Saturday, April 27, 2024

Conspracy of Conscious

THE ABSURD TIMES

Note: he will run as an independent to void the corruption of current parties. His MVP in Women's Volleyball is an achievement no other Republican Maga managed. The man on the right also has some distinctions.

-----

I have run out of words to match Demented Trump, but I came across this description of followers. We must realize that the Demented One merely helps express the American character. Note what a genuine wordsmith called the American character over 100 years ago. There has been no change, just an easier means of transmission. I have blocked out some paragraphs, just to make them easier to read, but not one word has been changed:

From H. L. Mencken:

PREJUDICES: THIRD SERIES

I. ON BEING AN AMERICAN

1

Apparently, there are those who begin to find it disagreeable—nay,

impossible. Their anguish fills the Liberal weeklies, and every ship

that puts out from New York carries a groaning cargo of them, bound

for Paris, London, Munich, Rome and way points—anywhere to escape the

great curses and atrocities that make life intolerable for them at

home.

Let me say at once that I find little to cavil at in their basic

complaints. In more than one direction, indeed, I probably go a great

deal further than even the Young Intellectuals. It is, for example,

one of my firmest and most sacred beliefs, reached after an inquiry

extending over a score of years and supported by incessant prayer

and meditation, that the government of the United States, in both

its legislative arm and its executive arm, is ignorant, incompetent,

corrupt, and disgusting—and from this judgment I except no more than

twenty living lawmakers and no more than twenty executioners of their

laws.

It is a belief no less piously cherished that the administration

of justice in the Republic is stupid, dishonest, and against all

reason and equity—and from this judgment I except no more than thirty

judges, including two upon the bench of the Supreme Court of the United

States. It is another that the foreign policy of the United States—its

habitual manner of dealing with other nations, whether friend or

foe—is hypocritical, disingenuous, knavish, and dishonorable—and from

this judgment I consent to no exceptions whatever, either recent or

long past. And it is my fourth (and, to avoid too depressing a bill,

final) conviction that the American people, taking one with another,

constitute the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish [cowardly], ignominious mob

of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom

since the end of the Middle Ages, and that they grow more timorous,

more sniveling, more poltroonish, more ignominious every day.

So far I go with the fugitive Young Intellectuals—and into the

Bad Lands beyond. Such, in brief, are the cardinal articles of my

political faith, held passionately since my admission to citizenship

and now growing stronger and stronger as I gradually disintegrate

into my component carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, phosphorus, calcium,

sodium, nitrogen and iron. This is what I believe and preach, _in

nomine Domini_, Amen. Yet I remain on the dock, wrapped in the flag,

when the Young Intellectuals set sail. Yet here I stand, unshaken and

undespairing, a loyal and devoted Americano, even a chauvinist, paying

taxes without complaint, obeying all laws that are physiologically

obeyable, accepting all the searching duties and responsibilities

of citizenship unprotestingly investing the sparse usufructs of my

miserable toil in the obligations of the nation, avoiding all commerce

with men sworn to overthrow the government, contributing my mite toward

the glory of the national arts and sciences, enriching and embellishing

the native language, spurning all lures (and even all invitations) to

get out and stay out—here am I, a bachelor [Mencken does not make explicit that this is a cardinal aspect of his financially] easy means, forty-two

years old, unhampered by debts or issue, able to go wherever I please

and to stay as long as I please—here am I, contentedly and even smugly

basking beneath the Stars and Stripes, a better citizen, I daresay,

and certainly a less murmurous and exigent one, than thousands who

put the Hon. Warren Gamaliel Harding beside Friedrich Barbarossa and

Charlemagne, and hold the Supreme Court to be directly inspired by the

Holy Spirit, and belong ardently to every Rotary Club, Ku Klux Klan,

and Anti-Saloon League, and choke with emotion when the band plays "The

Star-Spangled Banner," and believe with the faith of little children

that one of Our Boys, taken at random, could dispose in a fair fight

of ten Englishmen, twenty Germans, thirty Frogs, forty Wops, fifty

Japs, or a hundred Bolsheviki.

That is all we need to say about the MAGA morons. However, during jury selection, one was asked "what was your reaction when you say the defendant?

A.: He was not as orange as I expected.

Q.: Excused.]

Conspiracy was touted in the anti-Zionist butcher's demonstrations. Certainly, any demonstrations against Israeli war crimes must be insalubrious. Complaints of Jewish students in fear from antisemitism – then how do you explain all the Jewish Voice for Peace, the students unaffiliated but knowing what Nit Wit Yahoo is doing? But Biden said he saw babies being beheaded and Jewish women being raped. (Not bloody likely.)

Horrible the way anti-semitism blossoms every time Israel kills another unarmed and defenseless Palestinian. Is no place safe for the Swinging Semites at an Ivy League University who cheer on the slaughter? Every time they dig up mass graves after the Zionist occupation of a hospital, more antisemitism? Now three mass grave sites, reports from reliable observers of one where the Palestinians were buried alive. When will this anti-semitism stop?

Ah, but Maga Mike, Speaker of the House, goes to Columbia University and scolds the President. Really? What the hell is going on? Shouldn't he at least learn that the earth is more than 6 or 7 thousand years old before allowed at Columbia? Shouldn't he at least know that the First Amendment is there to protect free speech, not Religion? And where does he get off deciding that the University "reform" its faculty?

Remember the Pentagon Papers?

And another student movement: I was up in the administration building dealing with NSF and the Army Corps of Engineers over language to use in various new contracts. I gradually heard a chant and soon had to look down on the quadrangle as waves of students said in rhythm

FREE SOUTH AFRICA

DIVEST NOW!

FREE SOUTH AFRICA

DIVEST NOW!

FREE SOUTH AFRICA

DIVEST NOW!

And so on. I wondered: "Should I be down there joining the mob, or stay up here and defend research from large agencies or huge corporations (who were often easier to deal with than the Army). Well, Mandella won.

Check out Democracy Now, below. Juan was with the Young Lords at Columbia while I was in Chicago.

AbsurdTimes's Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thank you for reading AbsurdTimes's Newsletter. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Share AbsurdTimes's Newsletter

They killed Fred Hampton. From what I gather, Hunter Thompson was a few blocks south of me (I had no idea who he was) and I was busy with Abbie (all of them). Now Juan is in Chicago. I enjoyed toying with the Chicago P.D. (even worked there for a while). Lots of similarities and it shows that those who think can also act. Some have pointed out, however, that during the Presidential election years, suicide rates for "smart" people rise 40%. Well, it's time for a report:

Related

Bodies Recovered at Mass Graves in Nasser Hospital Bear Signs of Torture, Mutilation & Execution

At least 320 bodies have been discovered buried in a mass grave at the destroyed Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Younis, just weeks after a similar mass grave containing up to 400 bodies was discovered amid the ruins of Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. Some of the bodies, which include children, medical staff and patients, appear to have been executed or buried alive. Meanwhile, Israel continues its bombardment of Gaza as its assault of the beleaguered enclave surpasses 200 days. "Every single body that is being unearthed, you find tens of people rushing for the sake of identifying whether those are their relatives," says Akram al-Satarri, a journalist based in Gaza. "Some of the people were tied. Some of the people had medical accessories on their hands, like the cannulas. And when they were unearthed from the ground, it was apparent that they were buried alive. Some people were tortured. Some of the bodies were extremely mutilated, which means that those bodies, some of their organs were taken by the Israeli occupation."


Transcript

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: In Gaza, medics and Civil Defense workers are still recovering bodies from mass graves found at the Nasser Medical Complex for the sixth day in a row following Israel's siege on the hospital. Over 320 bodies have so far been discovered, including women, children, patients and medical staff, according to Al Jazeera. Another mass grave with up to 400 bodies was discovered weeks earlier at Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. Civil Defense officials have said bodies were found stacked together and showed indications of field executions or being buried alive. The United Nations and the European Union have called for an independent probe into the mass graves, and the White House on Wednesday also called for an investigation.

This comes as Israel continues its bombardment of Gaza, with at least 43 people killed over the last 24 hours, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry. At least five of them were killed in the southern city of Rafah, where Israel has conducted near-daily airstrikes as it prepares for an offensive in the city.

AMY GOODMAN: A spokesperson for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government told Reuters Israel is moving ahead with a ground operation in Rafah, but gave no timeline. An unnamed Israeli defense official said Israel had bought 40,000 tents, each able to hold between 10 and 12 people, to house Palestinians evacuated from Rafah ahead of its assault on the city. Israeli news outlets report Israel will forcibly evacuate civilians to the nearby city of Khan Younis, which has been virtually destroyed by Israeli forces. Over 1.3 million Palestinians are seeking shelter in Rafah, the southernmost city in Gaza.

We go now to Rafah, in Gaza, where we're joined by Akram al-Satarri, a journalist based in Gaza.

Welcome back to Democracy Now!, Akram. Just moments ago, Palestinian officials held a press conference in Rafah regarding the mass graves at the Nasser Medical Complex. Can you tell us the latest? I know there's a delay in the broadcast.

AKRAM AL-SATARRI: Good morning, Amy, to you and all the viewers.

I have just come back from Khan Younis area. I was at Nasser Hospital. I spoke to the Civil Defense official who's now giving this press conference about the situation in Nasser Hospital and about the number of the people who were killed, the way they were killed, and an account of the potential suffering they had been seeing even before they did.

It looks like the mass graves, the three different mass graves, are containing around 700 bodies. Up to this particular moment, around 400 bodies were unearthed and discovered. Around 300 bodies or even more are still in the ground. The bulldozer — one bulldozer, because of the very limited resources, working — is working there for the sake of just digging out the bodies.

Family members are lined up there. Family members are trying and rushing with passion and with great deal of sorrow to identify the bodies of their dears. Some of them managed to identify the bodies. Then you hear the outcry. You hear the people screaming, crying and mourning the death of their dears. But at the very same time, they feel a little bit relief, because they finally found the body of their dears.

I spoke to a mother who's around 42, 43 years old. She was trying to identify her son. And then she found the body of her son. She was crying. The sister also, her daughter, was crying. And they were calling for the family to come and join them in the burial, because in our culture as Muslims and Arabs, we find a burial as the best fitting homage for the people who are dead.

People are continuously digging out the bodies. People are continuously — and this is very ironic — they're trying to save the dead. People, when they die, are supposed to be resting in peace. And I was saying that people in Gaza, when they die, they're neither resting nor in peace. The bodies, those bodies, were collected twice by the Israeli occupation forces. They were taken for some forensic investigation. They were returned to Nasser Hospital. They're stockpiled in this very big hall, three different halls. And then they were buried. And then, a second time, the Israeli occupation forces came back to Nasser Hospital. They invaded all different departments of the hospital. They targeted the specialized surgery department, the reception and emergency. And they once again unearthed those hundreds of bodies and took them once again. And then they returned them to this mass grave or mass graves. So, the suffering even for the dead people in Gaza is still continuous.

And the heartache for their families is nonstop. Every single body that is being unearthed, you find tens of people rushing for the sake of identifying whether those are their relatives or otherwise. You see also many families looking into these individual graves in the Nasser Hospital area. You see written on the tombstone that "This guy is a tall guy. He has long hair. He's wearing a gray shirt. And this is all we know." And then it's up to the family to try and to find and for people to recall what their dears were wearing the day they were parting from them, what were they wearing the day they were killed. So, a very emotionally draining process.

The numbers are quite shocking. But the account of the loss and the death that led to that eventual mass grave is extremely shocking, where some of the people — like you have just said, some of the people were tied. Some of the people had medical accessories on their hands, like the cannulas. And when they were unearthed from the ground, it was apparent that they were buried alive. Some people were tortured. Some of the bodies were extremely mutilated, which means that those bodies, some of their organs were taken by the Israeli occupation. Some lost their eyes. I could see some bodies with no eyes. I could see some bodies with no liver, with no kidney, some bodies that are — you see them, like the outer skin is just covering the skeleton, and that's it. So, the account of that experience is quite heart-wrenching.

The families that have been suffering for the sake of just identifying their dears are also broken. They have been crying. But at least they say, "We feel comfortable because we found our dear." So, it gives you an insight, a glimpse, into the suffering people of Gaza have been living. It gives you a glimpse into the bereavement the women, men, children and girls in Gaza have been experiencing for the last six months also.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: Akram al-Satarri, just for our audience to know, you know, whenever we speak to you, we have — there's this constant noise around you, and those are drones, of course, flying overhead, as they have been for months now. But if you could respond? You know, the European Union, the United Nations and now also the United States have called for an independent investigation into these mass graves. So, your response to that? And we're speaking to you in Rafah. If you could also describe what conditions there are on the ground?

AKRAM AL-SATARRI: Well, as to the independent scrutiny or investigation committee that needs to be developed, I've been working in journalism for around 16 years now. I have been hearing about the independent committees, commissions, inquiries, fact-finding committees and international reports and tribunals about the situation in Gaza, looking into the particular details of the incidents that were taking place, investigating the death of several people in mass killing incidents, including the war in 2008, the war in 2014 and the war in 2021. I have been hearing a book about Gaza and the war in Gaza from 2014, and I was reading the exact words that I'm going to say now: "Palestinians struggle to dig out the bodies." So, this is something that happened in 2014. This is something that happened in 2008. This is something that happened in '21, '22 and is still happening throughout 2023 and 2024.

The international community has failed to preserve and — to preserve and observe the dictates of the international humanitarian law. The humanity at large is facing a challenge. All the political systems worldwide are asked now and expected to do something tangible for the sake of just saving the Gaza Strip. Rhetoric is no longer needed. Rhetoric is no longer satisfactory. We need them to do something tangible to stop the things that are happening in Gaza.

Some of the things that Gazans are suggesting, the no-fly zone to protect the civilians in Gaza. Some of the things that Gazans are suggesting, that Israel should be held accountable for what they call crimes that were committed against the humanity, against people, against civilians. The international humanitarian law is rich with terms and vocab that are related to the, what they call the civil objects, civil objects that are protected, journalists that are protected, medical teams that are supposed to be protected, medical facilities that are supposed also to be protected. But when you review the shocking numbers about the way that the journalists are being killed, for instance, the medical teams are being killed, for instance, you conclude that the international community is failing so far to do something tangible, rather than the statements, the condemnations, the calls for independent inquiries or commissions to look into the investigation. We need something tangible. And that something tangible has not been achieved so far. And Gazans have been dying constantly because of that.

Something should be done. Something swift should be done. Otherwise, the death would continue. Now in Gaza today, 79 people were killed. And an average number of around 65 to 79 is killed every day. And if nothing is done, this means the international community accepts the killing of Gazans and accepts the justification of Israel to continue that killing. [coughs] Sorry.

And when it comes to the situation in Rafah, in Rafah, around 1.4 to 1.2 million, because of the influx of people from Rafah in the last few days. People are so scared because of the looming ground operation. They understand that the Israeli occupation is going to target them, and they understand that death would be chasing them. So some of them moved from Rafah. Around 150,000 Gazans have already left Rafah and moved to the area in al-Mawasi, a buffer zone between Rafah and Khan Younis, in the hope that they would survive. The ones who are in Rafah and the ones who are in Khan Younis and the ones in Gaza, at the entirety of Gaza, are all IDPs, around 2.1 million IDPs, because of the destruction of the infrastructure, the destruction of the homes, the destruction of the streets, and because of the continuous bombardment that has been taking their life. And those people are living in areas that have no infrastructure. No infrastructure means that they don't have water supplies that are regular. They don't have sewage systems. They don't have food. They don't have even drinkable water with which they can cook the food. They don't have houses. They're living in tents. And today is a very hot day. Today and yesterday were very hot days in this specific season. And now people in the tents are struggling. They are sweating all day. The children that have respiratory — even the adults that have some respiratory disorders are suffering more than any other people, and this suffering is continuous.

And this situation, when it comes to the humanitarian situation in Gaza, is unbearable, unimaginable and unacceptable. When I tell you the situation is unimaginable, because, for me, some parts of Gaza and some part of those camps that I have seen, the suffering of the people is unimaginable. You will see them living just by the minimum, and even there is no minimum. And they have no other choice to continue living and waiting and hoping some solution would be developed or concluded sometime soon. This is the truth about the situation, something I have never seen in my life, let alone someone who's living thousands of miles away from Gaza.

People are buried in the streets. People are buried on the pavement. People are buried everywhere, in their homes. And some of the bodies, around 10,000 bodies, are in Gaza, are still under the rubble, and they have not been retrieved so far. You walk down the streets, and you smell death everywhere. You go to the hospital, that is supposed to be the temple of protection and humanity, you find the hospital totally devastated by death. You find the patients, who were supposed to be receiving the medical treatments, buried within the hospital. And you smell their decomposed bodies after the bodies were desecrated and unearthed. And wherever you turn your face, you see the children, you see the adults, you see the women and the men, the girls and the boys, suffering from that unjust situation that is still continuous. And no one single international power could stop that or bring an end to that ongoing suffering and misery.

AMY GOODMAN: Akram al-Satarri, we want to thank you so much for being with us. Be safe. Akram is a Gaza-based journalist, speaking to us from Rafah.

Student protests calling for university divestment from Israel and the U.S. arms industry have rocked campuses from coast to coast. The nonviolent protests, which have been characterized as "antisemitic" for their criticism of Israel, have been met with an intensifying police crackdown as university administrators threaten academic discipline and arrests. On Wednesday, local and state troopers violently arrested dozens at the University of Texas at Austin. Meanwhile, Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson visited Columbia University in New York City, the site of a high-profile student encampment and one of the first to be met with police action, where he called on university president Minouche Shafik to resign. We hear from two Jewish students involved in protests at their schools. Joshua Sklar, a graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin and an organizer with Jewish Voice of Peace Austin, says concern over campus antisemitism is insincere, and that, in fact, "The people who are being targeted are Muslim students, Arab students, and especially Palestinian students." Sklar and Sarah King, a member of Columbia University Apartheid Divest who was arrested at the campus's Gaza Solidarity Encampment, also point out that a large percentage of protesters are Jewish anti-Zionists concerned about their safety from state repression. "The threat is really coming from Columbia University, which has set the police on hundreds of its students who are entrusted to its care," says King.


Transcript

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org. I'm Amy Goodman, with Nermeen Shaikh.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: Protests against Israel's assault on Gaza have rocked campuses from coast to coast over the past week amid an intensifying police crackdown. At the University of Texas in Austin, school officials called in local and state police, including some on horseback, who violently broke up a student encampment on campus. At least 50 people were arrested, including at least one journalist. Some faculty at UT Austin are going on strike today to protest the police crackdown.

Meanwhile, the Gaza Solidarity Encampment at Columbia University continues a week after over a hundred students were arrested in a failed attempt by the university administration to clear the demonstration. University President Minouche Shafik had said on Tuesday — had set on Tuesday a midnight deadline to reach an agreement on clearing an encampment, but the school extended negotiations for another 48 hours. On a visit to campus Wednesday, House Speaker Mike Johnson called on Shafik to resign.

SPEAKER MIKE JOHNSON: I am here today joining my colleagues in calling on President Shafik to resign if she cannot immediately bring order to this chaos. As speaker of the House, I am committing today that the Congress will not be silent as Jewish students are expected to run for their lives and stay home from their classes, hiding in fear.

AMY GOODMAN: For more, we're joined in New York by Sarah King, member of Columbia University Apartheid Divest. She is Jewish, one of the students arrested at the encampment last week who's now suspended. We're also joined by Joshua Sklar, a graduate student at University of Texas Austin, a member of Jewish Voice for Peace Austin, who was at Wednesday's protest.

We welcome you both to Democracy Now! Josh, there were more than 50 arrests at UT Austin. If you can respond to the House speaker, who's saying that these encampments around the country are antisemitic and pro-Hamas?

JOSHUA SKLAR: It's absolutely ridiculous. I was there with a contingent of Jewish students, and we were received very warmly. There were even Jewish Zionists there, and they were not harassed at all. In fact, I would say that they probably felt safer than the majority of protesters.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: Sarah King, if you could describe what's happening now at Columbia University and your own position? You were suspended?

SARAH KING: Yes, I was one of the over 100 students who was arrested as part of a peaceful protest in the Gaza Solidarity Encampment, and I'm one of the student who's been suspended, as well, so I'm currently not allowed to be on campus. And I have to say it's — the camp itself is very beautiful. It's been a real place of interfaith celebration and solidarity, in support of the people of Gaza, who are now at over 200 days of genocide. But, you know, the threat is really coming from Columbia University, which has sent the police on hundreds of its students who are entrusted to its care.

AMY GOODMAN: And can you talk, Sarah, about what's happened, how you got suspended and your treatment? I've been talking to a number of Columbia and Barnard students who said that some of them were given 15 minutes to get out of their dorm, and your meal card canceled, as you're banned from campus, as well.

SARAH KING: Yeah, that's exactly right. I'm one of the lucky ones, because I live off campus. But many students live in Columbia housing, and so they were evicted from their homes or locked out from their homes, probably illegally in many cases. We're looking into it. And they lost access to their normal food. I had an undergraduate who is low-income and was staying with me, because she was evicted with no notice and lost access to her meal plan.

And it's really very concerning the way Columbia uses the threat of — initially it was just — "just," quote-unquote — the threat of housing, the threat of loss of food to try to — you know, as a cudgel to get students into the correct political line that is best for its pocketbook, its investment portfolio. And now they're threatening to set the National Guard on us, risking another Jackson State, another Kent State, where students have been killed because the National Guard were set on students. And they're willing to risk the threat of violence at their hands because we're not, you know, consistent with what's best for their board of trustees or for their portfolios.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: And, Sarah, what about your response to Mike Johnson being invited to speak at Columbia University on campus yesterday?

SARAH KING: Yeah. I mean, first, I think it's shameful that he was allowed there. Like, I myself am not allowed on campus. I'm, you know, one of many talented and promising students with bright futures who have been banned from campus, but Mike Johnson, who is an open racist and white supremacist, along with people like Gavin McInnes, the head of the Proud Boys, they were welcomed on campus yesterday.

And to me, that really tells the story of what's at stake here, which is that, you know, the students fighting for Palestinian liberation are part of an interracial coalition — so many Jewish students, Muslim students, Black, Brown, Arab students — working together for the cause of freedom, on one side, and then, on the other side, you have political opportunists, like the House speaker, who, you know, will take any excuse they can get to come after that kind of interfaith, multigenerational coalition fighting for freedom. And right now it happens to be under the guise of something like antisemitism. But, you know, there's no substance to it at all. And I think anybody who came to campus and saw, the worst prosecution that the Jewish students on campus are facing is from Columbia University. We were disproportionately banned by Columbia because so many of us are part of the Gaza Solidarity Encampment trying to prevent a genocide in our name.

AMY GOODMAN: And, Joshua Sklar, wrote a piece in The Austin Chronicle. "We need a ceasefire now," it was called, the subtitle, "Anti-Palestinian violence is not 'on the other side of the globe.' It's here in Austin, too." If you can talk about that and how protesters were treated yesterday? You had riot police on horseback?

JOSHUA SKLAR: Yeah. I think that there's been this narrative that there's been rampant antisemitism. And this simply is not the case. The people who are being targeted are Muslim students, Arab students, and especially Palestinian students. Police came in on horseback, and they attacked protesters. I heard from other students that during an earlier part of the protest, they were clearly targeting Brown people and women. I wasn't there personally, but this is what I heard.

AMY GOODMAN: Let me ask Sarah King a final question. We have 10 seconds. And that is, 48-hour extension goes 'til tonight. What are the plans? Ten seconds, Sarah.

SARAH KING: You know, I think most of the people at the encampment have already agreed to risk arrest, and they won't move unless moved by force or until Columbia concedes to our demands, which are for divestment, amnesty and financial transparency.

AMY GOODMAN: We want to thank you both for being with us, Sarah King, Columbia University Apartheid Divest, and Joshua Sklar at UT Austin. I'm Amy Goodman, with Nermeen Shaikh.

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.


Tuesday, April 16, 2024

Self-Defense

RIGHT OF SELF-DEFENSE?

IRAN V. ISRAEL

THE ABSURD TIMES

Illustration: Nothing like being at home.

RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE

We are a bit late with this, 24 hours in fact, but it takes precedence over what we were working on. It has been quite a cognitive crucifixion not to decide on which way to vote, if at all, but to find any time in the past of our electoral system such a dirth of principle existed in what remains a two-party system. It was taking quite a bit of time and analysis, and all of a sudden Iran elects to "even the score" with a retaliation against Israel. Also, some new buzz-words were still-birthed as well as some surviving ones ridden excessively.

One that seems to have faded is the "deconfliction zone" which refers to when and where people involved will stop attacking one another. A very ominous and insane asylum flock of refugees apparently exists in Israel at the moment. We have established quite clearly that Nitwit Yahoo is slaughtering as many civilians, women, and children as possible in Gaza, but his purpose seemed to be self-preservation, to use his position as a war-time leader as a cloak of immunity in much the same manner as Demented Don is running for President in the U.S. We now hear that many members of his ruling clique are worse and more sadistic and unchecked than even him. They want to kill every Palestinian they can and take over the land. Kushner (yes, the son-in-law of the orange man) has said that Gaza looks like an "excellent beach-front" property. Other members of Neten's cabinet call Palestinians "animals," and there are hopes that larger swaths of land in the Golan Heights will be added to the land already bearing the Trump name.

A reasonable Calculus incrementally and tangentially set to zero would make this quadratic linear and … I'm realizing that one needs to use this term with less background, not even Leibnitz meant that.

So what did happen? Well, starting with Israel's attack on the Iranian consulate in Syria (legally, Iranian soil) several Iranian officials or officers were killed – not clear whether murder, assassination, or war – by Israel (not by its client state's or organization.) This is the same excess as would be an attack on Teheran. Iran said that it would retaliate. The attack on Iran was April Fool's Day, and the response was two weeks later.

The response was actually quite stylish and was quite amusing to follow on MSM here in the U.S. It was helpful to stay with one outlet to watch as the story developed. The first thing we heard was that a drone (yes, singular) had been sent from Iran to Israel. If you knew its probable speed and distance, you could estimate that it would be five hours before it reached Israel so that left time to wash the dishes and change, at the very least. All of a sudden, it became 45 and then 100 drones on the way to Zion. What are we going to do?

Well, as we wonder, we learn that after these two hours passed, 100 missiles have been launched and are heading towards Israel at twice the speed of the drones. It is still not Calculus, but the addition is clear. You do it.

Finally, we hear of a lack of warning. Right after the Israeli raid on the Iranian embassy or consulate, Iran said they would retaliate by exercising the right to self-defense. Then the attack was at least five hours (the drones) ahead of time, giving ample time for others to shoot them down. When we first heard of the attack, I was asked how long it would take to land and said "less than 20 minutes"). Well, obviously, I didn't have all the facts. I had simply believed that they used an ICBM such as we timed during or so exciting games with the Soviet Union. This was hardly that. Let us hope that some degree of sanity returns before Israel increases its pursuit of Lebensraum.

AbsurdTimes's Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Share

Share AbsurdTimes's Newsletter

In previous postings, we mentioned the difficulty in obtaining accurate reporting. One of the places where such is present is in non-corporate, non-profit, public-supported agencies such as DEMOCRACY NOW from whence comes this transcript, DEMOCRACYNOW.ORG:

The Middle East is bracing for the possibility of regional war after Iran responded to Israel's bombing of the Iranian Consulate in Damascus with a major drone and missile attack Saturday. The attack caused little damage inside Israel, as it intercepted nearly all of the drones and missiles with help from the United States, Britain, France and Jordan. Iran's government described the attack as a defensive maneuver after Israel's unprovoked strike on its embassy killed some of Iran's top military brass. This was "a performative operation to send a message," says journalist Reza Sayah, who joins us from Tehran. But while Iran "does not want to escalate matters," Israel may be preparing to do just that. Washington, D.C.-based analyst Trita Parsi says that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has been trying to instigate conflict between the U.S. and Iran for "more than two decades," and given that Biden has demonstrated an unwillingness to "draw any red lines for Israel publicly," these latest provocations could become a prime "opportunity" for such a war. Crucially, Iranian restraint "cannot last forever," warns our final roundtable guest, the Israeli journalist Gideon Levy, who touches on both Iran's own sovereignty and increasing global pressure for Israel to end its war on Gaza. "Gaza is still starving and bleeding, and we shouldn't forget it," says Levy.

Transcript

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: The Middle East is bracing for possible retaliation from Israel after Iran launched 300 drones and missiles at Israel in response to Israel's recent bombing of the Iranian Consulate in Damascus, Syria. The Iranian attack caused little damage inside Israel, which intercepted nearly all the drones and missiles, with help from the United States, Britain, France and Jordan. U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres called for maximum restraint Sunday at an emergency U.N. Security Council meeting.

SECRETARY-GENERAL ANTÓNIO GUTERRES: The Middle East is on the brink. The people of the region are confronting a real danger of a devastating, full-scale conflict. Now is the time to defuse and deescalate. Now is the time for maximum restraint.

AMY GOODMAN: As we broadcast, Israel's war cabinet is reconvening to debate how to respond to Iran's first-ever direct attack. Israeli war cabinet member Benny Gantz has vowed Israel will retaliate against Iran.

BENNY GANTZ: [translated] In the face of the Iranian threat, we will build a regional coalition and exact the price from Iran in the fashion and timing that is right for us. And most importantly, faced with the desire of our enemies to harm us, we will continue to unite and become stronger.

AMY GOODMAN: President Biden has reiterated his, quote, "ironclad" support for Israel, but he reportedly told Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that the United States will not participate in any retaliatory strikes against Iran.

At the United Nations Sunday, Iran's U.N. Ambassador Saeid Iravani defended the missile and drone attack on Israel, saying it was done in self-defense.

SAEID IRAVANI: These countries, especially the United States, have shielded Israel from any responsibility for the Gaza massacre. While they have denied Iran's inherent right to self-defense against the Israeli armed attack on our diplomatic premises, at the same time they shamefully justify the Israeli massacre and genocide against the defenseless Palestinian people under the pretext of self-defense.

AMY GOODMAN: Iran's attacks on Israel may add new momentum for the U.S. Congress to approve more aid for Israel as the House returns to session today.

For more, we go to Tehran, where we're joined by Reza Sayah, freelance journalist based in Tehran, where he joins us from. Trita Parsi is executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, joining us from Washington, D.C. And later we'll speak with Gideon Levy, award-winning Israeli journalist and author in Tel Aviv. He's columnist for the newspaper Haaretz, a member of its editorial board. His most recent piece is headlined "If Iran Attacks Israel, the Blame Lies on Israel's Irresponsible Decision-makers."

We welcome you all to Democracy Now! Reza Sayah, let's begin with you in Tehran. Can you talk about the response there in Iran's capital after Iran retaliated against Israel for bombing the Iranian Consulate in Damascus?

REZA SAYAH: Well, the people of Iran have had a variety of responses and sentiments. And I think it's important to remind everyone that neither myself nor any journalist can sit here and tell you that a population, an entire population, has a single feeling, a single voice, a single sentiment, but this is what you hear oftentimes in Western news media, are journalists describing what an entire population is feeling or saying. That's simply not the case. There are different competing sentiments in every population, and that is the case here in Iran.

There's a segment of the population here in Iran that are staunch supporters of the clerical establishment, staunch supporters of the supreme leader. They believe that it's the duty of every Muslim to support and help the oppressed, and they view Gazans and Palestinians as the oppressed. They're following very closely the events in Gaza over the past six months. They were outraged when Iran's Consulate was attacked in Syria. And they cheered Iran's response over the weekend when they fired those rockets and those drones in Israel. That's one segment of the population.

There's another segment of the population in Iran that are staunch critics of the government. They have a very different view. They want reform in the government. Some want the government gone. They don't mind when senior officials of the Revolutionary Guard are assassinated. They don't mind when the establishment is undermined, when the Revolutionary Guard is undermined. They believe that the Iranian government, instead of funding Hezbollah and Hamas, should help the people. So they were — they are and they remain critical of Iran's role in this conflict.

But it's important to point out that most people here in Iran are, remarkably, continuing their lives. Obviously, some people are worried. They see the headlines. They wonder what's going to happen. But remarkably, they continue their lives. Schools are open. Stores are open. Businesses are open. And I think that speaks to the resilience of the Iranian people, who've faced so many challenges over these last 40-plus years — the isolation, a horrible economy, inflation, a lack of jobs. But somehow they continue living while monitoring what's happening.

AMY GOODMAN: Can you talk about who died in the attack on the Iranian Consulate in Damascus? At least two Iranian generals. Is that right?

REZA SAYAH: Yeah, these were two Iranian generals that had significant roles in Iran's presence in Syria and the reported operations that Iran has conducted against U.S. targets in the region, in Syria and Iraq. And it's important to note that many people within the government continue to remind everyone that this was an act of war by Israel, even though Israel has not confirmed that it conducted the attack on the Iranian Consulate. Iran continues to remind the international community — they did it at the U.N. Security Council meeting — that Iran's attack on Israel was a response to an act of war that Israel carried out against the Iranian Consulate, which is seen as Iranian soil.

It is also important to point out that Iran's response took two weeks. And that is in line with how Iran has reacted to similar incidents and assassinations in recent years. You'll recall the assassination of General Soleimani, the top-ranking Revolutionary Guard general, in Iraq in 2020. You'll recall Iran's response was to attack a U.S. airbase in Iraq, but just as they did with this attack in Israel, they took a lot of time. It is reported that they even announced what they were going to do. And that's a clear indication that Iran does not want to escalate matters with Israel and the U.S. and regional allies, that this was, as many say, a performative operation to send a message, and calculated in a way where Iran doesn't want to escalate matters. And you saw Iranian officials explicitly say that, for them, the matter is over. Now we wait to see if Israel agrees, if it's over for them, if they retaliate, and what Iran does after that.

AMY GOODMAN: I want to go to John Bolton, Trump's former national security adviser, interviewed on CNN.

WOLF BLITZER: Give us your assessment of an appropriate Israeli response to what Iran has now done.

JOHN BOLTON: Well, what Iran did tonight that I think was most significant was the firing of ballistic missiles and cruise missiles from its territory directly at Israel. Almost certainly at this point, none of those missiles contained a nuclear warhead. But you never can tell when the next firing, the next salvo of ballistic missiles might contain a nuclear warhead. So, I think among the many targets Israel should consider, this is the opportunity to destroy Iran's nuclear weapons program. And I hope President Biden is not trying to dissuade Prime Minister Netanyahu from doing that.

AMY GOODMAN: So, that was John Bolton speaking on CNN. We're also joined by Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, speaking to us from Washington, D.C. Trita, can you respond to what Bolton said and also how Washington is responding right now?

TRITA PARSI: Well, I think you saw there, in John Bolton's response, he used the word "opportunity." And this is how some of the hawks view this. They see this as an opportunity to materialize the war between the United States and Iran and Israel that they have been seeking for more than 25 years. And that includes Bibi Netanyahu. I think it should not be forgotten that Netanyahu has been trying to start a war between the United States and Iran for more than two decades and has seen him being actually rebuffed by several presidents in a row, who may have been very hawkish on Iran, who may themselves have contemplated the idea of going to war with Iran, but who nevertheless rejected the pressure from Netanyahu to do so on behalf of Israel. But Bolton is reflecting that view, the idea that this is an opportunity to have a much larger war in the Middle East.

AMY GOODMAN: And can you talk about President Biden saying that Israel has the "ironclad" support of the U.S., but telling Netanyahu after this attack that the U.S. would not participate in any kind of retaliation, though the U.S. intercepted, I think they said, how many drones and something like six missiles and 90 drone strikes on the — with the Iranian attack? Jordan also participated, as did Britain and France.

TRITA PARSI: I think what Biden is saying here is quite contradictory, because at the end of the day, there will be no distinction between offensive and defensive measures in the second the war actually breaks out. So, consider this scenario. The United States does not support and does not participate in Israel's counterstrikes against Iran, and the Israelis may follow Bolton's advice and try to target Iran's nuclear facilities. The Iranians then respond in kind with a much larger barrage of missiles. Clearly what they did this time around was choreographed to minimize damage and make sure that there's no casualties. Next time around, they won't do that. Once the Iranians have started their counterstrikes, then the United States is dragged into the war, because Biden said that he will participate in the defensive measures. And then, regardless of what the previous measure was by the United States, the U.S. will be at war in the Middle East. And as a result, Netanyahu now has a clear pathway on how to drag the United States into this war. All he needs to do is to escalate further. The U.S. will reject that, but then the U.S. will be there once the Iranians are responding. And at that point, any distinction between offensive and defensive is meaningless.

If Biden instead makes it very, very clear that it does not lie in the U.S.'s interest to have any escalation in the region and draws a red line in front of Iran and in front of Israel, he will then not need to come to the defense of Israel, because there will not be a war to begin with. That would be a much better pathway that serves U.S. interests, that prevents any regional escalation. But so far we have seen that Biden, even though he apparently is frustrated privately, he does not feel comfortable to draw any red lines for Israel publicly. And the ones that he has drawn privately, Netanyahu has systematically ignored for the last seven months.

AMY GOODMAN: We're talking to Trita Parsi, who's executive vice president of the Quincy Institute, has written several books on Iran and the United States. We're going to continue with him and Reza Sayah, freelance journalist in Tehran, and we'll be joined by Gideon Levy, who is Haaretz columnist, on the editorial board of Haaretz, wrote the article "If Iran Attacks Israel, the Blame Lies on Israel's Irresponsible Decision-makers." Back in 30 seconds.

[break]

AMY GOODMAN: "Khooneye Ma," "Our House," by Marjan Farsad. This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org, The War and Peace Report. I'm Amy Goodman.

The Middle East is bracing for Israel to retaliate amidst claims — calls for restraint after Iran fired over 350 drones and missiles at Israel in response to Israel's attack on the Iranian Consulate in Syria that killed two Iranian generals and a number of other military officers. We are joined by guests in Tehran and Washington, D.C., and now to Tel Aviv, where we're joined by Gideon Levy, an award-winning Israeli journalist and author, columnist for the newspaper Haaretz and a member of its editorial board, his most recent piece headlined "If Iran Attacks Israel, the Blame Lies on Israel's Irresponsible Decision-makers."

In it, Gideon writes, quote, "For several years now, Israel has provoked Iran constantly, in Lebanon, Syria and also on Iranian soil, and has not paid any price. It would be foolish to believe that the rope Israel has stretched will not break. That moment may have come." He ends by writing, "Just don't say, again, that there was no choice. There was a choice: not to kill. Even if it is deserved, even if it is permitted and even if it is possible. The person who sent the assassins put Israel at risk of war with Iran."

Gideon Levy, you are joined — you are joining Reza Sayah, a freelance journalist in Tehran, Iran, and Trita Parsi, one of the heads of the Quincy Institute. Can you respond to Iran's attack and what Israel did to provoke that, the bombing of the Iranian Consulate in Damascus? Did that surprise you?

GIDEON LEVY: Nothing surprised here. The only thing which surprised, really, was the defensive capability of Israel, together with its allies. It was really impressive. But it's not a guarantee for the future. When I wrote my article, it was before the attack came. And still I thought that the assassination in Damascus was unnecessary. The problem with the Israeli armed forces and intelligence organizations is that whenever they see an opportunity, they take it, without thinking about the consequences, without thinking about the price. And until now it was working for them, because Iran didn't react 'til now directly on Israel, only through its proxies. But it was very clear that this cannot last forever.

So, those who send the assassinators to assassinate on Iranian soil, on an Iranian diplomatic mission, those two generals and five more, those had to think what will be the next day. And the next day came, and we were attacked. And luckily enough, we didn't suffer out of this attack. The only conclusion right now should be: No, don't you dare to retaliate now, because then we will be in a regional war, and that's a new game.

AMY GOODMAN: Talk about what Benny Gantz said — as we broadcast right now, the war cabinet, Israel's war cabinet, has reconvened — what Netanyahu said. Of course, they are competing with each other. If Netanyahu were to go down, it's perceivable Benny Gantz would become the next prime minister. But talk about what's happening within that war cabinet.

GIDEON LEVY: Amy, it's for long time that I claim that those who want to get rid of Netanyahu are obviously right, but the hope that the alternative will be any better on core issues — for many issues it will be much better, but on core issues, like apartheid, the occupation, continuing the war in Gaza, will be very, very disappointed. And here we go. Benny Gantz, who is the alternative, who is the liberal alternative, who is the dovish alternative of Israel, he speaks exactly like Netanyahu and would act exactly like Netanyhau when it comes to core issues or core questions like launching an assassination, like launching a war, like using the military power of Israel. And that's really very, very depressing that there is no alternative thinking in Israel and no lessons out of the experience. All the assassinations that Israel committed, all of them, never led to anywhere. Nothing good came out of them, except of the ego of the organizations who stood behind it. And here comes this Benny Gantz, the big hope of the liberal Israel, and suggests to continue the war, to make it worse, to go for a regional war with Iran. That's really, really, very depressing.

AMY GOODMAN: Are you concerned, Gideon Levy, that what's happening with Iran now is taking attention away from what's happening in Gaza, where the death toll just continues to mount, over — close to 34,000 people, just the official death toll, is expected to be much higher, and where the resistance was mounting in the United States, for example, on President Biden not to arm Israel, given what's happening in Gaza, that now the House, which is notoriously divided, is perhaps coming together around giving more aid to Israel?

GIDEON LEVY: It goes without saying, Amy. Not only Gaza is forgotten. Also look what is happening in the West Bank — pogrom after pogrom, and nobody cares anymore. The army collaborates in those pogroms. We have videos from the last days in which the army not only stands aside, but many times take part of those pogroms against the Palestinians. And nobody pays attention to it — not to speak, obviously, about Gaza — because everyone is now concerned about Iran. But Gaza is still starving and bleeding, and we shouldn't forget it, even not for a moment, like we shouldn't forget the hostages who are still there. But it seems that now everyone is only concerned about retaliating Iran. This would be such a major, maybe fatal, mistake.

AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to bring back in Reza Sayah. You were based in Cairo, Egypt, when you covered the negotiations between Israel and Hamas in 2014 as Israel launched its assault on Gaza then. Can you talk about what unfolded back then and how it compares to the negotiations that are taking place, what, in Doha and Cairo now for a ceasefire?

REZA SAYAH: Well, obviously, back then, what took place, as is taking place right now on a smaller scale, was the killing of lots of innocent civilians. But one thing that sticks out in my mind in 2014, in covering that conflict, was the Israeli government's flat-out refusal to negotiate. There were so many instances when I was talking to Hamas leaders who were in Cairo. And in these instances, they would tell me that the Israeli officials who were supposed to show up for those negotiations simply would not show up. And this was something that was not widely reported by Western and U.S. media, the Israeli government's seeming unwillingness to negotiate with Hamas. Eventually, there was negotiations, and that war ended, but in subsequent years leading up to this conflict, the cycle of war continued. But that's something that sticks out in my mind in that 2014 conflict.

AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to ask about Jordan's position in all of this, Trita Parsi, what role it plays. You had the United States, Britain, Jordan, France all intercepting some of these drones and missiles.

TRITA PARSI: Yes, numerous countries participated in the interception of these missiles. And the only reason they could do so was because the Iranians had given them 72 hours' heads-up, deliberately, because the entire purpose of this exercise was not to inflict damage but to restore what the Iranians believe is their deterrence and showcase their capability. And as Gideon said, the shooting down of these missiles was quite impressive, but I think we also have to keep in mind that there might be a different scenario in the future in which there is no forewarning of these attacks, and as a result, France, Britain and the United States will not be able to prepare for and participate, in this extent, in the shooting down of the missiles. And then, as a result, it's not entirely clear to what extent the Israeli air defenses would be capable of handling what would likely be a much larger barrage of missiles shot at Israel. So, I think the Israelis may have also picked up that at the end of the day, a military confrontation, even though Israel, of course, is much stronger than Iran, and certainly the U.S. is, but, nevertheless, will be very, very damaging to Israel, as well. And that, I think, is one of the key messages the Iranians were trying to send.

The Jordanians are, of course, caught in the middle there, because all of these different things are then flying over Jordanian airspace. And the Jordanian position has been that they're defending their airspace. They are not defending Israel. This is not done in order to necessarily help the Israelis. It's to make sure that Jordan asserts that no war should be taking place on its territory or in its airspace. That, nevertheless, is a tough position for the Jordanians to take, given the very, very strong sentiments that are now boiling over inside of Jordan because of the population's frustration with what is happening in Gaza and their perception that the Jordanian government, and the Arab world at large, have been helpless and not done enough to prevent the slaughter.

AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to ask Gideon Levy if you've been surprised by the amount of conversation going on between Iran and the United States, perhaps not directly. And also I want to put that question to Reza Sayah. But where the result is, you have United States saying they will not participate in Israel's retaliation, if they retaliate against Iran?

GIDEON LEVY: First of all, I would say we always portray Iran as a crazy state, as an insane state. It might be described like this. But in this case, it was very measured. Very measured. I wish the United States and Iran would have spoken much more. I wish the agreement, the nuclear agreement, would be still valid, and we would be in a much better place and safer place, rather than what both Donald Trump and Netanyhahu arranged us, canceling this agreement, which was the best way to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons. The more they speak, the better — under the table, above the table, behind the curtains, any way to talk to them. I still believe that every regime has its own interests, and dialogue is, by the end of the day, the best way, even if it's the Satan of Iran.

AMY GOODMAN: And can you talk, as you talked about what's happening also on the West Bank, if you can talk about the most recent news about the death of one of the most prominent Palestinian prisoners in an Israeli prison, died of cancer, novelist Walid Daqqa, who spent the past 38 years locked up for his involvement in an armed group that abducted and killed an Israeli soldier in 1984, rights groups pressuring Israel to release him, saying he was in dire need of medical attention, Amnesty International calling for his release, saying that since October 7th he had been tortured, humiliated and denied family visits? You've written about this.

GIDEON LEVY: I'm following this story for many, many years. I even visited Walid once in jail many years ago. It's one of those horrible stories which tells you much more than the story itself. Walid Daqqa is an Israeli. He is not a Palestinian from the West Bank. He's an Israeli Palestinian. He, by the way, didn't murder. He participated in a group which kidnapped an Israeli soldier and then killed him, some of them. He was not involved in it. But he was charged for murder and everything fined. He sat 37 years for this murder, much more than any murderer in the world — in Israel, not in the world. He, in this period, changed his — declared that he had enough with terror, declared that he regrets any terror actions. He's exactly the style of leadership that we should look forwards, those Palestinians who change their minds and clear terror as a tool.

But, no, for Israel, no Palestinian is good enough, and here, in the last years, started really a sadistic behavior toward him and his family. No visits. When he started to be ill in cancer, when he got no visits half the year now, they didn't even inform the family that he's dying. They didn't even inform the family he died. And now it's already 10 days. They don't even return the body, and don't let them mourn in their home. I mean, what is more sadistic than this? And what is more the face of this current government of Israel? When it comes to Palestinians, Israeli Palestinians or Palestinians from the West Bank or Gaza, sadism is the name of the game.

AMY GOODMAN: And I wanted to give Reza Sayah the last word. In U.S. media, we don't often hear from people in Tehran. You're a freelance journalist there in the capital of Iran. You've been covering Iran's relationship with Hamas, particularly in the aftermath of October 7th. Could you expand on this, and what you think it's most important for people to understand outside of Iran, and particularly here in the United States?

REZA SAYAH: Well, I think, from the people's standpoint, the people here are resilient. Most of them are peace-loving people who do not want war.

And I want to follow up on Mr. Levy's thought about how Iran is often portrayed in Western media to the American and Western audience as a radical, reckless, violent government. And I think a lot of thoughtful analysts will tell you that a radical entity, a radical government, would not last for 45 years like the Islamic Republic has. And these analysts will tell you that the reason that they have survived for these 45-plus years is that they're not reckless, that they're very calculating and they're measured.

And they understand, at this very high-stakes juncture, that there are forces that perhaps Israel wants to bait them into a wider war. And I think Iran understands that that would be a mistake. I think many here understand that if they get baited into a wider war, it would be a distraction to what's happening in Gaza, that has served the establishment here well by getting them a lot of political clout. And it would also potentially galvanize and unite Israel with its Western allies, Western allies that have been critical of Israel in their operation in Gaza.

So, at this hour, they're waiting to see what Israel does, if Israel retaliates. But history has shown that if Israel retaliates, Iran is going to be aware of what their responses could cost, and they're going to take a measured response. It's obviously a very high-stakes chess game, and a lot of people anxious to see what happens in the coming days.

Monday, April 08, 2024

TRUMP/GREENWOOD BIBLE -- A REVIEW

THE TRUMP/GREENWOOD BIBLE

BOOK REVIEW

THE ABSURD TIMES

$ 100 – send to TRUMP UNIVERSITY

OUR FATHER ….

TWILIGHT OF THE TRUMP

STARE AT THE SUN

THE DEATH OF ABSURDITY

BY

THE ABSURD TIMES

The time has come to face the situation and admit defeat. Changing our name to THE INSANE TIMES seemed the most accurate response to recent developments, but that would make online searches for past editions difficult and confusing and it would be admitting something about personalities and forces at large here in the 21st Century. The truth is that these days discourse and events that generate such discourse are worthy of perhaps indifference. Indeed, why give these foul maggots any more attention than what they already get from our media in lieu of advertising expenditures?

PERSONAL NOTE:

We welcome all of the new subscribers, followers, and contributors. We have never asked, nor begged, for any contributions, but the recent spate of contributions has not only been surprising but somehow gratifying or meaningful. We have even thought about starting a podcast, but haven't thought about it very hard. Before this platform sends out an edition, it does note that no BUTTON has been pushed, and those buttons have various notes with them that mention contributions, but I do not write them – I use them to make subscribing easier for those who are interested. So far, however, we have done our best to send this out weekly. Again, thank you all.

tHE BUTTONS:

Leave a comment

Thank you for reading AbsurdTimes's Newsletter. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Now to the situations and the first person seems warranted. I have no idea how and who is interpreting what is going on and suspect most have just shut themselves off. I think the very strange man with the orange hair, on the other hand, fortells the Apocalypse. The Zionist entity, a cancerous blister on the face of a sickly world is spreading and increasing it its foul puss, killing those who have no weapons and saying it was "unintentional".

So we need to refer to what is called in AA meetings a "Higher Power," in this case, the Donald Trump/Lee Greenwood version of the KING JAMES BIBLE. If anyone out there can help clarify or answer any of the issues raised, surely what is left of civilization will be thrilled and perhaps relieved for the help. No research was done for this version – only that accumulated over the years and from various sources, but specific verses and authorities, much less page numbers, do not come up much on conversation and hence fade from the memory.

You can obtain much valuable background from a film called INHERIT THE WIND, a rendering of the main issues from an actual trial over the legality of Darwin in Ackron, Tennesee (not "Heavenly Hillsboro, as in the film"). All the characters were real, the dialogue is close to that in the trial transcripts, and it discusses the very King James version of the Bible, yes, the real version upon which so much of our attitudes and beliefs are based and which is available for only $59.99 from Donald Trump (CAUTION, PAGES MAY STICK TOGETHER). The book itself may spur on a new mantra, MAPA (as Donald has it, MAKE AMERICA PRAY AGAIN). Hey, I shit you not. The movie has been done three times, with Spencer Tracy, Jason Robards, and Jack Lemmon as the great Clarence Darrow. If there is interest, I'll review those productions in another edition.

Now for the world as this "Good Book" portrays it. The Donald presents us with the entire book, although for about a century the parts of it that Thomas Jefferson considered "nonsense" were ripped out of his edition, but all Senators and Congressmen, and OFFICERS were sworn in on it. Does God (see illustration above) accept that?

Well, we do need to have a bit of background as to how this book germinated. Earlier versions, in a form of Hebrew, were written down or scribbled, and the fashion then was to just use the consonants and forget about the vowels, an expedient that is about 89% reliable. Of course, that leaves at least some of it unreliable.

My first interest in this whole thing excluded Wycliff and any other translation. It is strictly King James (er, he followed Elizabeth I, the age of Shakespeare, Spenser, Marlowe, Ben Jonson, and a slew of others). So, how did this whole miserable existence start? I'd followed Hoyle (steady state universe), expanding, also followed by contracting, black holes, and so on, but never found a first cause. This could very well be a result of custom overcoming logic as we are conditioned to think in terms of cause and effect. Suppose effect comes first?

So, as best I can remember, it all started with "let there be light!" Well, that certainly beats working in the dark, but where is the light emanating from? From behind the Firmanent.

See, there was this firmament, and God "Parteth" it. Now where was this firmament and what was it doing? So, I guess we are in the second day, but you realize that the sun doesn't come into this until the fourth day (as the movie points out) so how long was the first day and how are we measuring it? I don't think we are going to get very far with this idea, so let us jump ahead.

Here is only the first of several pronouncements, perhaps laws, that is repeated several times through these pages. It states that "If a woman grabbeth a man by his secrets, her hand shall be cut off".) I actually do not remember the exact penalty for grabbing your man by his secrets, but it was severe. Several times when a social event morphed into a conversion conspiracy, I asked these humans what the secrets were, but got no answer. At most, the female members of the force simply bowed their heads to the floor, hoping that no divine wrath would befall them. i HASTEN TO ADD THAT THERE IS NO SUCH RULE ABOUT PUSSYS.

Careful, kids, the same is applied to you, so it's best you leave daddy's secrets alone. I'm not sure what they are, but it certainly seems like an insalubrious gesture to me, so best to ask your local priest – and bring the TRUMP/LEE GREENWOOD Bible with you.

The next one was first mentioned by Mark Twain. It seems there was this guy named Jereboam and God warned him to behave or he would separated "from those who pisseth against the wall". I imagine this was a very severe punishment, but there are other ways and places to relieve the pleasure. If you are confused about what this means, even Luther figured it out and it is in his translation.

The first time I heard David Steinberg's sermon on Job was in Chicago where I worked a bit at the Second City. He was mimicking a Rabbi he knew in New York. I was not a very good candidate for full-time activity because, although I could make up good lines when confronted, and start far-out situations, I never could remember my lines when it came to act or present them. That is something to remember when you hear someone claim they do things extemporaneously: actually, they have just about every situation done and rehearsed before it is even shouted out from the audience. The sermon ws the reason the Smothers Brothers was cancelled by CBS.

So Job is interesting because Jaweh sounds so stupid, arbitrary, and gullible that he does all sorts of ridiculous and sadistic things to Job just to show Satan how much people liked him. The whole thing about this religion caused Voltaire to attack Christianity because it was just a disguise for the same thing and later, in the Middle of the Twentieth Century, Jung mentioned that the whole Jesus birth and re-birth idea was God's way of straightening out his act.

Just one final topical item: somewhere in the Old Testament it is mentioned that God wants certain abortions to take place, mainly involving slaves who got pregnant.

The last issue, Revelations, is beyond me. It is some sort of allegory. In an allegory, one or more characters are posited as representing some value. Edmund started off with an epic on Holiness, and his adventures feature the forces against him. He is the Red 'Cross Knight. The next is moderation or Sir Guyon (Gee youn). An antagonist on holiness is Duessa, or duplicity, and so on. This goes on for a long time and Spenser dies before he finishes a bit more than six epics. I've written extensively on this.

REVELATIONS is completely beyond me. A plethora of horned demons, horses will, fire breathers, and so on infest the book. I simply assume it is the product of too much peyote and acid and whatever uppers were available. Frankly, I simply leave the entire project to fans of canon law.

So, I've seen enough proof the Trump/Greenwood book. I have heard reports that some of the pages stick together. I hereby relinquish any further interest in book reviewing.