Thursday, December 13, 2007

New Books from Tom Dispatch -- Comment by Robert Fisk


Illustration: Tis the Season
****************************************************
First a listing and discussion of some good current events books, then an article by Robert Fisk.
From Tom-Dispatch:
Yahoo! Mail <http://mail.yahoo.com/> Print <javascript:window.print()>
- Close Window <javascript:window.close()>
From: "TomDispatch" <tomdispatch@nationinstitute.org>
To: stanford_charles@yahoo.com
Subject: Tom's Review of Books, A TomDispatch Special
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:09:59 -0800
TomDispatch
a project of the Nation Institute <http://www.nationinstitute.org/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom's Review of Books
Dear Tomdispatch Reader,
For 30 years, I've been a book editor in -- or at the edge of --
mainstream publishing. I still co-run and co-edit a series I helped
launch back in 2003, The American Empire Project
<http://www.americanempireproject.com/> (out of Henry Holt's
Metropolitan Books). I've often written back to readers who wanted me to
check out their books (or favorite books of theirs) that the saddest
response a long-time book editor is this: I have so desperately little
time to read books these days. And it's true... it really is...
Nonetheless, in those wee hours after I've put Tomdispatch to bed, taken
my bleary eyes off the next still-to-be-edited manuscript page, and
turned off /The Daily Show/ or those interminable late night reruns of
/Scrubs/ and /Seinfeld/, I still pick up a book and paw through a few
pages. These days, I escape into fiction far less often (and miss that
feeling of being swept into another universe); but, when it comes to
nonfiction, I still have that urge to travel the world, peek into other
cultures and universes, plunge into history, and, above all, look for
new ways to frame our own puzzling, unnerving moment. More than
anything, I'm still moved by the generosity of writers willing to travel
where I wouldn't dare go (or couldn't even book passage), who have seen
things I never will, who understand things I haven't grasped -- and want
to take me along.
Anyway, like some old addiction I haven't kicked, it seems that I just
can't keep away from the world of books. Next year, Tomdispatch will be
spinning off books at -- for a tiny website -- a prodigious rate. New
works that first began at the site will include: Nick Turse's The
Complex, How the Military Invades Our Everyday Lives
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/0805078967/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20>
and a book on America's Iraq by Michael Schwartz, based on his running
commentaries at TD. (Both are due in the spring of 2008.) In May, The
World According to Tomdispatch
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/1844672573/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20>,
an imperial reader, will be published by Verso Books!
With all that in mind, I thought I'd try my hand at a little Tomdispatch
extra for subscribers -- a /Tom's Review of Books/ newsletter that won't
be posted at the main screen of the site. So, if I don't hear cries of
pain, horror, or outrage from you, perhaps I'll do two to four of these
little book letters a year, recommending works I've liked, some
connected to Tomdispatch, some not. And, of course, the holidays seem
like a reasonable time to begin -- that classic moment when, if you're
like me, you enter a bookstore stocked with a staggering array of titles
and only a faint idea of what in the world you should be picking up for
gifts.
So here goes -- and please excuse the self-interested beginning. Think
of it as dealer's choice.
In an era when an American culture of triumph returned to our world,
only to crash and burn in Iraq, my own book, The End of Victory Culture
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/155849586X/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20>,
might be worth a pit stop. Written in the mid-1990s, it's just been
reissued, updated to the present moment, and offering a perspective not
found elsewhere. Of course, I've written about the book before at the
site (and crib from it regularly for my own pieces). If you want to
learn a little about its more serious side, just click here
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/p/victory>. In the meantime, let me suggest
its charms as a secret cultural history of our times by offering the
following five trivia questions - and answers - drawn from the book.
(You'll be able to answer hundreds more after reading it!):
*1.* What was the great commercial triumph of cowboy hero Hopalong
Cassidy with his "spine-tingling episodes never before shown on TV!"?
(/Answer: Marketing his signature black shirt to one million children
soon after World War II, at a time when black was still associated with
mourning or Italian fascism./)
*2.* What did Desi Arnaz tell the studio audience of the top-rated TV
comedy /I Love Lucy/ in 1953, after Lucy was accused of being a
communist by gossip columnist Walter Winchell? (/Answer: "And now I want
you to meet my favorite wife -- my favorite redhead -- in fact, that's
the only thing red about her, and even that's not legitimate."/)
*3.* When did the first interracial kiss make it onto television?
(/Answer: November 22, 1968, in outer space. Star Trek's Captain Kirk
had to turn his back to the camera to simulate placing that kiss on
Lieutenant Uhuru./)
*4.* From what movie did junior officers at the Army Command and General
Staff at Fort Leavenworth, responsible for planning some of the ground
campaign in the first Gulf War, choose a nickname -- and what was it?
(/Answer: Star Wars and it was "Jedi Knights."/)
*5.* When, on May 1, 2003, George W. Bush made his carefully timed, late
afternoon landing on, and strut across, the deck of the /USS Abraham
Lincoln/, to announce that "major combat operations" had ended in Iraq
against the backdrop of that infamous "Mission Accomplished" banner,
what term did his advance men use for the photogenic moment chosen?
(/Answer: "Magic hour light."/)
Now, on to those all those other books.
At the top of my 2007 list is the new paperback of Mike Davis' Planet of
Slums
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/1844671607/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20>.
Talk about a single book taking you on a wild ride across a planet you
hardly knew was there! It's not just a matter of wholesale global
urbanization, which is stunning enough in itself. (After all, since the
late 1970s, in China alone, more than 200 million people have moved from
the countryside into cities, with another 250-300 million expected to
follow in the coming decades.) Nor is it just the impoverishment of so
many new city dwellers. It's also the de-linking of the city in whole
regions of the globe from all industrial processes, meaningful jobs, or
well-being of almost any kind. Not the city /with/ slums, in other
words, but the city /as/ slum. And Davis, typically, was there first.
"Instead of cities of light soaring toward heaven," he writes, "much of
the twenty-first century urban world squats in squalor... Indeed, the
one billion city dwellers who inhabit postmodern slums might well look
back with envy at the ruins of the sturdy mud homes of Catal Huyuk in
Anatolia, erected at the very dawn of city life nine thousand years
ago." To wield a phrase from the 1960s, this book is mind-blowing. Davis
is one of a kind. If you haven't met him on the page, start here.
The World Without Us
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/0312347294/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20> by
Alan Weisman hardly needs me to recommend it. It was, after all, a
bestseller. But once you accept Weisman's premise -- that, by some
unknown means, in a single historical moment (this one, to be exact),
humans were removed wholesale from the planet, the book is anything but
downbeat. It's a riveting exploration of how the traces of the heavy
hand of humanity would slowly disappear and, everywhere, nature would
return. As a dyed-in-the-wool city boy, I have to admit that there was
something moving about that return of nature -- you can't help rooting
for it -- and gripping about the way Weisman describes the dismantling
of my home town, New York City, starting with those flooded subway
tunnels almost the moment the power -- and so those 753 underground
water pumps goes dead. Imagine! Sooner or later, Second Avenue, on which
I took a bus to school so many mornings as a child, will be a river.
This book is, in fact, an infernally clever way to grapple with climate
change, without claiming to be about it at all.
Even here, by the way, put Mike Davis at the head of the class. In the
final chapter of his 1999 book Dead Cities
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/1565848446/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20>,
he began dismantling a great city, London, in what would become the
Weisman-ian manner. Of course, to my mind, the single greatest literary
dismantling of a city (and a civilization) takes place violently in H.
G. Wells' 1898 novel, The War of the Worlds
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/0141441038/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20>.
With gusto, Wells turned the task of taking London apart over to his
"Martian" invaders. (I first read that book under the covers, after
curfew by flashlight, at about age 12 or 13, and practically scared
myself to death.). After hearing a heartless discussion about the
British extermination of the Tasmanians, Wells reputedly decided to turn
the tables, fictionally at least, on imperial Britain. In the process,
he invented most of the tropes of the invader-from-outer-space sci-fi
novel. Ever since then, we humans have been imagining scenarios in which
implacable aliens with superweapons arrive to devastate our planet. What
if, as Davis and Weisman might both agree, it turned out that the
implacable aliens were us?
Speaking of that, I noticed that one of my favorite (tiny) "travel"
books -- ostensibly by bus deep into Africa, but in fact by research
deep into European colonial history -- was reissued this year by the New
Press: Sven Lindqvist's "Exterminate All the Brutes."
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/1565843592/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20>
(The title, of course, is taken from Kurtz's mad scrawl in Conrad's
/Heart of Darkness/). What a ride through the planetary past Lindqvist
takes you on as "progress" and "extermination" leave Europe hopelessly
intertwined, cut a swath across four continents, and arrive back home as
the god of slaughter, machine gun in hand, in August 1914. In a sense,
you could think of this book as the story of how the Jews of the
Holocaust were essentially the Africans of Europe. Read it and weep, as
they say. (Or check out my old /Nation/ review of it by clicking here
<http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20001023&s=engelhardt>.)
And talking about cutting a swath of destruction across a country, don't
miss Dahr Jamail's first book, Beyond the Green Zone: Dispatches from an
Unembedded Journalist in Occupied Iraq
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/1931859477/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20> --
and, while you're reading it, think of us as the invading Martians. I
hardly need to extol Jamail to Tomdispatch readers, but his book offers
a remarkably fresh glimpse at what those "Martians" looked like and felt
like through Iraqi eyes. This book should outlast the war it recorded
(even given Washington's urge to remain in Iraq forever).
On more purely American ground, not to say Ground Zero, stands Susan
Faludi's The Terror Dream: Fear and Fantasy in Post-9/11 America
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/0805086927/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20>,
which explores the full range of bizarre responses to the 9/11 attacks
-- the set of fantasies that Americans, the media, and especially the
right-wing and the Bush administration conjured up in about 30 seconds.
It offers a genuinely original window into the American psyche, for
those brave enough to peek. Where did all those fantasies of manly men
and women-in-need-of-protection come from anyway in a nation that mainly
watched 9/11 on TV? Faludi is convincing when she argues that they
emerged from an American mythology whose origins are as old as the
Puritans and which has been etched, almost like a genetic code, into our
national consciousness. /The Terror Dream/ has largely been reviewed as
a 9/11 book, but, believe me, it's so much more fascinating and deeper
than that.
Oh, not that I haven't recommended it before, but if you're in that
classic, history-can't-repeat-itself-can-it mood, Juan Cole's Napoleon's
Egypt: Invading the Middle East
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/1403964319/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20> is
the book to cure you. Yes, Virginia, it all happened before. The
invasion bringing "liberation" and "democracy," behind which were the
grandiose dreams of a "Greater Middle East." The miscalculations, the
unexpected, bitter guerrilla war that followed, the full fiasco. The
difference? Napoleon's disaster took a mercifully short three years to
unfold and he, at least, brought along a corps of scientists, rather
than private security cops and crony corporations, and some of them
found the Rosetta Stone. Cole, who runs the Informed Comment website
<http://www.juancole.com/> (my daily bread) is just a barrel of energy
and so has set up a separate blog <http://napoleonsegypt.blogspot.com/>
for his book, which is fascinating in its own right.
In Soldier's Heart, Reading Literature Through Peace and War at West
Point
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/0374180636/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20>,
Elizabeth Samet takes us into an otherwise no-admission world -- that of
the officer-corps-in-the-making for our all-volunteer Army. As that
force has become ever less a citizen's army, and so ever less connected
to all of American society, it becomes ever more important for the rest
of us to understand it. Samet offers what, on the face of it, might seem
an unlikely vantage point for illuminating military culture. She teaches
literature and poetry to West Point cadets, but she's canny and
eagle-eyed -- and the ways the young almost-officers she deals with
every day grapple with literature (especially war poetry) turn out to be
telling. "Like their teacher," she points out -- like most of us, in
fact -- "most of my students first encountered war and military life
through the stories of their fathers and from the movies... The signal
difference is that they have actually agreed to turn make-believe into
real life." Not surprisingly, "owning war" -- wresting the right to
write about and interpret it from civilians -- "is one of the things for
which they will fight hardest." The book is peppered with insights into
these young men (and women) and what drives (and confuses) them, while
introducing the civilian reader to a culture that is the best and worst
of small town life. Samet even takes time to consider that almost
all-purpose military exclamation -- nobody really knows where it came
from or exactly what it means -- "hooah" (which she finally bans from
her classroom).
Near the top of the must-read stack of books by my bedside, along with
Naomi Klein's The Shock Doctrine
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/0805079831/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20>
(my next stop actually) and an account of the great Arab conquests in
the century after Mohammed's death, is Studs Terkel's new autobiography,
Touch and Go
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/1595580433/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20>.
Our premier oral historian -- and all-around amazing character -- he is
now 95 years old, but don't you dare say that this is his last book! He
continues to defy the odds. Until I read this one, let me recommend two
slightly older Terkel gems, both perfect paperback purchases: Hope Dies
Last, Keeping the Faith in Difficult Times
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/156584937X/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20> is
his oral history of activists, from the 1930s into the twenty-first
century. It's filled with stirring testimony and a reminder that, in bad
times, to dispel the gloom, hoping is not enough. Only acting -- even
taking the smallest step toward change -- engenders actual hope and a
sense of optimism. I'd like to urge on you as well Will the Circle Be
Unbroken? Reflections on Death, Rebirth, and Hunger for a Faith
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/0345451201/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20>,
Stud's oral history of death. For those of us of a certain age, it is, I
guarantee you, a strangely upbeat, genuinely uplifting book. I edited it
once upon a time and I have to admit that some of the interviews moved
me so that I found myself tearing up even as I marked the pages. I'm
unlikely ever to forget the mother who forgave her son's killer (to his
face) or the touching fantasy of the Chicago sanitation worker who
donated part of his liver to a man he didn't know.
Okay, consider the book "review" part of this letter officially over.
Whatever minimal authority or expertise I may have has now fled the
premises. But that won't stop me -- not before I wax enthusiastic about
two plays I've seen recently. If you're not already in New York or not
coming soon, you can stop here and holiday good speed to you. If you
are, or you will be, then rush for the phone (212-352-3101) or onto the
Internet
<http://www.cultureproject.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=61>
and order tickets to Howard Zinn's /Rebel Voices/ at the Culture
Project, which has just added shows through December 18th (and will soon
be adding more for January). In it, six young actresses and actors (and
the odd guest reader) work energetic magic with passages from the
Zinn/Anthony Arnove book Voices of a People's History of the United
States
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/1583226281/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20> as
well as stirring songs. I have to say that it's a distinctly feel-good
event.
And, if that isn't enough for you, pick up that phone again
(212-967-7555), you mad fool, or grab that credit card one last time for
David Henry Hwang's fabulous new play, /Yellow Face/, at the Public
Theater <http://www.publictheater.org/> only until December 23rd (unless
extended). It's a very personal, inventive, and superbly acted farce of
mistaken racial casting and identity, of father, sons, and American
dreams (as well as nightmares -- sometimes the two can't be told apart),
of anti-Chinese hysterias and other strange phenomena of our American
world.
And with that, to all a good night and -- let's hope -- a happier New
Year of reading and everything else. /Tom/
*Note:* /If you want your friends to read *Tom's Review of Books* and
don't want to forward the letter, you can always send them to the
Tomdispatch site, where it's posted on a separate page. The url is:
http://www.tomdispatch.com/p/book_review_12_11_2007 or just click here.
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/p/book_review_12_11_2007> /
**************************************************************************************
Independent.co.uk Online Edition: Home <http://www.independent.co.uk/>

Robert Fisk: A different venue, but the pious claims and promises are
the same

Published: 29 November 2007
Haven't we been here before? Isn't Annapolis just a repeat of the White
House lawn and the Oslo agreement, a series of pious claims and promises
in which two weak men, Messrs Abbas and Olmert, even use the same words
of Oslo.
"It is time for the cycle of blood, violence and occupation to end," the
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said on Tuesday. But don't I
remember Yitzhak Rabin saying on the White House lawn that, "it is time
for the cycle of blood... to end"?
Jerusalem and its place as a Palestinian and Israeli capital isn't
there. And if Israel receives acknowledgement that it is indeed an
Israeli state ? and in reality, of course, it is ? there can be no
"right of return" for hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who fled (or
whose families fled) what became Israel in 1948.
And what am I to make of the following quotation from the full text of
the joint document: "The steering committee will develop a joint work
plan and establish and oversee the work of negotiations (/sic/) teams to
address all issues, to be headed by one lead representative from each
party." Come again?
We went through all these steering committees before ? and they never
worked. True we've got a date of 12 December for the first session of
this so-called "steering committee" and we have the faint hope from Mr
Bush, embroidered, of course, with all the usual self-confidence, that
we're going to have an agreement by 2008. But how can the Palestinians
have a state without a capital in Jerusalem? How can they have a state
when their entire territory has been chopped up and divided by Jewish
settlements and the settler roads and, in parts, by a massive war?
Yes of course, we all want an end to bloodshed in the Middle East but
the Americans are going to need Syria and Iran to support this ? or at
least Syrian support to control Hamas ? and what do we get? Bush
continues to threaten Iran and Bush tells Syria in Annapolis that it
must keep clear of Lebanese elections, or else...
Yes, Hizbollah is a surrogate of Iran and is playing a leading role in
the opposition to the government of Lebanon. Do Bush and Condoleezza
Rice (or Abbas or Olmert for that matter) really think they're going to
have a free ride for a year without the full involvement of every party
in the region? More than half of the Palestinians under occupation are
under the control of Hamas.
Reading the speeches ? especially the joint document ? it seems like an
exercise in self-delusion. The Middle East is currently a hell disaster
and the President of the United States thinks he is going to produce the
crown jewels from a cabinet and forget Afghanistan and Iraq and Iran ?
and Pakistan, for that matter. The worst element of the whole Annapolis
shindig is that once again millions of people across the Middle East ?
Muslims, Jews and Christians ? will believe all this and will then turn
? after its failure ? with fury on their antagonists for breaking these
agreements.
For more than two years, the Saudis have been offering Israel security
and recognition by Arab states in return for a total withdrawal of
Israeli forces from the occupied territories. What was wrong with that?
Mr Olmert promised that "negotiations will address all the issues which
thus far has been evaded". Yet the phrase "withdrawal of Israeli forces
from occupied territories" simply doesn't exist in the text.
Like most people who live in the Middle East, I would like to enjoy
these dreams and believe they are true. But they are not. Wait for the
end of 2008.
Interesting? Click here to explore further

Also in this section
* Robert Fisk: Darkness falls on the Middle East
<http://news.independent.co.uk/fisk/article3191532.ece>
* Robert Fisk: Holocaust denial in the White House
<http://news.independent.co.uk/fisk/article3146418.ece>
* Robert Fisk: Warning... this film could make you angry
<http://news.independent.co.uk/fisk/article3124292.ece>
* Robert Fisk: King Abdullah flies in to lecture _us_ on terrorism
<http://news.independent.co.uk/fisk/article3109869.ece>
* Robert Fisk: Executed at dawn. But who was he?
<http://news.independent.co.uk/fisk/article3078962.ece>
* Printable version <javascript:printWindow()>
* Email newsletter <http://news.independent.co.uk/article293769.ece>
* RSS Feeds <http://news.independent.co.uk/article293771.ece>
* Scale fonts
* A <javascript:setActiveStyleSheet('normal');>
* A <javascript:setActiveStyleSheet('large');>
* A <javascript:setActiveStyleSheet('x-large');>
Peace Summit
* Former Nato military chief appointed Middle East envoy
<http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/article3204053.ece>
* Abbas loyalists open fire at funeral march, injuring 26
<http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article3204052.ece>
* Adrian Hamilton: Annapolis's sole purpose is to serve the Bush
agenda
<http://comment.independent.co.uk/commentators/adrian_hamilton/article3204028.ece>
Editor's Choice
Fancy lots from Tracey Emin, Alex James or Mark Hix? Now's your chance
to bid for some unique experiences!
Where to buy, what to share and who to watch
Drumming gorilla aids revenues at Cadbury
Invisible fence that can help to save great apes of Africa
In pictures: Designer Oliver Heath's eco-home
What it's like to live in one city and work in another
Help to save lives of women and children in Afghanistan

Independent services

Day in a page
Find articles published on:

Top stories
Search this site: Independent.co.uk
The Web
© 2007 Independent News and Media Limited

Sunday, December 09, 2007

More Primary Idiocy

 
 
 
 
 
Illustration:  A more recent view of my backyard.  I'll have to rake the leaves some day.
 
-----------------------------------------------
 
Mitt Romney recently gave a speech on him Mormonism.  One would have expected something like JFKs speech on his Catholocism and separation of Church and State, but no.  Essentially, what he said is that nobody should be elected until he attends church and is a Christian.  If these damn churches want to influence government policy, why not have them pay property taxes and the preachers income taxes?  Especially the Pat Rebertsons, etc.  I mean, this place was colonized by people escaping a state with an official religion.  That's what we complain about in Iran and criticize in Saudi Arabia, Iran, and, some, Israel.  Romney warns about "creeping secularism," and boy, ya better watch out, better not pout, Jesus is coming to town.  I am hereby reinstituting my church of secular humanism, I declare myself pope, and you can join.  $50 to be a monk, $150 a Bishop, $350 an Arch-Bishop, and $1,000 to be a Cardinal.  If you want to join, just leave a comment.  I will bill you, no CODs, and when your check clears, I'll send you a certificate.  For an extra $50, it will be in color.
 
___________________________
 
Sorry, had enough.
 
 

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

National Intelligence Estimate & Co.


I TOLD YOU SO!

National Intelligence Estimate

This is a report compiled by our sixteen spy agencies. I understand it was submitted to the Administration about six months age. It states that Iran stopped its nuclear weapons interests in 2003 (as it said it did). A few days ago, the Decider, our President, may God have mercy on him, warned that Iran's work towards a nuclear war might lead to World War III. More recently, he said he hadn't read the report until last week.

Now there are people who think he is lying about this, but I think it is clear from his ACT scores and GPA that he never really developed good study or reading habits, so who are we to judge?

He also claims that the report supports everything he said about World War III and Israel agrees. Nobody else anywhere else does, but they are just poor sports.

He also thinks we need that missle battery and radar sites along the Russian border. Why? Well, to help avoid World War III started by Iran. You should know that.

So stop criticizing the poor guy. As he himself said, with respect to himself and his personality and deciding, 'PSYCHOLOGY 101 DOESN'T WORK." (He did not say which year's version of the DSM he had in mind or the year of the course, but take him at his word.) This stiuation is reserved for a course called Abnormal Psychology with is at least an advanced undergraduate course in the field. (I am reluctant to get and deeper into that issue concerning the Decider without some test results).

The Domestic Scene in Politics

Some of you have asked why I don't comment more on the primaries. Well, they haven't started yet, for one thing. Not a single vote has been cast nor a single delegate chosen. However, here are a few factiods:

  • Guliani has been loosing ground, aminly because of his love nest next to ground zero at the 911 site.
  • Huckabee has emerged as a Republican with at least one good statement. He is a fundamentalist Babtist minister and was asked what Jesus would think of the death penality. He managed to keep both his conservative credentials and avoid answereng the main question by saying "Jesus was too smart to ever run for elective office."
  • Obama has been under attack by the Clinton campaign as too ambitious. They even pointed out that he has written an essay in Kindergarten saying he wanted to be President. Well, when asked about it, Obama said "No, no comment -- I understand she quoted something said by my kindergarten teacher in the Phillipines. I think we should stick with current -- well, no comment."
Mexico Invades
Lou Dobbs of CNN points out the Mexico wants to claim Utah. I say, let them have it.
Latest in Sports
One of you has been kind enough to forward the following account of the last Olympics, which I had entirely missed. They have changed so much lately that they loose interest. Isn't the next one going to be in China?
Here is the account ot the main wrestling competition.

Our stoTOlympics, specifically the wrestling event. It is narrowed down to the Russian or the American for the gold medal. Before the final match, the American wrestler's trainer came to him and said, "Now don't forget all the research we've done on this Russian.

He's never lost a match because of this "pretzel" hold he has. Whatever you do, don't let him get you in this hold! If he does, you're finished!"

The wrestler nodded in agreement. Now, to the match: The American and the Russian circled each other several times looking for an opening. All of a sudden the Russian lunged forward, grabbing the American and wrapping him up in the dreaded pretzel hold!

A sigh of disappointment went up from the crowd, and the trainer buried his face in his hands for he knew all was lost. He couldn't watch the ending.

Suddenly there was a horrible scream, and a resounding cheer from the crowd. The trainer raised his eye just in time to see the Russian flying up in the air. The Russian's back hit the mat with a thud, and the American weakly collapsed on top of him, getting the pin and winning the match.

The trainer was astounded! When he finally got the American wrestler alone, he asks, "How did you ever get out of that hold? No one has ever done it before!"

The wrestler answered, "Well, I was ready to give up when he got me in that hold, but at the last moment, I opened my eyes and saw this pair of balls right in front of my face. I thought I had nothing to lose, so with my last ounce of strength I stretched out my neck and bit those babies just as hard as I could. You'd be amazed how strong you get when you bite your own balls!"

Friday, November 30, 2007

Fascism in Amerika


Illustration: a rather small pic of our first author, found of the Huffington Post.
***********
Here are a number of articles that have been accumulating to justify a full-fledged circulation. The first is an interview with Naomi Wolff talking about our crypto fascist state. It could be called "The Ten Steps to Fascism." She is announced as a feminist and this raises a curious point. Many critics tried to condem her ad hominum. Since the title of the book was "The Beauty Trap," the right wing thought they could say she feels that way ecause she is ugly. Well, she thinks more than "feels," and she had the appearance of one of the female leads of Dynasty.
The next is a good analysis of why we don't count Iraqi casualities. In a way, it reminds me of a line from Mort Sahl: "The news announced 'our troops killed two thousand COMMUNISTS today in Viet Nam.'"
"Whew, good thing they weren't people!" The article also contains some excellent links for any of you writing an article or a term paper.
The last one is in remembrance of Arlo Guthrie's Alice's Restaurant and what it meant to so many of us back them. I especially include it as it has a link to a performance of it on You Tube so you right people with High-speed can enjoy it.
***************************************************

'The End of America': Feminist Social Critic Naomi Wolf Warns U.S.
in Slow Descent into Fascism
Wednesday, November 28th, 2007
In her new book, 'The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young
Patriot', Naomi Wolf says the United States is on the road to becoming a
fascist society, right under our very noses. Wolf outlines what she sees
as the ten steps to shut down a democratic society and argues that the
Bush administration has already implemented many of these steps. Wolf is
the author of several books including the 1990s feminist classic, 'The
Beauty Myth.' [includes rush transcript]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The United States is on the road to becoming a fascist society, right
under our very noses. That's the premise of a new book by feminist
social critic Naomi Wolf. It's called "The End of America: Letter of
Warning to a Young Patriot" and is already on the New York Times
bestseller list.
Naomi Wolf outlines what she sees as the ten steps to shut down a
democratic society and argues that the Bush administration has already
implemented many of these steps. Wolf is the author of several books
including the 1990s feminist classic, "The Beauty Myth.'
Critics describe her latest book, 'The End of America,' as a wake-up
call to Americans to heed the lessons of history and fight to save their
democracy before its too late. Naomi Wolf joins me now in the firehouse
studio.
* * Naomi Wolf*. Social critic, feminist, and author of "The Beauty
Myth.' Her latest book is called 'The End of America: A Letter of
Warning to a Young Patriot.'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
RUSH TRANSCRIPT
/This transcript is available free of charge. However, donations help us
provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our TV
broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution.
*Donate* - $25
<https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr'cmd=_xclick&amount=25&business=order@democracynow.org&item_name=Democracy%20Now&no_shipping=1&return=http://www.democracynow.org/thankyou.htm&cancel_return=http://www.democracynow.org>,
$50
<https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr'cmd=_xclick&amount=50&business=order@democracynow.org&item_name=Democracy%20Now&no_shipping=1&return=http://www.democracynow.org/thankyou.htm&cancel_return=http://www.democracynow.org>,
$100
<https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr'cmd=_xclick&amount=100&business=order@democracynow.org&item_name=Democracy%20Now&no_shipping=1&return=http://www.democracynow.org/thankyou.htm&cancel_return=http://www.democracynow.org>,
more...
<https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr'cmd=_xclick&business=order@democracynow.org&item_name=Democracy%20Now&no_shipping=1&return=http://www.democracynow.org/thankyou.htm&cancel_return=http://www.democracynow.org>/
*AMY GOODMAN: *Today, we're joined by a special guest who has just
written a book. The United States is on the road to becoming a fascist
society, right under our very noses. That's the premise of the new book
by feminist social critic Naomi Wolf. It's called /The End of America:
Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot/, and it's already on the /New York
Times/ bestseller list.
Naomi Wolf outlines what she sees as the ten steps to shut down a
democratic society. She argues the Bush administration has already
implemented many of these steps. Naomi Wolf is the author of several
books, including the '90s feminist classic, /The Beauty Myth/.
Critics describe her latest book, /The End of America/, as a wake-up
call to Americans to heed the lessons of history and fight to save their
democracy before its too late.
Naomi Wolf joins us in our firehouse studio. Welcome to /Democracy Now!/
*NAOMI WOLF: *Thank you, Amy.
*AMY GOODMAN: *It's good to have you with us. Start off with the stories
that you tell in your book.
*NAOMI WOLF: *Well, they're the stories of societies that were
systematically closed down by would-be despots, would-be dictators,
whether they were on the left or the right, who essentially developed a
blueprint in the first part of the twentieth century to crush
democracies or to crush democracy movements. So they're also individual
stories of how people react as a democracy is being closed down.
But I guess the book really began with a very personal story, because I
was forced to write it, even though I didn't really want to, by a dear
friend who is a Holocaust survivor's daughter. And when we spoke about
news events, she kept saying, 'They did this in Germany. They did this
in Germany.' And I really didn't think that made sense. I thought that
was very extreme language. But finally she forced me to sit down and
start reading the histories, of course, not of the later years, because
she wasn't talking about German outcomes, '38, '39; she was talking
about the early years, 1930, '31, '32, when Germany was a parliamentary
democracy, and there was this systematic assault using the rule of law
to subvert the rule of law.
And once I saw how many parallels there were, not just in strategy and
tactics that we're seeing again today, but actually in images and sound
bites and language, then I read other histories of Italy in the '20s,
Russia in the '30s, East Germany in the '50s, Czechoslovakia in the
'60s, Pinochet's coup in Chile in '73, the crushing of the democracy
movement in China at the end of the '80s. And I saw that there is a
blueprint that would-be dictators always do the same ten things, whether
they're on the left or the right, and that we are seeing these ten steps
taking place systematically right now in the United States.
*AMY GOODMAN: *Lay them out.
*NAOMI WOLF: *Well, they're not happy. The first step is that all
would-be dictators or would-be despots, which is what the founders of
our country who foresaw exactly this kind of possibility would call them
-- all would-be dictators invoke a terrifying internal and external
threat. And often it's a real threat, which they will hype or
manipulate. For instance, Stalin spoke about sleeper cells, which is one
of those phrases that are being recirculated now by the Bush White
House. And this was an invention. He said there were capitalist secret
agents who were hiding among good Soviet citizens and who are going to
rise up at a signal and create terrorist mayhem -- fake story, but it
worked to frighten citizens.
Pinochet talked about a real threat: armed insurgents. There were armed
insurgents, but he hyped it using fake documents. And we saw -- we see
this a lot in the historical blueprint, that a would-be dictator will
fake documents. His were called Plan Z. He claimed they were going to
bomb infrastructure, assassinate leaders. We saw fake documents used by
the White House to hype of a terror threat when they used the fake
yellowcake documents to claim that Iraq was trying to secure yellowcake
uranium. And remember the famous sound bite -- 'We can't wait for the
smoking gun to come in the form of a mushroom cloud' -- to drive us into
an illegal war with a nation we were not at war with.
*AMY GOODMAN: *You also talk about the language, like the Department of
Homeland Security.
*NAOMI WOLF: *That is where I, as a social critic and a student of
language, get really scared. It's scary enough to see these ten steps,
but what is terrifying to me personally is how many actual phrases are
being recycled, and tactics. 'Homeland security' -- '/heimat/' -- became
popularized by the National Socialists. Goebbels developed the practice
of embedding journalists. Leni von Riefenstahl was embedded, for
instance, in Poland. And we're seeing embedded --
*AMY GOODMAN: *She's the famous German filmmaker.
*NAOMI WOLF: *Filmmaker. If you look at the sequence of, you know,
Hitler descending in an airplane in von Riefenstahl's famous /Triumph of
the Will/ and being greeted by the uniformly armed paramilitary sort of
surrounding their leader and him saying, 'Help us accomplish our
mission,' and then you look at other famous images from this
administration --
*AMY GOODMAN: *Like George Bush on 'Mission Accomplished.'
*NAOMI WOLF: *'Mission Accomplished,' exactly right. You look at how,
you know, Hitler said we have to invade Czechoslovakia because they're a
staging ground for terrorists and they're abusing their ethnic
minorities -- again, a country that we're not at war with, when the WMD
charge vanished, the White House said we have to invade Iraq because
they're a staging ground for terrorists and they're abusing their ethnic
minorities. On and on and on.
I mean, this one scare's me to death. You know, Mussolini developed --
again, a parliamentary democracy, Italy was, in the teens and into 1920.
He developed the Blackshirts, which were these paramilitary thugs that
beat up newspaper editors, terrorized the population, and they
intimidated people counting the vote in Milan. And then Hitler studied
Mussolini, so many things were repeated by Hitler. Stalin studied
Hitler, Hitler studied Stalin. But Hitler developed the Brownshirts, the
SA, who intimidated people counting the vote in Austria. So 90% of them
voted for their own annexation, because they were the Brownshirts. And
you saw this scene of identically dressed Republican staffers in Florida
in 2000 intimidating people counting the vote.
So things like that are really chilling. And they're more and more
chilling as -- I think right now people are kind of ramping up their
awareness of these echoes, and what you also see predictably, because
the blueprint is predictive, is that the White House is ramping up its
implementation of some of the scariest aspects of its crackdown.
*AMY GOODMAN: *You began with these stories back in the summer of 2006
of headlines from a two-week period. Give some of those examples.
*NAOMI WOLF: *Well, 2006 seems so long ago and so innocent a time,
considering how swiftly we've zoomed along implementing this blueprint
or we're suffering this implementation. In 2006, a blogger was jailed in
San Francisco. In 2006, people in Alabama couldn't get a fair hearing
for protecting voter rolls. There was the beginning of the Military
Commissions Act of 2006, in which the state basically legalized torture,
which is one of these crucial turning points as an open society closes
down.
*AMY GOODMAN: *You talk about Christine Axsmith, the computer security
expert working for the CIA, who, what, wrote -- posted a message on a
blog site on a top-secret computer network, criticizing waterboarding --
*NAOMI WOLF: *Waterboarding.
*AMY GOODMAN: *-- saying waterboarding is torture, and torture is wrong.
*NAOMI WOLF: *And then she lost her security clearance. She's one of
many, many whistleblowers, key individuals, who have tried to take a
stand against some of these positions and who have faced -- again, in a
closing society this is what happens. This is step seven: target key
individuals. They face job loss, character assassination or worse.
Valerie Plame's bolts were taken away from her back deck, fifty feet off
the ground. She has two toddlers. People are being put on the watch list
for criticizing the government, for engaging in antiwar protest. Their
kids are being put on the watch list. But, yeah, back then, all she said
was it's wrong. And now we've just confirmed an attorney general who
pretends not to know what waterboarding is, because if he acknowledged
that it's against US and international law, he'd be confirming the fact
that there are criminals in the White House right now who have already
staged a coup.
*AMY GOODMAN: *You say step three is establishing secret prisons.
*NAOMI WOLF: *That's right. You establish secret prisons, and what I
mean by that is unaccountable prisons where torture takes place. And
often there will be a military tribunal system set in place. Lenin
pioneered that. Mussolini developed the confino system. Hitler again
studied Mussolini and developed the People's Court.
And what starts to happen is -- and this is what's so scary about
Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib and these black sites around the world --
apart from the moral issue -- and your interview just now with the
Palestinian representative brought me to tears, because when he said
it's not just the Palestinians he's concerned about, it's the Israelis
who lose their souls by this kind of occupation -- it's not just the
often-innocent prisoners in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib and these black
sites around the world we should be concerned about, it's our own
American souls that are at stake. But just for purely personal reasons,
we should be afraid when the state starts to torture people that it sees
as at the margins or that citizens see at the margins: brown people on
an island in Guantanamo with Muslim names, whatever. That's what they
did in Germany in '31, '32: anarchists, communists, Gypsies, Jews,
whatever, homosexuals, whatever. You know, people didn't care, because
they were seen as at the margins. People knew about the torture cellars
in Germany.
But then, what always happens, always -- you can't name a society in
which this doesn't happen, Amy -- is that there's a blurring of the
line. And once the state legalizes torture of people at the margins,
inevitably it will begin to direct state abuse at people at the heart of
civil society, and it's always the same cast of characters: journalists,
editors, opposition leaders, outspoken clergy and labor leaders. And
when that starts to happen, society can close down in a heartbeat,
because people start to sensor themselves.
*AMY GOODMAN: *It's interesting. During the lead up to Nazi Germany,
American reporters were fired by their American editors, pulled back
from Germany, because they were sounding the warning. They were saying,
'We're seeing a fascist society build.' And they were told that they
were biased, they were not understanding the circumstances in which
Hitler was rising up, people were concerned about their economy, they
had been devastated, and that they were being alarmist.
*NAOMI WOLF: *Interesting. That's really interesting. I mean, I'm
immediately thinking, as you say that, which I actually hadn't known,
that -- thinking of a lot of books I've been reading lately about deep
US involvement. Some corporations were deeply involved in Nazi Germany,
making millions, like IBM. How did they round people up so quickly, you
know, in Germany when they were rounding up the Jews so fast' It's
because IBM had developed this prototype of a punch card system, and
they were secretly working with the Nazis. Prescott Bush, Bush's
grandfather, was making millions in consolidation with Krupp, Thyssen,
and it's very interesting to me, because in the Nuremberg trials they
went after these industrialists like Krupp, and so there was a moment at
which the Nuremberg trial was about to identify supporters of these war
crimes who were US collaborators.
*AMY GOODMAN: *But they didn't.
*NAOMI WOLF: *But they didn't. But I think it's interesting that there
is that historical memory in the family.
*AMY GOODMAN: *It's the question of who controlled the trials, right'
It's the question of who controlled the trials and not wanting their own
people to be involved.
*NAOMI WOLF: *I see.
*AMY GOODMAN: *You talk then -- four, developing a paramilitary force
and surveiling ordinary citizens. Those are the fourth and fifth steps.
*NAOMI WOLF: *Yeah, that's another big one. I just want to note about
the blurring of the line why we're in such a moment of danger right now.
The President has said that he can say, 'Amy Goodman, you're an enemy
combatant. Naomi Wolf, you're an enemy combatant. This guy behind the
camera, you're an enemy combatant. A person walking down the street,
enemy combatant. can be anyone. A person walking down the street, enemy
combatant.' And it doesn't matter that we're innocent US citizens. I
mean, we could be Republicans, we could be evangelicals. It doesn't
matter. He can take us, and if he says it's true, that makes it true,
because it's a status offense, and he can put us in a ten-by-twelve-foot
cell in a Navy brig in solitary confinement for three years, making it
difficult for us to see our families, to contact an attorney, to get
charges filed.
They can't torture us yet, though I was chilled to learn that an adviser
to the White House was reported in a British newspaper yesterday as not
ruling out waterboarding against US citizens. However, psychologists
know that prolonged isolation makes sane people insane. That's what
happened to Jose Padilla. So, you know, when I say everyone's got their
moment at which they start to silence themselves, the day I read in the
/New York Times/ that someone I identify with has been named an enemy
combatant and is sitting in a Navy brig in isolation, that's when I'm
going to stop talking in a context like this, because that's when I will
become too afraid.
*AMY GOODMAN: *We're talking to Naomi Wolf. Her book is /The End of
America: A Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot/. Number six in these
ten steps toward fascism: infiltrate citizen groups. Seven: arbitrarily
detain and release citizens. Eight: target key individuals. Infiltrate
citizens' groups, the evidence'
*NAOMI WOLF: *Well, the ACLU is suing many agents of the state for
illegally infiltrating citizens' groups. It's not a new thing in the
United States. COINTELPRO did it quite a lot. But it is a hallmark --
it's an extension of a surveillance society, and it's a hallmark. It's
an extension of step number four, which was the surveillance apparatus.
Now, you can't close down a democracy without a surveillance apparatus
aimed at ordinary citizens. And what many of us know is that there's
been a heightening of surveillance in the wake of 9/11.
But what we've got to understand is that our country is unique right now
in directing the crackdown on civil liberties and surveillance at
citizens. In countries like England and Spain, experienced the same
terror attacks, the same kind of terror attacks by the same bad guys
that we did, but they're not using that as a pretext to strip citizens
of civil liberties in the same way. And what is so terrifying -- again,
Italy had a surveillance apparatus, people were informing on each other;
Germany, surveillance, the Stasi in East Germany. You couldn't have a
conversation with your neighbor without fearing that it was going to go
into your file.
You can't close down a society without a paramilitary force. We skipped
over that one. It's very important. Blackwater, the Blackshirts, the
Brownshirts, that's not answerable to the people, and surveillance.
So why am I petrified, you know, when I read about Blackwater and about
surveillance' I was on the watch list for a year and a half, Amy, which
means that every time I got on a plane, I got taken aside for extra
searching, quadruple-S high-risk Naomi, you know. And I was told,
'You're on a list.' And I found out that many critics of the
administration are on the list: ACLU staffers, Ted Kennedy, antiwar
activists, David Altoon [/phon./], a highly decorated Vietnam War
veteran who was critical of the Iraq war. Not only is he on the list,
but people who come to me in tears after my readings are more upset that
now their kids are on the list if they write a letter critical of the
Bush administration.
*AMY GOODMAN: *Have you been able to get off the list'
*NAOMI WOLF: *Well, I was off the list 'til this book came out, and now
I'm back on the list. Why is this more than a sort of irritation' Or,
you know, in a strong society, it's just like whatever, you know, it's a
kind of compliment. But in a closing society, it gets very frightening.
In February, the management of the list, which has swollen from 45,000
to 775,000 Americans -- they're adding 20,000 names a month, right'
Where are they getting those names' Remember when I said, how do they
round up people so quickly in a closing society' The management of the
lists is going to go from the airlines to the government. And in
February, unless we push back this regulation -- it's being slipped in
very quietly -- we are going to have to apply to the state to get an
airline ticket to cross a border, which moves us from 1931 to about 1936.
*AMY GOODMAN: *Number nine and number ten of your steps toward fascism:
restrict the press; cast criticism as espionage, dissent as treason.
Subvert the rule of law is eleven. What is the patriot's task, where you
conclude'
*NAOMI WOLF: *Well, the patriot's task is, first, wake up. I mean, all
around the world, democracy activists who are familiar with these same
ten steps are sort of waving their arms at us, going, 'No! You know,
recognize this.' You don't make it easier for the President to declare
martial law, as we just did with the 2007 Defense Authorization Act. You
don't make it easier for the President to lock up political opponents in
a cell or strip people of /habeas corpus/. No, you don't make it easier
for the President to have a paramilitary force like Blackwater, composed
of hand-selected torturers and murderers from countries like Chile and
Nigeria and El Salvador, where they're trained to torture their own
civilians. You know, you don't set them loose in Illinois and Southern
California and North Carolina. No! Bad idea! So, first, you wake up. You
see the blueprint.
*AMY GOODMAN: *We have ten seconds.
*NAOMI WOLF: *Finally, we have to -- we started the
americanfreedomcampaign.org <http://www.americanfreedomcampaign.org>.
It's a democracy movement to restore the rule of law. We're calling for
lawyers across the country and citizens to call for hearings, special
prosecutor, identify the crimes, impeach and prosecute, and save the
country.
*AMY GOODMAN: *Naomi Wolf, I want to thank you for being with us. Do you
think Democratic candidates are raising these issues, for president'
*NAOMI WOLF: *Not enough. This is a transpartisan issue, and we all need
to push them, hold their feet to the fire across the board.
*AMY GOODMAN: *Naomi Wolf's book is /The End of America/. Thank you for
being with us.
********************************************************************
2
*ZNet | Iraq*
*Iraq Has Only Militants, No Civilians
'Tactical Perception Management' in Iraq*
*by Dahr Jamail; TomDispatch <http://www.tomdispatch.com>; November
26, 2007*
/"Sometimes I think it should be a rule of war that you have to
see somebody up close and get to know him before you can shoot
him." -- Colonel Potter, M*A*S*H/
Name them. Maim them. Kill them.
From the beginning of the American occupation in Iraq, air
strikes and attacks by the U.S. military have only killed
"militants," "criminals," "suspected insurgents," "IED
[Improvised Explosive Device] emplacers," "anti-American
fighters," "terrorists," "military age males," "armed men,"
"extremists," or "al-Qaeda."
The pattern for reporting on such attacks has remained the same
from the early years of the occupation to today. Take a
helicopter attack on October 23rd of this year near the village
of Djila, north of Samarra. The U.S. military claimed it had
killed 11 among "a group of men planting a roadside bomb." Only
later did a military spokesperson acknowledge that at least six
of the dead were civilians. Local residents claimed that those
killed were farmers, that there were children among them, and
that the number of dead was greater than 11.
Here is part of the statement released by U.S. military
spokeswoman in northern Iraq, Major Peggy Kageleiry:
"A suspected insurgent and improvised explosive device cell
member was identified among the killed in an engagement between
Coalition Forces and suspected IED emplacers just north of
Samarra.... During the engagement, insurgents used a nearby
house as a safe haven to re-engage coalition aircraft. A known
member of an IED cell was among the 11 killed during the
multiple engagements. We send condolences to the families of
those victims and we regret any loss of life."
As usual, the version offered by locals was vastly different.
Abdul al-Rahman Iyadeh, a relative of some of the victims,
revealed that the "group of men" attacked were actually three
farmers who had left their homes at 4:30 A.M. to irrigate their
fields. Two were killed in the initial helicopter attack and the
survivor ran back to his home where other residents gathered.
The second air strike, he claimed, destroyed the house killing
14 people. Another witness told reporters that four separate
houses were hit by the helicopter. A local Iraqi policeman,
Captain Abdullah al-Isawi, put the death toll at 16 -- seven
men, six women, and three children, with another 14 wounded.
As often happens, the U.S. military, once challenged, declared
that an "investigation" of the incident was under way.
*And So It Goes*
On October 21st, two days before that helicopter strike near
Djila, American soldiers, again aided by helicopters, but this
time in a heavily populated urban neighborhood, claimed to have
killed 49 "armed men" in a "gun battle" in Sadr City, a
sprawling Shi'ite neighborhood in eastern Baghdad. Then, too,
the military initially insisted "no civilians were killed or
injured." A Shi'ite citizens' council and other Shi'ite groups
responded that many innocent bystanders had died. Among the 13
dead mentioned in initial reports by local Iraqi police were
three children and a woman. Other Iraqi authorities announced
that 69 people had been injured.
The U.S. military had no explanation for the widely varying
American and Iraqi tallies of casualties.
The official American account went like this:
"The operation's objective was an individual reported to be a
long time Special Groups member specializing in kidnapping
operations. Intelligence indicates he is a well-known cell
leader and has previously sought funding from Iran to carry out
high profile kidnappings. Upon arrival, the ground force began
to clear a series of buildings in the target area and received
sustained heavy fire from adjacent structures, from automatic
weapons and rocket propelled grenades, or RPGs. Responding in
self-defense, Coalition forces engaged, killing an estimated 33
criminals. Supporting aircraft was also called in to engage
enemy personnel maneuvering with RPGs toward the ground force,
killing an estimated six criminals. Upon departing the target
area, Coalition forces continued to receive heavy fire from
automatic weapons and RPGs and were also attacked by an
improvised explosive device. Responding in self-defense, the
ground force engaged the hostile threat, killing an additional
estimated 10 combatants. All total, Coalition forces estimate
that 49 criminals were killed in three separate engagements
during this operation. Ground forces reported they were unaware
of any innocent civilians being killed as a result of this
operation."
To be fair, the military admitted that the target of this
manhunt was not, in fact, among those captured or killed.
After the "operation," television news outlets broadcast images
of grieving families in the streets of Sadr City. One man
reported that his neighbor's 6-year-old child had been killed,
and a 2-year-old wounded. Arab television outlets caught scenes
of ambulances with wailing sirens carrying the injured to the
Imam Ali hospital, the largest in Sadr City, where doctors were
shown treating the casualties, including children.
Typically with such incidents, those 49 dead "criminals" turned
back into civilians when local police began checking, including
two (not three) children in their final count.
Iraqi Prime Minister Nour al-Maliki vowed an investigation for
which U.S. military officials offered to form a joint committee;
but, as is so often the case in such "investigations," there
have been no follow-up reports. In this "incident," the U.S.
military, as far as we know, still stands by its assertion that
no civilians were killed or wounded.
Two months earlier, in a similar incident, the U.S. military
claimed 32 "suspected insurgents" killed during an air strike,
also in Sadr City, a claim disputed by Iraqis in the
neighborhood, followed by the usual promise of an investigation
-- of which, once again, nothing more was heard.
*"Tactical Perception Management"*
For perspective, let me take you back to Iraq in November 2003.
I had been there less than a week on my first visit to that
occupied country when the U.S. military reported a raging
firefight between American forces and 150 of Saddam Hussein's
former /Fedayeen/ paramilitary fighters. According to General
Peter Pace, then vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
American soldiers, on being attacked by the group, had responded
fiercely and killed 54 of them. "They attacked and they were
killed, so I think it will be instructive to them," General Pace
had smugly observed.
Most of the Western media simply chalked up the number of
"insurgent" dead at 54 and left it at that. Local media in
Baghdad, as well as outlets like /Al-Jazeera/, were, however,
citing very different figures taken directly from the hospital
in Samarra where the wounded were being treated. Doctors there
announced a count of eight killed in the incident, including an
Iranian pilgrim, and 50 Iraqis wounded.
I traveled to Samarra that week, visited the morgue at Samarra
General Hospital, spoke with wounded Iraqis at the hospital, and
interviewed one of the leading sheikhs of the city as well as
several eyewitnesses to the event. What I found was general
agreement that a U.S. patrol had, in fact, come under attack --
but by only two gunmen while delivering money to a downtown
bank. Jumpy American soldiers had responded with a spray of fire
that had killed neither of the attackers, but eight civilians,
while wounding 50 others. The streets in the city center, where
the firing took place, were riddled with bullets.
The military, nonetheless, stood by their figure -- 54 dead --
and insisted that the enormous force of "insurgents" had
attacked with mortars, grenades, and automatic weapons.
A man I interviewed, who had been in his tea stall in the
vicinity and witnessed most of the incident, summed up the local
reaction this way:
"The Americans say the people who fought them are al-Qaeda or
/fedayeen/. We are all living in this small city here. Why have
we not seen these foreign fighters and strangers in our city
before or after this battle? Everyone here knows everyone, and
none have seen these strangers. Why do they tell these lies?"
Another man, at the scene had drawn my attention to a parked car
scarred with 112 bullets. As I was photographing it, a man with
two children at his side approached. They were, he said, the
children of his brother who had been killed by the gunfire.
"This little boy and girl, their father was shot by the
Americans. Who will take care of this family? Who will watch
over these children? Who will feed them now? Who? Why did they
kill my brother? What is the reason? Nobody told me. He was a
truck driver. What is his crime? Why did they shoot him? They
shot him with 150 bullets! Did they kill him just because they
wanted to shoot a man? That's it? This is the reason? Why didn't
anyone talk to me and tell me why they have killed my brother?
Is killing people a normal thing now, happening every day? This
is our future? This is the future that the United States
promised Iraq?"
My life as an independent reporter in his country was just
beginning and his questions felt like so many blows to the gut.
Of course, I was the only American reporter there to hear him
and I was then writing for an email audience of under 200. This
is what it means, in Pentagon terms, to dominate not only the
battlefield, but the media landscape in which that battlefield
is reported. And that sort of domination was, it turned out,
very much on Pentagon minds in that period.
Within days of the incident, for instance, the /New York Times/
published
<http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0DE6DC143DF936A35751C1A9659C8B63>
an article about how the Pentagon had awarded a contract to
SAIC, a private company, which was to investigate ways the
Department of Defense could use propaganda for more "effective
strategic influence" in the "war on terror." The Pentagon
referred to this potential propaganda blitz (which would
eventually come back to haunt Secretary of Defense Donald
Rumsfeld) as a "tactical perception management campaign." The
title of the document SAIC produced was "Winning the War of Ideas."
On December 2, 2005, the U.S. military would admit that the
Lincoln Group
<http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion?pid=131435>, which
described itself as "a strategic communications & pubic
relations firm providing insight & influence in challenging &
hostile environments," had been hired by the Pentagon to plant
pro-American good-news articles in the new Iraqi "free" press
that the Bush administration was just then touting. This was
exposed during a briefing with Senator John Warner of Virginia,
head of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
The admission would not, as one might have expected, prove a
step towards deterrence. Not only did the Lincoln Group get
further contracts, but a wide range of similar tactics continue
to be employed by the military in Iraq today with even greater
impunity. In Iraq, the propaganda and misinformation have, in
fact, been continual and on a massive scale. And, of course, the
regular announcements of Iraqi "insurgent" or "criminal" deaths
in American operations have never stopped, nor have the
announcements of "investigations," when those claims are
seriously challenged on the ground -- investigations which,
except in a few cases, are never heard of again. All this is a
reminder of something George W. Bush once said
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/05/20050524-3.html>:
"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over
and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of
catapult the propaganda."
*The Military Wrist is Slapped*
Even when one of those investigations did lead somewhere, that
somewhere was almost invariably a dead end. Take Haditha.
Witnesses told reporters that, on November 19, 2005, in the
western town of Haditha, 24 Iraqi civilians had been slaughtered
by U.S. Marines. It was no secret that the Marines had shot men,
women, and children at close range in retaliation for a roadside
bombing that killed one of their own.
The /Washington Post/ quoted Aws Fahmi, a Haditha resident who
was watching
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/26/AR2006052602069.html>
from his home as Marines went from house to house killing
members of three families. He had heard Younis Salim Khafif, his
neighbor across the street, plead in English for his life and
the lives of his family members. "I heard Younis speaking to the
Americans, saying: 'I am a friend. I am good,'" Fahmi said. "But
they killed him, and his wife and daughters."
A /Post/ special correspondent and U.S. investigators in
Washington reported that some of the dead were women attempting
to shield their children. According to death certificates, the
girls killed in Khafif's house were aged 14, 10, 5, 3, and 1.
After the news broke in the U.S., the military ordered a probe
of the incident. An Iraqi had actually managed to film the
interiors of the blood-soaked houses as well as scenes of the
wounded at the Haditha hospital, and had recorded statements of
eyewitnesses to the massacre.
Even now, two years after the massacre, investigations continue.
Anonymous Pentagon officials having admitted to reporters that
there is an abundance of evidence to support charges against the
accused Marines of deliberately shooting civilians, including
unarmed women and children. Currently, Marine Corps and Navy
prosecutors are reviewing the evidence, and will likely ask for
further probes.
As for the charges levied against the soldiers involved in the
massacre, on April 2nd of this year, all of the charges against
Sgt. Sanick P. Dela Cruz, who was accused of killing five
civilians, were dropped
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/17/AR2007041701152.html>
as part of a decision that granted him immunity to testify in
potential courts-martial for seven other Marines charged in the
attack and in its alleged cover-up. On August 9th, all murder
charges against Lance Cpl. Justin Sharratt and charges of
failing to investigate the incident against Capt. Randy Stone
were dropped by Lt. Gen. James Mattis, well-known for claiming
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Mattisfame> of fighting in
Afghanistan, "It's fun to shoot some people." On August 23th,
the investigating officer suggested that charges against Lance
Cpl. Stephen Tatum be dropped as well. On October 19th, Tatum's
commanding officers decided the charges should be lowered to
involuntary manslaughter, reckless endangerment, and aggravated
assault. More recently, on September 18th, all charges against
Capt. Lucas McConnell were dropped, and the investigating
officer recommended that charges be similarly dropped against
Lance Cpl. Stephen Tatum.
On October 3rd, an investigating officer of an Article 32
hearing (a proceeding similar to a civilian grand jury)
recommended that Staff Sgt. Frank D. Wuterich be tried for
negligent homicide in the deaths of two women and five children,
and that the murder charges for his involvement in the killing
of 17 innocent civilians, be dropped. In other words, so far, no
one has gone to jail for the massacre in Haditha.
It is now commonplace for such investigations, regarding heinous
crimes against Iraqi civilians, to drag on for months or even
years. Equally commonplace: On completion of these
investigations, the low-level soldiers, who are charged with the
crimes, are often either cleared entirely or given laughably
light sentences by military courts.
On November 8th, for instance, Staff Sgt. Michael Hensley, a
sniper, was found not guilty
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/11/AR2007111100168.html?tid=informbox>
by military judges on three charges of premeditated murder for
killing three Iraqi civilians. He was instead convicted only of
placing an AK-47 rifle with the remains of a dead Iraqi during
one of his missions -- as evidence that the man was an "insurgent."
In January 2004, 19 year-old Zaidoun Hassoun, and his cousin
Marwan Fadil were forced off a ledge into the Tigris River in
Samarra at gunpoint by U.S. soldiers. Fadil survived. He
testified that the soldiers, after forcing the two into the
water, had stood by laughing as Hassoun drowned.
Sgt. 1st Class Tracy Perkins was the only soldier tried in the
case. Defense attorney Captain Joshua Norris suggested that
Perkins could not be convicted of manslaughter because there was
"no body, no evidence, no death." He was, in fact, cleared of
the involuntary manslaughter charge in a military court on
January 9, 2005 and instead was reduced in rank by one grade and
sentenced to six months in a military prison for assault.
Similarly, on June 6, 2006, three British soldiers were cleared
of charges of killing 15-year-old Ahmed Jabber Kareem in May
2003 by forcing him into a Basra canal.
*Iraqis Dehumanized*
None of this -- from the unending "incidents" themselves to the
way the Pentagon has dominated the reporting of them -- would
have been possible without a widespread dehumanization of Iraqis
among American soldiers (and a deep-set, if largely unexpressed
and little considered, conviction on the American "home front"
that Iraqi lives are worth little). If, four decades ago, the
Vietnamese were "gooks," "dinks," and "slopes," the Iraqis of
the American occupation are "hajis," "sand-niggers," and "towel
heads." Latent racism abets the dehumanization process, ably
assisted by a mainstream media that tends, with honorable
exceptions, to accept Pentagon announcements as at least an
initial approximation of reality in Iraq.
Whether it was "incidents" involving helicopter strikes in which
those on the ground who died were assumed to be enemy and evil,
or the wholesale destruction of the city of Fallujah in 2004, or
the massacre at Haditha, or a slaughtered wedding party
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4929336-103550,00.html>
in the western desert of Iraq that was also caught on video tape
(Marine Major General James Mattis: "How many people go to the
middle of the desert.... to hold a wedding 80 miles from the
nearest civilization? These were more than two dozen
military-age males. Let's not be naive."), or killings at U.S.
checkpoints; or even the initial invasion of Iraq itself, we
find the same propaganda techniques deployed: Demonize an
"enemy"; report only "fighters" being killed; stick to the story
despite evidence to the contrary; if under pressure, launch an
investigation; if still under pressure, bring only low-level
troops up on charges; convict a few of them; sentence them
lightly; repeat drill.
At the time of this writing, the group Just Foreign Policy has
offered an estimate
<http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq/iraqdeaths.html> of
Iraqis killed since the U.S.-led invasion and occupation. Their
number: 1,118,846. Consider that possibility in the context of
the latest round of news from Iraq about lessening violence.
The estimate is based on figures from a study conducted by
researchers from Johns Hopkins University in the U.S. and
al-Mustansiriya University in Baghdad, and published in October
2006 in the British Medical Journal, /The Lancet/, which found
655,000 Iraqis had died as a direct result of the Anglo-American
invasion and occupation. The report methodology has been called
"robust" and "close to best practice" by Sir Roy Anderson, the
chief scientific advisor to Britain's Ministry of Defense. Since
that time, in addition to Just Foreign Policy, the British
research polling agency Opinion Research Business has
extrapolated a figure of 1.2 million deaths in Iraq. Based on
this, veteran Australian born journalist John Pilger wrote
recently <http://www.antiwar.com/pilger/?articleid=11910>, "The
scale of death caused by the British and U.S. governments may
well have surpassed that of the Rwanda genocide, making it the
biggest single act of mass murder of the late 20th century and
the 21st century."
It is an indication of the success of an effective Pentagon
"tactical perception management campaign," of the way the Bush
administration has continued to "catapult propaganda," and of
the dehumanization of Iraqis that has gone with it, that the
possibility of the number of dead Iraqis being in this range has
largely been dismissed (or remained generally undealt with) in
the mainstream media in the United States. Add to that the
refusal of the U.S. military to bring justice to those charged
with some of these heinous crimes, the lack of accountability,
and an establishment media which has regularly camouflaged the
true nature of the occupation, and we have the perfect setting
for a continuance of industrial-scale slaughter in Iraq, even
while the news highlights the likes of Britney Spears and
Lindsay Lohan and their adventures in various rehab clinics.
In what could reasonably serve as a summary of the American
occupation of Iraq, the eighteenth century philosopher Voltaire
wrote, "It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are
punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of
trumpets."
/Dahr Jamail. an independent journalist, is the author of the
just-published Beyond the Green Zone: Dispatches from an
Unembedded Journalist in Occupied Iraq
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/1931859477/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20>
(Haymarket Books, 2007). Jamail reported from occupied Iraq for
eight months as well as from Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Turkey
over the last four years. He writes regularly for
Tomdispatch.com, Inter Press Service, Asia Times, and Foreign
Policy in Focus. He has contributed to The Sunday Herald, The
Independent, The Guardian, and The Nation, among other
publications. He maintains a website, Dahr Jamail's Mideast
Dispatches <http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/>, with all his writing./
[This article first appeared on Tomdispatch.com
<http://www.tomdispatch.com/>, a weblog of the Nation Institute,
which offers a steady flow of alternate sources, news, and
opinion from Tom Engelhardt, long time editor in publishing,
/co-founder of the American Empire Project
<http://www.americanempireproject.com/>/ and author of /The End
of Victory Culture
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/155849586X/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20>
(University of Massachusetts Press), which has just been
thoroughly updated in a newly issued edition that deals with
victory culture's crash-and-burn sequel in Iraq./]
******************************************************************************
3
*ZNet | Activism*
*Sitting On the Group W Bench-War and Arlo Guthrie's Thanksgiving*
*by Ron Jacobs; November 20, 2007*
I first heard "Alice's Restaurant" in 1968 on Washington DC's
underground radio station WHFS. The most memorable time I heard
it was in May 1970 on the day after the military murders at
Kent State when a friend read it in homeroom at the junior high
I attended in Frankfurt, Germany. The song's innocence and hope
echo today in the empty chambers of our empty culture where the
current antiwar movement has yet to find an anthem. For those
who don't know this song by Arlo Guthrie, it is the story of a
littering arrest that becomes a humorous yet pointed diatribe
against the culture of war and conformity. The littering arrest
itself took place on Thanksgiving Day in 1965 and the draft was
in full swing-filling the growing demands of the war machine and
its war of the day.
Guthrie's song was part of a general distrust of authority
making its way back into white America after a post World War
Two hiatus. It was more than distrust actually. In fact, it
was turning quickly into a refusal to go along with said
authority. For the most part, this sentiment was most
profoundly felt and expressed by the young via their music,
culture and politics. In a story told several times over and
with an equal number of twists, the youth counterculture of the
time was a culture of opposition. Sometimes that opposition
took the form of protests and direct action against authority
and sometimes it wore the costume of color and danced to music
enhanced by sex and drugs. As naïve as its audience and as
jaded as its target, Arlo Guthrie's "Alice's Restaurant
Massacree" combined all of the counterculture's aspects into a
tale of disgust with the corporate status quo, opposition to its
desire to classify us all and throw us into war, and some good
ol' fun.
What can be more traditional than Thanksgiving, after all?
Despite its negative historical connotations in that it
celebrates the beginning of the Europeans' ethnic cleansing of
the American continent's indigenous peoples, most folks in the
United States celebrate it. It's not that they are celebrating
their ancestors' massacre of the native peoples; it's that they
see it as a time to gather with friends and family and have a
good time. Even the homeless shelters take on a bit of a
festive air this Thursday in November as merchants and
individuals contribute time and money to preparing a traditional
Thanksgiving meal for the residents of those often quite dismal
places of refuge. Of course, the next day there is no more
turkey and stuffing on the table and those without permanent
shelter are still without a home. The wealthy, meanwhile,
scrape several days worth of poor folks' Thanksgiving dinners
into their garbage disposals.
The second part of Arlo's song takes place at the draft
induction center formerly located on Whitehall Street in
Manhattan, New York. He has received his draft notice and is
reporting for the physical and mental exam that was given every
inductee before he had his locks shorn and went off to boot camp
and a life of military conformity. After going through a number
of tests, which are related quite hilariously by Guthrie, he is
finally at the last station on his induction, where he is asked,
"Have you ever been arrested?" This question naturally brings
up Guthrie's entire tale of his Thanksgiving arrest for
littering in Massachusetts and the entire trial following the
arrest. Because of his arrest, he is sent to the Group W bench
with all the other "criminals." There he is given another form
that ends with the question: "Have you rehabilitated yourself?"
I'll let Arlo tell the rest of the story...
I went over to the sargeant, and I said, "Sargeant, you got a
lot a damn gall to ask me if I've rehabilitated myself, I mean,
/(with added emphasis and a sneer)/
I mean, I mean that just, I'm sittin' here on the bench,
I mean I'm sittin here on the Group W bench 'cause you want to
know if I'm moral enough to join the army, burn women, kids,
houses and villages after bein' a litterbug."
Guthrie is not drafted because of his record. And his
Thanksgivings will never be the same. Neither should ours, even
if George Bush shows up for a photo op in Baghdad with a plastic
turkey and a couple dozen unarmed handpicked-for-their-loyalty
troops. There are thousands of other troops who have deserted
because they don't want to go back to Iraq. Protesters have
been arrested in Olympia and Tacoma, WA. for blocking military
shipments. It's time that those who oppose these dirty little
wars join their fellow antiwarriors in the Pacific Northwest on
today's Group W bench. Who knows, we might start a movement.
Watch it here: