I am posting this because I have long wondered some of the same things. Keith has done a great deal to lead a change in newscasting.
*ZNet | Mainstream Media*
*Is Olbermann on Thin Ice?*
*by Jeff Cohen; October 07, 2006*
I fear for Keith Olbermann.
Like so many others who hunger for some journalistic
independence on TV news, I often marvel at Olbermann’s dogged
reporting and unique commentary. In a cable news environment of
conformity and conservatism, the MSNBC host takes on the Bush
administration for “demonizing dissent,” for abusing our
Constitutional traditions, for “taking cynical advantage of the
unanimity and love [following 9/11], and transmuting it into
fraudulent war and needless death.”
Only Olbermann talks about Team Bush “monstrously transforming
[9/11 unity] into fear and suspicion, and turning that fear into
the campaign slogan of three elections.” He was virtually alone
on TV news in seriously reporting on 2004 election
irregularities in Ohio, and in exploring the pre-Iraq war
Downing Street Memos indicating White House deception. In
recent months, his prime targets seem to have evolved from
softer ones like Bill O’Reilly to bigger game: Bush and his
minions.
It’s worth noting that strong criticism of an extremist
presidency hardly makes Olbermann a leftist. I remember him as
the whimsical sports guy on ESPN. I remember his first go-round
on MSNBC in 1998 when he could have sued his bosses for
repetitive stress disorder for having to host scores of Lewinsky
episodes on the road to Clinton’s impeachment – an impeachment
that may well have been impossible if not for the complicity of
TV news.
It’s obvious his bosses at MSNBC/NBC/GE never envisioned the
increasingly bold Olbermann of recent months. It’s likely that
Olbermann himself could not have foreseen his current role as
the lone voice of those who feel assaulted by a cable news
business dominated by the O’Reillys and Hannitys.
So why do I fear for Olbermann? Because I know his bosses. In
the runup to the Iraq war, I too worked for MSNBC – as an on-air
pundit and a senior producer on the primetime /Donahue/ show.
As I detail in my book /Cable News Confidential: My
Misadventures in Corporate Media
the Suits at MSNBC/NBC muzzled us and ultimately terminated us.
They feared independent journalism and serious dissent. They
smeared Bush critics, with MSNBC’s editor-in-chief actually
going on air – without evidence – to accuse Iraq WMD skeptic
Scott Ritter of being a paid agent of Saddam Hussein.
Olbermann has been gaining in audience ratings. That provides
him some security. But perhaps not enough.
When /Donahue/ was terminated three weeks before the Iraq
invasion, it was MSNBC’s most watched program. Canceling your
top-rated show doesn’t happen often, but it happened to
/Donahue/. Who knows what will happen to Olbermann?
With /Donahue/, management cared less about building up audience
than tamping down dissent. While independent outlets and blogs
were soaring in audience by questioning the rush to war, our
bosses imposed straightjackets on us that prevented similar
growth.
In the last months of /Donahue/, management gave us strict
orders: if we booked a guest who was antiwar, we needed two who
were pro-war. If we booked two guests on the left, we needed
three on the right. When a producer proposed booking Michael
Moore, she was told she’d need three rightwingers for
ideological balance.
Olbermann’s increasingly bold dissent has been occurring at a
time when Bush’s approval ratings are low and Bush’s war is in
shambles. That gives him some added security.
During /Donahue/’s tenure at MSNBC on the eve of war, Bush’s
popularity was high. And media conglomerates were particularly
concerned about not ruffling the White House at that moment – as
they were lobbying hard to get FCC rules changed to allow them
to grow still fatter.
The day after /Donahue/ was terminated, an internal NBC memo
leaked out; it said that Phil Donahue represents “a difficult
public face for NBC in a time of war.” Why? Because he insisted
on presenting administration critics. The memo worried that
/Donahue/ would become a “home for the liberal antiwar agenda at
the same time that our competitors are waving the flag at every
opportunity.”
NBC’s solution then? Dump Phil, stifle dissent, brandish the flag.
NBC’s solution now? So far, Olbermann appears to be on more
solid footing – mostly because the political zeitgeist is much
changed from four years ago.
But MSNBC is still owned by GE’s conservative bosses, and
managed by NBC’s ever-timid executives. Olbermann knows this
reality as well as anyone; six months ago on C-SPAN, while
expressing confidence that good ratings would keep them at bay,
he remarked: “There are people I know in the hierarchy of NBC,
the company, and GE, the company, who do not like to see the
current presidential administration criticized at all.”
I’m pulling for Olbermann; I’m one of the multitudes who find
his commentaries online (perhaps more see them on the Web than
on TV) – and forward them far and wide.
But with each new broadside against the Bush administration, I
fear for his future. His best security is us, an active
citizenry. It’s media activism, organized heavily on the Net.
It’s media watchdogs like FAIR.org, MediaMatters.org and
MediaChannel.org. It’s the movement that resisted the FCC
changes in 2003, challenged Sinclair Broadcast propaganda before
the ’04 election, and recently exposed the 9/11 “hijacking” of
ABC by rightwing Clinton-bashers.
In the epilogue of /Cable News Confidential/, I laud this
movement: “My only regret was that such a potent movement had
not coalesced by 2002 – to flex its muscles against MSNBC brass
in defense of an unfettered /Donahue/.”
If Olbermann gets muzzled or terminated for political reasons,
it will be up to us to fight – not only for him, but for the
concept that without serious dissent, democracy is a sham.
* * *
Jeff Cohen http://www.jeffcohen.org/ is the founder of the media
watch group FAIR http://www.fair.org/index.php, and author of
/Cable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media/
http://www.cablenewsconfidential.com/.
No comments:
Post a Comment