Anyone recognize this quotation? Who wrote it?
The means to real peace. No government admits any more that it
keeps an army to satisfy occasionally the desire for conquest.
Rather the army is supposed to serve for defense, and one invokes
the morality that approves of self-defense. But this implies one's
own morality and the neighbor's immorality; for the neighbor must be
thought of as eager to attack and conquer if our state must think of
means of self-defense. Moreover, the reasons we give for requiring
an army imply that our neighbor, who denies the desire for conquest
just as much as does our own state, and who, for his part, also
keeps an army only for reasons of self-defense, is a hypocrite and a
cunning criminal who would like nothing better than to overpower a
harmless and awkward victim without any fight. Thus all states are
now ranged against each other: they presuppose their neighbor's bad
disposition and their own good disposition. This presupposition,
however, is inhumane, as bad as war and worse. At bottom, indeed,
it is itself the challenge and the cause of wars, because, as I have
said, it attributes immorality to the neighbor and thus provokes a
hostile disposition and act. We must abjure the doctrine of the army
as a means of self-defense just as completely as the desire for
conquests. And perhaps the great day will come when people,
distinguished by wars and victories and by the highest development
of a military order and intelligence, and accustomed to make the
heaviest sacrifices for these things, will exclaim of its own free
will, "We break the sword," and will smash its entire military
establishment down to its lowest foundations. Rendering oneself
unarmed when one had been the best-armed, out of a height of
feeling -- that is the means to real peace, which must always rest on
a peace of mind; whereas the so-called armed peace, as it now exists
in all countries, is the absence of peace of mind. One trusts
neither oneself nor one's neighbor and, half from hatred, half from
fear, does not lay down arms. Rather perish than hate and fear, and
twice rather perish than make oneself hated and feared -- this must
someday become the highest maxim for every single commonwealth. Our
liberal representatives, as is well known, lack the time for
reflecting on the nature of man: else they would know that they work
in vain when they work for a "gradual decrease of the military
burden." Rather, only when this kind of need has become greatest
will the kind of god be nearest who alone can help here. The tree of
war-glory can only be destroyed all at once, by a stroke of
lightning: but lightning, as indeed you know, comes from a cloud -- and
from up high.
No comments:
Post a Comment