his articles, so we have to wait for them to be a week or so old. There is a woman columnist at the NY Times I used to read and they started charging for that as well. I wish I remembered her name. She is funny, Irish, and love to attack Bush.

*ZNet | Iraq*

*The Iraqis Don't Deserve Us, So We Betray Them*

*by Robert Fisk; Independent UK

; August 24, 2007*

Always, we have betrayed them. We backed "Flossy" in Yemen. The

French backed their local "harkis" in Algeria; then the FLN

victory forced them to swallow their own French military medals

before dispatching them into mass graves. In Vietnam, the

Americans demanded democracy and, one by one -- after praising

the Vietnamese for voting under fire in so many cities, towns

and villages -- they destroyed the elected prime ministers

because they were not abiding by American orders.

Now we are at work in Iraq. Those pesky Iraqis don't deserve our

sacrifice, it seems, because their elected leaders are not doing

what we want them to do.

Does that remind you of a Palestinian organization called Hamas?

First, the Americans loved Ahmed Chalabi, the man who fabricated

for Washington the"'weapons of mass destruction" (with a hefty

bank fraud charge on his back). Then, they loved Ayad Allawi, a

Vietnam-style spook who admitted working for 26 intelligence

organizations, including the CIA and MI6. Then came Ibrahim

al-Jaafari, symbol of electoral law, whom the Americans loved,

supported, loved again and destroyed. Couldn't get his act

together. It was up to the Iraqis, of course, but the Americans

wanted him out. And the seat of the Iraqi government -- a

never-never land in the humidity of Baghdad's green zone -- lay

next to the largest US embassy in the world. So goodbye, Ibrahim.

Then there was Nouri al-Maliki, a man with whom Bush could "do

business"; loved, supported and loved again until Carl Levin and

the rest of the US Senate Armed Forces Committee -- and, be

sure, George W Bush -- decided he couldn't fulfill America's

wishes. He couldn't get the army together, couldn't pull the

police into shape, an odd demand when US military forces were

funding and arming some of the most brutal Sunni militias in

Baghdad, and was too close to Tehran.

There you have it. We overthrew Saddam's Sunni minority and the

Iraqis elected the Shias into power, and all those old Iranian

acolytes who had grown up under the Islamic Revolution in exile

from the Iraq-Iran war -- Jaafari was a senior member of the

Islamic Dawaa party which was enthusiastically seizing Western

hostages in Beirut in the 1980s and trying to blow up our friend

the Emir of Kuwait -- were voted into power. So blame the

Iranians for their "interference" in Iraq when Iran's own

creatures had been voted into power.

And now, get rid of Maliki. Chap doesn't know how to unify his

own people, for God's sake. No interference, of course. It's up

to the Iraqis, or at least, it's up to the Iraqis who live under

American protection in the green zone. The word in the Middle

East -- where the "plot" (al-moammarer) has the power of reality

-- is that Maliki's cozy trips to Tehran and Damascus these past

two weeks have been the final straw for the fantasists in

Washington. Because Iran and Syria are part of the axis of evil

or the cradle of evil or whatever nonsense Bush and his cohorts

and the Israelis dream up, take a look at the $30bn in arms

heading to Israel in the next decade in the cause of "peace."

Maliki's state visits to the crazed Ahmedinejad and the much

more serious Bashar al-Assad appear to be, in Henry VIII's

words, "treachery, treachery, treachery." But Maliki is showing

loyalty to his former Iranian masters and their Syrian Alawite

allies (the Alawites being an interesting satellite of the Shias).

These creatures -- let us use the right word -- belong to us and

thus we can step on them when we wish. We will not learn -- we

will never learn, it seems -- the key to Iraq. The majority of

the people are Muslim Shias. The majority of their leaders,

including the "fiery" Muqtada al-Sadr were trained, nurtured,

weaned, loved, taught in Iran. And now, suddenly, we hate them.

The Iraqis do not deserve us. This is to be the grit on the sand

that will give our tanks traction to leave Iraq. Bring on the

clowns! Maybe they can help us too.