Tuesday, September 26, 2017

TRUMP THE VULGAR


THE ABSURD TIMES

What we are all about:
Seems to fit:
Palestine: just a reminder


Trump the Vulgar






So, what does vulgar mean?  It does not mean swear words.  What we have in mind is something between that and what the original term "Vulgate" meant when books were published in languages other than Latin so the "common" people could read them. 



Our President gave the most vulgar speech by a U.S. President in the history of the United Nations.  At the time, we simply stated: "Friends, Delegates, and Heads of State.  Lend me your ears!  He doth not speak for me nor doth he in my manner, this man of Orange."  That is enough.



Someone very prescient suggested that, instead of the National Anthem, which was made a tradition in football in 2009, perhaps a stirring rendition of the Bill of Rights would be appropriate:  At least a summary of some of the key points.  That is what it is all about, anyway.



Once in high school several of us were sent to the discipline office, run by the Vice Principal, who had also been my baseball coach.  Since the idea was to investigate a lack of patriotism, we were asked why we did not sing it.  Several answers where: 1) the range is too wide and I can not hit all of those notes, 2) it is scored in the key of X but was played in Y, and 3), mine, "it is one long rhetorical question to which the only logical answer is 'no'."  After he thought a bit about that, he said all we had to do was mouth the words and "fake it".  I started to protest, but he stopped me immediately, saying, "Hold on, I know you are very good at faking hitters out and you can at least fake out the monitor there."  That was the end of that. 



Have we officially recognized Global Warming yet?



North Korea in protest called our President a "dotard," leading to the intense online search for definitions by the U.S. citizenry.  The BBC immediately knew that it meant and how to pronounce it (showoffs) and the major U.S. Networks caught on in a matter of hours.  I pointed out that it "does not rhyme with not!  That seemed to help.



Someone mentioned that, thus, North Korea has done more to advance American literacy than Betsy Devoss (our Secretary of Education and sister of Blackwater owner).  It is said that she had something to do with not shooting bears near a high school and has also made it easier for college guys to rape people, it seems.



Much has been made of Putin interfering with the election.  Well, yes, what do you expect?  He had no desire to see Clinton elected and was able to screw up the U.S. well with Trump.  What would you expect?  He's happy.  And if you are so upset with the hacking of Podesta's e-mails, his account was on AOL and his password was PASSWORD.  He had also been warned ahead of time by the FBI.  We have not yet decided which was more disturbing, AOL or the lousy password.  Also, much has been said about Russia spending 100K on Facebook Ads.  What a huge sum compared to donations given to Trump by Billionaires.  Why, it almost amounts to 20 seconds of their earned income.  Many who voted for Trump in the key states (Wisconsin, Michigan, and even Pennsylvania), had voted for Obama in 2008.  This was not the case with his "base".



Nuclear disarmament in Korea?  I think that the lesson of Saddam and Gaddafi will make North Korea think twice, if even once.  Even if we think we can easily shoot down one of the armed missiles, they could rig it so that it would explode prior to impact emitting an Electromagnetic pulse that would fry a great deal of electronic equipment on the west coast.  Well, before you dismiss the idea, remember that Trump lost the entire west coast in the last election.



You may wish to reflect upon the last great international nuclear crisis, the Cuban missile crisis.  At that time, the opposing leaders were Mikita Kruschev (who survived Stalin and became leader of the Soviet Union) and JFK to be remember forever.  Today we have a 32 year old kid who kills his Uncles, brothers, and whomever to stay in power and who never led a country and our President whose governmental service is limited to what we have seen since the inauguration, a dotard.  Things look grim indeed.



One final observation before we leave you with a very apt discussion of the NFL v. Trump, who obviously does not know what "Mother" means to many of these players, as he does not understand their culture.  Colin's (#7) mother tweeted:  "Guess that makes me a proud 'bitch'." 



From Democracy Now:

In the biggest display of athletic defiance in years, football teams across the nation protested President Donald Trump after he attacked the NFLNBA and some of their most popular athletes for daring to draw attention to racism and police violence. We look at the unprecedented role of political activism among athletes under the Trump presidency and the politics of playing the national anthem at games. We speak with Dr. Harry Edwards, professor emeritus of sociology at the University of California, Berkeley, and the author of several books, including "The Revolt of the Black Athlete," reissued this year for its 50th anniversary edition. He was the architect of the 1968 Olympic Project for Human Rights and is a longtime staff consultant with the San Francisco 49ers. We're also joined by Dave Zirin, sports editor for The Nation magazine, who notes that playing the national anthem before games has a long and hallowed history that goes back to the days of "Jersey Shore" and Justin Bieber.



Transcript

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: In the biggest display of athletic defiance for decades, football teams across the nation protested President Donald Trump after he attacked the NFLNBAand some of their most popular athletes for daring to draw attention to racism and police violence by taking the knee during the national anthem. At a campaign rally in Huntsville, Alabama, Friday evening, Trump lashed out at players who have joined this growing protest movement, that, well, in its latest incarnation was started by the former 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick, against racial injustice, kneeling during the national anthem. Trump made the comments while stumping for Senator Luther Strange to replace Jeff Sessions in a close Republican primary in Alabama.


PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Wouldn't you love to see one of these NFL owners, when somebody disrespects our flag, to say, "Get that son of a bitch off the field right now. Out. He's fired. He's fired!"? Wouldn't you love it?

AUDIENCE: U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.!

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: You know, some owner is going to do that. He's going to say, "That guy that disrespects our flag, he's fired." And that owner—they don't know it. They don't know. They're friends of mine, many of them. They don't know. They'll be the most popular person for a week. They'll be the most popular person in this country, because that's a total disrespect of our heritage. That's a total disrespect of everything that we stand for, OK?

AMY GOODMAN: Trump's speech took place in the city of Huntsville, a couple hours from where Alabama's Governor George Wallace openly embraced segregation in his 1963 inaugural address. During his remarks, Trump urged football fans to turn off their TVs when athletes protest during the national anthem.


PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: But you know what's hurting the game more than that? When people like yourselves turn on television and you see those people taking the knee when they're playing our great national anthem.

AUDIENCE: Boo!

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: The only thing you could do better is if you see it, even if it's one player, leave the stadium. I guarantee, things will stop. Things will stop. Just pick up and leave. Pick up and leave.

AMY GOODMAN: Trump's comments come immediately—well, Trump's comments immediately drew outrage and criticism. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said in a statement, quote, "Divisive comments like these demonstrate an unfortunate lack of respect." The NFL Players Association President Eric Winston said Trump's comments were, quote, "a slap in the face to the civil rights heroes of the past and present." Former NFL wide receiver Anquan Boldin told ABC News he and other athletes are concerned about Trump's "hate speech."


ANQUAN BOLDIN: I think the president's words are real divisive. I don't like the hate speech that is coming out of his mouth. Neither do the players in the locker room. So, I think, as a league, we need to stand together and show that we're all about uniting one another and not the divisive rhetoric that's coming out of the mouth of the president.

AMY GOODMAN: Ahead of a series of NFL games Sunday, Trump again urged football fans to boycott NFL games unless clubs punish players who protest during the national anthem. He tweeted, "If NFL fans refuse to go to games until players stop disrespecting our Flag & Country, you will see change take place fast. Fire or suspend! NFLattendance and ratings are WAY DOWN. Boring games yes, but many stay away because they love our country. League should back U.S."

Trump's comments sparked nationwide protests, with players on most teams participating in some form of protest ahead of Sunday games. NFL players who kneeled and locked arms during the national anthem included members of the Buffalo Bills, Denver Broncos, New Orleans Saints, Miami Dolphins, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Cleveland Browns, Philadelphia Eagles, New York Giants. Super Bowl champions New England Patriots also protested, with white quarterback Tom Brady interlocking arms with teammates of color as others kneeled. Several players and staff from the Jacksonville Jaguars and Baltimore Ravens also knelt in defiance [ahead] of a game in London. Journalist Shaun King noted 27 players and staff from both teams participated in the protest, making it the "most ever in one game," he wrote. And nearly the entire Pittsburgh Steelers team sat out the national anthem in the locker room ahead of their game against the Chicago Bears, who stood on the sidelines with their arms locked in solidarity.

Meanwhile, during game one of the WNBA Finals, the Lynx linked arms during the national anthem, while the Sparks stayed in their locker room.

The protests spread to baseball teams, as well, with the Oakland Athletics' Bruce Maxwell becoming the first Major League player to kneel during the national anthem, on Saturday night. Maxwell was born on an Army base; his father is in the military. He told reporters he was, quote, "kneeling for people that don't have a voice."

And on Saturday, legendary musician Stevie Wonder joined protesting athletes by kneeling on stage before his performance at the Global Citizen Festival.

Meanwhile, Trump also took aim at the NBA, rescinding an invitation to basketball champions the Golden State Warriors to visit the White House, after the team's star player, Steph Curry, said he would not attend. Curry told reporters he and some of his teammates disagree with Trump and, quote, "the things that he's said and the things that he hasn't said in the right times." In response, Trump tweeted, quote, "Going to the White House is considered a great honor for a championship team. Stephen Curry is hesitating, therefore invitation is withdrawn!" This is Curry responding to Trump's Twitter attack.


STEPHEN CURRY: It's kind of, I mean, surreal, to be honest. I mean, just I don't know why he feels the need to target certain individuals, you know, rather than others. I have an idea of why, but it's kind of—it's just kind of beneath, I think, a leader of a country to go that route. It's not what leaders do. So, like I said, we have amazing people in this league that have spoken up on both sides of the conversation. The amount of support and encouragement I saw this morning around the league was unbelievable, from all types of players.

AMY GOODMAN: The Golden State Warriors say they'll visit Washington, D.C., but skip the White House and instead, quote, "celebrate equality, diversity and inclusion," unquote. Trump's tweet also drew a sharp rebuke from NBA superstar LeBron James, one of the nation's best-known athletes. He tweeted at Trump, quote, "U bum @StephenCurry30 already said he ain't going! So therefore ain't no invite. Going to White House was a great honor until you showed up!" James posted this video on his Instagram account on Saturday. As of Sunday evening, it had been viewed over 2 million times.


LEBRON JAMES: You look at him kind of asking, you know, the NFL owners to get rid of players off the field because they're exercising their rights, and that's not right. And then, you know, when I wake up, I see that a colleague of mine has been uninvited—of something that he said he didn't even want to go to in the first place—you know, to the White House. You know, that's just something I can't stand for, man. And we've got, you know, Jemele Hill and Colin Kaepernick, and, you know, all these people are speaking up, and it's for the greater cause. It's for us to all come together. It's not about a division. It's not about dividing. We, as American people, need to actually just come together even more stronger, man, because this is a very critical time. And me being in the position I am, I had to voice this to y'all. So, love y'all, man.

AMY GOODMAN: Basketball star LeBron James. Meanwhile, Sunday, even some of the anthem singers participated in the protests during the NFL games. In Motown, before the Lions game at Ford Field, singer Rico Lavelle performed "The Star-Spangled Banner," pausing between "home of the" and "brave" to drop to his right knee and raise his left hand in a fist, a move that recalled the Black Power salute of U.S. Olympians John Carlos and Tommie Smith at the 1968 Olympic Games in Mexico City.


RICO LAVELLE: [singing] For the land of the free and the home of the brave.

AMY GOODMAN: When we come back from break, we'll be joined by three guests: Dr. Harry Edwards, professor emeritus of sociology, University of California, Berkeley, adviser to Colin Kaepernick; we'll also be speaking with sportswriter Dave Zirin; and we'll be speaking with former NFL star Donté Stallworth. This is Democracy Now! Back in a minute.

[break]

AMY GOODMAN: That's Stevie Wonder performing Saturday night at the Global Citizen concert in Central Park. That was after he took both knees, as he said it, for America and for the world. This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org, The War and Peace Report. I'm Amy Goodman.

In the biggest display of athletic defiance in years, sports teams across the nation—football, baseball and basketball—protested President Donald Trump after he attacked the NFL, the NBA and some of their most popular athletes for daring to draw attention to racism and police violence.

We go now to get response. We're joined by three people. In Palo Alto, California, we're joined by Dr. Harry Edwards, professor emeritus of sociology at University of California, Berkeley, author of a number of books, including The Revolt of the Black Athlete, reissued this year for its 50th anniversary edition. He was the architect of the 1968 Olympic Project for Human Rights, longtime staff consultant with the San Francisco 49ers, where he worked with Colin Kaepernick. In Washington, D.C., we're joined by Donté Stallworth, a sports commentator, former NFL player who spent 10 years in the league. And also with us, Dave Zirin, a sports editor for The Nation magazine. His latest piece, "For the NFL, It was 'Choose Your Side Sunday.'"

We welcome you all to Democracy Now! Harry Edwards, let's begin with you. Have you seen anything like this, in one day, yesterday, what happened across this country and beyond?

HARRY EDWARDS: Oh, absolutely not. I mean, in the 1960s, you had pockets of athletes who were engaged in political activities, some of the greatest sports personalities in the history of this country, but there was nothing on this scale. Mr. Trump has managed to precipitate something that all of us, activists and intellectuals and media types, would never have been able to achieve, through his ignorance, impulsiveness and vindictiveness. And so, what he has done—if anybody is leading this movement, it's Mr. Trump. He has done more to put it on track and to move it forward than any other individual in history.

AMY GOODMAN: I mean, President Trump has managed to do something that hasn't happened in quite a while, like Roger Goodell, the head of the NFL, being united with players? Talk about the response of the predominantly almost all-white coaches, the staff and the players. Describe what we saw yesterday, from game to game, whether the players stayed back in the locker room for the anthem or went down on knee or locked arms, like Tom Brady, not usually seen in solidarity in this way, who talked about President Trump as being disrespectful.

HARRY EDWARDS: Well, Mr. Trump, first of all, threw the owners under the bus. The owners, who had been supporting him, all of a sudden had to choose between him—and the alt-right and that cheap applause that he got in Alabama—and their own players. And they knew, from the moment that he made those statements, if they didn't stand up on the right side of these issues and join their players, they've signed their last free agent, they probably would have a great deal of difficulty signing their draft choices, and they would have tremendous problems in their locker room because of the perception of what the owner stood for who took Mr. Trump's advice.

Again, this demonstrates Mr. Trump's utter ignorance of the dynamics of athletics in this country, particularly at the elite levels, what holds teams together, what motivates them and what they consider to be important and critical in terms of their own involvement in this great American sports institution. So, again, like in almost every other area that he has entered, he shows an abysmal ignorance of what is important, what's going on, and he doesn't hesitate to throw even his closest associates and supporters under the bus.

And I will say something else: We haven't heard the last of him in the sports arena. And so, we had better prepare ourselves to respond objectively, collectively, in unity, because, going forward, he's going to continue this vindictive tirade that he's been on.

AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to turn to the former NFL head coach, like head of the New York Jets, Rex Ryan, well-known Trump supporter. Speaking Sunday on ESPN, Ryan blasted Trump for his criticism of NFL players, saying he's appalled by Trump's comments.


REX RYAN: Like I'm [bleep] off. I'll be honest with you, you know, because I supported Donald Trump. You know, I sat back, and when he asked me to introduce him at a rally, you know, in Buffalo, I did that. But I'm reading these comments, and it's appalling to me. And I'm sure it's appalling to almost any citizen in our country. It should be. I mean, you know, calling our players SOBs and all that kind of stuff? That's not the—that's not the men that I know. The men that I know in the locker room, I'm proud of. I'm proud to be associated with those people. And it's just so—you know, I apologize for being [bleep] off, but guess what. That's it. Because, right away, I'm associated with what Donald Trump stands for and all that, because, you know, I introduced him. I never signed up for that. I never wanted that.

AMY GOODMAN: Dave Zirin, you've been covering sports and protest for a long time. Describe everything that we saw yesterday. I mean, we're not only talking about the NFL—NBA, cheerleaders, the actual anthem singers themselves, WNBA, as well, women's basketball.

DAVE ZIRIN: Yeah. And first and foremost, Amy, I just want to say what an honor it is to do this show with Dr. Harry Edwards. It's impossible—he said it's impossible to think about this moment happening without Donald Trump. I think it's impossible to see this moment happening without the work of Dr. Harry Edwards over the last five decades.

I will say this. Donald Trump thought he knew what he was doing in Huntsville, Alabama. He has a tremendous ability to speak to the worst instincts of his audience. And I'm sure, in his lizard brain, he looked at that audience of senior—white senior citizens' council in Alabama and said to himself, "You know what? I think that going after young black men will be a big win." And that's what he does. He goes after people of color. He goes after women. He goes after people that his base will celebrate their destruction.

And yet, what he did not understand, maybe because he never played the game of football, he did not understand that in football locker rooms they have what Seattle Seahawk Michael Bennett calls a brotherhood. And "brotherhood" could be seen as another word for solidarity. And it's kind of like a Spartacus thing, like "an injury to one is an injury to all" kind of thing.

And so, you think about what Donald Trump said at that rally and what NFL players and owners heard. You've got to take in the whole thing of what he said. First and foremost, he called the players SOBs, and he used the B-word. And that's going after players' mothers, and you just do not do that. Second, he went after their livelihoods, saying that they should be fired. Third of all, he went after their freedoms, their right to dissent.

And it also has to be said that Donald Trump, because he doesn't know the game, did not understand that the players who have been dissenting—and I'm talking about people like Malcolm Jenkins, Michael Bennett—they're not just individuals, they're not just people who are sitting during the anthem, they are people who are considered leaders in locker rooms, the most respected people in the National Football League. So he's going after people who a lot of these coaches love. They love having these guys in their locker room, because they're some of the most thoughtful people that they have.

And so, what Donald Trump spurred is remarkable. And I'd be remiss, Amy, if I did not read for your audience, just so people know how deep the politics of what we saw Sunday was, the statement made by the Seattle Seahawks in their refusal to come out for the national anthem. It's brief, and it's worth reading. This is what they said. They said, "We will not stand for the injustice that has plagued people of color in this country. Out of love for our country and in honor of the sacrifices made on our behalf, we unite to oppose those that would deny our most basic freedoms. We remain committed in continuing to work towards equality and justice for all." We have reached a point where protesting the anthem is an act that actually demands more unity than whatever it is that Donald Trump is saying from his bully pulpit.

AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to go to Michael Bennett himself, a Seattle Seahawk, NFLstar, appeared on Democracy Now! a few months ago, and I asked him about NFLquarterback Colin Kaepernick's decision to protest against racial oppression and police brutality by taking the knee during the pregame national anthem.


MICHAEL BENNETT: When he took that knee, it just—it just made me realize that, you know, when he did that and the way that he touched—made people speak around the world about this, it was like, "Wow! Athletes really do have this platform that a lot of people just want to hear." And when he made that decision to do that, I think it changed a lot of lives. I think it brought out some ugliness in people, but it also brought out some beauty in some people. And I think, for us, for me personally, it just challenged me to be—to even, you know, join him and try to make it—try to make everything in his message more—make it where people understand and they want to be a part of it, where young kids are speaking about it, too.

AMY GOODMAN: So that's Seattle Seahawk Michael Bennett speaking to us in February. Now, Dave Zirin, I wanted to ask you about the history of the playing of the national anthem. It wasn't always like this, was it? Weren't the teams usually in their locker rooms? Did this have to do with payment that the Pentagon made to the NFL to start recruiting more people, because young people watch football?

DAVE ZIRIN: Oh, Amy, playing the national anthem and having the teams line up before games, it has a long and hallowed history that goes back to the days of Jersey Shoreand Justin Bieber. I mean, we're talking 2009. I mean, Fast & Furious 4 came out in 2009. That's how long players have lined up for the anthem. And, yes, it comes out of a partnership between the Department of Defense and the National Football League. Everything you see at games, for years, until it was uncovered by Senator Jeff Flake from Arizona, everything you saw for years, like—

AMY GOODMAN: And John McCain, right?

DAVE ZIRIN: And John McCain, yes. And showing it in like—showing like the salute to the troop moment and all of these spectacles, they really were about recruitment for the armed forces, and they pay tens of millions of dollars to the National Football League to do these kinds of events, which speaks to, I think, this partnership that exists and how patriotism exists in these events. This is not some long tradition. I mean, this is something that's a very short tradition and one that was absolutely geared with post-9/11 war-on-terror concern about the recruitment levels for the armed forces and seeing the NFL as a way to shore up those numbers, and paying billionaires money to make this a reality. And, yes, this was only—this was something also that was hidden. It was discovered by the investigation of those Arizona senators. And I think that sort of gives the game away as far as what all this is about. I mean, Trump speaks about it as if it is this kind of long, hallowed tradition of players standing at attention for the anthem, when it's actually something very recent and very, I think, just monetary, in terms of the NFL's perspective.

HARRY EDWARDS: But—

AMY GOODMAN: Was that Harry Edwards?

HARRY EDWARDS: But, you know, the—uh-huh.

AMY GOODMAN: Go ahead.

HARRY EDWARDS: But, you know, it's not about the anthem.

DAVE ZIRIN: Yes.

HARRY EDWARDS: This is the part that we don't want to get hung up on. What Colin did was not an attack on the anthem. It was not an attack on the military. It was not even an attack on police. It was an attack on injustice. And he was no more against the anthem than he was against the soldiers who are in Afghanistan and in Iraq. And so, we don't want to get too tied up on the anthem and its place in sports and so forth. We want to look at the issues. Anything else is a red herring. That is what Colin was about. It's not even about Colin getting a quarterback job again. That's like saying that we should—that Montgomery—the Montgomery bus boycott movement should have been about Rosa Parks getting her seat back. It has to be about things much broader than that. And so, we want to understand the history and dynamics of the politics of the national anthem and how they're being played by people such as Trump, but we don't want to lose sight about what this struggle is about. It's about injustice in American society.

DAVE ZIRIN: Absolutely.

AMY GOODMAN: Dr. Harry Edwards, you are certainly speaking from personal experience. You're an adviser to Colin Kaepernick. And for people who haven't been following the whole controversy around him, after he first took the knee as a 49ers star, now not being able to get a job—I mean, I'm talking to you from New York, where a thousand people came out protesting outside of NFL headquarters. Talk about Colin's response right now to what we're seeing, the mass protests across the country.

HARRY EDWARDS: Colin Kaepernick is getting ready to play football. I think that that has been his commitment. All of this discussion about whether he wants to play—"Geez, is he willing to offer an apology?" An apology for what? He plays football. He is an activist in the struggle for human rights and justice in American society. Those two things are not contradictory. And so, this notion that perhaps he doesn't want to play anymore, perhaps he wants to be a civil rights leader instead, I mean, those two things are not contradictory.

So, a lot of that is simply rationalization for a reactionary culture, where owners, for whatever reason, are reluctant to give Colin Kaepernick the opportunity to play. The very idea that there are 96 quarterbacks in this league, including 32 clipboard holders, who are so much better than Colin Kaepernick, who took his team to three conference championships and a Super Bowl, that they are so much better than Colin Kaepernick, that he does not even deserve a chance for a tryout, is ludicrous. This is something that the league, along with siding with their players, within the very near future, is going to have to correct. Colin Kaepernick belongs at least on the field holding a clipboard. You can't make any other argument, especially given some of the performances that have shown up in the first three weeks by quarterbacks in this league. So, that's a challenge that the league is still confronted with. But what Colin Kaepernick is doing is preparing to play football, because that's one of the things that he does.

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.


Thursday, September 14, 2017

Occupation of the American Mind:


THE ABSURD TIMES

First, Trump won the south:


That's why/


 
An example of idiocy above and our media, even reliable parts of it.



I recently saw a restored version of Lawrence of Arabia, and a quote from Anthony Quinn seemed to be appropriate for Trump:  "You are a fool.  Thank your God he gave you the face to match!"



Now, about Palestine and our mind control at work here:


AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org, The War and Peace Report. I'm Amy Goodman. As we continue our conversation, we go now to an excerpt of—we are speaking with Roger Waters, the famous British musician, founding member of the iconic rock band Pink Floyd, Waters the narrator of the recent documentary titled The Occupation of the American Mind: Israel's Public Relations War in the United States.
ROGER WATERS: Over the course of 51 days, the Israeli military dropped nearly 20,000 tons of explosive on Gaza, a densely populated area the size of Philadelphia, killing over 2,000 Palestinians and wounding tens of thousands more. The overwhelming majority of these casualties were civilians.
HAMISH MACDONALD: This strip of land is being bombarded from the air, sea and land.
DIANA MAGNAY: Israel launched at least 160 strikes on the Gaza Strip.
RICHARD ENGEL: And there's one less hospital in Gaza now. Israel today flattened Wafa Hospital.
ROGER WATERS: The sheer scale of the attacks sparked outrage and condemnation around the world.
MARK BROOME: Israel's month-long pounding of Gaza has shocked many people around the world. Mass demonstrations have been held in many of the world's major cities.
ROGER WATERS: But in the United States, the story was different. Polls show the American people holding firm in their support for Israel.
ANDERSON COOPER: This is the latest CNN/ORC poll of Americans, shows 57 percent of those polled say Israel's action in Gaza is justified, 34 percent say unjustified.
ROGER WATERS: These numbers were striking, but they weren't new. Over the course of a conflict in which Palestinian casualties have far outnumbered Israeli casualties, the American people have consistently shown far more sympathy for Israelis than for Palestinians.
PETER HART: It's very difficult to divorce public opinion on any question from the media coverage that people rely on to form opinions. And I think the most prevalent lesson from looking at the coverage is that the coverage tends to see this conflict from the Israeli side.
AMY GOODMAN: That last voice, Peter Hart, the National Coalition Against Censorship. That a clip from the film The Occupation of the American Mind: Israel's Public Relations War in the United States, narrated by our guest, Roger Waters, the musician.
Well, on Wednesday, Nermeen Shaikh and I interviewed Roger Waters and Sut Jhally, professor of communication at the University of Massachusetts, founder and executive director of the Media Education Foundation, which produced the documentary. I asked Sut Jhally why he chose to make the film.
SUT JHALLY: Well, it started, actually, quite a while ago, and the reason for it is that American public opinion is so far outside the bounds of world opinion when it comes to—when it comes to Israel. As we talked before, I mean, the moment you start—you break—you start to talk about this, there's an attempt to silence you. So you're actually not allowed to—you're not allowed to talk about it. And then, actually, once you do talk about it, you realize that Americans have a very warped sense of the conflict. I mean, I learned this from my own students, as well as from public opinion polls, that most Americans think that, in fact, it's the Palestinians who are illegally occupying someone else's land in the Middle East.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, talk about legally—talk about what in fact is happening in the Middle East.
SUT JHALLY: Well, it's such a clear kind of instance of, you know, colonization. We've just had 50 years of occupation, Israel's occupation of the West Bank and, until recently, of Gaza. And that's actually very, very clear, because there's also this instant—Americans think it's so complicated. That's actually—when I talk to my students, they always say it's too complicated. And I just actually explain to them, you know, in a few sentences, that this actually is a very, very simple conflict. And what—and when the conflict is that simple, what you have to do is you have to make it more complicated. And that's the function of public relations.
And so, that's what we focus on. We focus on the public relations campaign in the United States to essentially confuse the American public about what was going on, so there will be no pressure coming from the public on this. And in that sense, you know—and we say this in the film—the occupation of Palestine also depends upon an occupation of American public opinion, that unless the American government is aboard with this and acts as a protector of Israel, then that occupation is not possible.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: Let's turn to another clip from The Occupation of the American Mind, featuring our guest, Sut Jhally.
SUT JHALLY: Israel can saturate the media with its spokespeople, but there's still the problem of massive Palestinian casualties showing up on television screens. You can't make those images go away. An Israeli official actually said, "In the war of pictures, we lose. So you need to correct, explain or balance it in other ways."
Here, again, the Luntz document spells out which talking points have been most effective in spinning the brutal reality of Palestinian casualties. He says the first thing the pro-Israeli spokespeople should do is to express empathy for the innocent victims.
DAN GILLERMAN: Unfortunately, innocents do get hurt. And we—we really grieve that.
PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU: We're sad for every civilian casualty.
MICHAEL OREN: The entire situation is tragic.
SUT JHALLY: Once you've done that, Luntz says, you also have to get people to empathize with Israelis, by describing what life is like for them living in constant fear of Hamas rocket attacks. So, again and again, we hear the focus-tested phrase that the rockets are raining down on Israel.
MICHAEL OREN: We have thousands of rockets raining down on our civilians.
HILLARY CLINTON: Rockets were raining down on Israel.
NORMAN SOLOMON: Any advertising executive will tell you the essence of propaganda is repetition.
GRETA VAN SUSTEREN: Rockets raining down on southern Israel.
FOX NEWS ANCHOR: Rockets raining down on Israel.
NEWS ANCHOR: Well, Hamas rockets rained down on Israeli border towns.
SUT JHALLY: Then, Luntz tells PR spokespeople to turn the tables and ask the American people, "What would you do?"
PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU: So what would you do in the United States?
RON DERMER: Will you imagine what America would do if it were facing a similar threat?
NACHMAN SHAI: We always try to ask you the question we ask ourselves: What will you do?
PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU: What would you do?
MARK REGEV: What would you do, if more than 3,000 rockets had been fired on your cities?
SEAN HANNITY: What would you do? Three thousand rockets.
MARK REGEV: What would you do, if terrorists were tunneling under your frontier?
SEAN HANNITY: What would you do if three kids are kidnapped because of a tunnel network?
YOUSEF MUNAYYER: What sort of question is this? Of course, anybody would act to defend themselves against unprovoked aggression. But it is a question that is completely devoid of any context. What drives a society to a point where, after multiple devastating wars, they continue to resist with these most feeble methods? They don't want you to ask that question. They don't want you to ask what is behind this, what's the history here, who are these people, where did they come from, why are they so desperate. No, they want you to understand Israeli behavior. Israeli behavior is always characterized as a reaction to unprovoked violence.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: So that's an excerpt from The Occupation of the American Mind. And the last voice was Yousef Munayyer of the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights. We also heard from Norman Solomon. And this is another excerpt from the documentary.
ROGER WATERS: Two years after the Lebanon invasion, the American Jewish Congress sponsored a conference in Jerusalem to devise a formal public relations strategy, known in Hebrew as hasbara. Participants included PR and advertising executives, media specialists, journalists and leaders of major Jewish groups. According to a brochure from the congress, "No single event brought home the need for a more effective hasbara, or information program, more persuasively than the 1982 war in Lebanon and the events that followed." As one conference participant put it, "Israel is no longer perceived to be 'little David,' but Goliath steamrolling across the map."
The primary aim of the conference was to develop strategies to spin unpopular Israeli policies and to counter negative press coverage by shaping the media frame in advance. "News doesn't just jump into a camera," a conference delegate said. "It's directed, it's managed, it's made accessible." Israel-based advertising executive Martin Fenton would put it in even more blunt terms: "'Propaganda' is not a dirty word," he said. "Face it: We are in the game of changing people's minds, of making them think differently. To accomplish that, we need propaganda."
The conference was chaired by U.S. advertising executive Carl Spielvogel, the legendary ad man who created the highly acclaimed Miller Lite beer ads in the 1970s.
SUT JHALLY: The choice of Spielvogel makes perfect sense. He's known as a master of image inversion and rebranding. The ad man responsible for transforming Miller Lite, which had been viewed before as a woman's beer, into a manly beer the tough guys would drink.
MAN IN BAR 1: But the best part is that it tastes so great.
MAN IN BAR 2: The best part is, it's less filling.
MAN IN BAR 1: Nah, tastes great!
MAN IN BAR 2: Less filling!
SUT JHALLY: His job with Israel would require the same kind of rebranding, only in the opposite direction: to help soften the image of a country that's coming to be seen as a bully. So he recommends creating a Cabinet post dedicated exclusively to explaining policy, whose job would not be setting policy, but presenting it in the most attractive way to the rest of the world.
NORMON SOLOMON: Classic PR is to say the problem is not the policy, it's the presentation. When the policies are so reprehensible that many people become critical, rather than acknowledge there's anything wrong with the policy, there's a doubling down on the PR effort.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: So that was another clip from The Occupation of the American Mind. And that last voice was Norman Solomon of the Institute for Public Accuracy, the film, of course, narrated by our guest, Roger Waters. But, Sut Jhally, I want to ask you about these clips, the way in which the Israeli state, working with different media organizations, has changed, as you argue, American public opinion, or swayed it in this way to be sympathetic only to the Israeli side. Now, this strategy of hasbara, the attempt to influence U.S. public opinion, Israeli supporters argue that such initiatives are attempted by practically all countries in the world, they all have lobbying firms in the U.S. What is it that distinguishes hasbara from the propaganda, in fact, that's attempted by every country attempting to influence U.S. foreign policy?
SUT JHALLY: And that's true. Everyone tries to mold perception in some way for their own—their own actions. The difference in this case is the public—is that Israeli public opinion—or, Israeli public relations is so closely connected to the interests of the American state. And so they're not pushing against the American policy. And it's American policy working hand in hand with Israeli policy, as well. In the film, you know, we try and we—because we really want to make clear that this is not about an Israel lobby that's manipulating—you know, that's manipulating politicians and the public. The reason why Israeli public relations works is because it goes hand in hand with American elite opinion. And if that didn't happen, then the public relations wouldn't work in that way. And we know that that's—that those two things go together, because when American elite opinion differs from what Israel would do, oftentimes American elite opinion prevails, as in the discussion around the Iran policy. The Israel lobby really wanted to push a different line on that. But that was one place where the interests of the lobby diverged from the interests of the American state. And so, when we talk about this, it's not about—it's not about, you know, a lobby that has all this power. It's about an Israel—it's about a lobby that goes hand in hand with the interests of the state. And if that—
NERMEEN SHAIKH: So, in other words, even—so, if U.S. elite opinion were to change, this precise strategy, hasbara, would be relatively ineffective.
SUT JHALLY: Well, it relies upon the American state to go along with it, which is why American public opinion is so important, which is why you have to control American public opinion. Not only do you have to control Senate and the House, which they do, but you also have to make sure there's no pressure on politicians, which is why you have to control public opinion, which is why we say you need to occupy American public opinion to make the occupation possible, as well.
AMY GOODMAN: When it comes to this film, where was it shown?
SUT JHALLY: We've had a huge amount of difficulty getting this shown. It's been shown almost nowhere in the United States.
AMY GOODMAN: Elsewhere?
SUT JHALLY: It's been shown in other—we showed it in Mexico City. It's been shown in Brussels. It's been shown—I just came from a screening in Beirut. We showed it in London. It's screened in—on television stations in Scandinavia, in Europe. Russia Today showed it. Al Jazeera showed it. So, it's been shown outside of this country.
AMY GOODMAN: And the reaction to this film when you attempt to get it to play in the United States?
SUT JHALLY: I mean, it's the way that censorship works, which is silence. We submitted it to film festivals, which is the first way you try and get some publicity and some visibility. We did not get it accepted into one film festival in the United States, and therefore that means it's very difficult then to make the next step, which is how do you get it into theaters, how do you get it into television, how do you get media reviews. I mean, we've—there's been, around this issue—and it's not just this film, but on this issue. It's like there's a web of silence around it.
And it's not just, you know, the right-wing media. It's not just Fox. And it goes everywhere. I mean, it's the one—it's the one topic that even so-called liberal media won't touch. In the film, you know, we had the example of Rachel Maddow, who is supposed to be the most, you know, progressive voice on television, and yet refuses to deal with this issue.
AMY GOODMAN: Let's go to another clip from The Occupation of the American Mind.
SUT JHALLY: Look at how American media covered Israel's 2014 attack on Gaza. A keyword search of all the major networks showed that over the course of the 51-day assault, Israel's ongoing military siege and blockade of Gaza were barely mentioned, compared to the thousands of times Hamas rocket attacks on Israel were mentioned.
JAKE TAPPER: Why is Hamas launching missiles into population centers of Israel?
SUT JHALLY: The basic propaganda frame is built into the very assumptions journalists bring to the table.
JAKE TAPPER: Since Israel pulled out of Gaza in 2005, 8,000 rockets have been fired from Gaza into Israel.
SUT JHALLY: This is how propaganda works. It works by getting your words in the mouths of other people, especially the mouths of supposedly objective media commentators.
DAVID GREGORY: I'm wondering, though, whether you're outraged by the conduct of Hamas, starting the conflict by firing rockets, building tunnels to kill and kidnap Israelis, being more than willing to sacrifice Palestinian lives by embedding them into—into their own kind of arsenal, and using them, as Israel contends, as human shields. Do you have a level of outrage at Hamas itself?
SUT JHALLY: It doesn't seem like propaganda at all. It just seems like news. And this goes across all the major media, including the supposedly most liberal. Look at Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, who's known as the leading progressive voice on mainstream television. She did only four segments on the war. And during these few segments, she never once mentioned Israel's ongoing occupation of the West Bank or its siege and blockade of Gaza, and never once mentioned the fact that the U.S. has armed Israel with the very weapons that were being used against a defenseless civilian population, instead choosing to frame the invasion as part of a senseless cycle of violence perpetrated by both sides.
RACHEL MADDOW: It's been a constant cycle of fighting between Israel and Hamas for the past several years in Gaza. And the fighting and the cause of the fighting feel terribly familiar, because this is basically a recurring war. And if it feels like déjà vu, feels like, "Ugh, I've heard all of this before," you are right, because this really does keep happening, over and over and over again.
RULA JEBREAL: Rachel Maddow, the most important woman on MSNBC, the leader when it comes to politics, in six weeks of war, never mentioned the word "blockade," "occupation," "illegal settlements," never mentioned the support that Congress have for Israel, unconditional amount of money, billions of dollars. What is that? What a disappointment! Our media operations, national media, is a scandal when it comes to Israel.
AMY GOODMAN: An excerpt from The Occupation of the American Mind, the documentary that is narrated by Roger Waters, that's produced by Sut Jhally. That last voice, former MSNBC analyst Rula Jebreal, who is an Italian-Palestinian journalist. Let's go for a moment to the contrast, Sut, that you bring into this film, which is the international media.
JON SNOW: Mark Regev, how does killing children on a beach contribute to that purpose? What was the point of bombing the al-Wafa Hospital, for goodness' sake? ... There are grave uncertainties—
MARK REGEV: No, no.
JON SNOW: —about whether you're acting within the law.
MARK REGEV: No, no, no. I disagree.
JON SNOW: Oh, yes. Oh, yes. You are deliberately targeting—
MARK REGEV: No, I reject that.
JON SNOW: —neighborhoods in which you know there are women and children. ... You've tried everything with Gaza. You've besieged it for seven years. The people live an intolerable and ghastly life, and you know that better than anybody. Why don't you try one other thing: talking? Why not talk? Why not be brave and talk directly with them? Why not?
AMY GOODMAN: That's another excerpt from The Occupation of the American Mind. Sut Jhally, you produced this film. Talk about the contrast of the media coverage.
SUT JHALLY: I mean, the contrast is quite striking when you look at—when you look at—you don't have to go to other parts, you know, really foreign parts of the world. Just look to the way it's covered in the United Kingdom. That's a striking difference. And part of the reason—and, I mean, the clip we show—that clip we use was of Jon Snow, doing what a journalist should be doing, which is asking questions. So, in the U.K., journalism actually still exists. On this issue, in the United States, journalism has ceased to do what it's supposed to do, because it has just succumbed to public relations.
AMY GOODMAN: Sut Jhally, founder of the Media Education Foundation, which produced the film The Occupation of the American Mind: Israel's Public Relations War in the United States. When we come back from break, we return to Sut Jhally and the musician Roger Waters, in a minute.
[break]
AMY GOODMAN: Roger Waters, performing "We Shall Overcome," accompanied by the teenage cellist Alexander Rohatyn, here in the Democracy Now! studios.
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.