Showing posts with label Horkheimer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Horkheimer. Show all posts

Saturday, July 06, 2019

Reason is Dead



The  Absurd Times 

 

Werner put this up, so it must count, right?



The Death of Reason

Some time ago, Max Horkheimer published the Eclipse of Reason.  Then, along with Adorno, he published The Authoritarian Personality.  Who would have imagined that Americans as well as other cultures were afflicted by it?  Well, that was the last time our government asked his opinion on anything, as we all know.

Below, in a rather strange format, are some exchanges I've had recently on Twitter.  Now there are a few advantages there not available on other platforms.  I can simply ignore idiots or, if I follow them back, I can either block or mute them.  If I mute them, at least I don't have to see their nonsense while they may have to see mine.  I can also block them, meaning nothing either from or to that person need be dealt with further.  Donald Trump had blocked the author Stephen King.  I then blocked Donald Trump.  For one thing, I see and hear too much of him anyway.  For another, I somehow enjoyed the action.

As can be expected, I mute most things I find ridiculous, so this is obviously a biased sample.  However, at least it is not disgusting.  

It seems, however, to be a world wide movement for all nations around the world now to think of themselves as superior to all other nations and to find people from a different ethnic group disgusting or at least offensive.  In this country a great deal of people drive around with Confederate battle flags flowing from their cars, none knowing that both the former President of the Confederacy and the main military leader, Robert E. Lee, both said, on different occasions, words to this effect: "Ok, knock it off you guys.  We lost and that's that."  No, these people do not listen to their ancestors.  The are probably ignorant of what they have said.

If Heller's Catch-22 came out today, he'd be prosecuted for treason.
I can not think of a better time and place to say goodbye.  So, fare thee well!




Love Bertrand Russell. He was hilarious. His book _Why I Am Not a Christian_ is a classic. Loved his debate series with Copelston; he pretty much dominated until the argument from contingency which is an intriguing offer from Copelston.

My favorite is the nun bathing fully clothed so that the Lord would not see her naked. Words to the effect "He can see through concrete, steel, and wodd, and yet is foiled by your garment is beyond me."

Next
Bollocks to depression. It fucking sucks. Secondly bollocks to Brexit. Directly linked to the downturn here due to uncertainty. Thank you each and everyone of you that fell for the lies. My family has lost a true friend. #ItsOkNotToBeOk

It is a part of International Nationalism and hatred of others. Everyone is joining in. What fun! I guess it really was a 1,000 year Reich.  We just didn't know it.
Next:

Trump on the 1776 war of independence " Our army manned the air, it took over the airports" This shit isn't funny anymore, he needs to be removed on the grounds of stupidity /insanity #TrumpParadeFail

I am incapable of responding other than to say Once More?

NextWhere are human rights? From this heinous crime, Israeli terrorist soldiers used the apartheid regime against civilians in the State of Palestine. More than 50 gunmen. Can you justify this? pic.twitter.com/zNAqQmkdeF
Replying to @yousefalhadda17 and @zenjk0
I wouldn't even hazard an attempt. The answer is no.

Next

Completely lacking the will to live or smile today. Never felt as lonely as I do right now. Too many battles to fight irl I'm overwhelmed with it all Post me some joy ... sobs in a mush of patheticness This isn't the me I know
Replying to @RED660 and @meNabster
All I can tell you is that suicide is not worth the effort. Others will continue to live and some are stupid enough to be happy.

Next:
Immediately thereafter:
just need to say to you all that you are absolutely amazing. I didn't expect so much love and I'm blown away by it all. I'm still a miserable old moaning grump but I feel less alone & some me has crept back out of her hole. Tomorrow is a new dawn THANK YOU


You are welcome.

Next:

Mine alone:
July 4, 2019 This is what we celebrate: Did You Know? Three prominent U.S. Founding Fathers and Presidents, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and James Monroe all died on the U.S. Independence Day, the 4th of July, (in 1826, 1826, and 1831, respectively). twitter.com/meNabster/stat…


Next

Rob Reiner
@robreiner
·
1h
We can all make fun of this idiot citing air travel in the 1700's, but what's not funny is this sick soulless excuse for a human being has our nuclear codes. If this man is not impeachable, no one is. #ImpeachTrumpNow
Replying to @robreiner and @ProgressWeekly
He is much too Absurd to be impeached which is a process that employs reason. Reason is now dead. 
(I left the name is as he is a public figure.)

next
Narcissism doesn't have an "off" switch. He's only capable of doing what he believes will benefit him. In this case something like "if I show off the military my ratings will be great." That's really all there is...
Replying to
We regret to inform you that you are correct.

Next


Alert: Turn off trump when kids are present. He's single-handedly dumbing down America. Yesterday's head shakers, airports taken over in Revolutionary War & Alexander Graham Bell an American when he was first an immigrant. Proof positive anyone can be an illegitimate potus.
Replying to
Wrong. He is the leader in that, but he has lots of help. He is a sociopath while most of his closest people are psychopaths,. I've said it before, the 1,000 year Reich continues in various guises.
Next

I feel shame, sorrow, anger and rage. I see it equal to the South African Apartheid flag or the flag for Germany between 1935 and 1945.
Replying to @maria_engstrom1 @StandWithUs and @Israel
I see it as a continuance of the 1,000 year Reich. It simply changes names and flags and call itself different things, but it is all state nationalism combined with hatred for the other.

Next


almightygod
@almightygod
·
15h
Thanks for letting Me decide who deserves peace, John! Glad all those genocides in My past didn't disqualify Me! twitter.com/pastorjohnhage…
Pastor John Hagee
@PastorJohnHagee
· 16h
Peace is given, not achieved, and it is given to those with whom God approves.
Replying to @almightygod
I think he has read too much Calvin.

 (I thought these deserved credit for their remarks.)












Sunday, January 20, 2019

WALL AGAINST REASON


THE ABSURD TIMES

 

This is actually a pretty accurate assessment of what Schopenhauer actually said in his essay ON SUICIDE.  Fitting for today.

THE WALL
BY
HON. CZAR DONIC

In the middle of the last century, Max Horkheimer wrote his ECLIPSE OF REASON and what was eventually to be called the FRANKFURT SCHOOL, was firmly established  It was a result of WWII and the treatment of people in Nazi Germany that helped make it popular, but it was followed by another work called THE AUTHORITARIAN PERSONALITY which pretty much established Critical Theory and a definitive theoretical discipline.  Adorno, Marcuse, and many others emerged from the school.  Habermas is the last I know of who was head of theat school.  Angela Davis wrote her Ph.D. dissertation with Adorno and, after she returned to the states, it was finished with Habermas.

Today, we are faced with a wall against reason.  Not logic, but reason, and this is not the place for a full discussion of the distinction.  Suffice to say, an accountant is capable of logic, but not reason.  The same goes for the current administration.

Too many absurd, patently absurd, things are going on and the news is replete with it.  A few things, however, are interesting.  Recently it was announced that terrorists obviously were crossing the Mexican border because some woman in one of the states saw a prayer rug out in the desert.  These days, that serves as proof positive for too many people. 

I believe that it was Voltaire who said words to the effect that life is a comedy to those who think and a tragedy to those who feel, but today's leader is capable of neither.  All activity is directly stimulated and processed by the Reptilian Cortex.  The authoritian personality of the "base" simply swallows it all, obeys, and believes.  Donald Trump, by himself, is doing what Charlie Chaplin did for Hitler back in the 30s.   

We could go back as far as the Monroe Doctrine to document our attitude toward the hemisphere, but we can skip the intervening years and get to the great reversals of the Reagan Era.  Of course, before that we had the murder of Alliende in Chile and his replacement by Pinochet, courtesy of Henry Kissinger and Richard Nixon.  We also had Jimmie Carter calling for the release of the prisoners in Cuba.  When Castro said they were mainly insane criminals, Carter insisted.  So, Castro complied.  Soon, we complained about all the killers and criminals Castro released to our shores.  Well, go figure.

It was during Reagan that the Iran Contra scandal broke out with Ollie North defending it.  See, David Ortega and his Sandinistas liberated Nicaragua and we then established a military counter called the "contras," making a deal with the Ayatollah of Iran to help arm them.  These military mercenaries continued to terrorize the south for years.  North is now spokesman for the NRA.

It is this treatment of the south that led to such a mass migration through Mexico, and it has nothing to do with Islam.  Yet, we hear about prayer rugs.  More to the point, for years, we have been manipulating the elections in Mexico.  One of the last we backed, against Obrador, was Vincente Fox.  When he was recently asked about the wall, he said, "We will not pay for his fucking wall."  Pretty clear as to what he thought.  The last guy had about an 8% approval rating, again we made shure that Obrador did not get elected.  Now, for some reason, he is the President of Mexico.  I don't know what happened there.

Perhaps Trump is as percepting as the legendary Republican Dan Quayle who, upon being down there for awhile, said "I really like the people.  I wish I had studied Latin more in High School."  We will never know, but you can see his role as the one real puppet not attacking Venezuela.

Here is some more:

he United States and allied nations in Latin America are ratcheting up pressure on Venezuela in what appears to be a coordinated effort to remove Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro from office. Maduro was sworn in last week to a second 6-year term following his victory in last May's election, which was boycotted by the opposition. Days before Maduro was sworn in, opposition figure Juan Guaidó became head of the National Assembly, which soon voted to declare Maduro a "usurper" in an effort to remove him from office. The United States, Brazil and other nations have welcomed the effort. As the political crisis intensifies, Maduro has reached out to the United Nations to help establish a peace dialogue in Venezuela. We speak with Jorge Arreaza, Venezuelan foreign minister. He met with U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres this week.

Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now! I'm Amy Goodman. The United States and allied nations in Latin America are ratcheting up pressure on Venezuela in what appears to be a coordinated effort to remove Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro from office. Maduro was sworn in last week to a second 6-year term following his victory in last May's election, which was boycotted by the opposition. Days before Maduro was sworn in, opposition figure Juan Guaidó became head of the National Assembly, which soon voted to declare Maduro a "usurper" in an effort to remove him from office.
The United States, Brazil and other nations have welcomed the effort. Vice President Mike Pence tweeted, the U.S. "strongly supports the courageous decision by Juan Guaidó" to "declare the country's presidency vacant." On the day of Maruro's inauguration, January 10th, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called Guaidó to congratulate him on his election victory to head the National Assembly. Then, national security adviser John Bolton announced, quote, "The United States does not recognize Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro's illegitimate claim to power," unquote. Brazil, now led by the far-right President Jair Bolsonaro, has gone a step further by saying it recognizes Juan Guaidó as the rightful president of Venezuela, even though Guaidó himself hasn't even claimed that title. A group of Latin American countries known as the Lima Group also recently voted to not recognize the legitimacy of Maduro's presidency. Mexico was the sole dissenter.
The U.S.-led effort targeting the oil-rich nation of Venezuela dates back two decades, since the late Hugo Chávez became president in 1999. In November, John Bolton accused Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua of being part of a "troika of tyranny." In September, The New York Timesreported the Trump administration conducted secret meetings with rebellious military officers in Venezuela to discuss overthrowing Maduro. In August, Maduro survived an assassination attempt when he was attacked by a small drone. He accused the U.S. and Colombia of being involved in the plot. In 2017, President Donald Trump said he could not rule out a, quote, "military option" to deal with Venezuela.
All of this comes as Venezuela is facing a staggering economic crisis, caused in part by falling oil prices and broad U.S. sanctions. According to the IMF, inflation is over 1 million percent in the last year, the highest rate in the world. There are widespread reports of food and medicine shortages. The United Nations estimates 3 million Venezuelans have left Venezuela since 2015, resulting in what the U.N. has described as an "unprecedented migration crisis" in Latin America.
As the political turmoil intensifies, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has reached out to the United Nations to help establish a peace dialogue in Venezuela. Venezuela's foreign minister, Jorge Arreaza, met this week with U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres here in New York.
On Thursday, I had a chance to interview Foreign Minister Arreaza, who has served as foreign minister for the past three years. From 2013 to '16, he served as Venezuela's vice president. I began by asking him if he believes Venezuela is being set up for a coup.
JORGE ARREAZA: Of course. It's evident. And you see this man, who nobody knows in Venezuela—you ask in the streets, "Who is Juan Guaidó?" and nobody knows him—but he's being pushed to say that he is the new president, by the U.S. He hasn't said that, but Pompeo says it, Almagro from the OAS says it, and other presidents say that now he's the president. They are trying to push a political conflict in Venezuela. They are calling the armed forces to make pronunciations against President Maduro. That's what they want, a coup d'état in Venezuela. They want a war in Venezuela. And it's not going to happen.
AMY GOODMAN: So, let's talk more about what you believe is the role of the United States in coalescing opposition to Maduro.
JORGE ARREAZA: They are the bosses of the opposition. They tell them what to do. Nothing that the opposition does is without the permission or authorization of the State Department, at least, here in the United States. And they confess this. They say, "We have to make consultations with the embassy. We have to make consultations with the Department of State." It happens. I mean, they are not free. They are not independent.
But in spite of all of that, the president is trying to sit, again, with the opposition—with the democratic opposition, not the extremist opposition that makes violent demonstrations and burns people alive, no? And that is what he's going to insist, on the dialogue. But this, what is happening now—John Bolton tweeting and doing communiqués, and Pompeo and everyone saying that Maduro is not the president, that he's illegitimate, that he's a usurper—come on, that is a coup d'état, again, against Venezuela.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, explain that term, a "usurper." I mean, it looks like, you know, a case is being built for an overthrow, when he, when Guaidó, the opposition, the head of the National Assembly, announces that Maduro is a usurper.
JORGE ARREAZA: I mean, they are manipulating the Venezuela Constitution. They say that the elections, where almost 10 million Venezuelans voted and more than 6 million voted for Maduro, that this didn't happen. No?
AMY GOODMAN: The opposition boycotted?
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes, they boycotted it—not only the opposition, Washington and Bogotá and Lima and Santiago, these governments—no?–neoliberal governments in Latin America. So, they said, when the elections were conveyed, three months before the elections, they said they're going to be a fraud, and they wouldn't recognize the results. And then they pressed the potential candidates of the opposition not to register. And when some of them registered, they pressed them to retire, to withdraw. And they didn't. And now they say that because the elections were a fraud, then there's no president of Venezuela, so the president of the National Assembly has to be the new president. And all these governments and the U.S. government are encouraging this thesis. So, it's very dangerous.
AMY GOODMAN: I want to continue on what the U.S. is doing. In November, national security adviser John Bolton claimed Venezuela was part of a "troika of tyranny."
JOHN BOLTON: The troika of tyranny in this hemisphere—Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua—has finally met its match. In Venezuela, the United States is acting against the dictator Maduro, who uses the same oppressive tactics that have been employed in Cuba for decades. He has installed an illegitimate Constituent Assembly, debased the currency for political gain and forced his people to sign up for a corrupt food distribution service or face certain starvation.
AMY GOODMAN: In December, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro accused U.S. national security adviser John Bolton of leading a plan to invade Venezuela.
PRESIDENT NICOLÁS MADURO: [translated] Today, I come out once again to denounce the plot set forth by the U.S. to destroy Venezuela's democracy, to assassinate me and to impose a dictatorship in Venezuela. Mr. John Bolton has been assigned, once again, as the chief of a plot to fill Venezuela with violence and to seek a foreign military intervention—a coup—assassinate President Maduro and impose what they call a transitory government.
AMY GOODMAN: Foreign Minister, can you elaborate on this and also this term "troika of tyranny," very much reminiscent of George W. Bush's "axis of evil"?
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes, the "axis of evil," no? And it's reminiscent of the language used in the Cold War—Nixon, McCarthy, all that dark history, no? And it has no sense. We're in the 21st century. You have to respect the sovereign nations. We have the right to build our own model, democratic model. And, yes, the United States government, especially the obsession of Bolton, of John Bolton, against President Maduro, they are behind everything that is happening in Venezuela. Yes, they almost killed, assassinated President Maduro August the 4th with drones. And it—
AMY GOODMAN: Well, let's talk about this. This was the first drone attack, attempted assassination, on a head of state in history.
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes.
AMY GOODMAN: August 4th, it was a Saturday. It was in front of the Palace of Justice.
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes.
AMY GOODMAN: Maduro was giving a speech. And explain exactly what happened.
JORGE ARREAZA: What happened is that suddenly a drone appeared, and it exploded.
AMY GOODMAN: Were you there?
JORGE ARREAZA: I wasn't there. But most of the ministers were there, and the military forces were there, and the other branches of power were there. And it was two drones. These people were trained in Colombia. We told—we gave this information to the Colombian government. We gave them the place where they were trained, the people who were involved, the names of the people, of the officials of migration that led them across to Venezuela with the drones. We gave the U.S. government the information about these people in Miami, who met there and also were part of this plot against President Maduro. And nothing happened.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, before it, in April, at the Latin American summit in Lima, Peru, Vice President Mike Pence said more must be done to isolate Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
VICE PRESIDENT MIKE PENCE: We must all stand with our brothers and sisters suffering in Venezuela. And I can promise you the United States will not rest, we will not relent, until democracy is restored in Venezuela and the Venezuelan people reclaim their birthright of libertad.
AMY GOODMAN: So, that's Vice President Mike Pence. In June, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro called U.S. Vice President Mike Pence a "viper" and vowed to defeat what he called Washington's attempts to force him from power.
PRESIDENT NICOLÁS MADURO: [translated] Every time the poisonous viper of Mike Pence opens his mouth, I feel stronger, clearer of what the road is. The road is ours. It is Venezuelan. It is not the one Mike Pence points out to us, not 20 poisonous snakes, not 20 vipers like Mike Pence.
AMY GOODMAN: Foreign Minister Arreaza, explain. Why—what is Mike Pence's particular interest here? You're looking at Pence, Bolton—
JORGE ARREAZA: Bolton.
AMY GOODMAN: —and Pompeo, now secretary of state.
JORGE ARREAZA: Pompeo, as well. You know, Pence, you know, he's a religious guy. He's from the extreme right. You know him. And he's obsessed, as well, with the Venezuelan revolution.
You see they say that you have to restore democracy in Venezuela. We have a democracy. We have had 25 elections in 20 years. We've had elections for president in 1998, in 2000, 2004, 2006, in 2009, 2012, 2013, 2018. I mean, our people are used to—and not only democracy, because the Constitution says you have to elect these presidents and parliament members and mayors and governors; no, because we have—our society is organized in community councils—consejos comunales—and communes, and you take the decisions. Every single day, Venezuelans are exercising democracy. We have democratized the access to education, which was being privatized before the revolution. We have democratized access to housing, which was also exclusive for the rich before the revolution. We have democratized access to health. We have doctors all over—they used to be Cubans, now they're Venezuelans—all over the country. You walk one block, and you have the doctor there. So, we are really trying to build a root democracy, rooted in the people. And that is what they don't like, because that is not what they would like from the countries of Latin America.
AMY GOODMAN: I want to talk about sanctions and the effect they're having on the Venezuelan economy. You have Henry Kissinger, still an elder statesmen, consulted by Democrats and Republicans alike. Let's go back half a century, go back decades. He wanted to make the Chilean economy under Allende scream, he said.
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes.
AMY GOODMAN: You have the half-century embargo against Cuba. What does economic pressure—economic sabotage, if you will—look like in Venezuela? In November, the Congressional Research Service published a short overview of current U.S. sanctions in Venezuela and mentions the Trump administration is considering a new wave of sanctions. But the report also states, quote, "Although stronger economic sanctions could influence the Venezuelan government's behavior, they also could have negative effects and unintended consequences. Analysts are concerned that stronger sanctions could exacerbate Venezuela's difficult humanitarian situation, which has been marked by shortages of food and medicines, increased poverty, and mass migration. Many Venezuelan civil society groups oppose sanctions that could worsen humanitarian conditions." Now, again, this is not the Venezuelan president saying this; this is the U.S. Congressional Research Service. Can you talk about the effect of U.S. sanctions on Venezuela?
JORGE ARREAZA: The Venezuelan people are suffering because of these so-called sanctions, which are cohesive, unilateral measures. This is not approved by the United Nations Security Council. It has no legality. These are decisions taken by one government unilaterally to impose a blockade against Venezuela so it's difficult for us to import food, to import medicine. We cannot use the dollar as a currency to exchange. We have to switch. Only this switching from dollars to euros is more than what we need to invest in, in importing the vaccines for our children or the treatment for HIV in Venezuela for two years. And it's probably—the figure that I can give you is more than $20,000 million that we have lost because of the so-called sanctions in more than a year.
AMY GOODMAN: So, these sanctions are overt. Are there covert sanctions against Venezuela?
JORGE ARREAZA: Of course, because it's not only this, that is official. It's pressing the companies not to work with Venezuela. It's threatening to seize a company that we have here in the United States, Citgo. We cannot repatriate the profit from our company in the United States to invest it in food and medicine in Venezuela.
AMY GOODMAN: And for people to know, Citgo, which is Venezuelan state oil company—
JORGE ARREAZA: Owned, yes.
AMY GOODMAN: —has been used for many years in the United States to support poor people—
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes, yes.
AMY GOODMAN: —in their programs for—to have oil in the winter.
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes. And we intend to keep on using it for this in the United States. But most of the profit annually should be sent to Venezuela, and we cannot do it. It has to be here in the banks of the United States, blocked. We have more than $1,600 million or euros blocked in Europe in this company, intermediary—it's called Euroclear. Why? Because of the sanctions.
AMY GOODMAN: You mentioned Russia. On Wednesday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov expressed concerns over U.S. meddling in Venezuela.
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes.
SERGEY LAVROV: [translate] We have heard talk that allows for military involvement in Venezuela, talk that the United States will now recognize as the president of Venezuela not Nicolás Maduro, but the representative of the parliament. All this is very alarming. And all this shows is that the approach of undermining governments the United States doesn't like stays on as a priority of their activity in Latin America and in other regions.
AMY GOODMAN: If you can talk about the significance of Lavrov weighing in, also the latest news, in December, Russia landing two nuclear-capable Blackjack bombers in Venezuela as part of a joint training exercise?
JORGE ARREAZA: You know, Russia has been friends of Venezuela for over 16 years. We believe that the world has to have several poles, several centers, not only the United States. The United States cut all the military cooperation with Venezuela 20 years ago. And we have military cooperation with Russia. And these planes, aircrafts, that came this year, they came in 2013, as well, and nothing happened. But this year it was taken like it was that we were trying to bomb the U.S. And, come on, that's nonsense. We have the right to have cooperation with Russia, with China, with whatever country in the world. And what Lavrov said there is exactly what the United States is doing. And he knows that they are trying to manipulate the people, the media, the Constitution of Venezuela even, to impose a man who has not been elected president.
AMY GOODMAN: Venezuelan Foreign Minister Jorge Arreaza. We'll be back with him in 30 seconds.
[break]
AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org, The War and Peace Report. I'm Amy Goodman, as we continue with my interview with the Venezuelan foreign minister, Jorge Arreaza.
AMY GOODMAN: You have massive flight from Venezuela. The U.N. high commissioner for refugees has called the ongoing Venezuelan migration crisis "unprecedented" in Latin America. The U.N. estimates about 3 million Venezuelans have left since 2015. Another 2 million are projected to leave this year. About a million of them are living in Colombia; half a million in Peru, Ecuador, Argentina, Chile, Panama, Brazil—all have large numbers. Why, Foreign Minister Arreaza, are so many people, so many Venezuelans, leaving?
JORGE ARREAZA: Well, first, it's not—you know how many Colombians live in Venezuela? Six million Colombians live in Venezuela. Over—Peruvians and Ecuadoreans, over 1 million. Spaniards, Italians, Portuguese, Arabs, over 2 million.
So, of course there is migration at the moment, because we are blocked, because it's difficult to find medicine, to find some products of food, and the hyperinflation process, with an exchange rate, Amy, that is not set by the national authorities in Venezuela, by the central bank, it's set by webpages in Miami, you know? The exchange rate the day before Maduro's inauguration was $1, 1,000 bolívares, which is crazy. Well, the day of the inauguration, it duplicated. It was 2,000 bolívares for $1. And that has no economic logic. That is all political. That is warfare. That is using the currency against our own people.
So, we are worried, of course, because there are—it's not 3 million Venezuelans. It's probably 1 million Venezuelans. And most of the people that have gone to Colombia are Colombians that live in Venezuela and that have gone back to their country. And we are willing them to come back to Venezuela. That's what we want, for the Venezuelans and the Colombians that lived in Venezuela to come back to Venezuela.
AMY GOODMAN: But the economy, inflation over a million percent last year—
JORGE ARREAZA: Yeah, but that—
AMY GOODMAN: —the highest rate in the world?
JORGE ARREAZA: That's the figure of the IMF. That's not the exact—that's not the figure at all. It's probably 10 times less than that. It's a very difficult problem. But this inflation is induced from abroad. It is produced by these webpages and all this warfare, economic warfare, against Venezuela. It is not only because we have not taken some measures in Venezuela. Of course it's not. And it makes things very difficult for the Venezuelan people.
AMY GOODMAN: So, food and medicine shortages. Do you feel that your government, the Maduro government, takes some responsibility for what's taking place?
JORGE ARREAZA: Of course. We are not perfect, as the government here is not perfect at all, and the government in Argentina is not perfect. Of course we have responsibilities. But most of the problem, the vast majority of the problems, in Venezuela are caused by the blockade, are caused by the warfare, economic warfare, against Venezuela.
And in spite of all of that, we are in a better situation today than we were in 2016. There is more food. There is more medicine. There's more—the employment is under 6—unemployment is under 6 percent. And many things. I mean, we have not closed one school, one university, one hospital. We have not expelled the Cuban doctors, because we have to protect our people. We have delivered more than 2,000,500 houses to our people in the last four years. And that is investment that we have made, in spite of the sanctions, in spite of the blockade against Venezuela.
AMY GOODMAN: So, let me ask you about Human Rights Watch and the Venezuelan NGO Foro Penal recently releasing a reportaccusing Venezuelan intelligence and security forces of detaining and torturing military personnel accused of plotting against the government. The report claims, quote, "Some detainees were subjected to egregious abuses that amount to torture to force them to provide information about alleged conspiracies."
JORGE ARREAZA: That's psychological warfare against Venezuela. Of course there are detainees that were in plots last year to overthrow President Maduro. But no one is torturing them. This happened in the last century in Venezuela. We were used to torture. We were used to students being killed in the streets every week. We were used to repression. That stopped with the Bolivarian Revolution. It doesn't happen anymore. But these NGOs are paid also by the USAID and by the government of the United States, and they say what they have to say because they are paid.
AMY GOODMAN: So, I want to ask you about other leaders in Latin America. On the one hand, you have Brazil's far-right president now, Jair Bolsonaro, and Argentina's President Mauricio Macri meeting to discuss joint opposition to the Venezuelan government. And then you have the newly elected president of Mexico, AMLO, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, who is not joining with these other countries who are opposing Venezuela. But first talk about the Macri-Bolsonaro alliance and what that means, joining with the U.S.
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes. As I told you, it's—in Latin America, it's like a company, you know, a corporation. Trump is the CEO of a corporation, and these presidents, who are businessmen, are his directors. And they want to be promoted by President Trump, so they have to do—they have to follow the orders. And they have been said that they have to isolate Maduro, that they have to not recognize Maduro's government, and they have to do what the United States says so, in order to overthrow Maduro. And that's what they're doing.
Of course, we are worried about Brazil, because this man is far on the right. It's fascism again. It's what we felt, that what we believed to have disappeared from the Latin American history, it's happening again. This man hates women. This man hates the black population. This man hates the homosexual community. This man hates Venezuelans. He's a racist. We are worried about Brazil. He hates the poor. But—
AMY GOODMAN: And loves the Brazilian—former Brazilian military dictatorship.
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes, he loves the dictatorship.
AMY GOODMAN: And what does it mean to you that AMLO, the president of Mexico, Andrés Manuel López Obrador—the stance he has taken in support of Venezuela?
JORGE ARREAZA: I believe that the president of Mexico is right. We have to respect each other. We have to respect the principles of international law. I mean, if you join the United Nations, it's because you respect the internal affairs of the other states. It's because you respect the equality of states. It's because you don't have the right to interfere in other nations. That's not what the United States does. They have done wars in Iraq. President Trump said that he regretted—we regretted that the United States invaded Iraq, because now the situation is worse than it was with Saddam Hussein. And the same in Libya.
AMY GOODMAN: And yet you see the same thing happening and, of course, a very serious similarity. You have George W. Bush coining the term, or his people writing the term and him saying it in 2002, "axis of evil," which set up the foundation for the invasion of Iraq. And then you have the U.S. talking about the "troika of tyranny."
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes.
AMY GOODMAN: And the similarities between Iraq and Venezuela are three letters: oil. And interestingly, many years ago, the original name of the invasion of Iraq was going to be Operation Iraqi Liberation, but they realized the acronym was OIL, and they had to change it. That was the United States. But what about this similarity, this resource, focusing on countries that are, you know, the world's most important oil providers?
JORGE ARREAZA: I am sure that if in Venezuela we only had bananas, none of this intervention would be happening. But we have oil. We have gas. We have gold. We have silver. We have bauxite. We have iron. We have water. I mean, Venezuela is a very rich, wealthy nation. And that is why we are—they want to rule the country again, as they did until 1998. They want to have control of the Venezuelan resources. And that is why they are so obsessed to overthrow Maduro, because they want to have these resources for the development of capitalism here in the United States.
AMY GOODMAN: What do you think this coup will look like if it takes place?
JORGE ARREAZA: Well, first of all, it cannot take place, because we have to defend our Constitution, and we have to defend the peace of the Venezuelan people. And the military forces in Venezuela are aligned with the Constitution. They support the Constitution. And as a consequence of that, they support the legitimate president, who is Nicolás Maduro. No doubt about it. So it won't happen.
But what they would like to happen is that some militaries say that Maduro is not the president anymore, and then that they will appoint this young fellow, Guaidó, as president, with no constitutional support. And then they will have control of PDVSA, of the oil of Venezuela—you said it: the oil. They will have control of the companies of Venezuela, of the resources, the gold and everything. And they believe that is possible. That's not possible, not in Venezuela. Maybe in some other country, but not in Venezuela.
AMY GOODMAN: I'm looking at a tweet that just came over, from Florida Senator Marco Rubio. He says, "We must support those members of military in #Venezuela who have announced they will defend the constitution and recognize Guaidó as legitimate interim President." That's the president of the National Assembly.
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes. You know that those are supposed to be military people. They live in Peru. They don't live in Venezuela. That's part—
AMY GOODMAN: You're talking about the picture he tweeted out—
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes. That's a video.
AMY GOODMAN: —of military men.
JORGE ARREAZA: That's a video that last night came, and it's supposed to be Venezuelan militaries, who live in Peru. I mean, that's part of the show. They are probably paid, maybe by the Peruvian government. I don't know. They are in the Peruvian TV. But that's not happening in Venezuela. That's what Marco Rubio wants, that this were to happen in Venezuela, that the military were to announce that they don't recognize President Maduro. That's not going to happen. And if it were to happen, a small group, we are ready for any scenario. But that's—they want a coup d'état in Venezuela. That's a good proof of what Bolton, Pence and Trump and Marco Rubio want for Venezuela.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, let me ask you about the issue of press freedom in Venezuela.
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes.
AMY GOODMAN: In December, the 75-year-old newspaper El Nacional published its last issue. It was the largest remaining opposition newspaper publishing in Venezuela. The Committee to Protect Journalists reported the closure was due to restrictions that the government imposed on access to newsprint. According to CPJ, over 20 Venezuelan publications have been forced out of print due to government restrictions on newsprint. Natalie Southwick of CPJsaid, quote, "The disappearance of El Nacional's print edition is the latest casualty of the Venezuelan government's ever-expanding campaign to silence critical reporting and limit the voices of independent media in the country."
JORGE ARREAZA: You know, before all this economical trouble and problems we have, we used to subsidize the import of paper for the newspapers. And now it's the private newspapers that have to import their own newspaper, and it's more expensive. So, that's what happened to El Nacional.
But El Nacional—you can check the social networks. You can check Twitter. You can put in Google—you can google "kill Maduro," "matar a Maduro," "maldito Maduro," and it's all over all the media in Venezuela—the radio stations, newspapers, TV broadcasting channels of the opposition. Probably 70 percent of the media in Venezuela, which is private, is against the government and encouraging all these situations to happen, because they are owned by the wealthy families, traditional wealthy families of Venezuela. But, I mean, that's part of the show, saying that in Venezuela there is no free press and freedom of speech.
AMY GOODMAN: But what about the shutting down of this almost two dozen papers?
JORGE ARREAZA: That's not true.
AMY GOODMAN: El Nacional is not—
JORGE ARREAZA: They're bankrupt. They don't have enough money. They don't sell enough newspaper in order to have money to import their own paper.
AMY GOODMAN: For a non-Venezuelan audience, how would you define the Bolivarian Revolution? I mean, you are the foreign minister under Maduro. You're also the son-in-law of Hugo Chávez. Talk about that history.
JORGE ARREAZA: The history of the Bolivarian Revolution is a process of independence, of giving back the people their rights, of guaranteeing that the people have access to health, to education, to housing, to culture, to their national identity, to their sovereignty. That is the Venezuelan revolution, democratizing our society, really democratizing the human rights in Venezuela. That is what we're trying to do, using the wealth of the oil and the other natural resources to invest it in the people, for the people, as Abraham Lincoln said. That's our mean, that's our goal. That's what happened.
But because those resources are not for the U.S., are not for other interests in the world, they are trying to overthrow President Chávez and then President Maduro. And they will continue. President Maduro would like to have a conversation with President Trump. And it would probably solve some issues, because I am sure that when they—if they were to talk and see each other to the eyes, they would see that they can coexist, and they can fulfill some agreements between them. But there's no way. I haven't been able to have a meeting with—not with Pompeo, who is like a minister of foreign affairs, no? With no one in the State Department. They don't want to have dialogue with the Venezuelan authorities. What's that? That's uncivilized.
AMY GOODMAN: Final question, and this is about the International Criminal Court. In September, Argentina, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Paraguay, Peru called on the ICC to investigate Venezuela. Human Rights Watch hailed the move, saying, "In two crackdowns, in 2014 and 2017, Venezuelan security forces committed systematic abuses against critics, including torture, Human Rights Watch research shows. They detained more than 5,400 people between April and July 2017. Members of the security forces have beaten detainees severely and tortured them with electric shocks, asphyxiation, sexual assault, and other brutal techniques."
JORGE ARREAZA: That's part also of the show. Now, you can compare the human rights record of Venezuela with Argentina or Brazil or any of these countries that are doing—manipulating the international institutions and using them to attack Venezuela. We are waiting for Michelle Bachelet, who is the high commissioner of human rights of the United Nations, to visit Venezuela. She's—
AMY GOODMAN: Michelle Bachelet, the former president of Chile.
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes. She is—
AMY GOODMAN: A torture survivor herself.
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes, she is. And she's been invited by President Maduro, and we're waiting for her to come to Venezuela and to see the situation by herself. Of course, this is part of the warfare against Venezuela. But as I told you, this is going to be part of the past, Amy. These governments, right-wing governments in Latin America, are going to be over—some of them this year, some of them next year. And Venezuela is going to be there, at least the revolution—
AMY GOODMAN: How do explain this right-wing wave throughout Latin America, of course, excluding Mexico?
JORGE ARREAZA: Yes, Mexico, Bolivia, Nicaragua, the Caribbean nations. They have popular governments, as well. But it's—Uruguay, of course, has a progressive government, as well. But it's part of the cycle. You know, it's part of the cycles.
But I must say that the United States was focused on the Middle East after 9/11, and they invested all these funds and money. And suddenly, the progressive governments became majority in Latin America. And when they turned their head, they said, "Hey, what's happening here? We have to do something. We have to do a coup d'état in Honduras, because this Zelaya is trying to do a progressive government. We have to fund the candidates of the right. We have to"—so, they have had success until now.
But the peoples of Latin America are seeing, are witnessing this, and they will change the conditions. They will change, because the peoples have the right to be in power in Latin America.
AMY GOODMAN: Jorge Arreaza, Venezuelan foreign minister. He was here in New York to meet with the U.N. secretary-general. He's also the former vice president of Venezuela and the son-in-law of the late President Hugo Chávez.
That does it for our broadcast. Happy birthday to Edith Penty!
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.


Tuesday, March 29, 2016

Palestine and Ferguson: Critical Theory and Angela Davis


THE ABSURD TIMES





ILLUSTRATION:  This was worth reprinting as the information is so often suppressed.





Palestine and Ferguson: Critical Theory and Angela Davis
By
Karl Entenmann

We have below and excerpt of an interview with Angela Davis.  Before presenting that, however, the popular image of her needs a bit of attention.  She was actually in Paris when the infamous incident with four black girls in the United States happened and it affected her greatly as in France she had somewhat escaped the bigotry of the United States south. 

She did, however, continue her studies in Germany under the influence of Critical Theory or the "Frankfurt School," which is described below.  Max Horkheimer was the most important director the school ever had and his The Eclipse of Reason  is one of the most important books of this century.  It talks about how reason is replaced by instrumental logic which in turn is used as a tool of oppression.  Contrary to widely held beliefs, the philosopher who influenced Horkheimer was not Nietzsche, but Schopenhauer which may help explain his own perceptive pessimism. 

Ms. Davis began her graduate study onder the direct influence of Herbert Marcuse, author of One Dimensional man.  He once raised his own uproar when he talked about audio recordings replacing the experience of the concert hall.  He in no way meant to attack the recordings themselves.

After Marcuse, Ms. Davis completed her dissertation with the supervision of Habermas. 

If one is pressed to summarize Critical Theory, it is the joining of the political left with the cultural right.  To paraphrase the narrator in Mann's Dr. Faustus, the liberation of the masses lies not in the churches but in the literary world, the world of humanism.  It should also be pointed outt hat this does not mean Universities where the "Humanity" is taken out of the Humanities, but rather than in individual art.

This, at any rate, is the tradition out of which Ms Davis arises, and the entire prixis of hers involving the Black Panthers, feminism, and cultural studies owes its foundation to the Frankfurt school.  This is a brief summary:     

Although sometimes only loosely affiliated, Frankfurt School theorists spoke with a common paradigm in mind; they shared the Marxist Hegelian premises and were preoccupied with similar questions.[2] To fill in the perceived omissions of classical Marxism, they sought to draw answers from other schools of thought, hence using the insights of antipositivist sociology, psychoanalysis, existential philosophy, and other disciplines.[3] The school's main figures sought to learn from and synthesize the works of such varied thinkers as Kant, Hegel, Marx, Freud, Weber, and Lukács.[4]
Following Marx, they were concerned with the conditions that allow for social changeand the establishment of rational institutions.[5] Their emphasis on the "critical" component of theory was derived significantly from their attempt to overcome the limits of positivism, materialism, and determinism by returning to Kant's critical philosophy and its successors in German idealism, principally Hegel's philosophy, with its emphasis ondialectic and contradiction as inherent properties of human reality.
Since the 1960s, Frankfurt School critical theory has increasingly been guided byJürgen Habermas's work on communicative reason, linguistic intersubjectivity and what Habermas calls "the philosophical discourse of modernity".[6] Critical theorists such as Raymond Geuss and Nikolas Kompridis have voiced opposition to Habermas, claiming that he has undermined the aspirations for social change that originally gave purpose to critical theory's various projects—for example the problem of what reason should mean, the analysis and enlargement of "conditions of possibility" for social emancipation, and the critique of modern capitalism.[7]
More on this school can be found here in this link to many of their writings:


Now to Democracy Now:
In a Women's History Month special, we speak with author, activist and scholar Angela Davis, professor emerita at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Her latest book is titled "Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement," a collection of essays, interviews and speeches that highlight the connections between struggles against state violence and oppression throughout history and around the world. "There are moments when things come together in such a way that new possibilities arrive," Davis says. "When the Ferguson protesters refused to go home after protesting for two or three days, when they insisted on continuing that protest, and when Palestinian activists in Palestine were the first to actually tweet solidarity and support for them, that opened up a whole new realm."

TRANSCRIPT

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: I want to ask you about your new book, Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement. Talk about this coming together of movements.
ANGELA DAVIS: Well, oftentimes there are historical conjunctures that one cannot necessarily predict, but they're moments when things come together in such a way that new possibilities arrive. And I think that when the Ferguson protesters refused to go home after protesting for two or three days, when they insisted on continuing that protest, and when they were—when Palestine activists, Palestinian activists in Palestine, were the first to actually tweet solidarity and support for them, that opened up a whole new realm. I don't know whether many people are aware of the extent to which Palestinian-American activists were involved, from the very outset, in the protest against the killing of Mike Brown in Ferguson. But it has been absolutely inspiring to watch the development of young activists. And I have to catch myself when I say the, you know, "youth movements" and "black youth movements." I have to catch myself and recognize that these are the movements of our time. They're not youth movements per se, because youth have always led radical movements. But it's very exciting to live during this era. And as I've pointed out many times, I think it must be extremely exciting to be young now. But it's also exciting for those of us who are older to see this promise that has emerged in such powerful ways for the first time since perhaps the '60s and the '70s.
AMY GOODMAN: Angela, you talk about the—not so much the intersectionality of identities, but the intersectionality of struggles.
ANGELA DAVIS: And I think that is what is characteristic of the work that young organizers are doing. They recognize that it's not possible to effectively create radical consciousness by focusing on a single issue. And whereas many of the movements that challenged police killings in the past focused almost in a myopic way on the prosecution of the individual perpetrator, now movements, these movements, are taking on larger questions, such as structural racism, institutional racism, state violence, the connection between terrorism and racism, the extent to which the counter—the so-called counterterrorist ideologies and approaches are transforming the way racism functions, transforming state violence. And so, it's so exciting to see the facility with which young activists are able to engage with this intersectionality of struggles. It's about racism, but it's also about homophobia, and it's about transphobia, and it's about addressing ableism. It's about creating a sense of international solidarity. And the extent to which Palestine has become central to efforts against racism in this country is an indication of how important international solidarity has become.
AMY GOODMAN: You write "On Palestine, G4S, and the Prison-Industrial Complex." Explain what G4S is.
ANGELA DAVIS: G4S is the third-largest private corporation in the world, third only to Wal-Mart and Foxconn. It's a private security corporation. It engages in the ownership and operation of private prisons, private policing and many other activities related to policing and surveillance and imprisonment. It is, interestingly, the corporation that hires more people on the continent of Africa than any other corporation in the world. So, actually, looking at the work that this corporation does gives us a sense of the extent to which security, security as propounded by those who believe that security can only be achieved by violence, whether structural violence or actual violence, is—that is the position represented by this corporation. And, of course, it has played a major role in upholding the occupation in Palestine. And so, we can say, from Palestine to private prisons all over the world to deportation—this company also provides transportation for the deportation of Mexican immigrants. So, if one looks at that corporation, I think that all of the issues that we are addressing can be seen. In a sense, the private corporations recognize the intersectionality of issues and struggles, and we have to do that, as well.
AMY GOODMAN: You write at the beginning of this essay, which was really a speech that you gave, "As I reflect on the legacies of struggle we associate with Mandela, I cannot help but recall the struggles that helped to forge the victory of his freedom and thus the arena on which South African apartheid was dismantled," as you remembered Ruth First and Joe Slovo and Albertina Sisulu and Govan Mbeki and Oliver Tambo. I mean, what you bring to so much of this is in-depth look at what's happening here, but globalizing it.
ANGELA DAVIS: And I think that we have to have a global perspective. We need—we used to call it internationalism. And I think we need to create a 21st century internationalism. None of the past struggles in this country, progressive struggles, took place in isolation from what was happening in the rest of this world. And certainly the Africa liberation movements helped to move struggles against racism in this country forward. And I think we need to begin to think in those terms. Palestine represents what, it seems to me, South Africa represented in the 1980s and up until the end of apartheid. So, you know, while we need to focus our attention on what's happening in Latin America and Asia and Europe—of course, the immigration struggle there, the racism that is so attached to issues of the refugees in Europe—Palestine seems to me that pivot that allows us to enlarge and broaden and extend our consciousness.
AMY GOODMAN: Angela Davis, professor emeritus at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Her latest book, Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement.

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be