Sunday, May 09, 2021

QANON IN Tongues

 


THE ABSURD TIMES

 



 

 

 

 

         

 Illustration: Guy Fawks mask wearing demonstrator. The V sign stands for "victory" and "vendetta". During WWII, Churchill used it to help reassure the British people in the war against fascism, especially Hitler. The BBC would start its news programs with the opening of Beethoven's Fifth Symphony, the first four notes of it which are Morse code for the letter V.

 

 

OCCUPY INSANITY

BY

TSAR X

 

 

This is going to be a bit longer than usual. I'm trying to keep it short, but there are a few items that should be pointed out. You may want to bookmark this or download it – as you will.

 

Well, I've picked up a few items from QANON, but it isn't always easy to be sure what he is saying now that he is talking in tongues. I'm practicing listening in tongues, however, and have made enough regress to pass on a few important items, some of which have made it onto the news of certain outlets.

         

The first is an important public service announcement that has been covered a bit by Swanson Mcnear. [Middle names of Tucker Carlson]. If you do happen to see a mother with her child and the child is wearing a face mask, immediately report her to the police or Family Services. We can't let masks get out of hand.

 

THE EVIL GREEEN NEW DEAL: it will take away hamburgers and any other beef products.  Beware of it. [Now actually, that bit of Twilight Zone madness has its origin in some study that theorizes that without beef products, climate goals could be achieved in 25 years. The fact is that other approaches are being  proposed. I can not imagine any sort of bill being passed in any country that has so many McDonald's franchises in it.]

 

Finally, and I'm putting this in last, mainly because it makes me laugh so much that it is difficult to type – still, here it is: in Arizona, some group called the Cyber Ninjas has been enlisted to audit the votes again. This would be the fourth audit. The problem seems to be a bunch of ballots that were flown in from somewhere in Southwest Asia. They can be identified as false if they have bamboo in them. So, the hunt is on for bamboo in the ballots which led the the horrid pun that the GQP thought the election had been bamboozled from Mr. Fat Head. Well, I'm tired and that is enough of this crap. It is time for the Democrats to simply take over, pass bill s1 and get that crap over with.

 

 

Breaking from that

 

Lately, there has been a great deal of pity blathered about on India. Now, a great deal of pity and faux concern has been expressed on the situation, and everyone is free to feel as sad as they choose about the situation. However, I have not seen much repeat of the footage concerning perhaps millions of them, in all states of undress (as if it mattered) wading together in the Ganges river. The water seemed rather foul at the time, but it was made clear that this was some some of holy religious ritual. Fine. Also, their leader is one of the most right-wing nuts to come along in a long time (but who are we to boast with our GQP showing us up as idiots world-wide?).

 

At any rate, if this was not a so-called "Super-Spreader" event, it was a holy sacrament and I suppose that makes it ok. To me, it gives superstition a bad name.  At any rate, lots of Covid there now, people dying by the thousands a day. Frankly, I thought the U.S. orgy festivals were bad enough, and stupid enough, yet this transcends them. At least those could be attributed to raging hormones. Well, perhaps the Ganges will be permitted to regain its pre-Covid level of pollution.

 

Back to the Absurd

 

Gladys Retweeted

Robert J. DeNault

@robertjdenault

·

2h

Jim Jordan accused of turning a blind eye to sexual abuse, Matt Gaetz under investigation for sex with a minor, Marjorie Taylor Greene harassed school shooting survivors and spewed anti-Semitic venom, but House GOP chooses to go after Liz Cheney for calling out the Big Lie. [And you expected what?]

 

Does anybody have any idea as to what the GQP platform is? What is it for? I know quite well that it is against anything Democrats try to pass. In fact, Moscow Mitch has said quite clearly that his entire purpose is to block anything the Biden administration is for. Quite clearly, it wants to support anything Donald Trump favors, but that can be elusive since the only question he has about anything is "What's in it for me?" It always has been.

 

The latest breaking news before mother's day is the defense argument for one of the insurrectionists on January 6, the day a bunch of frenzied morons tried to take over the Congress in order to keep Donald Trump in office, despite his overwhelming defeat by the Democrats. The guy's attorney says that his client is suffering from Foxitis and Foxmania.

 

Now, I do have some background in the DSM, sort of the official rulebook of the Psychological Association and can tell you that there is no such recognized condition. The best that can be said of his condition is feelings of inadequacy, a need to belong, and overactive hormones.  Perhaps stupidity would be more likely, but then that condition is incurable. Fox itself has successfully defended itself in the past by saying "no reasonable individual could possibly interpret what the Fox evening commentators say is anything other than entertainment."

 

Now, GQP states are running like mad to stop this horrible trend of voting. Just recently, the Governor of Florida signed a bill making all sorts of voting more difficult. It was televised, but coverage of the non-event was allowed to be covered only by Fox News. I personally do not feel left out, as it were, by this fact because I would have little interest in watching such a vile event. However, since it is a public event, featuring the elected Governor of a State, one would think there is some sort of violation of the First Amendment at play. Even local stations were prohibited from witnessing the event. It is our opinion, that this is a butchering of free speech as well as voter discrimination. It is quite likely that GQP voters will be affected as much as Democratic voters, but it makes little sense.

 

There is a bill in Congress, passed by the House and known as HR1, that would ensure fairer elections. Fairer elections, clearly, would be detrimental to the GQP at this stage. It is now in the Senate, known as S1, and needs to be passed. However, the most often used term, filibuster, more accurately cloture, makes a 60 vote majority for anything to pass in the Senate unless it is sent through another process called "reconciliation".

 

No member of the GQP is willing to cross the idiotic Trump wing of the party, so there will be no cloture unless reconciliation is used. The current parliamentarian would rule against using that process because it is not related to the budget. However, it is. The lead party, the majority party, appoints the parliamentarian. All that needs to be done is to appoint a different parliamentarian. The GQP has done this in the past, so there is precedent.

 

Some other issues: the bill that did go through reconciliation, the one that gave you the extra $1,200 and made so many other economic benefits, and was opposed by every GQP member, is now being boasted of by the same members of the GQP as if they had passed it and that their voters or constituents should take advantage of it: "I am pleased to announce that the Federal money is now available to you, he said." [Of course, he voted against it. Hypocrisy is rampant. And, Moscow Mitch stated openly that he is 100% against anything that the Democrats try to pass. He then tried to walk it back, but the point was obvious.

 

Now there is a reason this is so completely disgusting to me: I grew up in Chicago when Dick Daley became Mayor. I am also somehow related to the late Mike Royko, but even as I matured and he had moved to the right-wing Tribune because "at least it was a newspaper" after Rupert Murdock bought the liberal paper he worked for, we could never pin down how we were related, exactly, but both accepted the fact, deciding what difference did it make anyway?

 

In fact his generation saw things quite differently than mine, but our goals were similar. He once published a book titled BOSS, a collection of his past articles. At the time, he did anger Daley several times and as Daley's wife saw the book on the shelves at the local A&P (grocery store) she raised hell with the manager. In fear, the manager had to keep the book off of his shelves. Mike's reaction ran something like this, I quote from memory as best I can: "I wish she had done more. I mean, the phrase BANNED IN BOSTON certainly helped sales of a book, Ulysses by James Joyce the first example, but banned at the A&P just doesn't have the same ring to it." But I digress. I will just say that you can find him in conversation with Studs Terkel on You Tube, and also get a flavor for his real personality. Studs had a radio program every day at 10 am on WFMT. I think there is still and archive of both his programs and Mike's columns available on WFMT and the Tribune, respectively.

 

Some years ago, I was on social media swinging away at Obama when someone asked "What did Obama lack?" I said "Spine".  Daley, for all his faults and eventual slide into autocracy, at least made things happened. The same can be said of Lyndon Johnson. I hated the bastard at the time because I was of draft age and thought the war in Vietnam was both wrong and a mistake. I was working part-time at the library at the University of Illinois and had easy access to browse all sorts of shelves. Upon looking up the history of the country, it became clear that they had been defending their land for at least 1,000 years. The French did not last there, and China finally gave up. It was a stupid idea and I had the impression that John Kennedy thought so as well. Naturally, he was assassinated.

 

At any rate, he had promised to implement all the policies JFK supported. At the same time, Mr. Koch, father of the tea party guys, supported Barry Goldwater, a
Republican, who promised to "bomb Hanoi into the stone age". The choice seemed clear. LBJ was elected and promptly escalated the war.

 

However, at the same time, he did push through the Voting Rights Act that the south hated because it allowed Blacks to vote – it became a federal law. Additionally, he created Medicare, something FDR wanted but was never able to implement. Johnson, therefore, threatened or cajoled both Republicans and Southern Democrats on both of these bills and several more. At the time, he pointed out that the Democratic party has lost the South as a result for at least a generation, the only exception being Jimmie Carter from Georgia who had a habit of listening to Bob Dylan songs and reading sane articles. That was all stopped by Ronald Reagen, a spokesman for corporate America and eagerly supported by right wing nuts, including ex-Democrats who had become Republicans.

 

The point is that both Johnson and Daley managed to do things that, on the whole, were good for the American people. Daley during the protests that gathered around the Democratic convention at the time had actually, as some people from his circle said disparagingly, "Ah, duh old guy started ta believe what he been sayin fer so long. Dat means he's gone off his rocker. I quit"! Hubert Humphrey had backed Johnson (as if he had any choice) and therefore lost the election to, of all people, Richard Nixon! Whatever one says about Nixon, it is often overlooked that he created the EPA which could have helped stop the current climate crises the planet faces. Ronnie Ray Gun would have none of that.

 

Now the GQP is intimidated by Donald Trump, a racist demagogue and a con man. It is unpopular by a clear majority of the American people, but it will try to remain in power by reversing all these "Socialist" voting laws. Especially, keep those black folk from voting because they are inferior, white people, actually white men, are supreme and God wants them to have control over this great "Democracy". Well, right now the Democrats do have a majority in both houses. They can manage to get voting rights passed, S1, which will rule over all these mass efforts in various states to keep the GQP in control.

 

The real question is will they? I can assure them that if the GQP takes over in the next 19 months, they will not allow any niceties to inhibit them. They are even displacing one of the most right-wing ideologues in their own party in favor of someone with a much less right-wing bias because the right-wing one actually acknowledges that Trump lost the last election. They need to act now, and ruthlessly. That's enough.

 

 

 

 

Monday, May 03, 2021

Apartheid II (Better Version)



THE ABSURD TIMES


I



lustration: Israel bombing anti-semites



Apartheid

by

Tsar X


Well, we've been pointing this out for years now, and finally some progress is being made. Of course, Israel will call it anti-semitic and few people know what "semitic" really means. It refers originally to all Arab people as well as those who claim to be Jewish. It is not worth going into any more. Frankly, I'm tired of this entire situation and the U.S. should know better. Many do, even legislators, but they don't have a chance of re-election if they talk about fair treatment for Palestinians. I'm just glad that Biden hasn't the renaming to the Golan Heights to the Biden Heights as Trump was given the title of the Trump Heights. It is just sick. Anyway, here is some objective information on the subject:


MORE


A major new report by Human Rights Watch says for the first time that Israel is committing crimes of apartheid and persecution in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The international human rights group says Israeli authorities dispossessed, confined and forcibly separated Palestinians. "For years, prominent voices have warned that apartheid lurked just around the corner. But it's very clear that that threshold has been crossed," says Omar Shakir, Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch. "It's time for the international community to recognize the reality on the ground for what it is — apartheid and persecution — and take the steps necessary to end a situation of this gravity."


This is viewer supported news. Please do your part today.

DONATE

Related Story

STORYMar 04, 2021

Vaccine Apartheid: Marc Lamont Hill, Mitchell Plitnick on Israel's "Indifference to Palestinian Health"

TOPICS

Israel & PalestineApartheid

GUESTS

Omar Shakir

Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch.

LINKS

Omar Shakir on Twitter

"A Threshold Crossed: Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution"

Transcript

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: After weeks of speculation, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has postponed next month's parliamentary elections, which would have been held for the first time in 15 years in the Occupied Territories. Abbas said the delay was caused by Israel's refusal to promise that thousands of Palestinians living in Israeli-occupied areas of Jerusalem could vote in the election. The decision comes at a time when a rift is growing within the Fatah party.


Well, earlier this week, Human Rights Watch released a major report saying for the first time that Israel is committing crimes of apartheid and persecution in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The international human rights group says Israeli authorities have dispossessed, confined and forcibly separated Palestinians. Human Rights Watch concluded, quote, "the Israeli government has demonstrated an intent to maintain the domination of Jewish Israelis over Palestinians across Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories." Human Rights Watch also released this video alongside its report.


HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH VIDEO: Apartheid. While many associate the word with South Africa, "apartheid" is a universal legal term that refers to severe discriminatory oppression. Apartheid is also a crime against humanity. Its definition in the 1973 Apartheid Convention and the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court is made up of three key elements: an intent to maintain the domination by one racial group over another, systematic oppression by one racial group over another, and one or more inhumane acts as part of that oppression.


Persecution is a crime against humanity under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. It is made up of two primary elements: a discriminatory intent, leading to severe deprivation of fundamental rights of a racial, ethnic or other group.


On the basis of these definitions and its research, Human Rights Watch finds that Israeli authorities are committing the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution. Human Rights Watch finds that the elements of the crimes come together in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, pursuant to an Israeli government policy to maintain the domination by Jewish Israelis over Palestinians across Israel and the occupied territory. In the occupied territory, that intent has been coupled with systematic oppression and inhumane acts committed against Palestinians living there.


The Israeli government is the main authority across Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory. In these areas, Israeli officials have demonstrated a discriminatory intent to maintain domination over Palestinians by ensuring control over land and demographics by Jewish Israelis. Take the Jerusalem municipality as an example: The Israeli authorities' goal is to maintain a sizable Jewish majority by boxing in Palestinian areas while helping predominantly Jewish areas to flourish.


Israeli authorities maintain a two-tier system which privileges Jewish Israelis over Palestinians. The means used by Israeli authorities in the occupied territory amount to the systematic oppression needed to establish the crime of apartheid. Israeli authorities have committed a range of abuses against Palestinians. In the occupied territory, those abuses include mass land confiscation, the denial of residency rights and the suspension of civil rights, and rise to the threshold of inhumane acts and severe abuses of the fundamental rights of Palestinians. The international community should recognize the reality on the ground for what it is and press the Israeli authorities to end apartheid and persecution.


AMY GOODMAN: That's a new video by Human Rights Watch, issued this week. It comes as Israel is being hailed around the world for vaccinating 60% of its population, the highest percentage in the world, but only 3% of Palestinians are vaccinated.


On Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki was asked about the Human Rights Watch report on Israeli apartheid.


PRESS SECRETARY JEN PSAKI: As to the question of whether Israel's actions constitute apartheid, that is not the view of this administration.


AMY GOODMAN: Well, for more, we're joined by Omar Shakir, Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch, lead author and researcher for their groundbreaking new report called "A Threshold Crossed: Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution."


Omar, welcome back to Democracy Now! Start off by talking about the research you did into this and the significance of Human Rights Watch using, for the first time officially, the term "apartheid" when looking at how Israel is dealing with the Palestinians.


OMAR SHAKIR: Thank you for having me, Amy.


We spent over two years conducting the research for this report. What we tried to do is to connect the dots behind years of Human Rights Watch research — we've been working on Israel and Palestine for more than three decades — as well as look at new case studies we conducted for this report and review Israeli government planning documents, statements by officials and other materials. When we looked at all the evidence, we then compared it against established law on discrimination, including the universal prohibition on severe discriminatory oppression and the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution, as described in the video. When we did so, we reached the conclusion that Israeli authorities are committing the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution.


The report is entitled "A Threshold Crossed" because for years prominent voices have warned that apartheid lurked just around the corner. But it's very clear that that threshold has been crossed. It well may have been crossed years ago, but, without doubt, that corner has been turned. And it's time for the international community to recognize the reality on the ground for what it is — apartheid and persecution — and take the steps necessary to end a situation of this gravity.


AMY GOODMAN: And, Omar, what would be those steps?


OMAR SHAKIR: We list several steps on the international community's table that they should take immediately as a result of this report. First is for the International Criminal Court to investigate and prosecute these crimes, as well as for national courts to do so under the principle of universal jurisdiction. We call for the issuance of targeted sanctions, including asset freezes and travel bans against those Israeli officials implicated in the crime. We call for all states, including the United States, to condition all arms sales and military and security assistance on Israeli authorities on taking steps to end apartheid and persecution. We call on all countries to evaluate its engagement with Israel to ensure noncomplicity in the crimes, including bilateral agreements.


And, of course, to get to all these steps, step number one is to call a thing by its name, to call a spade a spade, to recognize that the reality we face on the ground today is not merely a temporary occupation. Depriving millions of Palestinians of their fundamental rights solely because of who they are speaks to a larger policy, a policy to privilege one people at the expense of another. A 54-year occupation is not temporary. A 30-year peace process will not dismantle systematic repression. What's needed is an entire new paradigm shift that's rooted in the protection of human rights and accountability.


AMY GOODMAN: What do you make of the White House spokesperson Jen Psaki's response, saying we just don't share the view, she was saying, of Human Rights Watch?


OMAR SHAKIR: I think the reality is it's going to take time, of course, for the international community to grapple with this reality on the ground. Human Rights Watch, by no means, is the first organization to make this assessment. Palestinians have been describing their lived experience as apartheid for years, if not decades. The Israeli human rights group B'Tselem reached a conclusion earlier this year. Other prominent commentators have been talking about apartheid as a hypothetical. But yet, the international conversation is so steeped in these assumptions around the peace process and the temporary nature of abuse that they're not going to be undone overnight. So I think a big part of the challenge incumbent upon us now is to really call on folks to understand and speak out to the reality for what everybody sort of knows is the case, and then to take the steps necessary.


So, I'm not surprised that the U.S. government, which has been deeply involved, obviously, in supporting Israeli government policies, is not yet ready to make that jump. I am encouraged, you know, that the statement was constructive, in the sense if you look at the larger picture of wanting to look more in depth at the report and its findings. We hope the U.S. government and other governments will do so. And we look forward to engaging them on the report and its recommendations.


AMY GOODMAN: Omar Shakir, can you comment on what's happening in the Occupied Territories with Palestinians' access to vaccines? Israel is being hailed around the world as the country that has vaccinated the highest percentage of its population, more than 60%. But we're talking about, well, according to Haaretz in the last day, 3% of Palestinians have been vaccinated. Talk about the situation. And who is responsible here?


OMAR SHAKIR: Absolutely. Look, today, between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, you have one government, the Israeli government, that primarily rules over these areas, where about 6.8 million Jewish Israelis and 6.8 million Palestinians live. And when it comes to vaccines, the Israeli government has vaccinated the vast majority of Jewish Israelis. And when it comes to the 6.8 million Palestinians, they have vaccinated Palestinian citizens, who make up — the majority of those, who make up about 1.5, 1.6 million people, as well as Jerusalem residents, but they have largely not vaccinated the 4.7 million Palestinians in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip who live under Israeli rule. This creates a dynamic in parts of the West Bank where on one side of the road you have people who are receiving a vaccine because they're Jewish, and people on the other side of the road who are not receiving a vaccine because they're Palestinian. It really sort of boils down to that, where you can have a 25-year-old Jewish Israeli settler who is eligible for a vaccine, while a 47-year-old Palestinian man, who may have health conditions, has yet to receive it.


The Israeli government, of course, says that this is the responsibility of the Palestinian Authority. But the law of occupation is quite clear that an occupying power has the duty to ensure medical supplies, including those needed to combat a pandemic, to the occupied population. And, of course, that obligation is heightened in the context of a half-century occupation, where the Israeli government has developed a sophisticated machinery to rule over Palestinians, yet seeks to offload the responsibilities to the health of the population, seeking rather only to control the land and to ensure that Jewish Israelis living in this territory are a fully integrated part of the system in Israel, while Palestinians are stuck living in a situation of deep, systemic oppression. And this dynamic very much is at the heart of the finding of apartheid and persecution that Human Rights Watch reached.


AMY GOODMAN: Omar Shakir, you are the Israel and Palestine director for Human Rights Watch. We're speaking to you in Amman, Jordan. You were expelled by Israel. Have you ever been allowed back? And what is Israel's treatment of human rights observers in the Occupied Territories?


OMAR SHAKIR: The Israeli government indeed did deport me in November of 2019. They made clear, and the Supreme Court upheld, an interpretation of their law of entry that found that I fell afoul as result of my human rights advocacy, both before I joined Human Rights Watch as well as my work at Human Rights Watch. As a result of that determination, I am unable to return to Israel and Palestine to cover human rights abuses, to do my job on the ground.


Of course, the treatment that I've received, I think, speaks to Israel's larger treatment of human rights defenders. Of course, Palestinian human rights defenders face it the worst. Israeli human rights defenders also face significant restrictions. To give one other example, a Palestinian staff member of Amnesty International, Laith Abu Zeyad, has, since 2019, faced a travel ban by the Israeli authorities on unspecified security grounds. He was not able to visit his mother in a hospital in Jerusalem three kilometers from his home as a result of this travel ban, where she was receiving chemotherapy. She passed away. He has challenged this decision with Amnesty International in the Israeli court system, and they ruled against him based on secret evidence. And he wasn't even able to attend his court hearing as a result of the travel ban. Palestinian human rights defenders have faced criminal charges. They've faced other sorts of restrictions. Israeli groups have been maligned. Human rights defenders internationally have been denied entry. This is a reality today. The Israeli government not only continues its systematic rights abuse, but muzzles those who speak out and document those abuses.


AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to ask you about the latest news that happened overnight, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas postponing next month's parliamentary elections, the first in 15 years, in the Occupied Territories, blaming Israel for refusing to promise that thousands of Palestinians living in the Israeli-occupied areas of Jerusalem could vote in the election. This is what he said.


PRESIDENT MAHMOUD ABBAS: [translated] Facing this difficult situation, we decided to postpone the date of holding legislative elections until the participation of Jerusalem and its people is guaranteed. Jerusalem will not be compromised, and our people in Jerusalem will not give up their right to exercise their democratic rights.


AMY GOODMAN: Abbas's decision comes at a time when there is a growing rift within his Fatah party, after the jailed Palestinian leader Marwan Barghouti recently endorsed a rival slate to challenge candidates backed by Abbas. Your comments?


OMAR SHAKIR: Look, I mean, there's two separate issues here. One is, absolutely, East Jerusalem, under international law, is a part of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, and of course its residents should have the right to vote in elections for the Palestinian Authority. The reality is, while Israel has annexed this area — you know, the vast majority of the world do not accept that annexation — it doesn't change the status of that territory. And, of course, the majority of Palestinians there don't vote in national Israeli elections, many of whom are stateless, you know, without any sort of permanent, stable legal status, and face these restrictions.


But I think, more to the point here, this really is pretext. Human Rights Watch has documented, for years now, the increasingly authoritarian trend of the Palestinian Authority, as well as Hamas authorities in the Gaza Strip. We've documented systematic arbitrary arrest and torture of critics and opponents, over recent years the increasing role security services have in making decisions. And it was quite clear, as you noted, Amy, that there were challenges to Abu Mazen, Mahmoud Abbas's rule even within the Fatah party. And I think many see this move as being done out of concern that this election, which all along was being set up to — you know, not really to offer Palestinians a viable chance to change and vote their conscience, but really as a rubber stamp, not only for the PA in the West Bank, but Hamas in Gaza. But when that was threatened, they canceled elections.


It's an unfortunate reality. Palestinian authorities, as they are, manage affairs in only a small part of the entire Occupied Palestinian Territory. Israeli authorities remain — retain overarching control. But, of course, we can't separate the PA's repression of critics and dissidents and more general ineffective rule from the larger oppression Palestinians face, including apartheid and persecution at the hand of Israeli authorities. Palestinians are stuck between two authorities, both of whom have engaged in different forms of repression, both of whom are holding them back from the realization of their full rights.


AMY GOODMAN: And finally, Omar, this latest news, at least 44 ultra-Orthodox Jews dying, dozens injured, after a stampede during a religious gathering, a pilgrimage. An estimated 100,000 people gathered at Mount Meron late Thursday. Stampede occurred in the early hours of Friday morning, after some appeared to slip on stones leading to a sloped passageway, triggering what one local news site described as a "human avalanche." Warnings have been issued over the years saying the site was not safe for mass gatherings. This was one of the first major gatherings with COVID restrictions being lifted.


OMAR SHAKIR: It's an absolute tragedy. And I think, you know, we've seen, I think, over the last year, in the wake of COVID, sort of the challenges that the Israeli government has had in dealing with some of the gatherings of more religious Jewish Israeli communities across the country. You know, this is the sort of thing that was warned about from some of the reporting that's come out from inside Israel, that watchdogs had warned that this scenario was possible. You know, during the pandemic, we saw, of course, examples of gatherings of different religious communities that the government sort of attributed to the rise of cases in particular areas. So, it's very clear that there are important issues here and that the Israeli government, whether or not it's formed in the coming days and weeks, or whether or not we head back to elections — these are the sort of things that fall by the wayside as politicians go back to back in rounds of elections. So, it's a really terrible tragedy. You know, obviously, the condolences of many in the world go out to the victims. You know, really awful human stories that are coming out, one that I read earlier today of a young boy who was being put in a body bag while his mother was calling him. Really awful, avoidable tragedy. And I hope the Israeli government will take steps to ensure this doesn't happen again.


AMY GOODMAN: Omar Shakir, I want to thank you for being with us, Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch. We'll link to your report, "A Threshold Crossed: Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution." Omar is speaking to us from Amman, Jordan.

APARTHEID



THE ABSURD TIMES



I
llustration: Map of Israel. it is worse today,



Apartheid

by

Tsar X


Well, we've been pointing this out for years now, and finally some progress is being made. Of course, Israel will call it anti-semitic and few people know what "semitic" really means. It refers originally to all Arab people as well as those who claim to be Jewish. It is not worth going into any more. Frankly, I'm tired of this entire situation and the U.S. should know better. Many do, even legislators, but they don't have a chance of re-election if they talk about fair treatment for Palestinians. I'm just glad that Biden hasn't the renaming to the Golan Heights to the Biden Heights as Trump was given the title of the Trump Heights. It is just sick. Anyway, here is some objective information on the subject:


MORE


A major new report by Human Rights Watch says for the first time that Israel is committing crimes of apartheid and persecution in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The international human rights group says Israeli authorities dispossessed, confined and forcibly separated Palestinians. "For years, prominent voices have warned that apartheid lurked just around the corner. But it's very clear that that threshold has been crossed," says Omar Shakir, Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch. "It's time for the international community to recognize the reality on the ground for what it is — apartheid and persecution — and take the steps necessary to end a situation of this gravity."


This is viewer supported news. Please do your part today.

DONATE

Related Story

STORYMar 04, 2021

Vaccine Apartheid: Marc Lamont Hill, Mitchell Plitnick on Israel's "Indifference to Palestinian Health"

TOPICS

Israel & PalestineApartheid

GUESTS

Omar Shakir

Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch.

LINKS

Omar Shakir on Twitter

"A Threshold Crossed: Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution"

Transcript

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: After weeks of speculation, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has postponed next month's parliamentary elections, which would have been held for the first time in 15 years in the Occupied Territories. Abbas said the delay was caused by Israel's refusal to promise that thousands of Palestinians living in Israeli-occupied areas of Jerusalem could vote in the election. The decision comes at a time when a rift is growing within the Fatah party.


Well, earlier this week, Human Rights Watch released a major report saying for the first time that Israel is committing crimes of apartheid and persecution in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The international human rights group says Israeli authorities have dispossessed, confined and forcibly separated Palestinians. Human Rights Watch concluded, quote, "the Israeli government has demonstrated an intent to maintain the domination of Jewish Israelis over Palestinians across Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories." Human Rights Watch also released this video alongside its report.


HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH VIDEO: Apartheid. While many associate the word with South Africa, "apartheid" is a universal legal term that refers to severe discriminatory oppression. Apartheid is also a crime against humanity. Its definition in the 1973 Apartheid Convention and the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court is made up of three key elements: an intent to maintain the domination by one racial group over another, systematic oppression by one racial group over another, and one or more inhumane acts as part of that oppression.


Persecution is a crime against humanity under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. It is made up of two primary elements: a discriminatory intent, leading to severe deprivation of fundamental rights of a racial, ethnic or other group.


On the basis of these definitions and its research, Human Rights Watch finds that Israeli authorities are committing the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution. Human Rights Watch finds that the elements of the crimes come together in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, pursuant to an Israeli government policy to maintain the domination by Jewish Israelis over Palestinians across Israel and the occupied territory. In the occupied territory, that intent has been coupled with systematic oppression and inhumane acts committed against Palestinians living there.


The Israeli government is the main authority across Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory. In these areas, Israeli officials have demonstrated a discriminatory intent to maintain domination over Palestinians by ensuring control over land and demographics by Jewish Israelis. Take the Jerusalem municipality as an example: The Israeli authorities' goal is to maintain a sizable Jewish majority by boxing in Palestinian areas while helping predominantly Jewish areas to flourish.


Israeli authorities maintain a two-tier system which privileges Jewish Israelis over Palestinians. The means used by Israeli authorities in the occupied territory amount to the systematic oppression needed to establish the crime of apartheid. Israeli authorities have committed a range of abuses against Palestinians. In the occupied territory, those abuses include mass land confiscation, the denial of residency rights and the suspension of civil rights, and rise to the threshold of inhumane acts and severe abuses of the fundamental rights of Palestinians. The international community should recognize the reality on the ground for what it is and press the Israeli authorities to end apartheid and persecution.


AMY GOODMAN: That's a new video by Human Rights Watch, issued this week. It comes as Israel is being hailed around the world for vaccinating 60% of its population, the highest percentage in the world, but only 3% of Palestinians are vaccinated.


On Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki was asked about the Human Rights Watch report on Israeli apartheid.


PRESS SECRETARY JEN PSAKI: As to the question of whether Israel's actions constitute apartheid, that is not the view of this administration.


AMY GOODMAN: Well, for more, we're joined by Omar Shakir, Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch, lead author and researcher for their groundbreaking new report called "A Threshold Crossed: Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution."


Omar, welcome back to Democracy Now! Start off by talking about the research you did into this and the significance of Human Rights Watch using, for the first time officially, the term "apartheid" when looking at how Israel is dealing with the Palestinians.


OMAR SHAKIR: Thank you for having me, Amy.


We spent over two years conducting the research for this report. What we tried to do is to connect the dots behind years of Human Rights Watch research — we've been working on Israel and Palestine for more than three decades — as well as look at new case studies we conducted for this report and review Israeli government planning documents, statements by officials and other materials. When we looked at all the evidence, we then compared it against established law on discrimination, including the universal prohibition on severe discriminatory oppression and the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution, as described in the video. When we did so, we reached the conclusion that Israeli authorities are committing the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution.


The report is entitled "A Threshold Crossed" because for years prominent voices have warned that apartheid lurked just around the corner. But it's very clear that that threshold has been crossed. It well may have been crossed years ago, but, without doubt, that corner has been turned. And it's time for the international community to recognize the reality on the ground for what it is — apartheid and persecution — and take the steps necessary to end a situation of this gravity.


AMY GOODMAN: And, Omar, what would be those steps?


OMAR SHAKIR: We list several steps on the international community's table that they should take immediately as a result of this report. First is for the International Criminal Court to investigate and prosecute these crimes, as well as for national courts to do so under the principle of universal jurisdiction. We call for the issuance of targeted sanctions, including asset freezes and travel bans against those Israeli officials implicated in the crime. We call for all states, including the United States, to condition all arms sales and military and security assistance on Israeli authorities on taking steps to end apartheid and persecution. We call on all countries to evaluate its engagement with Israel to ensure noncomplicity in the crimes, including bilateral agreements.


And, of course, to get to all these steps, step number one is to call a thing by its name, to call a spade a spade, to recognize that the reality we face on the ground today is not merely a temporary occupation. Depriving millions of Palestinians of their fundamental rights solely because of who they are speaks to a larger policy, a policy to privilege one people at the expense of another. A 54-year occupation is not temporary. A 30-year peace process will not dismantle systematic repression. What's needed is an entire new paradigm shift that's rooted in the protection of human rights and accountability.


AMY GOODMAN: What do you make of the White House spokesperson Jen Psaki's response, saying we just don't share the view, she was saying, of Human Rights Watch?


OMAR SHAKIR: I think the reality is it's going to take time, of course, for the international community to grapple with this reality on the ground. Human Rights Watch, by no means, is the first organization to make this assessment. Palestinians have been describing their lived experience as apartheid for years, if not decades. The Israeli human rights group B'Tselem reached a conclusion earlier this year. Other prominent commentators have been talking about apartheid as a hypothetical. But yet, the international conversation is so steeped in these assumptions around the peace process and the temporary nature of abuse that they're not going to be undone overnight. So I think a big part of the challenge incumbent upon us now is to really call on folks to understand and speak out to the reality for what everybody sort of knows is the case, and then to take the steps necessary.


So, I'm not surprised that the U.S. government, which has been deeply involved, obviously, in supporting Israeli government policies, is not yet ready to make that jump. I am encouraged, you know, that the statement was constructive, in the sense if you look at the larger picture of wanting to look more in depth at the report and its findings. We hope the U.S. government and other governments will do so. And we look forward to engaging them on the report and its recommendations.


AMY GOODMAN: Omar Shakir, can you comment on what's happening in the Occupied Territories with Palestinians' access to vaccines? Israel is being hailed around the world as the country that has vaccinated the highest percentage of its population, more than 60%. But we're talking about, well, according to Haaretz in the last day, 3% of Palestinians have been vaccinated. Talk about the situation. And who is responsible here?


OMAR SHAKIR: Absolutely. Look, today, between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, you have one government, the Israeli government, that primarily rules over these areas, where about 6.8 million Jewish Israelis and 6.8 million Palestinians live. And when it comes to vaccines, the Israeli government has vaccinated the vast majority of Jewish Israelis. And when it comes to the 6.8 million Palestinians, they have vaccinated Palestinian citizens, who make up — the majority of those, who make up about 1.5, 1.6 million people, as well as Jerusalem residents, but they have largely not vaccinated the 4.7 million Palestinians in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip who live under Israeli rule. This creates a dynamic in parts of the West Bank where on one side of the road you have people who are receiving a vaccine because they're Jewish, and people on the other side of the road who are not receiving a vaccine because they're Palestinian. It really sort of boils down to that, where you can have a 25-year-old Jewish Israeli settler who is eligible for a vaccine, while a 47-year-old Palestinian man, who may have health conditions, has yet to receive it.


The Israeli government, of course, says that this is the responsibility of the Palestinian Authority. But the law of occupation is quite clear that an occupying power has the duty to ensure medical supplies, including those needed to combat a pandemic, to the occupied population. And, of course, that obligation is heightened in the context of a half-century occupation, where the Israeli government has developed a sophisticated machinery to rule over Palestinians, yet seeks to offload the responsibilities to the health of the population, seeking rather only to control the land and to ensure that Jewish Israelis living in this territory are a fully integrated part of the system in Israel, while Palestinians are stuck living in a situation of deep, systemic oppression. And this dynamic very much is at the heart of the finding of apartheid and persecution that Human Rights Watch reached.


AMY GOODMAN: Omar Shakir, you are the Israel and Palestine director for Human Rights Watch. We're speaking to you in Amman, Jordan. You were expelled by Israel. Have you ever been allowed back? And what is Israel's treatment of human rights observers in the Occupied Territories?


OMAR SHAKIR: The Israeli government indeed did deport me in November of 2019. They made clear, and the Supreme Court upheld, an interpretation of their law of entry that found that I fell afoul as result of my human rights advocacy, both before I joined Human Rights Watch as well as my work at Human Rights Watch. As a result of that determination, I am unable to return to Israel and Palestine to cover human rights abuses, to do my job on the ground.


Of course, the treatment that I've received, I think, speaks to Israel's larger treatment of human rights defenders. Of course, Palestinian human rights defenders face it the worst. Israeli human rights defenders also face significant restrictions. To give one other example, a Palestinian staff member of Amnesty International, Laith Abu Zeyad, has, since 2019, faced a travel ban by the Israeli authorities on unspecified security grounds. He was not able to visit his mother in a hospital in Jerusalem three kilometers from his home as a result of this travel ban, where she was receiving chemotherapy. She passed away. He has challenged this decision with Amnesty International in the Israeli court system, and they ruled against him based on secret evidence. And he wasn't even able to attend his court hearing as a result of the travel ban. Palestinian human rights defenders have faced criminal charges. They've faced other sorts of restrictions. Israeli groups have been maligned. Human rights defenders internationally have been denied entry. This is a reality today. The Israeli government not only continues its systematic rights abuse, but muzzles those who speak out and document those abuses.


AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to ask you about the latest news that happened overnight, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas postponing next month's parliamentary elections, the first in 15 years, in the Occupied Territories, blaming Israel for refusing to promise that thousands of Palestinians living in the Israeli-occupied areas of Jerusalem could vote in the election. This is what he said.


PRESIDENT MAHMOUD ABBAS: [translated] Facing this difficult situation, we decided to postpone the date of holding legislative elections until the participation of Jerusalem and its people is guaranteed. Jerusalem will not be compromised, and our people in Jerusalem will not give up their right to exercise their democratic rights.


AMY GOODMAN: Abbas's decision comes at a time when there is a growing rift within his Fatah party, after the jailed Palestinian leader Marwan Barghouti recently endorsed a rival slate to challenge candidates backed by Abbas. Your comments?


OMAR SHAKIR: Look, I mean, there's two separate issues here. One is, absolutely, East Jerusalem, under international law, is a part of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, and of course its residents should have the right to vote in elections for the Palestinian Authority. The reality is, while Israel has annexed this area — you know, the vast majority of the world do not accept that annexation — it doesn't change the status of that territory. And, of course, the majority of Palestinians there don't vote in national Israeli elections, many of whom are stateless, you know, without any sort of permanent, stable legal status, and face these restrictions.


But I think, more to the point here, this really is pretext. Human Rights Watch has documented, for years now, the increasingly authoritarian trend of the Palestinian Authority, as well as Hamas authorities in the Gaza Strip. We've documented systematic arbitrary arrest and torture of critics and opponents, over recent years the increasing role security services have in making decisions. And it was quite clear, as you noted, Amy, that there were challenges to Abu Mazen, Mahmoud Abbas's rule even within the Fatah party. And I think many see this move as being done out of concern that this election, which all along was being set up to — you know, not really to offer Palestinians a viable chance to change and vote their conscience, but really as a rubber stamp, not only for the PA in the West Bank, but Hamas in Gaza. But when that was threatened, they canceled elections.


It's an unfortunate reality. Palestinian authorities, as they are, manage affairs in only a small part of the entire Occupied Palestinian Territory. Israeli authorities remain — retain overarching control. But, of course, we can't separate the PA's repression of critics and dissidents and more general ineffective rule from the larger oppression Palestinians face, including apartheid and persecution at the hand of Israeli authorities. Palestinians are stuck between two authorities, both of whom have engaged in different forms of repression, both of whom are holding them back from the realization of their full rights.


AMY GOODMAN: And finally, Omar, this latest news, at least 44 ultra-Orthodox Jews dying, dozens injured, after a stampede during a religious gathering, a pilgrimage. An estimated 100,000 people gathered at Mount Meron late Thursday. Stampede occurred in the early hours of Friday morning, after some appeared to slip on stones leading to a sloped passageway, triggering what one local news site described as a "human avalanche." Warnings have been issued over the years saying the site was not safe for mass gatherings. This was one of the first major gatherings with COVID restrictions being lifted.


OMAR SHAKIR: It's an absolute tragedy. And I think, you know, we've seen, I think, over the last year, in the wake of COVID, sort of the challenges that the Israeli government has had in dealing with some of the gatherings of more religious Jewish Israeli communities across the country. You know, this is the sort of thing that was warned about from some of the reporting that's come out from inside Israel, that watchdogs had warned that this scenario was possible. You know, during the pandemic, we saw, of course, examples of gatherings of different religious communities that the government sort of attributed to the rise of cases in particular areas. So, it's very clear that there are important issues here and that the Israeli government, whether or not it's formed in the coming days and weeks, or whether or not we head back to elections — these are the sort of things that fall by the wayside as politicians go back to back in rounds of elections. So, it's a really terrible tragedy. You know, obviously, the condolences of many in the world go out to the victims. You know, really awful human stories that are coming out, one that I read earlier today of a young boy who was being put in a body bag while his mother was calling him. Really awful, avoidable tragedy. And I hope the Israeli government will take steps to ensure this doesn't happen again.


AMY GOODMAN: Omar Shakir, I want to thank you for being with us, Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch. We'll link to your report, "A Threshold Crossed: Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution." Omar is speaking to us from Amman, Jordan.