Showing posts with label Terrorism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Terrorism. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 19, 2022

TERRORISM: REAL OR FABRICATED?

















THE ABSURD TIMES


 


 

Was he really stupid? Chamberlain

 

 

TERRORISM: REAL AND FABRICATED

BY

Maj. General Remarks, Ret.

 

This is going to be a bit different than most editions. A great deal is going on, both here and in daily life as well as abroad, I've spent a short time online spouting off and then leaving "gotta run" and so on. So, some of this you may have already heard but not in as much depth, some of it new, and some of it simply repetitive. Also, I'm not trying to organize it either, so it'll be like true aphorisms, a paragraph at a time on one subject. Then on to another. Eventually more on the first. No apologies.

 

1.

A quote from one of you:

 

"I think there should be a bread and milk enforcement van that drives around to everyone's house today who was at the grocery store yesterday buying bread and milk. And if they're not sitting in their fucking houses eating that bread and milk, they go to jail. And no bread or milk allowed ever again. Banned for life."

 

I will usually go shopping on a weekday, just after noon, as the traffic seems much lighter there, both outside and inside the stores. Well, I had not taken into consideration that this day was a day before snow was forecasted. Growing up in Chicago, impending snow never affected my plans. But these days, with the 9 warmest years on historical record, it is frightening to many people. I can imagine them muttering "Oh, cold wet white stuff come from sky. God have dandruff! Get food and hide inside!"

 

It reminds me of a column I read written by a relative of mine – a guy named Mike Royko. [The details of how this relationship came about eluded both of us. People have children, they get married, have children, etc., so eventually somehow you are related to someone else, by marriage or otherwise. The point is, we both decided it was a fucking waste of time to try to work out and he helped me out a few times like an Uncle might.]  At any rate, I had the same damn experience he did: I saw single guys coming out of a supermarket holding two gallons of milk who hadn't had a sip of milk in 20 years! (Gotta stock up, ya know.)

 

Some time ago, Mike quit the Sun Times because Rupert Murdock bought and joined the Tribune, a bastion of Republicanism and opponent of Unions, etc., but AT LEAST IT WAS A NEWSPAPER! Now it's not even that. [You can find a revealing interview between Studs Terkel and Mike Royko on You Tube.]

 

2.

So, a few observations: Rudy Guiani should be called "That Man of Four Seasons".

 

Arizona: The Republican candidate for Secretary of State there was in the crowd on Jan 6. Seems that position counts the votes or certifies all matters relating to elections. He is associated with the Oathkeepers. (Or is that Kari who is running for Governor? If you are in Arizona, might as well find out.)

 

A couple days ago, I finally laughed out loud, in fact, I was convulsed with laughter. A young woman, very bright seeming, more likely a volunteer than a professional, called and exchanged pleasantries and then went into a pitch to get me to support the "Young Republicans!" I could not help it. Now I've played a straight man, sometimes make Stephen Wright look like a smiler by comparison, but this made me burst out in laughter and I couldn't stop myself. Maybe a half hour later I could have come up with some quips, but then I was STILL uncontrollably laughing. Finally, I managed to say "You have the wrong household, I''m sorry" and then went back to laughing. I think I remember her saying something about crossing my number off her list (Ohh, that'll show me), but can't be sure.

 

Finally, here, I do get very tired of people comparing some Republican Presidential wannabes and Militia Members, the proto-fascists to Hitler. Just to clarify a few things: easily available online is a copy of Hitler's (A.K.A. "Schikelgruber's") drawing for admission to architecture school. Very few of the people I've seen lately can come close to doing something like that, especially 45. I'm tired of all the attacks against Neville Chamberlain. His "appeasement" enabled Britain to re-arm, build its army, in short, prepare for a war it certainly would have perished from at the time. Hitler had always cursed him for his trickery and his bad faith. In fact, he was livid. So, I am tired of hearing about Chamberlain and appeasement. In that case, it worked out well. So sue me. By the way, Ford made tanks for Hitler and young Hitler had a picture of Ford hanging on his wall. We bombed the Ford Tanks factory that supplied Hitler and Ford sued us! and get this: He won! That's enough of this idiocy. I don't get it, don't want to get it, the end.

 

 

3. Now the background to the seizure of the synagogue in Texas. The hostage taker was wrong in figuring somehow Judaism was responsible, but this is what happened. Nowhere else have I seen anything approaching the truth of this matter. And, she was tortured and arrested in Afghanistan but is Pakistani. Well, there is the truth on that, finally:

 

From Democracy Now

 

During Saturday's synagogue attack in Colleyville, Texas, the gunman Malik Faisal Akram repeatedly called for the release of Pakistani neuroscientist Aafia Siddiqui, who is serving an 86-year sentence in a U.S. federal prison located just miles from the synagogue. Siddiqui was convicted in 2010 on charges that she intended to kill U.S. military officers while being detained in Afghanistan two years earlier. However, many questions remain unanswered about her time in U.S. custody, and her conviction was secured without physical evidence and on U.S. officials' testimony alone, says Siddiqui's lawyer, Marwa Elbially. Elbially says there's a false impression of Siddiqui in the U.S. as a terrorist, even though terrorist charges were never brought against her, and Pakistan officials have voiced concern about her arrest and detention. We also speak with Mauri' Saalakhan, director of operations for The Aafia Foundation, who calls Siddiqui's case an unprecedented miscarriage of justice.

 


Transcript

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.orgThe War and Peace Report. I'm Amy Goodman, with Juan González.

As we continue our coverage of the 11-hour hostage standoff at a synagogue outside Fort Worth, Texas, Saturday, we turn to look at the complex case of an imprisoned Pakistani neuroscientist, Dr. Aafia Siddiqui. During the standoff, the armed gunman, Malik Faisal Akram, a British man, repeatedly called for Dr. Siddiqui's release. She is currently serving an 86-year sentence at Federal Medical Center, Carswell prison in Fort Worth, which is like 20 miles from the Beth Israel synagogue in Colleyville, Texas. In Pakistan, she's considered a political prisoner. In the United States, some call her "Lady al-Qaeda."

In 2010, the MIT-Brandeis-trained Pakistani neuroscientist was convicted of attempted murder for allegedly shooting at U.S. soldiers and FBI agents while jailed in Afghanistan in 2008. In fact, none of the Americans were injured, but Dr. Siddiqui was shot and wounded while she was in their custody. Many questions remain unanswered about her time in U.S. custody. Dr. Siddiqui's supporters say she was forcibly disappeared, along with three of her children, by Pakistani authorities in 2003 and interrogated and tortured for years by the United States at the Bagram Air Base and other locations. U.S. authorities say Siddiqui was never held by the U.S., was arrested in July 2008 by Afghan police and handed over to U.S. authorities.

We're joined now by two guests. Marwa Elbially is with us. She's the current lawyer for Aafia Siddiqui. And Mauri' Saalakhan is with us, the director of operations for The Aafia Foundation.

I want to begin with Dr. Siddiqui's lawyer, Marwa Elbially. You were there outside Dallas on Saturday, Marwa. You expressed your horror and the horror of the Siddiqui family at what was taking place with the armed gunman holding the hostages, the rabbi and three others. Can you start there and then just briefly tell us the story of Dr. Siddiqui, who the gunman kept saying he wanted released?

MARWA ELBIALLY: Yes. Thank you, Amy.

First of all, we are so thankful that the hostages were released safely and that the rabbi and his congregants weren't harmed. What happened there was despicable, and it is not acceptable to anyone.

Dr. Aafia Siddiqui, during her sentencing, stated that she doesn't want any violence done in her name. And I haven't had the chance to speak with her about what happened. I don't think she even — she might not even know about the events of Saturday. But we just wanted to make that very clear, that she and her family have always said that they don't want any violence done in her name.

Just to make the audience aware, there's a lot of misinformation out there about Dr. Aafia Siddiqui's case. And it has been made to display as if she has been charged and tried for terrorism, which has never happened. As you mentioned earlier, she was tried for allegedly being able to get a weapon from a U.S. soldier and shoot it at them multiple times. There was nobody injured other than herself. There was no physical evidence. So, there was no gunshot residue on her person or clothing. There was no fingerprints on the weapon. There was no shell casings from the weapon she allegedly fired, no bullet holes. So no physical evidence. When she went to trial, it was based on the testimony — and contradictory testimony — of the individuals that were in the room. And her trial itself was extremely unusual in that there was a threat to the jury, which resulted in the dismissal of two jurors. The defense moved for a mistrial, which the judge denied. And then she was sentenced to 86 years. And again, I can't emphasize enough that she was never charged with terrorism. So this false moniker exists out there against her, in which they refer to her as "Lady al-Qaeda" and other names, where there's no — she was never tried for any of that in a court of law here in the United States.

The other thing that I think is very important to mention is she is well known in Pakistan and is referred to, by no less than the former prime minister, as "the daughter of the nation." And that was Prime Minister Yousaf Gilani. And both the National Assembly and the Pakistani Senate have passed resolutions on her behalf, in which they stated — the National Assembly of Pakistan in 2008 stated that they're deeply concerned about her arrest and detention, and they're concerned about the lack of information about her underage children, who were underaged at that time. And then, again in 2018, the Senate of Pakistan, Resolution number 399, said that it appreciates the efforts made by the Parliament of Pakistan and its committees for the repatriation of the daughter of the nation. The House reiterates that there is a dire need to take up the matter with the government of the United States of America again and solve the same. So this is by no means a fringe issue. There's a serious concern out there about Dr. Aafia Siddiqui, and it's really, really unfortunate that it's come again to media attention with somebody that she has no connection with, no — like, that she would never support whatsoever.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And, Marwa Elbially, I wanted to ask you: The issue of her originally being disappeared back in 2003 as a result, apparently, of the complicity of a previous Pakistani government with the FBI, could you talk about that and how she then ended up in Afghanistan?

MARWA ELBIALLY: Yes. So, in 2003, March of 2003 — so, Dr. Aafia Siddiqui studied here in the United States for over 10 years. She was on a student visa. She is a graduate of MIT undergrad, and then Ph.D. in neuroscience, where she studied how children learn through imitation. She moved back to Pakistan in June of 2002. In March of 2003, the FBI issued a seeking information alert. They said that they didn't have any evidence connecting her or her ex-husband, who also had a seeking information alert issued for him, Dr. Mohammed Amjad Khan — didn't have any evidence connecting either of them to terrorism but that they were wanted for questioning.

What we do know happened is that several news organizations, including NBC Nightly NewsNewsweek, the Indian ExpressDawn, published articles that said she had been taken in for questioning. And then, all of a sudden, within a few days, that was walked back. And what we do know is that from March of 2003 until July of 2008, Dr. Aafia Siddiqui's location was never confirmed. She was mentioned both by the NYU Law Center for Human Rights and Global Justice in a 2005 "Fate and Whereabouts Unknown: Detainees in the 'War on Terror'" report, that she was potentially in U.S. detention and may be held in a U.S.-controlled secret location or foreign facility. And then she was again mentioned in the 2006 Amnesty International report. And we also have — like, we have formal apologies from the former foreign minister of Pakistan in 2012, and he goes — and I quote — "I'm sorry for handing over the innocent Dr. Aafia Siddiqui to the Americans. It was my biggest mistake ever."

So there is a lot of questions surrounding her location and whereabouts between 2003 and 2008. And Dr. Aafia Siddiqui maintains that she was held in secret prison sites. And her name is mentioned in two of the footnotes of the Senate Intelligence Committee report on torture, and only the executive summary has been released, so we don't know if she and what really happened to her is included in the 6,000 actual — 6,000-page actual report.

AMY GOODMAN: Can you just explain how she was then picked up in 2008, after five years? I mean, I just watched the former deputy director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, saying, "Some say she was held by the U.S. for five years. That is not true." And he said, "I was very closely connected to that case." But she was picked up in Ghazni, far, far from, for example, Bagram, with her elder son, with, what, bomb plans? And that's when she was taken in by the authorities, handed over to the U.S., where she was then accused of trying to escape and open fire?

MARWA ELBIALLY: Yes. So, she disappeared off of the streets of Karachi, Pakistan, in — like, as we mentioned, in 2003. So, hundreds of miles away, in Ghazni, Afghanistan, which I believe is only an hour or two away from Bagram or Kabul, she was found on the street by Afghan police. She can't speak any of the local languages. She looked completely disheveled. She was emaciated, weighed about like 90 pounds at the time of her reappearance. She only had her eldest son with her. Her two other children were nowhere to be found. And so, the Afghan police took her into custody, and then — on July 17th. And then, on July 18th, U.S. two FBI agents were flown in from Kabul by helicopter, and then local soldiers, who were based in FOB Ghazni, went in to question her.

The official story is that they were brought into an Afghan police station, they went into a room that was separated by a yellow curtain, and that they did not know that she was behind this curtain, and that one of these soldiers, out of respect for Afghan culture, puts down his M4 rifle, which every — from what I've read, every military member would never keep a distance from their weapon, especially when they're on foreign soil in the middle of a war. He says that he puts it down, and somehow Dr. Aafia manages to grab it, pick it up, like, turn off the safety and fire shots. And then the interpreter grabs her, and then somehow they manage to shoot her multiple times in the stomach — the soldiers in the room — and nobody else was injured.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Well, if we can, I'd just like to bring in Mauri' Saalakhan, the director of operations for The Aafia Foundation. Could you talk about why you've become such a vocal supporter of Dr. Siddiqui?

MAURI' SAALAKHAN: Yes. First of all, thank you for having us on and for dealing with this topic.

In short, I heard former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark, when we were together in Fort Worth, Texas, for Aafia Siddiqui, and also he wanted to pay a visit to both Aafia and Lynne Stewart, who was imprisoned at the same institution at that time. He said in a speech, "The case of Dr. Aafia Siddiqui is the worst case of individual injustice I have ever witnessed."

When he said these words, they resonated with me, because that is the way I felt. I've been a human rights advocate for about three decades, and of all the cases and issues I've ever dealt with, this case has been the heaviest on my heart. This is the worst of the worst. And so, this is the reason why we connected to it in a year after she was brought back to the United States half-dead, and we have been vigorously doing as much as we possibly can to secure her release and repatriation since then.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, I want to thank you both for being with us. We're going to continue to cover these stories. Mauri' Saalakhan, director of operations for The Aafia Foundation, and Marwa Elbially, current lawyer for Aafia Siddiqui. Again, the lawyer and family condemned what took place at the Colleyville synagogue.

That does it for our show. Democracy Now! is currently accepting applications for a human resources manager. You can learn more and apply at democracynow.org.

Democracy Now! is produced with Renée Feltz, Mike Burke, Deena Guzder, Messiah Rhodes, Nermeen Shaikh, María Taracena, Tami Woronoff, Charina Nadura, Sam Alcoff, Tey-Marie Astudillo, John Hamilton, Robby Karran, Hany Massoud. I'm Amy Goodman, with Juan González. Stay safe. Wear a mask.

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.


 

 

Sunday, August 04, 2019

GUNS, TRUMP, AND TWERPS





THE ABSURD TIMES


Guns, Twerps, and Trump



 



Tsar Donic



Well, El Paos, the "west texas town of El Paso/ I saw a sign of more things to come."  About 12 hours later, Dayton Ohio was shot up.  I was asked "Who did it?"  I had no hesitation in saying "Some white guy."  The response was relief as Moslems are always nervous that there will be some sort of reaction.  Nope, a white guy, domestic terrorism, white superiority.  (Or is it supremacy?)  Now what is so supreme about get a damn machine gun and shooting up a place?  The logic escapes me.



Shouldn't there be some sort of requirement that you have a photo ID to buy one of these things?  It can be done more easily than voting in many places. 



Almighty God has already said that they have no more room for all the thoughts a prayers people keep sending, so maybe voting will help?  Maybe get a photo ID if you don't have one.



What else?  Really, comparing Boris Johnson and Donald Trump is simply too depressing to contemplate.  One thing I can point out is the Johnson apparently studied Greek and Roman classics when he was younger.  Trump, however, in uncluttered by such epitude, and thus has no excuse.



Now, I have to send this off before there is another mass murder here in the US.  I figure I only have about 8 hours left at a minimum.


 




Virus-free. www.avg.com

Tuesday, April 04, 2017

Why Impeach Trump?



THE ABSURD TIMES


A SIGN FOR THE TIMES



On Impeaching Trump

By

Arthur Schopenhauer



Many of you will not like the points made here.  Too bad.



A recent survey indicated that the most popular American candidate for President right now would be Bernie Sanders, despite his use of the term "socialist" and statements otherwise objectionable to the wealthy.  In addition, we know full well that many who voted for Obama with his message about hope and change, and eliminating the "politics of fear" (meaning George Bush and other Republicans who were then in power) this time voted for Trump.  The only possible reason for this is that the vast majority of the country does not like the way healthcare is handled, how wealth is distributed, how people are treated.



For awhile, blame cast upon minorities will allow the "elite" (meaning the few with most of the money) to escape and divert blame.  However, ultimately the idea of a coalition of the very poor and the workers along with much of the middle class will emerge as a dominate force, unless of course military force is used against them by their own government which is not an unbelievable sernario.



Many American voters, having been stupid enough to vote for Donald Trump, are now regretting it.  Calls for Impeachment abound, and the accusations of "collusion" with the Russians to elect him are based on the basic notion of treason.  The point here is to explain why this is not a great idea, how this came to pass, and what would come to pass if such a movement were possible and came to fruition.  The focus, however, would be on motive and consequences.



The idea that the largest nuclear powers could come to an agreeable truce of sorts and cooperate, at least to avoid a deadly conflict, is propagated as somehow evil and bad for the working class.  The working class, thinking that the real enemy consists of Mexicans and Moslems has so far been diverted, but there is no real evidence that this will continue.  The prospect of an arrangement with Russia has even led to terrorists attacks inside Russia, this time in St. Petersburg. 



There is no real evidence that Putin set out to get Trump elected, none at all.  In fact, there is more evidence that he despised Hillary Clinton than anything else, so let us forget about hacking and all that.  As best I can make out, since I speak no Russian of consequence, and the Cyrillic alphabet is an enormous barrier here, Putin once said that Trump was "Flashy."  That was translated, incorrectly as "bright," and such a mistake is clearly possible.  Given Trump's personality disorder, details to follow, he easily interpreted that to mean Putin considered him a "genius."  Hence his admiration for Putin as far as it goes.



Now why would Putin detest Hillary?  To understand that, you have to understand a bit about Putin.  The Stasi, or Staatssicherheit (State Security) will come in a bit later in connection with Merkel.



Putin was in East Germany during the fall of the Wall.  He was completely alone, cut off from Moscow, expendable part of the KGB, but did burn countless documents as East Germans threatened the building.  He went out alone and told the crowd that it would be best for them not to enter as there were countless armed defenders and that he would hate for them to be shot as he considered them brothers.  They refrained and he returned to finish burning papers.  He eventually made his way to Moscow and after the farce of Yeltsin, became President.  



After his first two terms under the new constitution, he had his friend take over for a few years and then ran again.  Hillary, then Secretary of State, led a charge against him, and used every means possible to overturn him, without success.  She then (and the tape exists somewhere) conferred with NATO allies to depose the pro-Russian government and replace him with what she called "Yaz".  (Some of you may know who I mean.)  Putin never forgot.  There is little doubt that if he could punish her, he would.  The fact that Trump would benefit was "collateral damage," if nothing else.



Further, for centuries, every conflict Russia had was with attacking border states.  The U.S. does not seem to take this into account.  It was, in fact, the reason for the Warsaw Pact.  The Pact was abandoned on the assurance that there would be not encroachment on Russia.  The U.S. has expanded NATO to the point where Russia is now surrounded on its west by hostile countries with the lone exception of Ukraine, a country populated by a vast Russian population.  The entire Eastern part of Ukraine is predominately ethnic Russian.  Crimea was glad to join the Russian Federation as the Wages of each worker increased fourfold as a result.  Clinton was very much in favor of any and all expansion eastward.  Putin and most Russians saw her as a clear threat to their own peace.



There is also doubt as to whether the Russians did in fact do any hacking as the CIA is perfectly capable of forging Russian programming code and, more importantly, nothing that was leaked was erroneous.  Podesta's email account had a password.  It was PASSWORD.  Is it unlikely that someone would try that, perhaps an eleven year old?  Anyway, the whole point is moot.  Surely, we would never interfere in another country's election. 



Trump did much to spread good will when Angela Merkel was here by suggesting that they were both wiretapped by enemies (Obama).  For her, growing up under the Stasi, this was a remarkable statement and she looked at him as if he were insane.  She was close.  He is simply neurotic.



On to the impeachment. 

First, let's look at the line of replacement.  After Mike Pence, Paul Ryan, Orrin Hatch, Rex Tillerson, and so on.  Not a very nice thing to contemplate. 



So let's look at Trump for the next two years after taking a look at the personality disorder he exhibits.  This is ultimately from DAM V and is, in my opinion, a bit sketchy and the entire edition has too many problems to go into here, however, it is a starting point:



DSM[i]-5 criteria for narcissistic personality disorder include these features:

·                        Having an exaggerated sense of self-importance

·                        Expecting to be recognized as superior even without achievements that warrant it

·                        Exaggerating your achievements and talents

·                        Being preoccupied with fantasies about success, power, brilliance, beauty or the perfect mate

·                        Believing that you are superior and can only be understood by or associate with equally special people

·                        Requiring constant admiration

·                        Having a sense of entitlement

·                        Expecting special favors and unquestioning compliance with your expectations

·                        Taking advantage of others to get what you want

·                        Having an inability or unwillingness to recognize the needs and feelings of others

·                        Being envious of others and believing others envy you

·                        Behaving in an arrogant or haughty manner





One need only have a certain number of these symptoms, and requiring constant admiration, a sense of entitlement, and inability to unwillingness to recognize the need and feelings of others, etc., are certainly there.  The constant admiration is a centerpiece.  Also, he has an exaggerated sense of self-importance.  In other words, he is more or less oblivious of special outside interests.  All of the others in the line of succession want to privatize Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and eliminate any of the reforms of the FDR administration.  One the other hand, Trump only wants what will help enhance his sense of self-importance, the rest be damned.



Let us take an example: Obamacare.  He would easily sign a bill repealing Obamacare, but if it repealed the Affordable Care Act, he would veto it.  Many people who benefit from the ACA like it, but hate Obamacare.  It is like the woman in the earlier tea party days who shouted at Arlen Spector of Pennsylvania "Keep your government hands off my Social Security!"  They are morons, but they love Trump and his idiotic rants. 



He has no idea of where Neil Gorsuch stands or how good a judge he is.  He got his name from a list provided by some "Heritage" right wing group, eliminated the female judges, and settled on Gorsuch.  He can only distinguish a judge by how much money it will cost him and how it will affect his brand name.  He does not care that the Judge was Hispanic, he did care that he would rightfully rule against him.  Trump is not a sharp legal mind.



The reason he did not ban Moslems in the gulf states, for example, is that Trump hotels and the like are there with his brand name on them.   Somalia?  Ok, they are all black anyway, aren't they?  (Sessions assured him that they were.  Guliani helped out with the deal of the ban.)  So what if it is stopped in the courts? He will fight and look good to his bigot fans. 



At one time, I was extremely angry with Nancy Pelosi for not allowing the Democratic Majority impeach George Bush because of the proven lies about the Iraq war.  He truly deserved to be impeached, but that would have, after all, left Dick Cheney in charge.  That would have been even more horrible what with his penchant for shooting friend and foe alike.  



Certainly Trump is disgusting and has made it fashionable for white supremacists to attack Blacks, Moslems, and Jews, but these attacks have also led to greater harmony amongst those groups.  Hispanics and women also and yes, I know there are Hispanic women.  The point is, Trump is so ridiculous that he may do something that does not fall in line with the big money if it leads to further unpopularity or is otherwise a blow to his ego.  His lack of comprehension of any real ideology other than self-love or esteem is easier to tolerate than the ideological likes of the other Republicans. 



The only real answer is for the Democratic Party to become a progressive, people centered party.  So far, it has not done very well, allowing the Zionist lobby stop Ellison from becoming head of the DNC.  Still, it is the only real solution. 



His family now rules the country.  Kushner will bring peace to the middle east, restructure the U.S. government, stimulate scientific progress in "innovation," and still keep Ivanka satisfied.



The Romanovs thought the same about themselves, but they did not end happily.



Trump will always be happy, as he is, by his own definition, superb. 



Besides, he will now make us safe from a nuclear attack from North Korea.  After all, a missile could reach the West Coast in 20 minutes and we could not detect it as it is limited by the speed of light and our many jets would be useless, no?



At any rate, with the structure of state such as it is right now, impeachment is a futile gesture and would only perpetuate matters.












[i] The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychological Association, usually considered the authority on mental illnesses.

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

RADICAL RELIGION & HOMOPHOBIA







THE ABSURD TIMES










Lately, we have seen a great deal of attention given to domestic issues and nobody benefits from this more than Hillary Clinton.  Rather than rehas all of Hillary's war-mongering, we decided to focus on the domestic aspects of recent events.



The first seems to be Donald Trump (who is regularly called "Tramp" in many publications).  His big solution to all of our problems is that use the phrase "Radical Islam."  The reasoning seems to be that once we do that, all the terrorist attacks will stop.  It would seem most logical to also use the terms "Radical Christianity" for other people who commit massacres, and probably "Radical Judaism" for supporters of Israel, at least those who are busy passing laws to prohibit anti-bds activity.  Of course, Radical Xtianity is also behind such legislation. 



Of course, Trump has shifted a bit, instead talking about banning anyone who came from a country that has had terrorism problems, point of origin, so to speak.  Of course, he thought that the Orlando creep was born in Afghanistan, but it turns out that he was born in Queens NY.  Well, let's ban all people born in Queens, including Trump.  Better yet, lets build a wall around queens.  I never cared about Queens anyway.  Brooklyn was OK, maybe Manhattan, but not Queens.  So Trump has to be rounded up and deported and re-enter this country legally or go to Queens once the wall is constructed.



Radical Christianity has its own tradition, and the Spanish Inquisition and the Salem Witchcraft trials are a couple.  The reckless bombing of Gaza is an example of Radical Judaism. 



See, all of this is based on a literal, although illiterate, reading to the so-called Holy Books.  If you want to see some of the tenants of Radical Christianity and Judaism, you can read Deuteronomy and Leviticus.  They are especially harsh on women who "grabbeth a man by his secrets." 



Now we have this mess in Orlando.  Some guy whose father says he was offended by seeing two men kissing got an automatic rifle (perfectly legal under today's gun laws) and started shooting.  Same type of gun that was used in Sandy Hook by radical Christians I suppose and at the movie theaters by a radical Batman aficionado.  These guns require hardly any skill.  Not even average hand-eye co-ordination is required.  Just a lot of bullets.



Well, should men kiss each other in public?  Well, they got the right.  I'm not thrilled by it, nor by two women, nor by a man and a woman, nor by a woman breast feeding, nor by Cocoa Puffs, but what the hell?  If it turns them on, let them.



Then what about LBGTQ rights?  I'm not sure yet what the Q stands for, but it is not Quixotic, I'm pretty sure.  Why get into a fuss about it?



One could honestly suspect that Donald Trump is a plant by the Democratic party to make sure that the Republican Party is crushed this year, and it may well work, sort of like Barry Goldwater did back in the 60s.  Instead of Daddy Koch's John Birch Society, we have the sons' Tea party rooting out radical Islam and homosexuality. 



Oh yes, and abortion.  DNA and the fetus is nothing more than a blueprint.  Any man and woman waste hundreds of thousands of potential Beethovins every time they have any sort of release.  So when does the blueprint become a human?  Don't human's have opposable thumbs, the ability to walk on two legs, of speech unless something was wrong with the blueprint?  Maybe Leviticus knows.



I do know one thing: ISIL, and Isilanity, would be very happy to be called Radical Islamists.