Showing posts with label derschowitz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label derschowitz. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 06, 2019

ISRAEL AGAIN



THE ABSURD TIMES







Israel Continues
By Czar Donic


I really have no idea as to how to really drive home the point that Israel is a real danger to humanity and human values.  I've tried, and of course nothing works.  In fact, their lobbying and activity simply gets increased and more lawmakers live in fear of it.

Now, we are supposed to avoid "tropes" that are harmful to Zionists, who call themselves "persecuted Jews."  Well, the illustration above gives a fairly accurate of what a "trope" is.  Since I've published, peer-reviewed material, on Renaissance Rhetoric, in fact, too much, I am pretty much written out on the subject.  The rhetoric books of the time list over 200 to 300 specific types of tropes, and about as many "schemes" on the topic.  Also, I had to learn to read Latin for the projects.  Fortunately, I did not have to learn conversational Latin and it seldom comes up these days.  I will confess that I did have a bias in favor of Peter Ramus, or Ramism – but I hardly think that is a great offense, although many did.  Such is academia.

I am not sure what sort of trope "dual-allegiance" is, or perhaps some other expression was contemplated.  Now, Congress is voting to condemn Anti-Semitism and, to its credit, possibly Islamophobia.  (I have yet to receive a response from any of the candidates on that issue.) 

Some of you may remember Norm Finklestein, a well-published author and respected teacher, whose mother was a holocaust survivor who was denied pressure due to immense pressure by a trove of pro-Israeli agitators, led by Alan Derschowitz, somewhat affiliated with Faux News.  An interview with Norm follows the report from the United Nations.
·        * *
·         
A United Nations inquiry has found Israeli forces may have committed war crimes and crimes against humanity by targeting unarmed children, journalists and the disabled in Gaza. The report, released by the U.N. Human Rights Council on Thursday, looked at Israel's bloody response to weekly Great March of Return demonstrations, launched by Palestinians in Gaza nearly a year ago, targeting Israel's heavily militarized separation barrier. The report found Israeli forces have killed 183 Palestinians—almost all of them with live ammunition. The dead included 35 children. Twenty-three thousand people were injured, including over 6,000 shot by live ammunition. We speak with Sara Hossain, a member of the U.N. independent commission that led the Gaza investigation.


Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: A United Nations inquiry has found Israeli forces may have committed war crimes and crimes against humanity by targeting unarmed children, journalists and the disabled in Gaza. The report, released by the U.N. Human Rights Council Thursday, looked at Israel's bloody response to weekly Great March of Return demonstrations, launched by Palestinians in Gaza nearly a year ago, targeting Israel's heavily militarized separation barrier. The report found Israeli forces have killed 183 Palestinians, almost all of them with live ammunition. The dead included 35 children. Twenty-three thousand people were injured, including over 6,000 shot by live ammunition. Santiago Canton chaired the U.N. commission.
SANTIAGO CANTON: The commission has found reasonable grounds to believe that the Israeli security forces committed serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. These violations clearly warrant criminal investigation and prosecution, and we call on Israel to conduct meaningful investigations into these serious violations and to provide timely justice and reparations for those killed and injured.
AMY GOODMAN: Another member of the U.N. independent commission, Sara Hossain, described how Israeli forces targeted civilians and journalists in Gaza.
SARA HOSSAIN: We are saying that they have intentionally shot children, they have intentionally shot people with disabilities, they have intentionally shot journalists, knowing them to be children, people with disabilities and journalists. And some of the children—not all of the children are visibly children perhaps, but many of them are. As Commissioner Murungi just said, the journalists were all marked with press vests, that we investigated. And the people with disabilities, as I said, a double amputee in a wheelchair, a person using crutches, they were visibly that. And they've been shot at by snipers, who also have spotters available with them, who have very high-level technology available to see who is out there in the field.
AMY GOODMAN: The U.N. report called on nations to arrest, quote, "persons alleged to have committed, or ordered to have committed, the international crimes," unquote, or to seek their extradition. The U.N. also demanded Israel immediately lift the blockade on Gaza. Israel's acting foreign minister dismissed the report as "theater of the absurd." However, grieving Palestinians welcomed the report, including Raeda Ayoub, whose teenage son Mohammad was killed during the Gaza protests.
RAEDA AYOUB: [translated] We are happy that someone is supporting Gaza's children, and we are happy that they are supporting us to defend Gaza's children and youth in Gaza against the crimes committed by the occupation.
AMY GOODMAN: The U.N. report was issued Thursday, the same day Israel's attorney general announced Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing an indictment on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust.
For more, we're joined by two guests. Sara Hossain is a member of the U.N. independent commission that led the Gaza investigation. She's also a barrister practicing in the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. She joins us from Dhaka, Bangladesh. And here in New York, scholar Norman Finkelstein, author of many books, including Gaza: An Inquest into Its Martyrdom.
We welcome you both to Democracy Now! Sara Hossain, let's begin with you. Tell us about the most significant findings of your report and how this report came into being.
SARA HOSSAIN: I'm sorry. I couldn't hear that.
AMY GOODMAN: Please explain the findings of the report.
SARA HOSSAIN: Sure. I mean, this report was commissioned as basis of a resolution by the Human Rights Council. And accordingly, we've conducted investigations for about six months now with trained investigators and a team of experts. I should mention, we haven't been given access to Gaza or to Israel, which obviously has hampered us quite considerably. But nevertheless, we have been able to interview witnesses, and we have been able to interview many victims, as well, some in person and some remotely. We've also been able to gather an extraordinary amount of documentary material, including video and drone footage, social media content, as well as all of the affidavits and other testimonies. So, based on that, we've come to our assessment.
AMY GOODMAN: And talk about the most significant findings.
SARA HOSSAIN: The most significant, I think, is just the number of killings and the numbers of injuries. There are 183 Palestinians who have been killed in the course of the period that we have investigated, which is from the 30th of March to the 31st of December. As you know, the demonstrations are continuing, and killings and injuries have continued to be reported, but we've just covered this particular period. We also found, as you said, over 6,000 injuries to Palestinians caused by live fire. We found that four Israeli soldiers had been injured during this time, and two Israeli soldiers had also been killed, but both of those were outside the particular parameters of the investigation. They weren't in the context of—they weren't at the protest sites, although one of them was within the protest times. And I think, amongst the numbers of killings, what we also found, which was of great concern, was the fact that protected—groups who are protected categories in international law, protected persons, such as children, people with disabilities, and also health workers and journalists, were amongst those who were both killed and injured in large numbers.
AMY GOODMAN: The U.N. report calls on states to arrest "persons alleged to have committed, or ordered to have committed, the international crimes." What exactly does that mean?
SARA HOSSAIN: Well, our investigation is done according to the standard of reasonable grounds to believe. It's not a criminal investigation. We have made some preliminary findings based on the facts as we found them, and applying international human rights law and international humanitarian law where that was relevant, given that we're speaking about the context of an occupation and the context—in certain contexts, the conduct of hostilities. So we've made these findings, but we believe that these need to be taken further. We've called on Israel itself to conduct investigations, and we understand that Israel has opened at least five investigations into the incidents that we've found. But we are not clear why it has not opened a larger number of investigations. We think that's the first thing that should happen. We've also asked for the international community to look into this. We are going to present our findings, hand them over to the high commissioner for human rights of the United Nations. And I think then it's for other bodies to take this further. As—
AMY GOODMAN: I want to go to acting Israeli foreign minister—
SARA HOSSAIN: —you know, there's a process at the International Criminal Court.
Israeli forces have killed 183 Palestinians since weekly Great March of Return demonstrations began in Gaza nearly a year ago targeting Israel's heavily militarized separation barrier. That's according to a new United Nations inquiry that found Israeli forces may have committed war crimes and crimes against humanity by targeting unarmed children, journalists and the disabled in Gaza. The report was released by the U.N. Human Rights Council on Thursday. We speak with Norman Finkelstein, scholar and author of "Gaza: An Inquest into Its Martyrdom," and Sara Hossain, a member of the U.N. independent commission that led the Gaza investigation.


Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: I want to go to the acting Israeli foreign minister, Yisrael Katz, responding to the U.N. Human Rights Council's report.
YISRAEL KATZ: [translated] This report is another chapter in the theater of the absurd produced occasionally by the United Nations Human Rights Council, another hostile, mendacious and slanted report against the state of Israel. It's a report based on distorted information, in which the facts were not at all checked, whose only purpose is to slander the only democracy in the Middle East and harm our right to self-defense in the face of the terrorism of a murderous organization. The state of Israel outright rejects this report.
AMY GOODMAN: Norm Finkelstein, the significance of Israel saying it rejects the report?
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Well, Israel has always rejected the reports, whether they come from the United Nations or, more often than not, they come from reputable human rights organizations, like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch or the Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem. So it's not as if—to use the words of the person you just had on, it's not as if it's a typically mendacious U.N. report. It's a report that falls in line with the findings of every reputable human rights organization.
AMY GOODMAN: What most struck you about this report?
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: What most struck me about the report was it was remarkably honest. It was very forthright in its conclusions. And it didn't fake this kind of balance, which most human rights organizations, even reputable ones, attempt between Israel and the United States. So, just to take a couple of examples, it forthrightly stated that Israel targets intentionally children during these demonstrations. It targets reporters. It targets medical personnel. And that's unusual. Allow me just two examples, which you would be familiar with. So, when there was the killings during Operation Protective Edge of the four children who were playing hide-and-seek—
AMY GOODMAN: This was back in 2014.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: 2014. Recently, The Intercept had an article on those four—killings of the four kids, and had this story that they weren't really intentionally killed, it was an accident, it was a mistake. And same thing with The New York Times when it had the big story on Razan al-Najjar, which was quoted everywhere. The essence of the story was, there was an Israeli sniper's bullet, it hit the ground, ricocheted and then accidentally hit three Israeli medical personnel. It was a magic bullet, because there was a huge crowd of people, but this magic bullet only hit three medical personnel.
But this human rights report by the Human Rights Council, it's very straightforward. It says intentionally targets children, intentionally targets even disabled persons. And that, to me, was a credit to them that there was no fake balance. If you look at the proportions, when it looks at the damages done to the people of Gaza, they devote 10 full pages. And then there's a section called "Impact on Israel." It's three paragraphs. And that's exactly what the reality shows, that overwhelmingly—in fact, virtually entirely—all the infliction of death and destruction is on the Palestinian side. For the period they covered, during the demonstrations, there were no fatalities during the demonstrations, and four Israeli soldiers were lightly injured. These are massacres. They're not conflicts. They're not engagements. They're just outright massacres of overwhelmingly unarmed, nonviolent demonstrators.
AMY GOODMAN: This report comes out as the attorney general of Israel says he's going to indict the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. The significance of this?
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: Well, the Israelis ignore the reports. So, in that context, it's not significant. However, there is a critical significance. Namely, the International Criminal Court has had now two cases referred to it on the situation among the Palestinians. One case is on the Mavi Marmara, the flotilla in 2010 that came under Israeli attack. And the second case is on Israeli war crimes in the West Bank, mostly the settlements, and Operation Protective Edge in Gaza. Now, the chief of staff during Operation Protective Edge during July, August 2014—the Israeli chief of staff is—was Gantz—I guess his first name is Benny, but I could be mistaken—Gantz. And the fact of the matter is, if Netanyahu is out, Gantz will probably be the prime minister, and he will be up for indictment by the International Criminal Court. The chief prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, is desperately trying not to investigate Israeli war crimes. But within the International Criminal Court, there has been an unprecedented pushback. There are large numbers of members—large numbers of members of the ICC who say it's time to indict Israel. And the pressure—because of this report, the pressure on Bensouda, chief prosecutor Bensouda, is going to be enormous. It's time to indict Israel.
AMY GOODMAN: And just to be clear, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, if indicted, as the attorney general says, is not being indicted for this, but for corruption.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: That's correct. It's sort of—like I said, it's sort of like Al Capone being indicted for tax evasion. In the great scheme of things, that was the least of Capone's crimes. But that's the way the judicial system works.
AMY GOODMAN: Has the U.S. responded to the report?
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN: To my knowledge, the U.S. has not. This is a preliminary report. The full report will come out on March 18th, I think. So this is sort of the—what they call like an executive summary. It was 22 pages. I imagine the full report will be considerably larger.
AMY GOODMAN: And, Sara Hossain, what do you want to see come out of this report?
SARA HOSSAIN: I think we'd definitely like to see some action, action by Israel, action by the Palestinian Authority also and action by the international community.
I just want to mention one thing, though, in terms of the findings. We did also make findings that on two—in two of the incidents we looked at, on the 14th of May and on the 12th of October, there may have been some justification for the shootings. On the 14th of May, we found an incident in which 21 people were killed, but we think there may have been an issue of direct participation in hostilities, possibly justifying the shootings. And that requires further investigation, as well.
But we think that all the findings, we have, and so we're going to take them forward. We think it's critical that with the 30th of March in front of us, the anniversary of the start of the so-called Great March of Return, it's very important that the international community take action to ensure that this death toll and this injuries toll doesn't continue. We're calling for protective monitoring to be put in place. We're calling for action to end—end this terrible death toll and injury toll that has been continuing over the last year and continuing even now.
AMY GOODMAN: Sara Hossain, I want to thank you for being with us, member of the U.N. independent commission that led the Gaza investigation. Norman Finkelstein, author and scholar; his most recent book, Gaza: An Inquest into Its Martyrdom. We'll be back in 30 seconds.
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Derschowitz Anti-Semetic



THE ABSURD TIMES







Illustration:  Alan Derschowitz criticized Israel for not allowing Chomsky through.  He is therefore either 1)anti-semetic or 2) a self-hating Jew.  His reasons were that 1) it made Israel look rediculous and 2) Chomsky is an ineffective speaker.  Chomsky has published over 100 books and has an extremely demanding speaking schedule as he is much in demand.  Apparently, audiences are tired of effective speakers.




Apartheid Israel, Bunker Israel: Elvis Costello and Noam Chomsky

The repercussions of the brutal shooting-fish-in-a-barrel Gaza War, of the continued Israeli siege and boycott of the Gaza Strip, and of the vigorous colonization of the Palestinian West Bank by militant Israelis, continue to grow. The clear resistance of the far rightwing government of Binyamin Netanyahu to the two-state solution sought urgently by US president Barack Obama, in favor the massive and ongoing theft of Palestinian land and resources, has increasingly tarred Israel with the brush of Apartheid policies. The greatest danger facing Israel is no longer, as in the past, neighboring Arab armies, tank corps and missiles. It is a series of humiliations in the realm of cultural politics, most of them self-inflicted.
The arts community is often pioneers in symbolically protesting human rights violations that others find it inconvenient to mention. Artists are independent-minded and often financially independent, and so cannot easily be pressured.
Thus, singer Elvis Costello’s decision to join Carlos Santana, Sting, Gil Scott Heron, and Bono in boycotting Israel is likely a harbinger of things to come rather than being just an individual decision of conscience. Costello announced at his web page that:
‘ It is after considerable contemplation that I have lately arrived at the decision that I must withdraw from the two performances scheduled in Israel on the 30th of June and the 1st of July.
One lives in hope that music is more than mere noise, filling up idle time, whether intending to elate or lament.
Then there are occasions when merely having your name added to a concert schedule may be interpreted as a political act that resonates more than anything that might be sung and it may be assumed that one has no mind for the suffering of the innocent.
I must believe that the audience for the coming concerts would have contained many people who question the policies of their government on settlement and deplore conditions that visit intimidation, humiliation or much worse on Palestinian civilians in the name of national security. ‘
If some world cultural figures will not go to Israel anymore, increasingly irrational and Draconian Israeli restrictions on dissidents have excluded from Israel Jewish-American linguist and activist Noam Chomsky. Aljazeera English interviewed Chomsky on the episode:

acting like a totalitarian state.
Ironies abound here. The Likud government has by this action legitimated academic boycotts, a political technique that the British Left in particular has advocated be used against Israel itself. Those who argued against boycotting Israel earlier were able to say that it upheld academic freedom and exchange and so should not be isolated. Chomsky himself pointed out that Israel was in essence boycotting Bir Zeit University in preventing his appearance there.
(Another important point is that Israel was making this decision for occupied Palestinians. The latter have no voice in the matter, since they cannot vote for the Israeli government that rules them and decides whose lectures they may attend).
Another irony is that Chomsky could not get official confirmation that he would be permitted to enter the West Bank on a second try, and so he addressed his Bir Zeit audience by video from Amman, with Aljazeera helping out. In the region, Aljazeera has played an important role in giving a platform to a very wide range of political views, and now this Arab media outlet is more open than the supposedly democratic Israel.
The stories of Elvis Costello and Noam Chomsky illuminate two over-arching processes. Israel’s growing reputation as an Apartheid state will not result in major economic boycotts in the near term. But the step Costello took may become more and more common if the Palestinians continue to be deprived by Israel of their basic human rights. Chomsky’s story is one of self-imposed isolation on the part of Israeli officials, mired in the proto-fascist political philosophy of Vladimir Jabotinsky– the intellectual background of the Likud Party and of Netanyahu.
  • Share/Bookmark
This entry was posted in Israel/ Palestine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.

8 Responses to Apartheid Israel, Bunker Israel: Elvis Costello and Noam Chomsky



  1. Cide Hamete Benengeli says:
    Here is a revealing statement from Ehud Olmert in 2003:
    “More and more Palestinians are uninterested in a negotiated, two-state solution, because they want to change the essence of the conflict from an Algerian paradigm to a South African one. From a struggle against `occupation,’ in their parlance, to a struggle for one-man-one-vote. That is, of course, a much cleaner struggle, a much more popular struggle – and ultimately a much more powerful one.”
    Evidently, even the Israeli leadership agrees that they are running an Apartheid state.


  2. peter says:
    according to the BBC, Chomsky’s reaction to the Israelis’ statement that they didn’t like his writings, was “I asked them if they could find any government in the world that likes the things I say.”


  3. Kathleen Galt says:
    Prof Cole did you watch the
    Senate Foreign Relations Cmte. Hearing on START Treaty (May 18, 2010)
    Senate Foreign Relations Cmte. Hearing on START Treaty In April, Pres. Obama and Russian Pres. Medvedev signed a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) that will limit long-range nuclear weapons. Sec. of State Clinton, Defense Sec. Gates and Jt. Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mullen discussed the treaty at a Senate Foreign Relations Cmte hearing. This would replace the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty and the 2002 Moscow Treaty.
    Washington, DC : 2 hr. 16 min.
    Hillary “warmongering” Clinton claimed some things about Iran that I hope you dissect. She said that Iran IS enriching uranium above 20%. She was also saying that she had China and Russia on board for more sanctions.
    http://www.c-span.org/
    Have you noticed all of the energy commercials on the MSM? First they have a Iraqi Vet talking about how the US needs to get off the oil teat in the middle east, show US tanks being blown up by IED’s, then they show a shot of the Iranian President and call him a MADMAN and how our oil addiction puts money in his pocket. Several versions of these commercials but they are being played all over the MSM. MSNBC, CNN etc.
    New strategy to fuel aggression towards Iran


    • citizen says:
      Sorry to say this, but it appears that the American public is the most manipulated people in the free world. Actually it is worst than how it was in the USSR. In the USSR most people knew that what they saw and heard was part of government propaganda. As such they could filter out at least some of the propaganda. Here, in this country however, the manipulation and propaganda is pervasive and sophisticated that most people even do not realize who their opinion is being manipulated.
      A sad state of affairs in the land of the free and home of the brave.


      • super390 says:
        Every private-sector TV commercial you’ve ever seen is a meta-commercial for corporate rule. They have spent your entire life telling you that they have all the answers, that they are the ones who care about you, that they will make your life easy and protect you from all dangers.
        It all adds up.

  4. Pingback: May 19, 2010 « Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?


  5. citizen says:
    Good for Elvis Costello, Santana, Sting, Gil Scott Heron, and Bono!
    I too would like to boycott Israeli products on a personal basis. I am not sure there are a lot of consumer products being sold in this country that are from Israel. I assume most are industrial products and services sold to industries rather than to consumers. Does anyone know about organization or websites that inform consumers on this issue? Thanks.


  6. DBake says:
    Dr. Cole (or readers),
    Are there any books on the intellectual history of Likud and Jabotinsky’s political philosophy you would recommend? I had read about fascist influence before, but I don’t know the details.